|
EnsGDT posted:Can anyone think of examples of work done where the camera is in a fish tank on a water line and it floats back and forth between the two, sort of like this: Happens in The Life Aquatic, I think it happens in Lost in Translation too but I haven't seen that in ages.
|
# ? Apr 10, 2011 06:01 |
|
|
# ? May 14, 2024 01:47 |
|
https://vimeo.com/22155917 As part of a camera test for an upcoming film, my classmate Kyle and I have been playing with the Red Lake highspeed camera. A prototype of the Y5 I believe. The interface we have to use with it is super non-intuitive, but we're getting some slick stuff. Anybody have any sort of significant high speed experience, particularly with a Red Lake?
|
# ? Apr 10, 2011 15:54 |
|
Anyone going to NAB? I'll be assisting Robert Starling at the Angenieux booth, showing off their new lens on his Steadicam. Come on by and say hello! And check out the slick lens, as well
|
# ? Apr 11, 2011 00:20 |
|
ogopogo posted:Anyone going to NAB? I'll be there Tuesday and Wednesday, so I'll see you guys there!
|
# ? Apr 11, 2011 03:45 |
|
Pretty sure I met Steadiman today No idea if he knows who I am but I was that goofy tall dude with Starling!
|
# ? Apr 12, 2011 02:57 |
|
EnsGDT posted:Can anyone think of examples of work done where the camera is in a fish tank on a water line and it floats back and forth between the two, sort of like this: The chopper crash in The Life Aquatic. on that note, I was always fascinated by this shot in Boogie Nights where the camera goes all around at a pool party and at the end follows a girl into the pool, and THEN continues to float above the surface as well. Is the camera just in a housing for the entire shot? I don't know jack about underwater shooting. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eCrGpT84G9Y
|
# ? Apr 12, 2011 19:09 |
|
ogopogo posted:Pretty sure I met Steadiman today No idea if he knows who I am but I was that goofy tall dude with Starling! Are you the German guy who was somehow taller than Garrett?
|
# ? Apr 13, 2011 00:34 |
|
So the new NAB Alexa line up must be making red poo poo bricks right now. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=orUvQ29OsIM
|
# ? Apr 14, 2011 03:22 |
|
That's all cool but I think they're still apples and oranges, or maybe more like screwdrivers and wrenches. vvvvv SquareDog fucked around with this message at 04:07 on Apr 15, 2011 |
# ? Apr 14, 2011 07:02 |
|
I'd compare it to a leatherman to a rock
|
# ? Apr 14, 2011 20:01 |
|
Here's a new reel based on some stuff I shot at a concert the other weekend: http://vimeo.com/22446361 It was my first time using a 5D, no shoulder brace and a huge lens so there was a fair amount more shake than I would have liked, but I cut this together of my selects to send to the director to save him some stuff combing through my footage (he shot everything on a 7D w/ a wide angle and a shoulder brace so his footage is solid all the way thru). http://vimeo.com/22446361 It's way too long, but it's off to a decent start. I've got a bunch more projects to add to it, I'm just waiting on the OK from different folks for me to include.
