|
goddamnit my new 60D came with a 'free' lowepro slingshot 102AW. I've never really even thought about camera bags - I had a lowepro nova mini that my parents bought me like 15 years ago when I first got a camera, and just have been using that. So the concept of a 'sling' bag (and one that holds a tripod, no less!) is really cool and somehow new to me. so I'm digging the bag and like pretty much everything about it, but then I was thinking about actually using it while traveling or something as like a day pack, and I realized I'd just have to have my netbook with me. so out of curiosity I google 'slingshot hold netbook' and find their 'slingshot classified' thing, which basically looks pretty much the same, but can hold a netbook and is... $120 MORE expensive than the 'free' $60 bag I got. damnit  can anyone recommend a similar, cheaper bag? I just want it to hold a DSLR, maybe a flash, wallet and small poo poo, and then a small netbook.
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2011 19:23
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 17, 2024 01:18 |
|
|
Anyone else here use a wrist strap / hand grip? I would always just wrap the neck strap around my hand until one of my photography buddies pointed out that they existed. I've just got a cheap one and am thinking of upgrading. Anyone got one they love?
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2011 19:44
|
|
|
anabatica posted:Anyone else here use a wrist strap / hand grip? I would always just wrap the neck strap around my hand until one of my photography buddies pointed out that they existed. I've just got a cheap one and am thinking of upgrading. Anyone got one they love? I have the Opteka professional grip strap and it's been great. Keep in mind this basically demands you shoot horizontally because getting to portrait orientation can be a little awkward.
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2011 19:52
|
|
|
Paragon8 posted:If you're on your feet for any length at all I strongly recommend getting a backpack no matter how dorky it looks. As neat as messenger style bags are they can really murder your back. I have a backpack that I wear when I ride my bike to work. I also have that bigass Burton backpack that I schlep out to locations. I really just want a messenger bag to hold my random things when I'm out on the town not necessarily shooting. My Contax plus an extra lens weighs barely a pound. I just want a protective area in a general-use bag for tossing it in so I have it with me if I see a decisive moment. I'm still just amazed that no one makes a storage bag with a small protective compartment. It seems so obvious, but I guess there's no demand for it.
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2011 20:00
|
|
|
mindphlux posted:goddamnit I can't recommend a replacement, but I'd happily buy that off of you for $60. We can move this to the centralized gear buy/sell thread to track, but I've been looking to get the 102 anyway and if I can help a fellow goon get something they'd rather have at the same time, why not? (If you don't want to sell, not a problem too)
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2011 20:06
|
|
|
anabatica posted:Anyone else here use a wrist strap / hand grip? I would always just wrap the neck strap around my hand until one of my photography buddies pointed out that they existed. I've just got a cheap one and am thinking of upgrading. Anyone got one they love? I always used to wrap the neck strap around my hand too.  To be honest, I didn't look that much, but it seems like all of the not-cheap ones go around the hand instead of the wrist, which I'm not a fan of. It looks less secure and more restricting. So I just got a cheapo wrist one. It gets the job done and no more getting tangled in the useless neck strap!Fake Edit: Apparently canon makes an official wrist strap, but I like mine better, it's a stretchy material and has a clasp so you can easily detach it from the camera if you need to put it in a strange position.
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2011 20:21
|
|
|
Kiri koli posted:I always used to wrap the neck strap around my hand too. What kind of wrist strap are you using? I'm doing a bit of alpine-skiing photography with my neck strap around my arm, and it's not working too well. Haven't dropped the camera yet, but I have a feeling I will soon..
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2011 20:41
|
|
|
McMadCow posted:I have a backpack that I wear when I ride my bike to work. I also have that bigass Burton backpack that I schlep out to locations. Ah, I get you. Have you looked into maybe just getting a padded bag/pouch as an insert?
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2011 20:45
|
|
|
HPL posted:Look into top-loading holster-style bags like the Lowepro Toploader Pro 75 AW. If you use a medium-sized lens, you can fit another lens in the bottom of the bag and have the camera on top of it. Or if you're using a 70-200, you can have the camera with that on it in the bag, and attach a side bag for another lens. Think Tank has their digital holster series as well but you'll probably have to buy a belt for that. I still kinda want a satchel/shoulder bag. A holster is like the fanny pack of the camera world. Yeah, it would suit my purposes, but I have to keep some sense of style.
