|
Detroit Q. Spider posted:to your average wiki editor, yes So you're working out and getting buff so you are strong to do what? "Getting women" as if they are objects to do what? gently caress them and forget about it? Some life. "Getting women" improves your social status amongst those who hi-five people for being "playa"s. Who gives a drat about being more social amongst those vapid wastes of food and employment? Video games are a great way to have fun, and enjoy things that are availible to you in life. Not only this, but the making of a game is an art form - by playing through, say, an RPG, you are treated to a grand story that is just overwhelmingly more fufilling than going out, loving some chick, hi-fiving yourself and calling it a night. Preceding unsigned comment added by 127.0.0.1 (discuss) 05:59, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
|
# ? Oct 11, 2011 22:45 |
|
|
# ? May 10, 2024 09:13 |
|
is there any wiki significance of the ip being 127.0.0.1 like maybe it was jimmy wales or something, or one of the sysadmins or something
|
# ? Oct 11, 2011 23:08 |
|
could just be his username
|
# ? Oct 11, 2011 23:16 |
|
not gonna lie i'd add a comment in every japan article saying "this is bigger than anime in japan" just to tweak wikinerds
|
# ? Oct 11, 2011 23:18 |
|
Lutha Mahtin posted:not gonna lie i'd add a comment in every japan article saying "this is bigger than anime in japan" just to tweak wikinerds ugh, there will be some inexplicable backlash that involves making pictures crappier or having giant ?'s just floating around pages or somethign
|
# ? Oct 11, 2011 23:25 |
|
CoupleBeersNoBeers posted:is there any wiki significance of the ip being 127.0.0.1 no i threw that together using that old quote and the default unsigned comment thing there are probably lots of wikipedia editors who feel that way though
|
# ? Oct 12, 2011 01:00 |
|
a few years back there was some shithead state republican who got himself arrested. i replaced his wiki photo with the mugshot and argued that, being the most recent officially-released government photo of an elected official, the mugshot was valid. people immediately took up the cause and were fighting over it for at least the month i bothered keeping tabs. i hope you enjoyed the above story about wikipedia.
|
# ? Oct 12, 2011 03:42 |
|
Pakled posted:So you're working out and getting buff so you are strong to do what?
|
# ? Oct 12, 2011 03:47 |
|
We've traced the preceding comment... It's coming from inside the wiki. Now an arbitration committee member is coming over right now, just get out of the wiki!!
|
# ? Oct 12, 2011 03:49 |
|
duTrieux posted:a few years back there was some shithead state republican who got himself arrested. i replaced his wiki photo with the mugshot and argued that, being the most recent officially-released government photo of an elected official, the mugshot was valid. people immediately took up the cause and were fighting over it for at least the month i bothered keeping tabs. i did, ty.
|
# ? Oct 12, 2011 03:53 |
mr_jim posted:i did, ty.
|
|
# ? Oct 12, 2011 03:53 |
|
duTrieux posted:a few years back there was some shithead state republican who got himself arrested. i replaced his wiki photo with the mugshot and argued that, being the most recent officially-released government photo of an elected official, the mugshot was valid. people immediately took up the cause and were fighting over it for at least the month i bothered keeping tabs. lol thats p good
|
# ? Oct 12, 2011 03:59 |
|
duTrieux posted:a few years back there was some shithead state republican who got himself arrested. i replaced his wiki photo with the mugshot and argued that, being the most recent officially-released government photo of an elected official, the mugshot was valid. people immediately took up the cause and were fighting over it for at least the month i bothered keeping tabs. was anyone else arguing in favor? what's the pic now?
|
# ? Oct 12, 2011 05:08 |
|
i spent about a half-hour reverting changes and pushing the "official state photo" claim while watching my stories on the teevee. everything after that was self-sustaining; this was during the run-up to the last election. as for the current state of the page, i don't actually know. the guy isn't even from my state and the only thing i do remember is that he had a very punchable face.
|
# ? Oct 12, 2011 05:30 |
|
i actually had that post typed up a few days ago, but decided to wait a bit and see if i could remember the details. SPOILER ALERT i couldn't.
