|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_lawn owns however
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2011 08:02
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 09:52 |
|
|
got dat wmd posted:as a tranny anti-adultist... got dat wmd posted:sorry, disabled gay tranny jew it's times like these i wish that those tabloid headlines about hackers being able to kill people through the internet were true
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2011 08:53
|
|
|
CoupleBeersNoBeers posted:luigi get your baseball av back it was less gayer i didn't ask for this
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2011 13:37
|
|
|
lmao, when i read got dat wmd's post expressing approval that the guy nominated "ageism" for deletion i was all, "ageism? that's a real thing, wth" it did not occur to me that wikipedians were actually writing articles about how unfair it is to be sent to school I JUST WNAT TO PLAY THE NEW FINAL FANTASY gently caress YOU DAD
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2011 14:24
|
|
|
Hammerite posted:it did not occur to me that wikipedians were actually writing articles about how unfair it is to be sent to school I JUST WNAT TO PLAY THE NEW FINAL FANTASY gently caress YOU DAD i never knew there were so many 13 year old wikipedia editors
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2011 15:57
|
|
|
Detroit Q. Spider posted:i never knew there were so many 13 year old wikipedia editors tons of kids on there
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2011 16:46
|
|
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocene_calendar let's demonstrate the usage of this calendar by listing some examples of important moments in human history The United States of America declares independence from Britain AD 1776 11776 HE Discovery of the planet Uranus AD 1781 11781 HE French Revolution July 14, AD 1789 11789 HE End of the Belle Époque; First World War AD 1914–18 11914–18 HE Second World War and nuclear fission AD 1939–45 11939–45 HE Discovery of DNA genetic code AD 1953 11953 HE First artificial satellite (Sputnik I) AD 1957 11957 HE Yuri Gagarin becomes The first human in space AD 1961 11961 HE First human landing on the Moon AD 1969 11969 HE Pioneer 10 becomes the first space probe to leave the Solar System AD 1983 11983 HE The creation of Wikipedia, the first open edit encyclopedia AD 2001 12001 HE September 11 Terrorist attacks AD 2001 12001 HE Completion of Human Genome Project AD 2003 12003 HE
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2011 23:21
|
|
|
Lamont Cranston posted:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocene_calendar wikipedia did 9/11
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2011 23:24
|
|
|
mr_jim posted:wikipedia did 109/11
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2011 23:25
|
|
|
19100
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2011 23:29
|
|
|
Lamont Cranston posted:everything on this page is fantastic quote:"Spreading fear in the name of righteousness. Vigilance, Mr. Worf. That is the price we have to continually pay."
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2011 23:35
|
|
|
Lamont Cranston posted:The creation of Wikipedia, the first open edit encyclopedia AD 2001 12001 HE
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2011 00:51
|
|
|
Aleksei Vasiliev posted:in he 12001 wiki was beginning what happen?
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2011 05:16
|
|
|
all your edits are revert by us
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2011 05:18
|
|
|
See also: Ha-Ha
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2011 05:31
|
|
|
i did also see ha-ha
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2011 06:11
|
|
|
got dat wmd posted:that shii guy did nominate the ageism article for deletion so that's a +1 i think shii might be trolling
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2011 06:57
|
|
|
Isn't shii the pedophile who got permabanned for posting underage porn in adtrw
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2011 07:04
|
|
|
what is this posted:Isn't shii the pedophile who got permabanned for posting underage porn in adtrw i don't know if he was posting it or just making "ironic" comments about how sexy it was, but yes edit: http://forums.somethingawful.com/dictionary.php?act=3&topicid=1413 http://forums.somethingawful.com/banlist.php?adminid=&actfilt=9&ban_month=4&ban_year=2005#list that awful man fucked around with this message at 07:33 on Aug 24, 2011 |
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2011 07:12
|
|
|
Coffee Quack posted:19100 my totally sweet tiberian sun forum did this on every post made early 2000
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2011 20:38
|
|
|
even if shii wasn't into anime kiddie porn he should have been banned for being so hopelessly creepy yet terribly boring at the same time kirtaner/marshallbanana too
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2011 23:24
|
|
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/300-page_iPhone_bill
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2011 10:12
|
|
|
whoa check out those references
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2011 11:03
|
|
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kiss features this voyeuristic photo of two teenagers kissing, complete with leaves from the tree the photographer was hiding behind. checking out  the original photo uploaded reveals 1) even more tree leaves making it creepier, and 2) the girl is topless and her nipple is visiblebut hey, at least its not encumbered by restrictive copyrights  meanwhile over on the talk page they have bigger problems to address quote:Being a classic-cartoon watcher, it seems to me there's something missing from the article, and that is the "Insulting kiss" which Bugs Bunny used to plant on Elmer Fudd all the time. That's a bit of antiquity, but WB didn't make it up: They got it from a Charlie Chaplin movie. So I have to figure it was already old even when Chaplin did it. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 00:19, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2011 20:05
|
|
). Without going too deeply into semiotics, I'd suggest that Bug's "Insulting Kiss" would be a useful addition, to counter the overly-functionalist tone of the rest of the article. The only problem with this that I can see is finding an appropriate image without running into copyright problems. AndyTheGrump (talk) 13:40, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Aleksei Vasiliev posted:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/300-page_iPhone_bill poo poo i had one of those, only about 60 pages though. i coulda become a viral media star
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2011 20:10
|
|
|
Dixie Cretin Seaman posted:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kiss features this voyeuristic photo of two teenagers kissing, complete with leaves from the tree the photographer was hiding behind. checking out http://ms.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paparan_awam_kasih_sayang
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2011 20:18
|
|
|
Di kelab malam, ia adalah perkara biasa bagi lelaki dan wanita "mengisar" (satu bentuk tarian) atau menari rapat seperti yang ditunjukkan dalam wayang Dirty Dancing.
