|
It's Friday!
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2011 09:48
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 9, 2024 15:25 |
|
|
Honestly don't know any of them for sure this week, but I'll have a guess anyway 1. