|
Gibertjim posted:http://minneapolis.craigslist.org/ank/wan/2295275965.html Dead babies right on the front page and a broken website, nice.
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2011 22:18
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 12, 2024 13:38 |
|
|
"Fairytale Wedding Portraits" Yeah, lots of fairy tales have witches 
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2011 23:16
|
|
|
http://www.adorama.com/ILXCF16GB2P3.html 3 16gb cards for $99 on adorama, good to split between friends or hoard for video work 
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2011 23:42
|
|
|
Gibertjim posted:http://minneapolis.craigslist.org/ank/wan/2295275965.html Broken website indeed. The only photo in her portfolio you can see and sort of looks like someone is doing something unsavory with a baby. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2011 00:33
|
|
|
xzzy posted:I can't imagine why anyone would fight over Afghanistan, much less choose to live there. Every picture I've ever seen of the place looks like it's a scene from Mars. Large portions of Afghanistan are stunningly beautiful and rich for cultivation. The main reason it has been tossed around so much militarily over the past couple centuries though, is because in the 'great game' it is seen as a gateway to Asia proper. As for the photos, I would guess he is using a Hassleblad/Fuji X-pan.
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2011 01:24
|
|
|
Reichstag posted:As for the photos, I would guess he is using a Hassleblad/Fuji X-pan. He mentioned a swinging lens camera.
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2011 01:26
|
|
|
HPL posted:He mentioned a swinging lens camera. Yeah just saw that, likely the Noblex then.
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2011 01:26
|
|
|
Bang Bang Club trailer
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2011 14:52
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2011 14:39
|
|
|
Ringo R posted:Is he one of those guys from the Bang Bang Club?
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2011 16:07
|
|
|
torgeaux posted:Is he one of those guys from the Bang Bang Club? Nope, the BonBon Club.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2011 18:42
|
|
|
I find myself unable to stop thinking that the Bang Bang Club is somehow related to porn.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2011 19:49
|
|
|
The premise for the movie sounded really awesome and then I watched the trailer and it just looked like terrible, over-Hollywooded poo poo. Zero interest in seeing it. But I might look to see if there's a book about them that tries a little less hard to make photographing a war-ravaged country sexy.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2011 20:16
|
|
|
mr. mephistopheles posted:The premise for the movie sounded really awesome and then I watched the trailer and it just looked like terrible, over-Hollywooded poo poo. Yeah it looks pretty terrible. I'll probably Netflix it eventually though.  Will also head over to RFF for the inevitable gear-sperging.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2011 22:42
|
|
|
Looks really, Hollywood. I don't know, I've seen the same conflict covered shortly in War Photographer and I doubt anything else will have the same impact. Also, the Bang Bang Club is such an undocumented group of photographers I'm glad something's finally done about them. By the way, I wonder who will play the James Nachtwey cameo. He was there when Ken Oosterbroek died EDIT: And holy poo poo, Joao Silva actually lost both of his legs recently in Afghanistan. I haven't heard that yet. 
Fragrag fucked around with this message at 00:39 on Apr 4, 2011 |
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2011 00:34
|
|
|
Fragrag posted:Looks really, Hollywood. I don't know, I've seen the same conflict covered shortly in War Photographer and I doubt anything else will have the same impact. Also, the Bang Bang Club is such an undocumented group of photographers I'm glad something's finally done about them. By the way, I wonder who will play the James Nachtwey cameo. He was there when Ken Oosterbroek died Agreed. War Photographer is really, really good, albeit depressing. Anybody with any sort of interest in photojournalism should definitely check it out.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2011 01:44
|
|
|
Guys, is there a dedicated rangefinder thread? I'm thinking of buying one for fun and for street photography instead of my dlsr. I don't know alot about rangefinders but i'm quite interested about knowing more and what kind i should get
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2011 02:07
|
|
|
BobTheCow posted:Agreed. War Photographer is really, really good, albeit depressing. Anybody with any sort of interest in photojournalism should definitely check it out. War Photographer was fantastic film, I loved the way it was shot. Very creative and informative, especially when he's on scene since you could see the environment around him while he was determining what he wanted to document and what was relevant to him. I also liked the documentary "Shooting Robert King" which I watched based on a recommendation months ago in this thread. Here's the trailer, it does have nudity and death so nsfw.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ew4OyneLv84
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2011 08:18
|
|
|
Oh boy. http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3402298
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2011 13:52
|
|
|
mr. mephistopheles posted:Oh boy. Open to close in ten minutes, impressive. And already gas chambered at that.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2011 16:01
