|
wa27 posted:I thought "Cod four" was a pretty acceptable way of shortening that title.
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2011 21:48
|
|
If I was asking for it in a store I would say the whole title, but still...
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 22:51 |
|
|
I feel naked without my watch, its my only accessory that I always wear; hell I still use it to check the time.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2011 21:52
|
|
|
So Kotaku just confirmed GTA V to take place in Los Angeles/Los Santos. And it will apparently have multiple main characters.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2011 21:54
|
|
|
My older brother got me this nice pocketwatch as a groomsmen present but I have used it all of 3 times because phones etc. Maybe if I had a suit or something... Speaking of suits give me Deider Sach's back I want my suits damnit
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2011 21:55
|
|
|
Funholy posted:So Kotaku just confirmed GTA V to take place in Los Angeles/Los Santos. That sounds drat good, but the bolded part makes me suspicious of the truth behind it.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2011 21:56
|
|
|
Funholy posted:So Kotaku just confirmed GTA V to take place in Los Angeles/Los Santos. Exclusively? Because I'm just hoping we'll get another huge sandbox ala San Andreas with the same kind of design focus on fun. EDIT: Also: I don't see planes working in a one-city world and I want my loving planes back 
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2011 21:58
|
|
|
Arguing about the location of future GTA games is literally the only thing in my life that hasn't changed in the last ten years.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2011 21:59
|
|
|
Holy Cow posted:Really, really hope this game is set in London. I have a feeling it'll be Vice City, but I can hope. A Vice City made in the style of GTA IV would be beautiful. Especially if they set it in the 1980s. Zedd posted:That sounds drat good, but the bolded part makes me suspicious of the truth behind it. Yeah, Kotaku are mostly shitbirds. Still, a new Los Santos game would be great, even though Vice City would be more of a iconic setting.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2011 22:00
|
|
|
Iacen posted:I worked for a spell at GAME. I had customers coming in and asking for GTA Ih Vee. On the flipside I remember going into a GAME asking for Call of Duty 5 and getting a discourse on how there is no Call of Duty 5, the intracicies behind multiple studios developing the series simultaneously, and the politics between them. I wish I could say I had the balls to just say "So you don't sell Call of Duty 5?" and then walked out but I was getting it for someone else.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2011 22:00
|
|
|
Joda posted:Exclusively? Because I'm just hoping we'll get another huge sandbox ala San Andreas with the same kind of design focus on fun. Doing SA like it was in the 3-era with IV's level of detail would make it way to big to design though. If they just do extended Los Santos (little bit of countryside?) I would be happy.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2011 22:00
|
|
|
Speaking of phones, I hope you can do internet poo poo on your phone in this one. Going to the internet cafe every time you have to send an email is a pain. Also, I'm still holding out hope for a 1970s blaxploitation GTA. Someday...
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2011 22:01
|
|
|
moms pubis posted:Speaking of phones, I hope you can do internet poo poo on your phone in this one. Going to the internet cafe every time you have to send an email is a pain. Better yet: Either flesh the internet stuff out properly or just get rid of it entirely. All it really was and felt like in GTA IV was a device to drive a few story elements forward and to get random car theft jobs. Joda fucked around with this message at 22:06 on Oct 25, 2011 |
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2011 22:04
|
|
|
Multiple main characters? Intriguing. A little disappointing that it's in a city we've been already. OH well, Los Santos was a decent spot for GTA. edit: I have the same sentiment with the email. It was annoying to keep driving to a twat center and there wasn't many. It made the car jacking feel tedious.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2011 22:10
|
|
|
Funholy posted:So Kotaku just confirmed GTA V to take place in Los Angeles/Los Santos. You know after the EFLC I have no problem with just dividing the story mode up into several characters. I care a lot more about the gameplay than having to grow to care about one specific character. And part of me hopes they DON'T get the facial recognition tech from la noire just because it supposedly ate up a ton of data and while graphically impressive, the only thing it added to the gameplay was having to try to guess when people were lying which I didn't find entertaining at all. Also please set it in the late 90's so that people can have cel phones but most people don't care about the internet yet.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2011 22:12
|
|
|
I would take it with a grain of salt. Since when has Kotaku ever known what they were talking about?
