|
Binge posted:There is a carfax report, but it just has all the oil/filter and inspections listings and a couple "Vehicle serviced" entries. It also failed inspection at 32k miles, but has passed every one since it. Well, if you liked the E90 328i I wouldn't bother with an xi anyway. Just pick up a 2003+ 325i or 330i four-door in 5 speed. Do you really want the AWD? Unless you live in the back of beyond in Minnesota, winter can be dealt with fairly effectively with snow tyres on steelies and judicious use of the DSC system. Thus removing a number of potential failure points from the car.
|
# ? Jun 15, 2011 09:49 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 20:44 |
|
Binge posted:Bad idea or awesome idea? There is a 2003 325XI with 70k for 12k from a dealership. I have a 2007 Ford Edge at the moment, and am heavily considering trading it in for it. Your Edge is only 4 years old, and there will likely be no issues with it in the foreseeable future. Keep that in mind. quote:It also failed inspection at 32k miles, but has passed every one since it.
|
# ? Jun 15, 2011 18:15 |
|
BrokenKnucklez posted:Well, the alternator died in a friend of mine's 540i. Its a water cooled and at a $650 price tag, vs $230 for the 530i. A water cooled alternator? That sounds pretty sweet, anybody got pictures of this contraption?
|
# ? Jun 15, 2011 18:16 |
|
Binge posted:Bad idea or awesome idea? There is a 2003 325XI with 70k for 12k from a dealership. I have a 2007 Ford Edge at the moment, and am heavily considering trading it in for it. Why not sell your Edge private party and get several thousand more in cash than the dealer will give you in trade?
|
# ? Jun 15, 2011 18:22 |
|
Yeah, as a relatively new BMW owner, if I could only give a person about to buy one ONE piece of advice, it would be to have that $2000 sitting safe somewhere for when you are GOING to need it.
|
# ? Jun 15, 2011 18:37 |
|
This is more of a general question: My rear tires wear out faster than my front tires. i have yet to change tires on this car. The fronts have about 65% life on them, the rears are pretty much dead. Should I change all 4? (and spend a bunch of money), buy 2 new rears (and miss out on possible rebates from buying 4 tires), or should I buy 2 used tires for the rear? (with all of the risks associated with used tires?
|
# ? Jun 15, 2011 18:55 |
|
Shadowhand00 posted:This is more of a general question: Personally I would never just replace 2 tires on a car, much less a performance car. You can absolutely do it and get away with it, but it's not something I would ever do. There's nothing "wrong" with doing it, but you have to consider the difference in grip and unpredictability of handling that it will give you. Also, if the fronts have good tread but are 3-5 years old, they are probably nearly due for replacement anyway. Tread is not the sole determining factor of a tire's condition.
|
# ? Jun 15, 2011 19:01 |
|
revmoo posted:Also, if the fronts have good tread but are 3-5 years old, they are probably nearly due for replacement anyway. Tread is not the sole determining factor of a tire's condition. This is so true, and a lot of people don't realize it. Even if there is still tread, after 5 years the rubber compound has likely hardened up to nearly a rock-like state and has lost much of its grip and traction both in dry and (especially) wet conditions.
|
# ? Jun 15, 2011 19:12 |
|
revmoo posted:Personally I would never just replace 2 tires on a car, much less a performance car. You can absolutely do it and get away with it, but it's not something I would ever do. There's nothing "wrong" with doing it, but you have to consider the difference in grip and unpredictability of handling that it will give you. Also, if the fronts have good tread but are 3-5 years old, they are probably nearly due for replacement anyway. Tread is not the sole determining factor of a tire's condition. The 2 tires were replaced mid-year last year. (I'm guessing it was 65%, but it could be lcoser to 75%). They were replaced by the previous owner of the car under warranty (i don't know why he didn't replace the rears too - bastard). So you are basically saying, regardless of the wear left on the fronts, replace all 4 tires?
|
# ? Jun 15, 2011 19:44 |
|
If they're only a year or so old, and in good condition, and you can replace the other two with another of the exact same tire, I think you'd be ok.
|
# ? Jun 15, 2011 19:48 |
|
revmoo posted:If they're only a year or so old, and in good condition, and you can replace the other two with another of the exact same tire, I think you'd be ok. Much appreciated. Is TireRack still considered the place to get tires?