|
# ? Apr 16, 2011 00:05 |
|
Any recommendations on shotgun microphones for a student? I guess I'm looking for something cheap, flexible and good quality. My camera's an XH A1 and has XLR ports as well as regular TRS mic inputs, so my options are pretty wide in that aspect. Something that can go between boom pole and camera mount would be handy as well, but I don't think most shotgun mics would complicate that.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2011 18:57 |
|
Slim Pickens posted:Any recommendations on shotgun microphones for a student? I guess I'm looking for something cheap, flexible and good quality. My camera's an XH A1 and has XLR ports as well as regular TRS mic inputs, so my options are pretty wide in that aspect. Something that can go between boom pole and camera mount would be handy as well, but I don't think most shotgun mics would complicate that. What's your budget? You could go with a Rode NTG-1 or a Rode Videomic if your budget is less than $300.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2011 23:36 |
|
Slim Pickens posted:Any recommendations on shotgun microphones for a student? I guess I'm looking for something cheap, flexible and good quality. My camera's an XH A1 and has XLR ports as well as regular TRS mic inputs, so my options are pretty wide in that aspect. Something that can go between boom pole and camera mount would be handy as well, but I don't think most shotgun mics would complicate that. I finally got a budget shotgun mic and got the Audio Technica AT897. I'm liking it so far. http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/300615-REG/Audio_Technica_AT897_AT897_Short_Condenser.html Although, I bought the shotgun mic kit for $800 on that site that came with the boom pole, dead cat, and a few other accessories. I've only used the mic 2-3 times so far, but I like it.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2011 01:50 |
|
VoodooXT posted:What's your budget? You could go with a Rode NTG-1 or a Rode Videomic if your budget is less than $300. I was hoping for something a little less than that. The equipment cage has decent audio equipment, but I was just looking to become somewhat independent of that process until farther down the line. They only give out shure sm58's for first year students, and it's one day rental only. I guess I'll just keep my eyes open for a decent deal on equipment. Slim Pickens fucked around with this message at 02:56 on Apr 19, 2011 |
# ? Apr 19, 2011 02:48 |
|
Slim Pickens posted:I was hoping for something a little less than that. The equipment cage has decent audio equipment, but I was just looking to become somewhat independent of that process until farther down the line. They only give out shure sm58's for first year students, and it's one day rental only. The Rode Videomic is about $185, but that's not including shipping or sales tax. You could go lower by going with Azden. But holy poo poo, only SM58s for first years? That's ridiculous. Rode Videomic Booming kit @ B&H Where will the majority of filming be? If it's outside: shotguns. If it's inside: hypercardioid condensers. I've heard these CAD CM217s are pretty decent for indoor dialogue recording on the cheap.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2011 05:24 |
|
Why hypercardioid instead of a plain cardioid? Just for a slight bit of ambiance? I can't imagine the sound of the ceiling being particularly interesting otherwise. Anyways, it'll probably be a mix of indoor and outdoor. I think a regular cardioid shotgun would work for most of what I want. I was looking through B&H, and I think this MXL FR-304 might serve me well. I'm pretty sure the one negative review was some retard who forgot to turn on the phantom power. Used or improvised poles and shock mounts shouldn't be too difficult to find/make cheap(or so I hope).
|
# ? Apr 19, 2011 05:43 |
|
Slim Pickens posted:Why hypercardioid instead of a plain cardioid? Just for a slight bit of ambiance? I can't imagine the sound of the ceiling being particularly interesting otherwise. Because C2V on DVXUser can explain it better than me, I'll just copy and paste his explanation: C2V on DVXUser posted:Shotgun mics reject almost everything that's off-axis. The one thing they cannot ignore, even from the sides, is bass spectrum. As that bounces around the room, it will muddy up the sound (whether the mic is next to the ceiling or not). Shotguns also have a small, narrow lobe of acceptance at 180º (to the rear of the element). This pulls in direct reflections that clog the signal and make everything sound hollow and "bathroomy" in highly reflective rooms. Basically, the same interference tube design that makes it reject so well outdoors is what pulls in too many acoustic problems indoors. quote:Anyways, it'll probably be a mix of indoor and outdoor. I think a regular cardioid shotgun would work for most of what I want. That MXL looks fine, so go ahead, though I would still find something not-a-shotgun to use for interiors.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2011 06:05 |
|
Good explanation, thanks for the repost. Guess I should read up on dvinfo a ton more.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2011 06:29 |
|
In that vein, can someone recommend a budget not-shotgun for indoors? Right now we have an ME66/K6 combo as our main mic, with a Studio Projects B1 large diaphram condenser for VO work. Almost all of our work is indoors and most of that is in highly reflective environments. I don't need it to be self powered like the ME66/K6--we just got a fantastic deal on that combo.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2011 19:54 |
|
powderific posted:In that vein, can someone recommend a budget not-shotgun for indoors? Right now we have an ME66/K6 combo as our main mic, with a Studio Projects B1 large diaphram condenser for VO work. Almost all of our work is indoors and most of that is in highly reflective environments. I don't need it to be self powered like the ME66/K6--we just got a fantastic deal on that combo. What's the budget? You could go for an Oktava MK-12 hypercardioid condenser if you got roughly $300 bucks to spend. If you want really budget, the link I posted to the CAD CM12s or whatever I hear are decent for indoor work.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2011 23:51 |
|
I've looked at those Oktava's before, but the reviews suggested they were super sensitive to handling noise and tricky to use on a boom. Any personal experience with em?