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2011 22:16
|
|
|
Shindragon posted:Multiple main characters? The lack of everything in IV was annoying. Why on earth did they think it would be a good idea to make you spend seven minutes driving to a gunshop to get body armor between each mission and that was on top of the scarcity of safe-houses and other essential services.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2011 22:22
|
|
|
the truth posted:Your argument doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Then why don't they write grand, theft, and auto
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2011 22:25
|
|
|
Coolodile posted:I would take it with a grain of salt. Since when has Kotaku ever known what they were talking about? When they're jacking off to some Japanese poo poo. FreakyZoid posted:Er, have you seen the logo on their website? Yes, but they shouldn't cater to people who don't have the mental capacity for roman numerals. Those people probably aren't old enough to buy the game on their own, anyway. the truth fucked around with this message at 22:32 on Oct 25, 2011 |
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2011 22:25
|
|
|
Cliff Racer posted:The lack of everything in IV was annoying. Why on earth did they think it would be a good idea to make you spend seven minutes driving to a gunshop to get body armor between each mission and that was on top of the scarcity of safe-houses and other essential services. There's a lot of body armor pickups around town, you don't have to go to a shop. Also one thing I really liked in 4 and the episodes was the way you could call a weapons dealer and have them meet you nearby, or in the episodes your buddy would bring you a car or a motorcycle. Definitely a feature that should stay. Some of the other stuff like darts and bowling I could give a gently caress about. The drunk simulator was nice. I kind of knew the game had problems when I started it up, went down to the nearby amusement park and it's all closed. Niko didn't have any kooky outfits either, that's lame. Making CJ look ridiculous is one of the most enduring gameplay elements in SA. Wabbit fucked around with this message at 22:36 on Oct 25, 2011 |
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2011 22:34
|
|
|
^ I wanted to ride that coaster so bad  Give me my silly codes back Rockstar. I want my 10x jump, flying cars, riots etc back. And please if you have bicycles let me have the mega bunny hope code. There was nothing more fun in SA than first person 300ft+ bunny hops around the world. e: I play these game at my friends house and my computer could never run these so I will never get to use the fun wacky loopy trainers 
verbal enema fucked around with this message at 22:43 on Oct 25, 2011 |
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2011 22:38
|
|
|
The biggest sin in vanilla 4 was the total lack of randomly generated missions/fights in the end game. The expansions dealt with this but then there were a few features that got cordoned off to each expansion/vanilla that you couldn't have fun with on them. And then on top of that the random fights in TLATD were invariably "dudes are standing around in this area, shoot them". It just feels so horrible because the entire game lends itself sooooo well to those "procedural" style moments and the only way you really get to enjoy them is screwing with the police.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2011 22:43
|
|
|
I'm incredibly dubious of the veracity of anything Kotaku says, even if it is from a "source close to the developers", which is like the equivalent of "my uncle works at Nintendo". But I do hope it's at least partially true, because I've been really crossing my fingers for a revisit to San Andreas.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2011 22:48
|
|
|
I want to see something bright and sunny, like San Fransisco or Vice City. Also, the 70's would be pretty cool.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2011 22:52
|
|
|
Wabbit posted:your buddy would bring you a car or a motorcycle. Or you can just call 9-1-1 for an ambulance and steal it.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2011 22:55
|
|
|
Coolodile posted:I would take it with a grain of salt. Since when has Kotaku ever known what they were talking about? Remember when IGN confirmed the 3rd PS2 one as being called "GTA: Sin City" because Amazon UK put up a preorder page for it? 
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2011 23:01
|
|
|
Come ooooon 1960s period piece.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2011 23:01
|
|
|
Iacen posted:I worked for a spell at GAME. I had customers coming in and asking for GTA Ih Vee. Yeah, I heard the same story of someone else saying that as well (maybe that was you I dunno)!
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2011 23:07
|
|
|
I would poo poo my pants if it turns out to be an extended Los Santos. That first section of San Andreas is by far the most memorable part of the series for me.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2011 23:15
|
|
|
the Bunt posted:I would poo poo my pants if it turns out to be an extended Los Santos. That first section of San Andreas is by far the most memorable part of the series for me. You sully the fine name of James Woods, sir.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2011 23:17
|
|
|
the Bunt posted:I would poo poo my pants if it turns out to be an extended Los Santos. That first section of San Andreas is by far the most memorable part of the series for me. LA in real life has an awful lot of variety in geography in it, I'm totally agreed.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2011 23:29
|
|
|
I really think this is going to involve gangs based on that logo, which does kind of assume it's going to somehow involve Los Santos. Sounds good to me, but I agree that they need to make the game look less bleak this time around.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2011 23:48
|
|
|
I really want a Santos in the '80s, but all the numbered GTAs are contemporary, so. Also, I don't really give a gently caress about LA in real life, so they can model it however they want, just so long as there's room for excursions to Fiero/Venturas/the countryside (like character-specific outings or something).
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2011 23:57
|
|
|
SaviourX posted:I really want a Santos in the '80s, but all the numbered GTAs are contemporary, so. GTA2 was in the future, wasn't it? edit: Wikipedia says maybe... edit2: Just checked my manual and it says "three weeks into the future", so I guess it is contemporary. wa27 fucked around with this message at 00:08 on Oct 26, 2011 |
|
#
?
Oct 26, 2011 00:05
|
|
|
for my inaugural ridiculous demand for GTAV I hereby put forward a wild-eyed foam-mouthed demand for inclusion of a copy the Wild Card Gym, home of Manny Pacquiao and Freddie Roach.
|
|
#
?
Oct 26, 2011 00:10
|
|
|
SaviourX posted:I really want a Santos in the '80s, but all the numbered GTAs are contemporary, so. Better include Grove Street. I'm GS for lyfe buster.
|
|
#
?
Oct 26, 2011 00:13
|
|
|
I just want to do missions for the Real Housewives of Beverly Hills.
|
|
#
?
Oct 26, 2011 00:14
|
|
|
I wonder how much SR2's success and SR3's buzz influence GTA5. Somewhere else I read about it being set in Hollywood, and the character sheets a few months ago had loony descriptions. Maybe it'll be a Beverly Hills Cop like setting.
|
|
#
?
Oct 26, 2011 00:24
|
|
|
I don't care where the game is set as long as it feels like the character progresses in their bad-assery. Vice City is the only game in the series to feel like you actually became a crime boss, or even moved up in general. Niko was a cry-baby, CJ had millions of dollars and a loving airport and jets but still couldn't stop hanging out in the ghetto. Let me enjoy my mansion, please. Oh, and don't let my protagonist cry about shooting certain people, he/she is going to put down thousands of people violently, it's really stupid to have him/her crying and whining.
|
|
#
?
Oct 26, 2011 00:33
|
|
|
I hope it's just not only LA. SA had a pretty big country-side and a variety of landscapes and it was neat driving through all the podunk towns, seeing farms/hills/mountains etc. Not sure if that could be supported with the current engine but I just hope GTA5 isn't just city-based.
|
|
#
?
Oct 26, 2011 00:33
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 22:51 |
|
|
Insane GTA speculation is my favourite speculation  It only just beats out the inevitable posts of "I'd love to see a GTA set in my hometown of Podunk, Michigan because"
|
|
#
?
Oct 26, 2011 00:39
|
|