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2011 20:46
|
|
|
vikingtravels posted:What kind of wrist strap are you using? I have this one: http://www.amazon.com/OpTech-6701062-Wrist-Strap-Black/dp/B00137NMMW/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&qid=1296160108&sr=8-4 It's nice and cheap, but I'm not sure if it could possibly rip if jolted really hard. I didn't plan on skiing or anything with it, just hiking. I lean over rivers and waterfalls a lot. Glancing around amazon, there seem to be some leather wrist/hand hybrids that might suit your purposes.
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2011 21:32
|
|
|
Paragon8 posted:Ah, I get you. Have you looked into maybe just getting a padded bag/pouch as an insert? I've looked at a lot of inserts, but even those seem to be for camera-specific bags. Have you seen any with a sealed top? I wouldn't want to just toss a camera into something and have it fall out because I'm an idiot. I can just see the situation in which I'd pick up a messenger bag with the flap open and my Contax comes tumbling out of an unsealed insert.
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2011 22:07
|
|
|
McMadCow posted:I've looked at a lot of inserts, but even those seem to be for camera-specific bags. Have you seen any with a sealed top? I wouldn't want to just toss a camera into something and have it fall out because I'm an idiot. I can just see the situation in which I'd pick up a messenger bag with the flap open and my Contax comes tumbling out of an unsealed insert. I haven't recieved it yet though, so it might be complete poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2011 22:22
|
|
|
sensy v2.0 posted:I've ordered one of these ( http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=170518115936#ht_8223wt_907 ), because it looks decent enough for the money. There are a lot of similar in different sizes on eBay. Man, that's really close. I'll have to check their store to see if they have anything more custom-fitted to a rangefinder. Thanks!
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2011 22:30
|
|
|
Kiri koli posted:I have this one: http://www.amazon.com/OpTech-6701062-Wrist-Strap-Black/dp/B00137NMMW/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&qid=1296160108&sr=8-4 Thanks for the input and the link, that should fit the bill perfectly.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2011 01:15
|
|
|
vikingtravels posted:Thanks for the input and the link, that should fit the bill perfectly. Seconding that one. I picked up a couple last year and they are much stronger than they look and won't cut off your circulation.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2011 05:31
|
|
|
For those looking for bags, the Crumpler 7 million dollar home is on Amazon right now for ~$100 in either black or grey/red: http://www.amazon.com/Crumpler-Million-Dollar-Photo-Black/dp/B001TINMRA/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&qid=1296222194&sr=8-4 About a $40 savings and ships free with Prime. I'm probably going to order it, just doing some last minute size estimating and the like.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2011 14:46
|
|
Cat Army
|
Ouhei posted:For those looking for bags, the Crumpler 7 million dollar home is on Amazon right now for ~$100 in either black or grey/red: http://www.amazon.com/Crumpler-Million-Dollar-Photo-Black/dp/B001TINMRA/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&qid=1296222194&sr=8-4 Hot drat that is awesome. Are the straps on Crumplers long enough to wear across the opposite shoulder?
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2011 15:07
|
|
|
DJExile posted:Hot drat that is awesome. Are the straps on Crumplers long enough to wear across the opposite shoulder? I'll be placing my order as soon as I decide on a color, haha.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2011 16:27
|
|
|
mindphlux posted:goddamnit I fit a 10" netbook in my Slingshot 200 by putting it in the camera compartment, on top of the padded dividers. Generally only did that when I was flying and using it as a carry-on though, I didn't like the added weight for walking around.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2011 17:54
|
|
|
RE: Crumpler 7 Million, are they water proof/resistant? EDIT: Oh it says they're resistant. Awesome 
DJExile fucked around with this message at 18:21 on Jan 28, 2011 |
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2011 18:02
|
|
|
You can also fit an ipad or a netbook at the front mini pouch of the 7 million. I'm thinking of going to the states this summer but it has been a while for me. I know that TSA restrictions are a pain and that even a tripod can be considered as a "weapon". Are carry on dimensions and restrictions strict for air travel? Since I'm only allowed to carry 1 bag, does that mean I can't carry an extra bag of duty free booze or bag? Since some airlines charge for check luggage for domestic flights, am I better off carrying a maximum carry on with my clothes and photo gear? And do I have to do the up in the air dance each time I transfer? Still worth visiting B&H and trying different bags! And look forward to a China town bus, how are the baggage restrictions?