|
# ? Apr 20, 2011 15:15 |
|
powderific posted:I've looked at those Oktava's before, but the reviews suggested they were super sensitive to handling noise and tricky to use on a boom. Any personal experience with em? I've never handled them personally, though I would think that as long as you have it on a shock mount with a windshield, it should be fine. You could go the route I did and get a Rode NT3, but that thing... loving christ, booming that poo poo is a nightmare.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2011 23:27 |
|
Welp, at Indie Rentals, where I work, we just got the new Sony F-3's and the new high-speed Diablo Y5. The F-3 is awesome, way better than the AF-100 (which we also carry). It has a true 35mm sensor and all the bells and whistles you could want short of getting a RED. I found that on the AF-100 the highlights turn green and it just looks so "video-y" but the F-3 looks great. We threw an Angenieux Optimo lens on it to try it out, baller. The Diablo is basically just like a Phantom that you can control from your iPhone. It does up to 1455 fps! Haven't shot anything with it yet but it looks awesome. I'll post something when I shoot a test.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2011 03:29 |
|
For the price I sure would hope the F3 is better than the AF100. If it wasn't, Sony would have a problem on their hands.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2011 07:17 |
|
I was skeptical but the shortcomings of the AF-100 make it worth the price difference. It surprised me too because I expected a lot more from the AF-100.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2011 08:12 |
|
SquareDog posted:Welp, at Indie Rentals, where I work, we just got the new Sony F-3's and the new high-speed Diablo Y5. Any thoughts on hooking the F-3 up to an Atomos Ninja to record 4:4:4 straight from the sensor through the HDMI port? The guy who runs cinema5d has been jizzing in his pants over this, but I haven't seen any footage yet.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2011 16:17 |
|
SquareDog posted:I was skeptical but the shortcomings of the AF-100 make it worth the price difference. It surprised me too because I expected a lot more from the AF-100. What do you see as the big shortcomings of the af100? It has been humming along fine for us.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2011 21:41 |
|
Well like I said the highlights turn green right before they blow out, the crop factor is even worse than the 7D, the color space and bit-rate is on the low end, it's just looks very "videoey" even with the narrow depth of field and the battery situation is insulting. You have to buy new batteries even though they are the same as the old ones except that they cut a little groove out of the bottom so that the old batteries won't fit. why? The crop factor, green highlights and videoey look rules it out of anything other than a documentary, concerts or reality TV. Show this next to an F-3 and any pro is going to pick the F-3. Just sayin'!
|
# ? Apr 22, 2011 02:24 |
|
SquareDog posted:Well like I said the highlights turn green right before they blow out What lens are you using? That could be chromatic aberration coming from the lens rather than the sensor.