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2011 20:38
|
|
|
Dixie Cretin Seaman posted:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kiss features this voyeuristic photo of two teenagers kissing, complete with leaves from the tree the photographer was hiding behind. checking out why hasn't anyone gone over and argued for the original picture because wikipedia is not censored
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2011 06:29
|
|
|
Lamont Cranston posted:why hasn't anyone gone over and argued for the original picture because wikipedia is not censored from Talk:Vulva Pre-Puberty Vulva? I may be unaware of what exactly is defined as child pornography, but assuming the person pictured isnt someone who didnt hit puberty until they were 18... isnt this child porn? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.20.160.17 (talk) 02:17, 14 March 2011 (UTC) The use of this image struck me as odd and somewhat suspect as well. It was uploaded recently, and the uploader is apparently Italian. He has had a conversation in user talk pages with someone else about it that I translated in Google Translate, and I can't draw a conclusion of the age of the person depicted, but breach of child pornography laws were drawn into question. I think this image should probably be deleted or at least removed from any pages it is used in, and the uploader should be contacted by a moderator. -- Ifrit (Talk) 00:42, 17 March 2011 (UTC) "Wikipedia is not censored" inDEED. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.73.70.113 (talk) 01:46, 9 April 2011 (UTC) I have no idea what picture you are talking about, but I would like to point out that nudity and pornography are very different things. Nudity is not a requirement for child pornography and not all pictures of nude children constitute child pornography. One could easily see photos of nude children (along with their parents etc.) on nudist sites, and these sites are the first to point out that they are protected even by american laws. The first commenter sounds like a YouTube commenter that sees breastfeeding videos on YouTube and calls it child abuse, since he sees breasts as sexual objects. I don't know if is should be included or not, but fear that it might be pornography isn't a valid reason. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.112.45.87 (talk) 11:43, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2011 19:27
|
|
|
hooooooooooolllllly shiiiiiitttt
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2011 19:28
|
|
|
pretend I made a gif of a giant  barfing smaller s
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2011 19:33
|
|
|
haveblue posted:pretend I made a gif of a giant oh come now, are you really surprised?
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2011 19:43
|
|
|
from Talk:Vulva
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2011 21:00
|
|
|
duTrieux posted:hooooooooooolllllly shiiiiiitttt
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2011 02:08
|
|
|
Wikipedia. The place for pre pubescent vulva talk.
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2011 02:18
|
|
|
Detroit Q. Spider posted:oh come now, are you really surprised? seriously, the only surprise was that it took me two tries to find something like that. here have another one Talk:Puberty Images/diagrams honestly i think there are tons of images that could be added than that one picture, maybe a diagram of those sex ed books or a hot teen, maybe a bit jailbaitish? 200.83.92.102 19:11, 1 May 2007 (UTC) is a real picture of an adolescent boy and girl out of the question? a real picture would pretty much sum up the whole article. remember child porn has to have he person performing a sexual act or have the picture focusing on the genitals or breasts. OR you could just get two pictures - Drawn out diagrams, one depicting the male puberty and the other one the female puberty. These diagrams usually show about five drawings, each of a step in puberty. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.200.150.137 (talk) 16:44, 8 October 2007 (UTC) Dude, where are you going to get a girl of age around 12-14 to show her breasts to wikipedia, and a boy of 14 to show his penis to the world, Im 14 and I wouldn't do that, so why would other people do taht
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2011 03:58
|
|
|
eeeeeeeeeww
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2011 04:01
|
|
|
wikipedophilia
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2011 04:09
|
|
|
guys it is ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY to have pictures of underage genitalia on our site how else will people know what we're on about????
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2011 04:42
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 09:52 |
|
|
Detroit Q. Spider posted:guys it is ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY to have pictures of underage genitalia on our site how else will people know what we're on about???? suppose a 10 year old girl visits wikipedia and only sees photos of sexually-mature vulvas. naturally she will wonder why hers looks different. it could give her a body image complex for the rest of her life. now in the name of protecting children wikipedia has caused major psychological harm to a child!
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2011 05:23
|
|