|
Russian Bear posted:I didn't read the previous report but a couple people mentioned a "fiasco" with it. This one is pretty much up to date as of yesterday(typing it up as they're going along) and looks like they're funding everything themselves - Maybe Fishfund guy learned his lesson who knows. I read that Angola report sometime last year, its something fierce. Dude's got gigantic balls.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 18:48 |
|
|
# ? Jun 7, 2024 11:37 |
|
ReelBigLizard posted:I still honestly don't see the advantage of these pumps, I bleed my brakes with less than a dollars worth of tubing. Using the pump already fitted to the bike (you know, the one you use to pump the brakes to stop).
|
# ? Mar 24, 2011 20:48 |
|
Hmm, clutch felt a little... off this morning. Literally one strand was still attached to the swage. I decided to take the van home.
|
# ? Mar 25, 2011 02:47 |
|
Rev. Dr. Moses P. Lester posted:Are you talking about refilling a brake system from dry or flushing a system? Cause without a bleeder, those are pretty tedious jobs. Either, I really don't find it a hassle. I use about 2m of clear tube and loop it over the handlebars and down into a container. Just keep topping up an pumping for a minute or two until the fluid is nice and bright, then pull lever, crack bleeder, rinse, repeat until it's bled. When I did it a couple of months ago it took maybe 35 minutes to do both calipers, start to finish, and that was the first time I had ever done it. Rev. Dr. Moses P. Lester posted:And yeah, if the brake system is complicated, more than just a vertical pipe or two, it's almost necessary to have a bleeder. My old Guzzi with linked brakes is basically impossible to bleed without a pump of some kind. Good for car brakes too. I thought it might be, my KTM is dead-simple brakes wise.
|
# ? Mar 25, 2011 10:12 |
|
What's awesome about the brake bleeders is the vacuum pressure doesn't really drop even when the caliper valve is open, so for flushing the brakes you can open the valve and let the bleeder pull fluid out of the caliper while you pour new fluid in the reservoir on top. It can't be beat.
|
# ? Mar 25, 2011 15:42 |
|
sirbeefalot posted:Hmm, clutch felt a little... off this morning. Yowch. Shouldnt these things happen only on long cosscountry trips?
|
# ? Mar 25, 2011 16:00 |
|
sirbeefalot posted:Hmm, clutch felt a little... off this morning. Same thing happened to me on the end of a two day trip from Milwaukee to Chicago and back on my RV90. Did the last 40 miles (of stop and go driving I might add) manually pulling up on the clutch cable with a pair of vice grips. You'd think a small bike like the RV would have a light clutch, but its really about 20lbs of pull at the cable, which is pretty tough to manage with vice grip while driving.
|
# ? Mar 25, 2011 16:22 |
|
I don't know that you can really say this belongs here but this is where I'm going to put it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59Vic7jRHvA "Are ya drunk enough buddy?" "AEEUGHAWHINHGAF!" FlerpNerpin fucked around with this message at 17:44 on Mar 25, 2011 |
# ? Mar 25, 2011 17:37 |
|
Holy crap I completely lost it when he spit out his false teeth
|
# ? Mar 25, 2011 19:18 |
|
I just...I'm just not sure what is wrong with some people. I mean, it's cool and all from a technical standpoint, but why would you put a belt drive on a Ninja 250 of all bikes?
|
# ? Mar 25, 2011 20:09 |
|
Because you're too lazy to lube a chain?
|
# ? Mar 25, 2011 22:08 |
|
KozmoNaut posted:Because you're too lazy to lube a chain? A belt seems like the best type of drive for a commuter bike
|
# ? Mar 25, 2011 22:11 |
|
It's not like a 250 is going to snap it either.
|
# ? Mar 25, 2011 22:17 |
|
That's actually a better idea than something like, say, a Buell XB12Ss, which develops 80lb/ft of torque and 100hp.. I was on the highway, downshifted a gear and gassed it, and the belt slipped a notch (or a few). Scary, and I had my Triumph a few weeks after that. On a 250 though, it'd almost make more sense than a chain.