|
# ? Jun 15, 2011 21:40 |
|
CornHolio posted:A water cooled alternator? That sounds pretty sweet, anybody got pictures of this contraption? http://members.roadfly.com/faisal_in_laurel/M62/M62_Alternator_R_R.pdf Scroll a ways down theres some pictures. Its really just a big can with some connections on the front, its not that impressive.
|
# ? Jun 15, 2011 21:49 |
Shadowhand00 posted:don't know why he didn't replace the rears too - bastard). So you are basically saying, regardless of the wear left on the fronts, replace all 4 tires? My M3, at least, eats rear tires like nobody's business. I've put two sets of rear tires on it in the 25,000 miles I've driven it, and it had good tread on them when I bought it. They wear evenly, but they just wear out. It's a symptom of soft compound rubber and driving the car like it's designed to be driven. The OE Pilot Sports only last 6,000 miles or so before needing replacement, and are $600 each. Needless to say, I don't buy Pilot Sports. My opinion is, if your front tires aren't old, why replace them if they don't need it? You can check the date code on the sidewall to see exactly how old they are if you're worried about it. Anything older than 5-6 years old would be a good candidate for replacement.
|
|
# ? Jun 15, 2011 23:39 |
|
wallaka posted:My opinion is, if your front tires aren't old, why replace them if they don't need it? Same here. Just put matching sets on each axle. They are not going to wear evenly front to back - it's a RWD car. The only time you're going to have equally worn tyres of equal ages on is when the car comes off the ramp at your local tyre shop. e: in case that's unclear, just replace the rears unless there is actually something wrong with the fronts. Actually, not just the tyre shine has worn off the sidewall... Saga fucked around with this message at 11:03 on Jun 16, 2011 |
# ? Jun 16, 2011 10:59 |
|
I am selling a 2002 BMW 325i in the SF Bay area. Here is the honest description of the car, slightly revised from last time I talked about it.EvilMoFo posted:2002 325i, teal green So yeah, anyone want a car that will likely be a project? I would really love to get 4k but I am open to offers. Like you have never seen a E46 3 series. Note the bumper. Trunk in blurrycam, comes with chains, BMW brand sun shade, and snow/ice brush/scraper. The interior. The mileage. edit: it threw an o2 sensor code last week but has not done it again since being cleared edit 2: vvv While I always liked my 2000 528i more than this thing, in the end I blame caltrans more than anything else. Most of those miles are from I-80, going between the bay area and Reno; the extreme weather and loving horrible roads contributed to the 528i (computer, specifically) dying, the 325i getting in this shape, and my 85 Mercedes diesel deciding to stop working. The good news of all that, I graduated and am not going to Reno ever again if I can avoid it. EvilMoFo fucked around with this message at 13:46 on Jun 16, 2011 |
# ? Jun 16, 2011 13:03 |
|
EvilMoFo posted:Somebody doesn't love their car. This makes me sad.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2011 13:25 |
|
Taco Box posted:Somebody doesn't love their car. This makes me sad. "engine and automatic transmission" Yeah, but it was one of those Trisomy 18 cars...it never had a chance.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2011 14:00 |
|
wallaka posted:My opinion is, if your front tires aren't old, why replace them if they don't need it? You can check the date code on the sidewall to see exactly how old they are if you're worried about it. Anything older than 5-6 years old would be a good candidate for replacement. This. My M3 disproportionately eats rear tires on the street and fronts on the track. If I bought 4 tires every time I needed 2, tirerack would hold a 2nd mortgage on my house. Always replace in pairs and do not mix performance types (no high-performance summer tires on one axle and touring all-seasons on the other) and you'll be fine.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2011 14:16 |
|
Have you guys seen the engine in the new M5? :iamafag: I'm assuming those huge boxes in the center are some kind of heat transfer device for the turbos... maybe? Also, just ordered four Kumhos for my car from the Tire Rack. My rears are nearly bald, and my fronts could definitely use replacing too. I couldn't justify the Bridgestone Potenzas since my car is old with a need-replacing-soon suspension. It would have been wasted. Still, I think these appear to be pretty decent tires. CornHolio fucked around with this message at 15:35 on Jun 16, 2011 |
# ? Jun 16, 2011 15:32 |
|
It's pretty, but imagine it's a bitch to work on.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2011 15:51 |
|
Fermunky posted:It's pretty, but imagine it's a bitch to work on. That was my first thought too. This probably indicates that neither of us can afford to buy one (he said presumptuously).