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2011 21:27
|
|
|
caberham posted:You can also fit an ipad or a netbook at the front mini pouch of the 7 million. Carry on restrictions sometimes depend more on the airline than anything. I just flew southwest and they allow "One carry-on and one personal item". For many this meant one small rolling bag (presumably with clothes) and something like a backpack or purse. I'd carry on all that you can, depending on airline. Southwest gives you your first two checked bags free, which is awesome, but I'd MUCH rather carry photo gear than check it, unless I had some very good padding on my bag. Security seems to give no poo poo about cameras, lenses, and batteries, if Detroit Metro and LAX were anything to go by. I doubt they'll let you take the tripod, however.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2011 21:50
|
|
|
Ordered the grey/red Crumpler, should be here Tuesday, can't wait!
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2011 21:54
|
|
|
caberham posted:You can also fit an ipad or a netbook at the front mini pouch of the 7 million. Most airlines are one bag carry on plus one personal item. However, depending on the airport, I regularly carry a carry on (small suitcase size gets put in the overhead bin) plus backpack with laptop (goes under the seat) AND a really small camera bag (when I had a large p&s). You could do the same with a purse or small handbag I would imagine. Just make sure you can stuff it into one of the bigger bags because some of the larger airports will give you poo poo about it. Once you're past security you can pop it back out and I've never had a problem just putting it on my lap in the plane. Most airlines charge for checked bags now (Southwest seems to be one of the few holdouts), but unfortunately if you want a tripod, it'll have to go in checked luggage. Same with booze. Airlines are very strict about their no liquids over 3 ounces rule, so if you want to bring bottles of any sort (shampoo, even toothpaste), you need to check them.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2011 22:02
|
|
|
Ouhei posted:For those looking for bags, the Crumpler 7 million dollar home is on Amazon right now for ~$100 in either black or grey/red: http://www.amazon.com/Crumpler-Million-Dollar-Photo-Black/dp/B001TINMRA/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&qid=1296222194&sr=8-4 
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2011 22:07
|
|
|
I've brought my tripod in a carry-on before with no problem. Had to disassemble center column and take the feet off to get it to fit though.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2011 23:04
|
|
|
DJExile posted:EDIT: Oh it says they're resistant. Awesome
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2011 18:30
|
|
|
Star War Sex Parrot posted:I have an unhealthy obsession with gear bags. I already have 3 generic laptop backpacks, 2 generic shoulder computer bags, a Timbuk2 bag, a Canon bag, a new Kata DR-467i, and I now I want this and an Ona bag.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2011 18:37
|
|
|
I've been wanting to get serious about backpacking (like out in the woods over night type backpacking) and since I'm a photographer, I would love to have a legit hiking backpack that accommodates a SLR. I found one (and only one) and I've had my eye on it for over a year now. The Naneu K5. I couldn't many reviews on it but what information i did find, seemed positive. The main difference between this bag and normal hiking bag is that it has a removable insert/bag that can hold a large SLR, 70-200 2.8 along with a couple more lenses and a flash. In addition, it also has a tripod strap on the back. That's about all I'd ever want to lug out into the middle of the woods. The other thing I liked about this bag, is that if I take the insertable bag out, it seems to be a perfectly good and normal hiking backpack. This is great because I don't plan on carrying around a SLR on every trip I go on and I'd hate to have to buy another bag. Which brings me to the main point of this post... The thing that's been holding me back from buying this bag is the price. I see it go for $250-$300, which is about average price for a normal high end hiking backpack. it's a fair price, I just haven't had the money for it. That is until today. I just found a deal here for $97.99 plus $10 shipping. I've never heard of thenerds.net but they seem to have a lot of great reviews on google so I went ahead and ordered it. If anyone else wants to order it, I found a coupon code "bargainen" for $5 off $50.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2011 20:36
|
|
|
I would definitely not take the 70-200 f/2.8 hiking.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2011 20:45
|
|
|
