|
Sarion posted:While a good call, I have a feeling such a statement would go right over most people's head. Its like trying to get idiots to realize that Iranians are Persian rather than Arab. Unfortunately most people think that Iranians are those orcs they saw in 300.
|
# ? Aug 21, 2011 02:41 |
|
|
# ? May 10, 2024 15:03 |
|
If I feel like i'm having a good faith discussion I will usually show them the death numbers between the Palestinians vs the Israelis. I will also show them that there is the movement with in Israel to stop the apartheid. If it is a bad faith discussion then move on. Some people aren't worth it.
|
# ? Aug 21, 2011 02:54 |
|
I want to post something like this on facebook: http://www.politicususa.com/en/jon-huntsman-republicans-science Republicans, I am not going to vote for anybody in your party if your presidential nominee claims the earth is only 6,000 years old, ie supports teaching creationist lies in place of actual science. At this point I think Jon Huntsman is only candidate you have who supports actual science. But I feel like it's really awkwardly worded. Anybody want to re-write it so it is better?
|
# ? Aug 21, 2011 18:29 |
|
Sarion posted:They aren't being racist. They're just making a joke. Based on an untrue stereotype that implies one group of people are worse than another while also subtly blaming the inferior group for the superior groups woes (terrorism and jobs). Just because something is a joke does not make it not-racist. Here is a very racist joke, if you're so sure of your position then why don't you go and tell it around a few of your black friends. A captain returned to America after a run on the slave routes. He entered his favorite bar, and next to him entered a gigantic negro with a beautifully blue, green, and yellow macaw on his shoulder. The captain sat down and he and the owner begin chatting. The owner looked at his wonderfully strong and healthy negro's body, then at the beauty of the macaw. "This is a wonderful specimen." He noted. "Where'd you get him?" "AWK, GOT IM IN AFRICA" the macaw replied, "ALL KINDS OF NIGGERS OVER THERE." I laughed like hell the first time I heard that joke, more because of the shocking racism of it than the joke itself. This is not funny. This kind of joke perpetuates racism that still exists. In some parts of the south being black and having a member of a powerful white family call you "friend of the family" is still a very scary thing. It wasn't but some weeks ago that a black man got beat to death for being black in public by some random white kids. Similar are "Difference between a jew and an apple pie" and rape jokes. Some people have been through this really bad poo poo, or had members of their families go through it. Nothing is sacred, but this is no laughing matter. These jokes can make people viscerally remember very dark times, and that's just not acceptable. Humor is meant to ease man's burden, not add to it.
|
# ? Aug 22, 2011 01:11 |
|
Nathilus posted:Just because something is a joke does not make it not-racist. Here is a very racist joke, if you're so sure of your position then why don't you go and tell it around a few of your black friends. Look up. You see that thing way up in the sky? It's the joke.
|
# ? Aug 22, 2011 01:24 |
|
Nathilus posted:Similar are "Difference between a jew and an apple pie" and rape jokes. Some people have been through this really bad poo poo, or had members of their families go through it. Nothing is sacred, but this is no laughing matter. These jokes can make people viscerally remember very dark times, and that's just not acceptable. Humor is meant to ease man's burden, not add to it. loving wisdom right here.
|
# ? Aug 22, 2011 02:08 |
|
Nathilus posted:Nothing is sacred, but this is no laughing matter.
|
# ? Aug 22, 2011 05:22 |
|
Strudel Man posted:This seems contradictory. If certain topics are 'no laughing matter,' doesn't that make them 'sacred,' as far as humor goes? I can make a rape joke that will be funny to a lot of people. In that sense, the subject of rape isn't sacred. You can always crack a joke about something, even if it's dire. Rape is still no laughing matter to many people though. Knowingly cracking a rape joke in front of a rape victim that is still dealing with the fallout is a really horrible thing to do, and unknowingly doing it is still extremely impolitic. You can make people laugh with your words and you can also hurt and scare them, so choose your words and your audience carefully.
