|
Flatscan posted:Tonight's Top Gear special. Well, like... who was on it? Also, the latest in A2A: "You're looking chirpy, Bolls. Been sitting on the washing machine again?" First line since LoM to make me laugh out loud.
|
# ? Dec 22, 2010 00:12 |
|
|
# ? May 16, 2024 17:53 |
|
The ending to tonight's Buzzcocks is incredible.
|
# ? Dec 22, 2010 00:16 |
|
echoplex posted:Apparently there's a double bill of Tramadol Nights tonight - wonder if C4 are just trying to get rid of it now - so I guess my sketch will be on the second ep, 10:30 tonight (if it's not been cut). Will own up to which one it was after it's aired Which sketch was it? I must know.
|
# ? Dec 22, 2010 00:51 |
|
Cichlid the Loach posted:Well, like... who was on it? Also if I may cast my gaze towards Vincent loving it up for everyone, essentially he's had his department cut back because he said he'd try to gently caress over News Corp buying the 60% of BSkyB they don't already own. There was no problem with him doing that, but now he's said he wanted to do it obviously he's shown bias in proceedings which are supposed to be impartial. ITV are having a dig at Vince because BSkyB still owns a 7.5% share in them, and the decision over whether or not BSkyB can be bought entirely by News Corp now rests with the head of the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, Jeremy Hunt. Who is, of course, an entirely impartial conservative MP. Jeremy Hunt posted:"The important thing is not whether a particular owner owns another TV channel but to make sure you have a variety of owners with a variety of TV channels so that no one owner has a dominant position both commercially and politically. Rather than worry about Rupert Murdoch owning another TV channel, what we should recognise is that he has probably done more to create variety and choice in British TV than any other single person because of his huge investment in setting up Sky TV which, at one point, was losing several million pounds a day. We would be the poorer and wouldn't be saying that British TV is the envy of the world if it hadn't been for him being prepared to take that commercial risk. We need to encourage that kind of investment."
|
# ? Dec 22, 2010 01:01 |
|
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad posted:Who is, of course, an entirely impartial conservative MP. loving sickening, that.
|
# ? Dec 22, 2010 01:12 |
Poor Vince Cable, one of the few lone voices of sanity in a whirl wind of utter poo poo.
|
|
# ? Dec 22, 2010 01:24 |
|
SeanBeansShako posted:Poor Vince Cable, one of the few lone voices of sanity in a whirl wind of utter poo poo. I can't help but think he was set up. I mean the people in there recording him were undercover reporters or such. I wouldn't put it past Murdoch/some Tory oval office to send someone in there to get Cable's offhand personal opinions on the matter and leak them in order to get him kicked off the decision(not fired because Osborne is a dithering mongoloid) and replace him with someone conveniently in complete favour of Murdoch and his enterprises. Watch Ofcom fall in line when they release their report or go against it and have massive budget cuts or reductions in power.
|
# ? Dec 22, 2010 01:46 |
|
Mark Thomson from the BBC says that 'Britain needs a channel like Fox News' http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/dec/17/mark-thompson-bbc-fox-news I find that really scary, the BBC seems to me to be pretty much bang on with impartial reporting and reading some of the threads that pop up in GBS about how awful Fox News is I would hate to see a UK version - I imagine it to be a televised Daily Mail.
|
# ? Dec 22, 2010 02:05 |
|
hookerbot 5000 posted:Mark Thomson from the BBC says that 'Britain needs a channel like Fox News' Holy poo poo. That's it, our country is properly hosed. He actually advocates opinion orientated reporting to run alongside impartial factual reporting. All of which is based on the idea that the rules are outdated because of the internet? The news is already opinionated to poo poo and back. Tabloids read like mental wank rags to some and the level of inaccuracy and skewed reporting on TV is already at an unreasonably high level. The last thing we need is the likes of Glenn Beck riling up the ignorant people of our country (of which there are many) into believing opinion over fact. This is like watching a trainwreck in slow motion, but we're all on the loving train.
|
# ? Dec 22, 2010 02:43 |
|
keveh posted:
Except The Morgana Show is completely awful.
