|
Hippokleides posted:Looks like our state beat your state: Oh man that's gonna cause some head explosions among the reactionary idiots in Illinois. RAR NO MORE DEATH PENALTY IMPEACH QUINN FRY THE MEXICANS!! b...bu... but STATE JOBS CUT?! MY TAX DOLLARS! HOORAY! WE LOVE YOU QUINN!
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 01:22 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 10:01 |
|
nm posted:So the PD's Office i was volunteering for is expecting to lay off 30 attorneys. Many of whom are quite a few years out of law school and have kids. TAXED ENOUGH ALREADY
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 01:27 |
|
Defleshed posted:Oh man that's gonna cause some head explosions among the reactionary idiots in Illinois. That's gotta be a real bittersweet moment for the people who got laid off though. It's like, you're super opposed to the death penalty and you spend your entire career defending people from it, and you finally get your ultimate victory and get rid of the death penalty completely and OOPS we don't need you anymore you're fired
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 01:59 |
|
Hippokleides posted:37 appellate defenders went down with the death penalty. Hippokleides posted:For the prosecution side of things, we did not have a dedicated death department, and I'm not aware of any losses. Error waived if not waived, no error if error, harmless if not harmless, "but look what he did!" repeat until affirmed
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 02:32 |
|
Hippokleides posted:Looks like our state beat your state: This is a county. Maybe 100ish PDs.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 04:34 |
|
Another reason not to go to law school: clients. One of the partners at the firm I work for got an email question from a former client. This being a criminal issue, said partner handed it off to my boss, who burst into laughter before promptly making it my duty to try to keep a straight face while answering this legal question that she wanted kept STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL: Former Client has a Buddy with a warrant for FTA emanating from a 15 year old dog at large charge. Client is now afraid of hanging out with Buddy since she found out about the FTA. Client is encouraging Buddy to get it handled, but is afraid to go with Buddy down to the SO to turn himself in. Because, "If I go with him when he turns himself in won't I become an accomplice!?"
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 05:05 |
|
Client sounds like a real loose cannon.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 05:25 |
|
Why is she still even talking to him? Patriot act has her phone tapped for sure. She's screwed.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 06:30 |
|
I get something that stupid and/or crazy at least once a week. This week has been the Brain Damage Special though.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 14:16 |
|
From the Supreme Court argument for J.D.B. v. North Carolina, which is about if you have to give the Miranda warning to a juvenile questioned by police at school. Mr. Feigin is arguing on behalf of the United States.quote:JUSTICE SCALIA: We don't want Miranda warnings to be given where they are unnecessary because they are only necessary to prevent coercion, and where there's no coercion, we want confessions, don't we? And warnings deter confessions. Got to love Scalia just openly saying that he wants confessions from 'the bad guys'. I wondering who he is referring to when he says 'we'?
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 14:26 |
|
And you're surprised?
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 14:57 |
|
Ainsley McTree posted:That's gotta be a real bittersweet moment for the people who got laid off though. It's like, you're super opposed to the death penalty and you spend your entire career defending people from it, and you finally get your ultimate victory and get rid of the death penalty completely and OOPS we don't need you anymore you're fired And think about all the jobs lost at the Innocence Project if the death penalty is repealed too! This is why we need to keep the death penalty around. The people at the Innocence Project are saving lives!
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 16:21 |
|
Wake Forest got their annual angry anonymous email to the entire campus today. Does this happen anywhere else?
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 18:20 |
|
So Scalia's position is that Mirandizing a suspect tells them that poo poo Just Got Real and makes them tend to clam up and ask for a lawyer. And since Scalia wants all suspects to blab about everything and implicate themselves as severely as possible, letting them know that poo poo Is Real should be avoided as long as possible. Well that's entirely unsurprising I guess
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 18:21 |
|
Chewbacca Defense posted:Wake Forest got their annual angry anonymous email to the entire campus today. Does this happen anywhere else? You should definitely post this. It'll surely end up on above the law anyway.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 18:22 |
|
The guy CC'd Above the Law.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 18:23 |
|
so post it so we don't have to wait
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 18:25 |
|
quote:"Wes Law" Chewbacca Defense fucked around with this message at 18:31 on Mar 24, 2011 |
# ? Mar 24, 2011 18:28 |
|
MoFauxHawk posted:And think about all the jobs lost at the Innocence Project if the death penalty is repealed too! This is why we need to keep the death penalty around. The people at the Innocence Project are saving lives! for the record the innocence project works on plenty (perhaps majority) non-capital cases. the ACLU foundation capital punishment project, on the other hand...