OneZeroSix posted:Someone posted this bag in the Canon thread: This is exactly the type of bag I've been looking for. I bought Lowepro's Classified 250 - and while a great bag, still a bit too big for me for an everyday bag. I might have to sell it off and get this instead.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2011 21:02
|
|
|
Pompous Rhombus posted:I would definitely not take the 70-200 f/2.8 hiking. Yeah not on a walking all day hike but I there are times where I'd like to make it to a base camp and hang out for a day or two while I shoot photos.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2011 21:25
|
|
|
Haggins posted:I've been wanting to get serious about backpacking (like out in the woods over night type backpacking) and since I'm a photographer, I would love to have a legit hiking backpack that accommodates a SLR. I have done numerous backcountry expeditions with my gear, anywhere from long weekends to 15 days in the mountains. My best recommendation is don't bother with a specialty camera pack. Get a specialty hiking backpack and you will have plenty of room for your gear. For padding, wrap your equipment in your clothes. Just don't throw your pack 10 ft away (done it, broke some lens filters) and you'll be fine. The motto of hike-in hike-out places is do not bring anything unless it has 2 or 3 jobs. Obviously camera gear doesn't quite qualify, but as long as you already have lots of things that can be used as padding, why bother bringing a specialty pack that will just add a lot more weight Last bit of advice? An ounce in the morning is a pound at night. I brought 20 pounds of camera gear on my last trek and that was on top of the 40 pounds of normal gear I had to carry for a week long excursion. I do not recommend that much gear at all, and I would encourage you (and the younger me) to be very very picky what you bring.
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2011 16:20
|
|
|
Pompous Rhombus posted:I would definitely not take the 70-200 f/2.8 hiking.
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2011 17:42
|
|
|
Pompous Rhombus posted:I would definitely not take the 70-200 f/2.8 hiking. Or if you do, take something out that weights the same amount. I've taken 70-200 2.8's hiking before and got some great shots that way. I also packed in a full bottle of asprin that wasn't full when I got back...
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2011 15:23
|
|
|
Pompous Rhombus posted:I would definitely not take the 70-200 f/2.8 hiking. Its doable. Ive taken a 70-200 2.8 IS on a 30D and a 24mm up linville gorge for a 3 day trip. About 2k feet change in elevation in about 2 miles or so. It sucked but id probably do it again.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2011 15:52
|
|
|
Pansies, I took my 70-400 G on several hiking trips this summer. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2011 17:06
|
|
|
Ouhei posted:For those looking for bags, the Crumpler 7 million dollar home is on Amazon right now for ~$100 in either black or grey/red: http://www.amazon.com/Crumpler-Million-Dollar-Photo-Black/dp/B001TINMRA/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&qid=1296222194&sr=8-4 Just to update, this arrived today and it's pretty sweet. Looks smaller in person than it does in pictures (always looks big on people, I'm 6' and it looks like a normal sized bag on me). I currently have my gripped D90 with the 18-105 mounted, 1 SB-600, 2 Yongnuo 560, 2 radio receivers and a trigger, and the 50mm 1.8 in there and it has some room to spare. I could fiddle things to get a netbook/ipad in there with all of this stuff. I normally won't be carrying the 2 Yongnuo flashes with me (I'm going to get a dedicated off camera lighting bag/case to put them in with the stands and stuff). So you could easily fit a few more small lenses or a big lens (70-200 2.8 would fit nicely) in there. I'll post up pictures tonight.
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2011 19:49
|
|
|
Haggins posted:
Well i got my shipment today. Turns out they sent me the wrong bag, instead they sent me the Sahara 115 by Naneu. Had a feeling it was too good of a deal to be true. Oh well, at least I didn't order a tent and sleeping bag to go with it 
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2011 03:03
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 17, 2024 01:18 |
|
|
My $7mil arrived today. Man you could beat someone to death with this thing. It feels very solid. It fits my lenses and flash very well, but I'm surprised the secondary pocket doesn't have any setups for dividers, smaller pockets, pen/business card sleeves etc. Small complaints but they seem to be the standard on a lot of other bags. Fits very nicely though and I've already popped on the velcro silencers because good LORD is that loud. Very well padded, looks quite durable, and water rolls right off it. Overall I'm pretty happy for the money.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2011 15:37
|
|