|
# ? Dec 22, 2010 04:27 |
|
Flatscan posted:Is it the Thomas the Tank Engine sketch by any chance? It was It got cut down a lot from what it was originally - mostly really offensive things - and the budget meant I couldn't make it look as nice as I'd have liked, but it did ok. Was the first time tonight that I'd seen it with the CGI eyes. Filming THAT scene: hookerbot 5000 posted:Mark Thomson from the BBC says that 'Britain needs a channel like Fox News' I read this the other day and it just gave me a horrible, cold, sinking feeling. I've often said that literally the only thing stopping this country from turning into America (which it very slowly is anyway) is the BBC. Reading that the Mail is now the #1 online newspaper is loving horrifying; them having their own channel even worse. The BBC is by no means perfect, but if there's one thing I'd actually *fight* for, it's the BBC (then the NHS, probably). It's the last good thing we have left. It'll die of it's own accord in time anyway, but not like this. If this is Thomson's attempt to appease the Mail into not calling for his head every day, then gently caress him, he needs to grow some balls and tell people why they NEED the BBC. If it means Gavin and Stacey specials every year, then fine, but don't give Murdoch our airwaves *is aware he just did a job for C4* echoplex fucked around with this message at 05:01 on Dec 22, 2010 |
# ? Dec 22, 2010 04:56 |
|
Daedo posted:Except The Morgana Show is completely awful. I like bits of it, it's a hell of a lot better than Tramadol Nights.
|
# ? Dec 22, 2010 08:56 |
|
echoplex posted:Filming THAT scene: Canon 5 or 7D? Also why the slr? Budget or style reasons?
|
# ? Dec 22, 2010 11:45 |
|
Watched 'Mad and Bad: 60 years of science of tv' last night, I recommend it. It's a history of science documentarys mostly with a little about science fiction thrown in, but it was a pretty good clip show and overview of the science documentary.
|
# ? Dec 22, 2010 12:54 |
|
cloudchamber posted:The ending to tonight's Buzzcocks is incredible. I think last nights Buzzcocks is my favourite this series, or a close second to the Terry Wogan one. Weird how the best hosts have been the ones that you'd think would appeal to older people, I really love Tim Minchin but his turn in the guest host seat was awful.
|
# ? Dec 22, 2010 13:31 |
|
I wasn't that surprised because Groban was terrific when he appeared as a panellist, but yeah it was a great episode. Catherine Tate episode notwithstanding, I do think this series has been very good.
|
# ? Dec 22, 2010 13:40 |
|
Adrianics posted:I wasn't that surprised because Groban was terrific when he appeared as a panellist, but yeah it was a great episode. Catherine Tate episode notwithstanding, I do think this series has been very good. He was, the 'Son's and Daughters of England' bit still makes me laugh to think about it (you tube clip: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HZ_x7c_AKw4 ). And I'll have to look back at the guest host list but I've felt pretty underwhelmed by a lot of them. But then I really loved Simon Amstell even though he did go a bit too far sometimes. hookerbot 5000 fucked around with this message at 21:09 on Dec 22, 2010 |
# ? Dec 22, 2010 13:45 |
|
hookerbot 5000 posted:He was, the 'Son's and Daughters of England' bit still makes me laugh to think about it. And I'll have to look back at the guest host list but I've felt pretty underwhelmed by a lot of them. But then I really loved Simon Amstell even though he did go a bit too far sometimes. Simon Amstell never went too far. If some of those stuck up "celebs" cant take a ribbing with jest then they deserve to have the piss taken out of them even more. You don't willingly throw yourself into the spotlight and decide "i'm never taking any criticism, gently caress you, i'm special", especially if it's obvious to everyone you're a minimally tallented flash in the pan.
|
# ? Dec 22, 2010 15:19 |
|
hookerbot 5000 posted:He was, the 'Sons and Daughters of England' bit still makes me laugh to think about it. "Rubbish!" *chuck* *smash!* *wince* What a guy.
|
# ? Dec 22, 2010 15:19 |
|
I just got around to seeing Dirk Gently today. I saw a handful of posts a few pages back but didn't notice a full discussion. Was the entire thing as easy to guess 15 minutes into it as I thought? If it gets picked up to a full series (has it?) I really hope the later episodes are more clever about it all.