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 18:39 |
|
Ugh stop using "begs the question" wrong everybody. Edit: Also yeah I thought about using that ACLU group, but the Innocence Project has better name recognition. But you're right. Man that movie Conviction that had Barry Scheck portrayed in it was such a turd.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 18:40 |
|
Chewbacca Defense posted:"I wonder if the two remaining librarians treat the faculty with the A law librarian's primary job is assisting the faculty in their research/publication. The reason that idiot never sees faculty members in the library is because they use this crazy thing called "e-mail" to send requests to librarians to do X, and then the librarian does X and sends it back to the professor. It's not like professors do their own research and then run into roadblocks and think "OH I'LL GO ASK THE LIBRARIAN WHAT TO DO!" What a loving retard. Full disclosure: I worked as a library RA throughout law school, and I really like my school's law librarians and I will gently caress up any law student that insults them.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 20:35 |
|
Chewbacca Defense posted:Man that guy could have at least run that angry rear end in a top hat email through the angry rear end in a top hat spellchecker. Who complains to the entire faculty and student body about such a thing? Man I loving hate law students.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 21:06 |
|
Chewbacca Defense posted:
What a little snot. I strongly suggest he does some soul searching and asks himself if he is ready, willing and able to get a loving grip. Realizing of course, no one will ever care about whether or not he feels entitled to something.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 21:20 |
|
Defleshed posted:Man that guy could have at least run that angry rear end in a top hat email through the angry rear end in a top hat spellchecker. Someone does it every year. It makes us look pretty lame.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 21:41 |
|
Chewbacca Defense posted:Someone does it every year. It makes us look pretty lame. What a weird tradition. Maybe there's a secret society devoted to putting them together. Wake Forest J. Law & Bitchy Emails.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 22:25 |
|
Konstantin posted:From the Supreme Court argument for J.D.B. v. North Carolina, which is about if you have to give the Miranda warning to a juvenile questioned by police at school. Mr. Feigin is arguing on behalf of the United States. For some reason I feel like Scalia is being sarcastic, but then I read the transcript. There is a whole lot of joking around and laughing in there considering the subject matter. Also I just love it when they address attorneys and solicitors general as "General So-and-So"
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 23:33 |
|
Phil Moscowitz posted:For some reason I feel like Scalia is being sarcastic https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T72vgAEX66M Never assume this
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 23:55 |
|
Chewbacca Defense posted:Wake Forest got their annual angry anonymous email to the entire campus today. Does this happen anywhere else? They're early this year. Gunners. Back in my day, the angry anonymous email bitched about Career Services around finals time. This is adding value to my diploma btw.
|
# ? Mar 25, 2011 01:14 |
|
Has anyone posted the New York Times article on how the Yale law library is loaning a therapy dog. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/22/education/22dog.html?_r=1&src=me&ref=homepage The New York Times" posted:Black’s Law Dictionary? Check.
|
# ? Mar 25, 2011 02:19 |
|
"dog-lending program" Some word you just don't expect to see put together, but then there they are anyway
|
# ? Mar 25, 2011 03:27 |
|
Draile posted:Has anyone posted the New York Times article on how the Yale law library is loaning a therapy dog. I'm fairly certain this was revealed to be a hoax, and the NYT didn't pick up on it. Or, perhaps, the hoax spurred an actual dog-loaning program Edit: The program starts next week. I guess it's the latter.
|
# ? Mar 25, 2011 03:32 |
|
MoFauxHawk posted:Ugh stop using "begs the question" wrong everybody. I actually just watched that tonight. We had a bunch of exonerees and admitted students in the audience and there was some laughing and gasping and crying and I guess people liked it. I thought it was a little contrived (and afterward one of our professors was like "if they'd made that movie about the Duke Law IP the movie would've been four hours longer; DNA is for chumps") but I liked that the guy from the OC was in it.
|
# ? Mar 25, 2011 04:26 |
|
Draile posted:Has anyone posted the New York Times article on how the Yale law library is loaning a therapy dog. trip report re: breed please
|
# ? Mar 25, 2011 06:09 |
|
meeting the red guy for drinks on saturday, think I'm gonna print out some poo poo from this thread to show him. help me law school thread you're my only hope
|
# ? Mar 25, 2011 06:24 |
|
scribe jones posted:
Meh, we have three Washington grads who got jobs here after our former chief justice tried to set up a scratch-my-back-scratch-yours thing with their admissions, and they're p. cool. There's worse places to go.
|
# ? Mar 25, 2011 06:28 |
|
scribe jones posted:
Two likes already....heresy spreads like a fire
|
# ? Mar 25, 2011 06:29 |
|
SWATJester posted:I want to know more. Why won't they tell me how this ends? Funniest thing http://www.loweringthebar.net/2011/03/deposition-battle-over-definition-of-photocopy.html Including quote:D: I’m sorry. I didn’t know what that meant. I understand that there are photocopying machines, and there are different types of them just like –
|
# ? Mar 25, 2011 10:17 |
|
Save me jeebus posted:Another reason not to go to law school: clients. No way sitting in a tight little room alone with a criminal is half the fun especially if they're the kind of hardcase who skips out on dog related charges
|
# ? Mar 25, 2011 10:46 |
|
hypocrite lecteur posted:No way sitting in a tight little room alone with a criminal is half the fun Are you in the frozen north yet? I'm thinking of applying for a clerkship and it's due today.
|
# ? Mar 25, 2011 13:50 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 10:01 |
|
hypocrite lecteur posted:No way sitting in a tight little room alone with a criminal is half the fun I don't mind most of our clients, and I have never felt unsafe; mostly annoyed. The worst ones are always the ones with petty offenses, or secure, middle- to upper-middle-class parents of dumbfuck kids who usually do something stupid involving adolescent females with a BAC >.08. Those ones have what I like to call "Only Client Syndrome."
|
# ? Mar 25, 2011 14:06 |