|
# ? Apr 22, 2011 02:34 |
|
No chance, it's the camera sensor. Doesn't matter if you have a Zeiss Super Speed or an Angenieux Optimo. :/ EDIT: Jalumibnkrayal posted:Any thoughts on hooking the F-3 up to an Atomos Ninja to record 4:4:4 straight from the sensor through the HDMI port? The guy who runs cinema5d has been jizzing in his pants over this, but I haven't seen any footage yet. We haven't tried it yet but The HDMI signal needs to have absolutely NO MARKINGS overlaying the image, no frame guides, no info, nothing. Because these devices record everything fed in to it. For this reason they can't work with 5D's or 7D's, if you try you get the white focus square recorded on to the footage. Don't know about the F-3 though. SquareDog fucked around with this message at 05:52 on Apr 22, 2011 |
# ? Apr 22, 2011 04:04 |
|
Jalumibnkrayal posted:Any thoughts on hooking the F-3 up to an Atomos Ninja to record 4:4:4 straight from the sensor through the HDMI port? The guy who runs cinema5d has been jizzing in his pants over this, but I haven't seen any footage yet. I don't think the Samurai is out yet, or won't be until this summer. EDIT: yep, already shipping. Still ordering this summer. Also, I think the highest the Samurai records is Apple ProResHQ, which is 4:2:2. Are you thinking of the Blackmagic Hyperdeck Suttle? That records uncompressed HD over HDMI and HDSDI. Costs $345 vs the Samurai's ~$1500, but the Shuttle requires SSD drives that are capable of recording uncompressed HD. I'm probably getting the Samurai when it comes out so I can record footage on my Steadicam sled and bring footage home with me without hassling production. Tiresias fucked around with this message at 07:08 on Apr 22, 2011 |
# ? Apr 22, 2011 06:56 |
|
SquareDog posted:No chance, it's the camera sensor. Doesn't matter if you have a Zeiss Super Speed or an Angenieux Optimo. :/ That's kind of strange. I really have not seen that, nor do people seem to be complaining about it. For sure the AF100 has some limitations, but really the F3 is 3x the cost, before lenses, not really a fair comparison. I love our AF100, just like I love our 500, but yeah if we could have an F3 or an alexa instead I'd probably swap out. Wouldn't give up the 500 though unless I could get into a p2 varicam. Love those EFP/ENG cameras.
|
# ? Apr 22, 2011 21:31 |
|
You make me want to throw it up and test it out again. I'll look at it next week. Oh and GENERAL ANNOUNCEMENT, the latest short film that I directed, titled Zineb's Journey, was accepted in to Cannes short film corner. Yay!
|
# ? Apr 23, 2011 01:19 |
|
ogopogo posted:Pretty sure I met Steadiman today No idea if he knows who I am but I was that goofy tall dude with Starling! Didn't get to see much but I am insanely interested in the Samurai! That thing looked almost too good to be true, I'll wait for some user reviews before committing but I really want one!
|
# ? Apr 23, 2011 01:49 |
|
SquareDog posted:You make me want to throw it up and test it out again. I'll look at it next week. Congrats! That seems like a pretty big deal.
|
# ? Apr 26, 2011 16:11 |
|
Steadiman posted:Ha that was you? Hadn't even occured to me. But thanks for pulling focus for me too, I realize I didn't make it particularly easy. Also that model was way too cute and I already lost her number and forgot her name . Ah well, Vegas... You could probably ask Robert for her name and number, he gave me the impression she works with the Angenieux folks pretty regularly. I also hear she's *ahem* probably very friendly with someone who works there. Regardless, press on my good man! I too can't wait to see a Samurai, I need to get my own ordered so I can figure out the cable situation. On one hand, I can only use it for SD since my sled isn't wired for HD yet, but after I do an HD upgrade, I'll want to use it.
|
# ? Apr 26, 2011 18:56 |
|
SquareDog posted:You make me want to throw it up and test it out again. I'll look at it next week. This is pretty awesome, man. Are you gonna be there?
|
# ? Apr 27, 2011 01:19 |
|
No :/ Can't afford to and they aren't giving us tickets to fly there. Today they sent me an e-mail with info on where and how to get my Cannes badges once I arrive at the festival.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2011 02:36 |
|
|
# ? May 14, 2024 01:47 |
|
SquareDog posted:No :/ Can't afford to and they aren't giving us tickets to fly there. Dam. Did you call them back to say "listen, I really want to be there to represent my film, but I can't afford it, is there anything you can do to help me get there? It could change my life." They like to hear that kind of stuff.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2011 02:44 |