|
# ? Dec 22, 2010 19:15 |
|
Kin posted:Simon Amstell never went too far. If some of those stuck up "celebs" cant take a ribbing with jest then they deserve to have the piss taken out of them even more. You don't willingly throw yourself into the spotlight and decide "i'm never taking any criticism, gently caress you, i'm special", especially if it's obvious to everyone you're a minimally tallented flash in the pan. I was really disappointed that both Phil and Noel have slagged Simon off since he's been gone in various articles and blaming him for the show not being as good anymore.
|
# ? Dec 22, 2010 20:30 |
|
feedmyleg posted:I just got around to seeing Dirk Gently today. I saw a handful of posts a few pages back but didn't notice a full discussion. Was the entire thing as easy to guess 15 minutes into it as I thought? If it gets picked up to a full series (has it?) I really hope the later episodes are more clever about it all. I watched it with my wife who's never read the Dirk Gently books, and she didn't get where it was going till much later. I was prepared for the time travel thing I got it early too. Still, enjoyed it, and I hope it gets picked up. Someone I know said "No hat, not Dirk" but I thought the guy playing him was pretty much exactly what I had in my head as what Dirk was like.
|
# ? Dec 22, 2010 22:29 |
|
Dear me. Always wanted to do rude things to Sohie Ellis-Bextor, now her mum hoves into view and reignights Blue Peter fuelled mumsy fancies. Not my mum. Brr
|
# ? Dec 22, 2010 22:44 |
|
HauntedRobot posted:Someone I know said "No hat, not Dirk" but I thought the guy playing him was pretty much exactly what I had in my head as what Dirk was like. It's weird, sometimes however many times an author goes to pains to describe someone's appearance, you get stuck with something completely different in your head. Dirk is meant to be kinda fat, but the character doesn't really *feel* fat, so it's easy to lose that picture of him.
|
# ? Dec 22, 2010 23:07 |
|
Trickjaw posted:Dear me. Always wanted to do rude things to Sohie Ellis-Bextor, now her mum hoves into view and reignights Blue Peter fuelled mumsy fancies. Not my mum. Brr
|
# ? Dec 22, 2010 23:11 |
|
That Panorama (about supermarket food), which I had on in the background while wrapping presents, was distracting because they kept using that whoosh sound effect from the final Icon of Sin level in Doom 2 (according to the Doom Wikia site the catchily named "Disc 6015, track 28-1: Fire,Ball - Impact and large fire burst, rumble").
|
# ? Dec 22, 2010 23:18 |
|
Carpet posted:That Panorama (about supermarket food), which I had on in the background while wrapping presents, was distracting because they kept using that whoosh sound effect from the final Icon of Sin level in Doom 2 (according to the Doom Wikia site the catchily named "Disc 6015, track 28-1: Fire,Ball - Impact and large fire burst, rumble"). This poo poo happens all the time, I remember was it Top Gear that had some music from command and conquer? Do they just have a database with EVERY NOISE ON MEDIA neatly tagged so they can find what they're looking for? Or are the FX guys just massive nerds who have an encyclopaedic knowledge of game noises.
|
# ? Dec 23, 2010 00:32 |
|
I finally sat down and watched The Increasingly Poor Decisions of Todd Margaret last night. Not only does it have David Cross and Will Arnett, it had a smattering of people from various british stuff - including mr Rubber Dingy Rapids from Four Lions - and it was honestly hilarious. It was a bit like a two hour peep show, where the awkwardness ramped up more and more and more until the final episode. I can't wait for series 2!
|
# ? Dec 23, 2010 01:27 |
Heh, I agree just started watching it myself on YouTube.
|
|
# ? Dec 23, 2010 01:50 |
|
meme posted:This poo poo happens all the time, I remember was it Top Gear that had some music from command and conquer? From what I can tell, a lot of game sounds from the Doom era and such were just stock sounds that could be found on the "10,0000 GREATEST SOUND EFFECTS EVER!" albums. That and the BBC sound library is all encompassing.