|
# ? Jun 16, 2011 16:03 |
|
Average fuel consumption is 28.5 miles per imperial gallon for the new M5? That's 23.75 MPG in the US. The current M5 gets an average of 13mpg. That's fantastic.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2011 18:10 |
|
Oh, drat, it's according to the BMW press release. BMW posted:• Significantly improved balance between performance and fuel consumption: acceleration 0–100 km/h (62 mph) in 4.4 seconds, 0–200 km/h (124 mph) in 13.0 seconds, top speed: 250 km/h / 155 mph (305 km/h / 190 mph with M Driver's Package); average fuel consumption in EU test cycle: 9.9 litres/100 km (28.5 mpg imp); engine output 10 per cent up on predecessor model, maximum torque increased by 30 per cent, That's awesome. That's on par with the puny NA 3.0L in my 330Ci, but the M5 makes almost triple the power. Goddamn. Guinness fucked around with this message at 18:37 on Jun 16, 2011 |
# ? Jun 16, 2011 18:32 |
|
Saga posted:Same here. Thanks for this. I have Pilot Sports on the front, currently have Yokohama S.Drives in the back. (original owner did this). I'm going to be replacing the rears with the Hankook V12s. Got a quote for $445 installed at a place in Milpitas. The charge for the tires are about 15 more than what Tire Rack will charge (+ shipping) and this guy can get them in the next day. I'll probably go with that unless someone thinks that's too expensive. Thoughts?
|
# ? Jun 16, 2011 19:07 |
|
Shadowhand00 posted:Thanks for this. I have Pilot Sports on the front, currently have Yokohama S.Drives in the back. (original owner did this). I'm going to be replacing the rears with the Hankook V12s. Got a quote for $445 installed at a place in Milpitas. The charge for the tires are about 15 more than what Tire Rack will charge (+ shipping) and this guy can get them in the next day. I'll probably go with that unless someone thinks that's too expensive. Thoughts? That seems about right. I got my V12's (only a pair for the rear) for 202 shipped, and they actually arrived fairly quickly. Got them installed for 15 each.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2011 21:36 |
|
Guinness posted:
And it's at least 5 passengers heavier than your car. This is the EU test cycle though, which could include more highway or something. Still, an average MPG of over 20 exceeds the requirements for a $100k car.
|
# ? Jun 16, 2011 23:59 |
|
That car is really going to be an excellent evolution of the 5er's. I am glad they moved away from the bangle design, but the the fuel economy is outstanding. I know purists want the NA form, but I think we have reached a point in automotive evolution that we are having to resort to forced induction for more power. Even GM is using turbo's on the Cruze.
|
# ? Jun 17, 2011 00:22 |
|
I'm really excited to see what BMW ends up doing with the F30 3ers that should be just around the corner. If the F10 5ers are any indication of the direction that BMW is heading in terms of styling, performance, and efficiency, then the next gen 3-series is going to be incredible. The F10 is basically what the E60 should have been. If they can bring the same level of improvement to the E90, which didn't suffer nearly as bad as the E60 in the first place, then we're in for a treat.
|
# ? Jun 17, 2011 00:31 |
|
Fermunky posted:It's pretty, but imagine it's a bitch to work on. To refill washer fluid, use BMW special tool 35 4 023...
|
# ? Jun 17, 2011 01:23 |
|
Is there a exploded diagram or similar of that new M5 engine around anywhere? I'd like to be able to see what's actually going on under those covers. Probably some relatively weird looking headers under there at least.
|
# ? Jun 17, 2011 01:38 |
|
CornHolio posted:Have you guys seen the engine in the new M5? I am not much of a materialistic person, but one of my primary motivations for earning money is so that I can someday own a car with this engine in it, know that I will never really be able to open the hood and do poo poo to it, and not have to care about that.
|
# ? Jun 17, 2011 02:25 |
|
AlternateAccount posted:I am not much of a materialistic person, but one of my primary motivations for earning money is so that I can someday own a car with this engine in it, know that I will never really be able to open the hood and do poo poo to it, and not have to care about that. Brother, I hear you. I enjoy turning a wrench under the hood quite a bit, but that's what project cars are for. I'd rather be able to drive cutting edge technology and not give a gently caress about the costs and maintenance difficulties, and have something a little more old school and simplistic for my own putzing around on in the garage. Some day...
