|
Orgophlax posted:But there's nothing to do in the city. If there's nothing to do in IV's Liberty City, the cities in all the previous games have negative amount of stuff to do.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2011 20:46 |
|
|
# ? May 31, 2024 11:38 |
|
Dan Hollis posted:Hopefully this game has more sex. You can show me murdering a hooker but not banging one? I'm curious, does the Saints Row series take this same puritanical approach to sex? They can't show explicit stuff while maintaining an M rating, blame the ESRB and seemingly illogical American standards
|
# ? Nov 2, 2011 20:48 |
|
Dan Hollis posted:Hopefully this game has more sex. You can show me murdering a hooker but not banging one? I'm curious, does the Saints Row series take this same puritanical approach to sex?
|
# ? Nov 2, 2011 20:50 |
|
As long as they DRASTICALLY reduce the number of pre-determined chases, I'll be happy. Nothing was more annoying than chasing a target and knowing you won't catch him until a triggered event occurred was such poo poo, particularly if you failed it and had to repeat that same sequence again..
|
# ? Nov 2, 2011 20:50 |
|
coldplay chiptunes posted:Why is something like this important to you in a video game? Do you not understand why they'd shy away from depicting actual intercourse? I remember back when San Andreas came out, Official Playstation Magazine had a big feature on what readers thought should be in it. Alongside popular suggestions like "kill pets" and "kill children", I remember it prominently including "more sex", and "porn channels on virtual TV". Mercifully Rockstar don't listen to 13-year-olds who aren't even old enough to legally buy their games.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2011 20:54 |
|
Orgophlax posted:But there's nothing to do in the city. Yup, and I'm saying even if there was even less to do I'd still be popping it in every month or so and driving around. Sorry. I agree with everyone saying the big complaint was not enough to do, especially after the missions end in vanilla 4. I'm just saying what's there still blows away just about every other game I own.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2011 20:54 |
|
coldplay chiptunes posted:Why is something like this important to you in a video game? Do you not understand why they'd shy away from depicting actual intercourse? Well, obviously for the ratings reason mentioned above. I just don't understand it. I love sex and would get a real kick from watching my guy nail a hooker before driving her off a cliff.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2011 20:54 |
|
Dan Hollis posted:Hopefully this game has more sex. You can show me murdering a hooker but not banging one? I'm curious, does the Saints Row series take this same puritanical approach to sex? Saints Row doesn't show anything either. Which makes me wonder how God of War can show boobs but GTA never has?
|
# ? Nov 2, 2011 20:55 |
|
I cannot wait to run around a Los Angeles facsimile
|
# ? Nov 2, 2011 20:56 |
|
Dan Hollis posted:Well, obviously for the ratings reason mentioned above. I just don't understand it. I love sex and would get a real kick from watching my guy nail a hooker before driving her off a cliff.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2011 20:56 |
|
Install Gentoo posted:If there's nothing to do in IV's Liberty City, the cities in all the previous games have negative amount of stuff to do. You can't possibly say this when IV didn't even have planes or bipedal vehicles. And the previous games, well, did.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2011 20:56 |
|
SheepNameKiller posted:Eh, the Gay Tony DLC is about where I think Rockstar should be as far as seriousness is concerned. The missions in that were varied and kind of over the top which made them awesome to play, the characters were likeable and it was still serious enough for you to care about what happened to them. Actually, I agree that Gay Tony is about the right tone. That game had some awesome action scenes, I just don't think it needs to go too far over the top. I don't really think there's any problem matching the seriousness of GTAIV with some of the more action-y moments of Gay Tony (like stealing the train car or (last mission spoilers) being escorted down the highway by Yusuf in his attack chopper. I just don't want to see them go back to GTA:SA with some of the James Woods missions and the jetpack and the other more insane parts of that game. Leave that poo poo to Saints Row.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2011 20:56 |
|
Dan Hollis posted:Well, obviously for the ratings reason mentioned above. I just don't understand it. I love sex and would get a real kick from watching my guy nail a hooker before driving her off a cliff. I mean you can't drive them off a cliff right after though because they get out of the car first.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2011 20:57 |
|
Knightmare posted:Saints Row doesn't show anything either. Which makes me wonder how God of War can show boobs but GTA never has?
|
# ? Nov 2, 2011 20:58 |
|
Knightmare posted:Saints Row doesn't show anything either. Which makes me wonder how God of War can show boobs but GTA never has? They can, just probably don't want the fuss associated with it. Although Red dead redemption had uncensored boobs at least once, as did LA Noire. And The lost and dammed had fully exposed in it, so who knows?
|
# ? Nov 2, 2011 20:58 |
|
wa27 posted:You can have sex with hookers in every GTA game since GTA3... The bouncing car thing?
|
# ? Nov 2, 2011 20:59 |
|
My hope is that this first trailer is highlighting one area of the game, and then we will get further trailers highlighting other areas. But that's just because I'd basically like this to be an exact copy of San Andreas with new toys and better graphics.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2011 21:01 |
|
If there is roaming animals I'm sorry I'm an rear end in a top hat whatever I smashing every dog with my grill. Blasting wolves in the face with a modded fireball in Oblivion owned so I'm sure blasting a dog in the face with the grill of my sportscar and having it fly into a fat guys face and knock him down/off a bridge/ mountain will own too.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2011 21:02 |
|
Spalec posted:They can, just probably don't want the fuss associated with it. Pretty sure RDR had a guy loving a girl like right on screen while Marston was getting a mission intro. It didn't really add much but it was there.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2011 21:03 |
|
Dan Hollis posted:The bouncing car thing?