|
# ? Aug 22, 2011 07:16 |
|
Nathilus posted:I can make a rape joke that will be funny to a lot of people. In that sense, the subject of rape isn't sacred. You can always crack a joke about something, even if it's dire. Rape is still no laughing matter to many people though. Knowingly cracking a rape joke in front of a rape victim that is still dealing with the fallout is a really horrible thing to do, and unknowingly doing it is still extremely impolitic. You can make people laugh with your words and you can also hurt and scare them, so choose your words and your audience carefully.
|
# ? Aug 22, 2011 07:23 |
|
Strudel Man posted:Okay. I guess I'm still not entirely clear on what position you're staking out here - are you saying it's okay to make a rape joke, as long as it's not around someone who's been recently raped? That certain topics may not be inherently 'sacred' or 'no laughing matter,' but are simply inappropriate in certain contexts? The onus is on you to know whether or not your humor will be appropriate. I won't lay down any law for anyone. I've told that super racist example joke a few times in front of people because I was absolutely sure that no one would take it the wrong way. In hindsight, for myself, I think even that was a mistake. I don't like being a person who perpetuates that kind of humor. Similarly, the "Jew and the apple pie" joke was told to me originally by a good Jewish friend I had in high school, and I laughed too hard, offending him slightly. Looking back on it I don't think I could have changed a thing. Sorry, I find that joke hilariously funny. That's black humor for you. So I'll waffle about instead of answering your question directly. I don't have the right to do so without being hypocritical either way. My experience has only taught me that you need to be sensitive to issues that might sometimes be irrelevant to you, like sexist, racist, or otherwise demeaning jokes.
|
# ? Aug 22, 2011 07:39 |
|
Y'all are making a huge fuss over a post that was sarcastic, just FYI.
|
# ? Aug 22, 2011 19:59 |
|
Yeah, I think my statement has been taken a bit too far. It was just a humorous way of agreeing with ucmallory by making the claim that the joke wasn't racist seem idiotic.Sarion posted:stereotype that implies one group of people are worse than another while also subtly blaming the inferior group for the superior groups woes (terrorism and jobs). This description is pretty much the definition of a racist joke, which was my whole point.
|
# ? Aug 22, 2011 20:45 |
|
Phlag posted:A very conservative friend of mine (who once said that roads and fire fighting should be privatized) got on unemployment after getting let go from his job working for the Republican National Committee. His justification was that he never liked the job, so he wanted to make them suffer by increasing the amount of money they pay for UI. Funny story about privatized firefighters They used to exist, and the whole thing was a huge cluster gently caress. You basically bought insurance from a company that owned a fire station and if your house caught on fire you had to call them. But if they were not available you were hosed, if another company showed up they'd refuse to put out the fire unless you paid them a hefty sum on the spot. Sometimes 2 or more companies would show up to an uninsured home and they would fight over who got to put out the fire while your house burned down. Good Times.
|
# ? Aug 24, 2011 02:28 |
|
When Marcus Crassus is the poster child for your ideals you had better take a good long look at your life.
|
# ? Aug 24, 2011 02:31 |
|
I've heard that there's also the problem with private fire companies starting fires and getting into miniature wars over who gets the rights to put out a valuable fire.
|
# ? Aug 24, 2011 02:33 |
|
vxskud posted:Funny story about privatized firefighters Isn't this kinds sorta the case with EMT's now? semi-private ambulances and all that.
|
# ? Aug 24, 2011 08:01 |
|
vxskud posted:Funny story about privatized firefighters Wasn't that a sub-plot in Gangs of New York as well?
|
# ? Aug 24, 2011 14:35 |
|
And then ofcourse there is the story of Marcus Licinius Crassus, who may well have been the richest man to have ever lived.quote:Crassus also expanded his wealth by trading in slaves and by purchasing whole neighborhoods of Rome as they burned at drastically below market value. At the time, Rome had no formal way of battling fires and they usually were left to burn themselves out, which meant several estates and fortunes were lost in the process. Crassus employed a firefighting brigade of some five hundred men and, after he negotiated the purchase of the burning building and the surrounding estates in danger, the brigade would collapse the home that was ablaze to extinguish the fire before it could spread. The etymology of the word crass comes from his last name. I'm not sure if the word came after him, or if he was named after the word.