|
# ? Jun 17, 2011 03:34 |
|
So, my 1982 BMW 320i with almost 200k on it has been making this 'clacking'? noise for some while now, seems to be getting slightly worse....Is it that it just needs a valve adjustment, or is it just poo poo worn out cuz its old and nothing really to be done about it. Video! I swear it sounds worse in the video than it does in person x.x Seriously, it sounds like a tractor in the video. I just did an oil change and havent really had the hood open with the engine running for a while. Decided maybe I should ask whats up with the noise. http://youtu.be/xE3hincrWfw unknown poster fucked around with this message at 04:13 on Jun 17, 2011 |
# ? Jun 17, 2011 04:11 |
|
I just bought a 2001 330ci a couple weeks ago, and have been reading up on maintenance. I was checking the coolant level and noticed the buoy is a couple inches below the lip, but the engine temperature seems to have been fine when driving. I'll be buying coolant from the BMW store tomorrow, but I was wondering if such a low coolant level is a cause for concern (i.e. is something broken?). Assuming engine temperatures have been normal, how damaging was it to have been driving around? e: thanks nitr0! rawrr fucked around with this message at 01:38 on Jun 18, 2011 |
# ? Jun 17, 2011 05:11 |
|
rawrr posted:I just bought a 2001 330ci a couple weeks ago, and have been reading up on maintenance. I was checking the coolant level and noticed the buoy is a couple inches below the lip, but the engine temperature seems to have been fine when driving. Depending on the last time it was filled it wouldn't be crazy to assume that some has evaporated. It's not going to cause any problems if your engine temperature stayed within normal variables. Don't worry 'bout it and fill it up when you can
|
# ? Jun 17, 2011 05:23 |
|
unknown poster posted:So, my 1982 BMW 320i with almost 200k on it has been making this 'clacking'? noise for some while now, seems to be getting slightly worse....Is it that it just needs a valve adjustment, or is it just poo poo worn out cuz its old and nothing really to be done about it. Well, when did you last check the clearances? What grade of oil did you use? If this was an M40/M42 and not an M10 (right? E21 end of run model?), I'd say replace the CCT (and in your case check and re-set clearances) and see how it sounds then.
|
# ? Jun 17, 2011 05:46 |
|
Saga posted:Well, when did you last check the clearances? What grade of oil did you use? When I bought it, the previous owner said he had checked the valve clearances recently and they were fine. I've put about 20k on it since then. I use Castrol GTX 20/50. It probably wouldn't be a bad idea to get the valves adjusted, how much should I expect to pay? I was just wondering if it was something that could be diagnosed as something simple like that, or more major from the sound. edit: its an M10, e21
|
# ? Jun 17, 2011 05:52 |
|
unknown poster posted:When I bought it, the previous owner said he had checked the valve clearances recently and they were fine. I've put about 20k on it since then. I use Castrol GTX 20/50. Why don't you do them yourself? All you need is a bit of wire coathanger, feeler gauges and a 10mm wrench.
|
# ? Jun 17, 2011 08:51 |
|
CornHolio posted:
Yeah, given their position and thickness (wrt to airflow direction), I'm guessing they're watercooled intercoolers. That engine cover must get really loving hot with the turbos right under it.
|
# ? Jun 17, 2011 09:32 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 20:44 |
|
unknown poster posted:When I bought it, the previous owner said he had checked the valve clearances recently and they were fine. I've put about 20k on it since then. I use Castrol GTX 20/50. What beach bum said. You should basically need a set of feeler gauges (metric) to check the clearances and a socket (or wrench if you must, should be in your BMW toolkit) to get the valve cover off. And whatever you use on the M10 to rotate the crank so you can get TDC on each cylinder. It will be in your Haynes / Bentley manual in any case. One of the nice things about having a 1982 car is being able to do these things without 3 hands, a lift, a photographic memory and special tool #1094190190. The CCT system's different to the M40/M42 ones that are just a sealed unit, but it doesn't look like a complicated setup (piston, spring and a plug) and it's probably $50 worth of parts (ready to be corrected by M10 experts...). http://bmwfans.info/parts/catalog/E21/Sedan/USA/320i-M10/LHD/M/1982/january/browse/engine/timing_valve_train_timing_chain_camshaft/
|
# ? Jun 17, 2011 11:03 |