|
# ? Nov 2, 2011 21:03 |
|
Come on, don't kill dogs. I hope I can have a dog in this game that will jump in the car with me, and he loves going for drives so much that he gets really excited when you go near the car.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2011 21:05 |
|
Tumble posted:Come on, don't kill dogs. Make the dogs like the horse in RDR. With different breeds and such.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2011 21:08 |
|
Dan Hollis posted:Tumble posted:Come on, don't kill dogs.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2011 21:09 |
|
I hope the dog can drive so that I can ride shotgun.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2011 21:11 |
|
Tumble posted:Come on, don't kill dogs. We need a playing Frisbee minigame.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2011 21:12 |
|
csidle posted:This is the greatest .gif I have seen this week. What is it from? I think it's Half Baked. And yeah, I totally thought that guy in the wifebeater was CJ at first. Is it really true that Rockstar said they were finished with the GTA3 era world/characters? That's a shame. IV was such a bore.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2011 21:12 |
|
Spalec posted:We need a playing Frisbee minigame. Peter Molyneux is kicking himself that he didn't think of this.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2011 21:13 |
|
Evil Badman posted:Make the dogs like the horse in RDR. With different breeds and such. The problem with this is...you can ride a horse. You can't ride a dog unless you're a toddler.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2011 21:13 |
|
the Bunt posted:I think it's Half Baked. They said the 3 continuity was done. There's no word yet on if this new game is going to be in the same universe as 4 yet.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2011 21:15 |
|
LOSS posted:I hope the dog can drive so that I can ride shotgun. I hope anyone else can drive in this. I loved calling the Wheelwoman in Saint's Row to drive me around while I hanged out the car with hundreds of guns and my http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ljtZJ9g5zo&list=FLAnDWwWK3ZvxS4vrFJ8j36A&index=76&feature=plpp_video
|
# ? Nov 2, 2011 21:15 |
|
the Bunt posted:You can't possibly say this when IV didn't even have planes or bipedal vehicles. And the previous games, well, did. There were no vehicles with legs in GTA games, let alone vehicles with two legs. Oh no, no planes that are annoying to control that would only be able to be flown for 5 minutes before you left the map? You still have helicopters. Remember, Liberty City is a city not a San Andreas-type "state". You didn't have anything but the Dodo in III and the Dodo with pontoons in VC as far as planes go. Helicopters are way better for the scale. Not to mention that buildings in IV are actually solid at the top and you can actually do things on them instead of glance up at them. Not to mention that you can actually go inside way more places in IV and you don't need to wait for loading times. And all those places to take dates and friends are actual things to do that are way more interesting than CJ's virtual gym minigames. I do not miss cities of bland textured blocks that most of the time don't exist to do anything other than block land travel in a certain direction. I don't know why you people think those cities were better rather than one where things actually happen.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2011 21:16 |
|
Dan Hollis posted:Well, obviously for the ratings reason mentioned above. I just don't understand it. I love sex and would get a real kick from watching my guy nail a hooker before driving her off a cliff. Watching awkward hooker sex is precisely the last thing I want to do when playing GTA.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2011 21:16 |
The graphics, good god the graphics. So drat bright and pretty.
|
|
# ? Nov 2, 2011 21:19 |
|
Himuro posted:The problem with this is...you can ride a horse. You can't ride a dog unless you're a toddler.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2011 21:19 |
|
Himuro posted:The problem with this is...you can ride a horse. You can't ride a dog unless you're a toddler. And they are complete and total assholes when you're not on them.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2011 21:20 |
|
Install Gentoo posted:I do not miss cities of bland textured blocks that most of the time don't exist to do anything other than block land travel in a certain direction. I don't know why you people think those cities were better rather than one where things actually happen. Yeah, people who think GTAIV has nothing to do in the city should try LA Noire.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2011 21:21 |
|
Install Gentoo posted:There were no vehicles with legs in GTA games, let alone vehicles with two legs. Oh no, no planes that are annoying to control that would only be able to be flown for 5 minutes before you left the map? You still have helicopters. Remember, Liberty City is a city not a San Andreas-type "state". You didn't have anything but the Dodo in III and the Dodo with pontoons in VC as far as planes go. Helicopters are way better for the scale. Date minigames were in San Andreas. They didn't make them any more fun in IV, and there are less of them there to boot. I'm not sure what you are talking about with "at least buildings in IV are solid at the top", because they all are in the older games. I might be wrong about 3, actually, but in VC and San Andreas I never came across a building I couldn't stand on top of.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2011 21:21 |
|
Dr. Video Games 0031 posted:Watching awkward hooker sex is precisely the last thing I want to do when playing GTA. I think we've actually found the only person who enjoyed the awful lapdance scene that you had to suffer through five minutes of to buy the strip club in Vice City.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2011 21:23 |
|
the Bunt posted:Date minigames were in San Andreas. They didn't make them any more fun in IV, and there are less of them there to boot. I don't recall any girlfriends in GTA4 who got off on drive-by shootings.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2011 21:25 |
|
|
# ? May 31, 2024 11:38 |
|
Considering how entertaining it was to push people down stairs in GTAIV, I just realized that it might very well be possible to push people down a mountain and watch the Euphoria glory unfold in GTAV.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2011 21:26 |