|
# ? Dec 23, 2010 02:03 |
|
feedmyleg posted:I just got around to seeing Dirk Gently today. I saw a handful of posts a few pages back but didn't notice a full discussion. Was the entire thing as easy to guess 15 minutes into it as I thought? If it gets picked up to a full series (has it?) I really hope the later episodes are more clever about it all. The time travel thing was pretty easy to guess, especially since that was such a key point in the original, but the whole thing about the old woman murdering Gordon with a frying pan was a nice twist, I thought! I don't really see how you COULD have predicted that, which I thought worked nicely against expectations.
|
# ? Dec 23, 2010 17:45 |
|
Shanty posted:The time travel thing was pretty easy to guess, especially since that was such a key point in the original, but the whole thing about the old woman murdering Gordon with a frying pan was a nice twist, I thought! I don't really see how you COULD have predicted that, which I thought worked nicely against expectations. I think it worked itself out marvelously. And, yes, no time traveling professors or the Ghost of Kublai Khan or whatever. It was still marvelous. Though, I love how they managed to work in all those references to the original story on Dirk's Board of Stuff.
|
# ? Dec 23, 2010 18:02 |
|
Shanty posted:The time travel thing was pretty easy to guess, especially since that was such a key point in the original, but the whole thing about the old woman murdering Gordon with a frying pan was a nice twist, I thought! I don't really see how you COULD have predicted that, which I thought worked nicely against expectations. True. I had suspected that her husband was Gordon after he realized he was too old for his college-aged girlfriend and decided to grow a mustache.
|
# ? Dec 23, 2010 19:35 |
|
feedmyleg posted:True. I had suspected that her husband was Gordon after he realized he was too old for his college-aged girlfriend and decided to grow a mustache. Hahaha yes, I went there for a bit, but didn't really think the timeline fitted. He would have to have been sent further back in time than the cat, really, which seemed a little too arbitrary.
|
# ? Dec 23, 2010 19:51 |
|
Taear posted:mr Rubber Dingy Rapids from Four Lions Kayvan Novak, the Fonejacker.
|
# ? Dec 23, 2010 20:26 |
|
Kin posted:I can't help but think he was set up. I mean the people in there recording him were undercover reporters or such. I wouldn't put it past Murdoch/some Tory oval office to send someone in there to get Cable's offhand personal opinions on the matter and leak them in order to get him kicked off the decision(not fired because Osborne is a dithering mongoloid) and replace him with someone conveniently in complete favour of Murdoch and his enterprises. Anyway, to stay relevant. I've just seen a preview for a Christmas Shooting Stars episode. I thought the last series was excellent since Vic and Bob seemed to have got back into the roles a bit more. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XR-MovUcZLA&feature=channel
|
# ? Dec 24, 2010 01:04 |
|
HoldYourFire posted:Kayvan Novak, the Fonejacker. Rubber dingy rapids is kayvan novak? really?
|
# ? Dec 24, 2010 01:47 |
|
LE0N posted:Rubber dingy rapids is kayvan novak? really?
|
# ? Dec 24, 2010 04:07 |
|
thehustler posted:Canon 5 or 7D? Also why the slr? Budget or style reasons? 7D for the slow motion. Would have used a RED if money was no object - could get one for £500 for the week so could have filmed everything with it - but the budget on that sketch was hypersmall. We used a combination of G-scale trains (as in the above picture) which are the same size as the original Thomas models, but for the majority of the moving stuff it was Hornby scale, which I think really is too small, no matter what lenses you use. We really did try to make it look as good as possible, but the original Thomas series cost £10k per minute, and I understand why, now. I think an air of wonky cheapness was what Frankie wanted anyway, so I guess it worked.
|
# ? Dec 24, 2010 17:28 |
|
|
# ? May 16, 2024 17:53 |
|
Has anyone been watching the Little Crackers on Sky? They're on Sky Anytime if you've got a Sky+ HD box and they're pretty drat good. Victoria Wood's was the grittiest northernest one and I really loved David Baddiel's, Julian Barrats, Chris O'Dowds and Bill Bailey's. Jo Brand and Kathy Burke had quite dull ones and I daren't touch Catherine Tate's. It's all very much up to the person who made it what it's like though. The female ones are all about their childhood for some reason, Bill Bailey's is basically a 15 minute sketch and David Baddiel's is basically an anecdote.
|
# ? Dec 24, 2010 21:21 |