|
# ? Aug 24, 2011 14:41 |
|
Just a reminder that there are already places in America where the fire department will let your house burn if you aren't current on your feesquote:A plan for a tax that would cover rural fire protection was rejected, he said, as county officials kept pushing municipalities to opt for subscription plans.
|
# ? Aug 24, 2011 14:45 |
|
I hope this isn't a repeat. I haven't seen this one posted yet.quote:God help us! Scary Obama!
|
# ? Aug 24, 2011 17:23 |
|
You scare me because you're black
|
# ? Aug 24, 2011 17:33 |
|
Oh no! Not wind farms and environmental policies!
|
# ? Aug 24, 2011 17:34 |
|
Haha, CONFIRMED BY SNOPES! [that it was written, not that it is true]
|
# ? Aug 24, 2011 17:36 |
|
JerkyBunion posted:You scare me because you're black It's amazing how many times he can write the same thing over and over again. Sure he changed the wording, but that's the base message there.
|
# ? Aug 24, 2011 17:38 |
|
Ana Lucia Cortez posted:I hope this isn't a repeat. I haven't seen this one posted yet. I like how they say it's 'verified on snopes' as if to imply that the conspiracies and blanket accusations (e.g. his Ivy League education paid for by nefarious elements, him wanting to replace our current mess of a health care system with one run by the government, etc.) are confirmed and true. When actually all it's verifying is that it's correctly attributed to some crazy rightwinger who apparently isn't even important enough to warrant a Wikipedia article (despite being "one of corporate America 's true living legends"). JerkyBunion posted:You scare me because you're black Also this.
|
# ? Aug 24, 2011 17:40 |
|
Ana Lucia Cortez posted:I hope this isn't a repeat. I haven't seen this one posted yet. That's extra hilarious because back in the 90's conservatives were chain-lettered into believing that P&G was run by a Satanist. http://www.snopes.com/business/alliance/procter.asp quote:PLEASE MAKE A DIFFERENCE
|
# ? Aug 24, 2011 17:56 |
|
Yeah, I guess P&G actually might have been run by a Satanist. I always thought that was just a myth, but Snopes confirmed it!
|
# ? Aug 24, 2011 17:58 |
|
Sock on a Fish posted:That's extra hilarious because back in the 90's conservatives were chain-lettered into believing that P&G was run by a Satanist. You beat me to it, but yeah, I found that ironic as hell. Wasn't part of the Satanist conspiracy theory about how the P&G logo was evil etc.?
|
# ? Aug 24, 2011 18:28 |
|
This impression is based on just a lot of informal conversations over the last couple years, but it seems "I just don't know enough about him/her" is emerging as a conservative criticism of last resort. It's not JUST a race code, either, though it's obviously tapping into "otherness" and the plausible deniability of the phrase lends it to race. In this case it's particularly stupid because Pritchett "knows nothing about" Obama and then rattles off the list of things he knows about his motivations and innermost thoughts.
|
# ? Aug 24, 2011 18:53 |
|
quote:THE PRESIDENT* Where's the footnote? I gotta see this
|
# ? Aug 24, 2011 19:20 |
|
quote:You scare me because you falsely believe that you are both
|
# ? Aug 24, 2011 20:15 |
|
Shimrra Jamaane posted:It's dogwhistle for "uppity".
|
# ? Aug 24, 2011 20:58 |
|
pangstrom posted:This impression is based on just a lot of informal conversations over the last couple years, but it seems "I just don't know enough about him/her" is emerging as a conservative criticism of last resort. It's not JUST a race code, either, though it's obviously tapping into "otherness" and the plausible deniability of the phrase lends it to race. Yeah, followed closely by the talking point "nobody vetted him!" which basically denies the protracted Obama/Hillary primary battle where the best they could do was Bill Ayers and his birth certificate. Meanwhile Sarah Palin being chosen out of complete nowhere to tank the McCain ticket was...