|
# ? Mar 25, 2011 22:37 |
|
It's already been done.
|
# ? Mar 25, 2011 23:27 |
|
They had it on the very first iteration of the Ninja, the '83 GPZ250, but it went to chain drive after that.
|
# ? Mar 25, 2011 23:33 |
|
As has already been said, belts have significant advantages over chains in certain applications, I cant think of a reason you wouldn't want one on a ninja. What I dont see in the picture is where the belt tensioner is.
|
# ? Mar 26, 2011 02:51 |
|
Note, do not fall while riding and catch a branch with your face. Impalement, NSFW!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ImuTpUYa-4
|
# ? Mar 26, 2011 03:45 |
|
mutt2jeff posted:Note, do not fall while riding and catch a branch with your face. loving OW dude. That looked really goddamned gnarly.
|
# ? Mar 26, 2011 03:57 |
|
God drat that makes me cringe watching it. Dude takes it like a loving man though.
|
# ? Mar 26, 2011 04:10 |
|
mutt2jeff posted:Note, do not fall while riding and catch a branch with your face. drat! A few inches lower and it could have been much worse. Content: Where my RD200 stands. What do you think? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGdiN0jab8c
|
# ? Mar 26, 2011 09:11 |
|
DefaultPeanut posted:Where my RD200 stands. Sounds great!
|
# ? Mar 26, 2011 10:51 |
|
DefaultPeanut posted:Where my RD200 stands. Was that your tires chirping on every downshift?
|
# ? Mar 26, 2011 15:44 |
|
Bent footpegs make using the rear brake a little touchy. I didn't think it had the power with drum brakes to lock up the rear brake. I had the clutch completely in when slowing down.
|
# ? Mar 26, 2011 17:43 |
|
Sounds pretty sweet, actually I believe it's easier to lock up a rear drum brake than a rear disc brake.
|
# ? Mar 26, 2011 18:04 |
|
infraboy posted:Sounds pretty sweet, actually I believe it's easier to lock up a rear drum brake than a rear disc brake. Yep, drum brakes are self-applying to a degree, which works like a brake booster. Since bikes generally don't have boosters, disc brakes take a bit more effort on the lever to reach the same braking level as a similarly sized drum brake, but drum brakes are harder to modulate
|
# ? Mar 26, 2011 18:15 |
|
I'm really tempted to try this in my mazda. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQH5k4PD9gM
|
# ? Mar 26, 2011 18:39 |
|
|
# ? Mar 26, 2011 19:23 |
|
I've found the inspiration if I ever want to customize my bike: EDIT: And a video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALiLCEMnXPw KozmoNaut fucked around with this message at 21:04 on Mar 26, 2011 |
# ? Mar 26, 2011 20:59 |
|
|
# ? Mar 26, 2011 22:56 |
|
lancemantis posted:This really is an ugly bike. It looks so strange.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2011 01:26 |
|
Rip off all the fairings and that god awful exhaust and it wouldn't be bad.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2011 05:52 |
|
It's kind of like the gussied up housewife of a Harley V-Rod. Wonder what their child would be?
|
# ? Mar 27, 2011 05:59 |
|
It's nice that someone's making a good muscle cruiser since the VMax bombed.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2011 06:00 |
|
If you rip all the poo poo off of it, it will kind of be like a modern, more ugly, S4R. Either way, Ducati has an insanely large aftermarket part market, so I'm assuming someone can make a pretty Diavel eventually.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2011 06:37 |
|
|
# ? Mar 27, 2011 06:56 |
|
Dude blows his engine at the track with flames. http://tinypic.com/player.php?v=o07aes&s=7
|
# ? Mar 27, 2011 12:31 |
|
I didn't think the Diavel was HORRIBLE in person
|
# ? Mar 27, 2011 14:10 |
|
lancemantis posted:I like it
|
# ? Mar 27, 2011 16:26 |
|
|
# ? Jun 7, 2024 11:37 |
|
schreibs posted:I like it Me too. It reminds me of the vmax in a good way, without the bulging look toward the front.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2011 17:57 |