|
# ? Oct 12, 2011 05:34 |
|
lol @ sitting on posts for DAYS
|
# ? Oct 12, 2011 05:43 |
|
in notepad
Note: Since you are not the owner of this rights-managed post, you can
|
# ? Oct 12, 2011 05:44 |
|
yospost_incubator.txt
|
# ? Oct 12, 2011 06:37 |
|
duTrieux posted:in notepad see lurkers, this is how you become pro-tier
|
# ? Oct 12, 2011 06:56 |
|
"oval office"
|
# ? Oct 12, 2011 10:37 |
|
look at dat fukken frames
|
# ? Oct 12, 2011 10:52 |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Something_Awful#4chan good god lookit dem words they are discussing the change of a single sentence
|
# ? Oct 12, 2011 10:59 |
|
motherfucking tryptofish find who he is and permaban him in whatever way results in his entire post history being replaced with [citation needed]
|
# ? Oct 12, 2011 11:46 |
|
fork bomb posted:lol @ sitting on posts for DAYS
|
# ? Oct 12, 2011 12:23 |
|
duTrieux posted:i actually had that post typed up a few days ago, but decided to wait a bit and see if i could remember the details. Did you have the "i hope you enjoyed the above story about wikipedia." typed out in notepad too or was that off the cuff
|
# ? Oct 12, 2011 12:24 |
|
Nevergirls posted:Did you have the "i hope you enjoyed the above story about wikipedia." typed out in notepad too or was that off the cuff lol
|
# ? Oct 12, 2011 12:56 |
|
AtomD posted:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Something_Awful#4chan how dare these so-called wikipedians tarnish my precious 4chan
|
# ? Oct 12, 2011 13:04 |
|
Wheany posted:see lurkers, this is how you become pro-tier yeah i can't count how many times i've sat on a post that says "dicks lol" for more than a week just to make sure it captures all the nuances of my argument
|
# ? Oct 12, 2011 13:47 |
|
AtomD posted:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Something_Awful#4chan what's the stance on non-public cites on wikipedia, if they allow that someone could just link to the archived 4chan thread
|
# ? Oct 12, 2011 14:22 |
|
Trig Discipline posted:yeah i can't count how many times i've sat on a post that says "dicks lol" for more than a week just to make sure it captures all the nuances of my argument i also can't count the number of times ive sat on dicks.
|
# ? Oct 12, 2011 15:21 |
|
you gotta live in the moment, post in the moment. leave nothing to tomorrow
|
# ? Oct 12, 2011 15:22 |
|
I type out my posts in word then do spellcheck/grammar check and rewrite until the fleich-kinkaid level gets to 12th grade. can't have dumb 99 percenters understanding my poo poo.
|
# ? Oct 12, 2011 15:27 |
|
Nevergirls posted:I type out my posts in word then do spellcheck/grammar check and rewrite until the fleich-kinkaid level gets to 12th grade. can't have dumb 99 percenters understanding my poo poo. Note: Since you are not the owner of this rights-managed post, you can
|
# ? Oct 12, 2011 15:49 |
|
idgi
|
# ? Oct 12, 2011 15:53 |
|
average reading age in america is =< 12th grade nevergirls is saying he is one of the top 1% earners (ref to the we are 99%) and does not want other people to read his posts so he writes them in a style above 12th grade and then i explain all this and become captain killjoy
|
# ? Oct 12, 2011 15:58 |
|
MORE CURLY FRIES posted:average reading age in america is =< 12th grade never explain things that can be explained by google
|
# ? Oct 12, 2011 17:19 |
|
Pakled posted:never explain things that can be explained by google
|
# ? Oct 12, 2011 17:21 |
|
Pakled posted:never explain things that can be explained by wolfram alpha
|
# ? Oct 12, 2011 23:39 |
|
mr_jim posted:
|
# ? Oct 13, 2011 06:21 |
|
|
# ? May 10, 2024 09:13 |
|
|
# ? Oct 13, 2011 06:33 |