|
|
|
tuyop posted:There's an android 3d phone coming, but I think it's a bad idea because the viewing angle is apparently really strict. Kind of a big deal on a cell phone. How tolerant is the 3DS's viewing angle? Not very tolerant.. 30 degree viewing angle or so before you hit the edge of the prism. I am not good at stereoscopic vision so the 3d effect of the DS seems really limited even when inside the recommended zone. B&H Photo has a video about currently available 3d cameras on their website.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2011 02:11
|
|
|
Ksi posted:Guys, is there a dedicated rangefinder thread?  Just get an XA
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2011 02:23
|
|
|
This is quite interesting. Want to see how it works http://re35.net/index.html Even if it does turn out to be a gimmick
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2011 11:59
|
|
|
Fists Up posted:This is quite interesting. It's a shame it is an April Fools joke http://translate.google.com.au/tran...s%26prmd%3Divns I can imagine an awful lot of photographers got their ponytails all twisted up in excitement.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2011 12:39
|
|
|
If it were real, it would probably cost $10000, and also drive prices of film cameras/dead mount lenses way up. I'm fine with it being fake.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2011 12:46
|
|
|
Fists Up posted:This is quite interesting. Almost definitely a gimmick I think. Still an interesting idea.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2011 12:46
|
|
|
Replace the film pressure plate with a sensor, attach a small generator/capacitor to the film advance so you don't need awkward battery packs, put an SD slot where the film cartridge would go. Easy!
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2011 12:55
|
|
|
spog posted:It's a shame it is an April Fools joke Damnit!
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2011 13:28
|
|
|
Moist von Lipwig posted:Almost definitely a gimmick I think. Still an interesting idea. Beastruction posted:Replace the film pressure plate with a sensor, attach a small generator/capacitor to the film advance so you don't need awkward battery packs, put an SD slot where the film cartridge would go. Easy! How much of a technical impossibility, is it? Put aside the commercial considerations for a moment. You wouldn't need a big battery pack, since the majority of the power requirements are the shutter/mirror actions, plus the LCD backlighting. With 32GB microSD, there's plenty of room for memory. How thick does a sensor have to be? This says that you can have small sensor 0.39mm thick http://documents.irevues.inist.fr/bitstream/handle/2042/16890/dtip08201.pdf?sequence=1 I think that's thin enough to fit against the back plate. (let's ignore the economics that would make designing a large, flat sensor totally impractical) I can see that squeezing the chips into a volume the size of a film canister is going to be tricky, since they are usually contructed on flat planes. I'd guess that the biggest issue is that you couldn't sync the sensor to the shutter.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2011 13:59
|
|
|
spog posted:I'd guess that the biggest issue is that you couldn't sync the sensor to the shutter. We can use an accelerometer to detect the sharp movement of the body when the shutter snaps open. It should be different than most camera handling movement.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2011 16:37
|
|
|
That's kind of funny, since that was almost a real thing. Search around for 'Silicon Film.'
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2011 16:57
|
|
|
Does anyone have a good way to go through their flickr contacts photos? I generally friend everyone who posts in the dorkroom, as well as photographers I find online, but there doesnt seem to be a good way to visualize the pictures. I've downloaded a couple apps, but for some reason I dont want to open another application besides my browser to look at Flickr photos. Anyone have any advice on this?
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2011 18:27
|
|
|
flickriver.com?
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2011 23:52
|
|
|
Ansel Adams' darkroom video.
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2011 18:51
|
|
|
There's nothing worse than coming back from a small walkaround shoot and having a card full of technically well shot photos, but they're all ridiculously boring. I almost like it better when I have zero keepers because I was shooting +2EV accidentally or something.
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2011 18:54
|
|
|
 I just moved and won't have internet until the 14th, PM pipes or email me off forums if anyone needs anything
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2011 19:31
|
|
|
~party time~ 
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2011 23:57
|
|
|
Finally I can post all those HDR's in PAD.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2011 00:05
|
|
|
What would be the most bannable possible photo? I'm thinking nudity, gaudy HDR, lens flare, super vignette, obnoxious watermark. Bonus points for pointlessly crooked horizon and distracting background elements.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2011 00:20
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 12, 2024 13:38 |
|
|
BobTheCow posted:What would be the most bannable possible photo? I'm thinking nudity, gaudy HDR, lens flare, super vignette, obnoxious watermark. Bonus points for pointlessly crooked horizon and distracting background elements.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2011 00:44
|
|