|
# ? Aug 24, 2011 21:14 |
|
The "vetting" and "I don't just know about him" stuff is irrelevant now. Dude has been president for a a few years. The whole point of the Ayers type stuff is to suggest that he might actually enact Sharia law and enslave all God fearing Americans and turn over the country to the Marxist Musim cabal, should he become president. That stuff hasn't happened. The only people susceptible to this kind of argument were never going to vote for Obama in any case.
|
# ? Aug 24, 2011 21:22 |
|
A fellow Canadian just posted this. I'm 99% sure it was originally written about America and someone just lazily replaced every instance of the word 'America' with 'Canada.' I mean, this is the first time I've ever even heard someone suggest that Canada is a Christian nation.Some bigot posted:Thinks its sad that we cant celebrate Christmas at school anymore. Now they want to stop playing OUR national anthem at morning assembly, cause it might upset some religious families. THIS IS CANADA...OUR SOLDIERS DIED UNDER OUR FLAG & ANTHEM TO FIGHT FOR OUR WAY OF LIFE! If they are so offended by the way our country was raised please feel free to go back to where u came from! ENOUGH IS ENOUGH! Do people even read this poo poo before sharing it with everyone? It'd be hilarious if it weren't so disgusting.
|
# ? Aug 25, 2011 00:35 |
|
Huge Liability posted:A fellow Canadian just posted this. I'm 99% sure it was originally written about America and someone just lazily replaced every instance of the word 'America' with 'Canada.' I mean, this is the first time I've ever even heard someone suggest that Canada is a Christian nation. Yeah that sounds more like an American post than Canadian. Plus, last I checked it wasn't foreigners asking for prayer to be taken out of school. Not really sure where the anthem thing comes from. I think a lot of times they just pass poo poo around on the assumption that if part of it is true like minded individuals will get all riled up and assume the rest is true. Oh wait, that's exactly what they do.
|
# ? Aug 25, 2011 01:39 |
|
Zwabu posted:The "vetting" and "I don't just know about him" stuff is irrelevant now. Dude has been president for a a few years. The whole point of the Ayers type stuff is to suggest that he might actually enact Sharia law and enslave all God fearing Americans and turn over the country to the Marxist Musim cabal, should he become president. That stuff hasn't happened.
|
# ? Aug 25, 2011 04:46 |
|
Sarion posted:Yeah that sounds more like an American post than Canadian. Plus, last I checked it wasn't foreigners asking for prayer to be taken out of school. Not really sure where the anthem thing comes from. I think a lot of times they just pass poo poo around on the assumption that if part of it is true like minded individuals will get all riled up and assume the rest is true. I'm from Toronto and just a few weeks ago there was pretty big issue with a school that was holding Muslim prayer serviced in the lunchroom during school hours. And it wasn't because of "Grrrrrr Evil Moon Worship Islam Grrrrrr" it was more of a "hold on there bub that's not exactly fair to everyone else either everyone gets to do it or no one does" attitude. Religion in public schools of any sort has been taboo since I was in grade school. Generally keeping religion out of public schools period is the more passionate and popular stance.
|
# ? Aug 25, 2011 05:04 |
|
Whats that email that refutes that the government doesnt provide anything with that anecdotal story? Edit: Nevermind I googled searched it and found it in a archived thread. Kneel Before Zog fucked around with this message at 06:18 on Aug 25, 2011 |
# ? Aug 25, 2011 05:18 |
|
|
# ? May 10, 2024 15:03 |
|
You know, the government gives a lot more leeway to strict Amish and Jewish with a capital J communities than it does to muslims who want to live a traditional way of life. Look up the history of Amish under the draft or anything about Kiryas Joel, NY.
|
# ? Aug 25, 2011 06:05 |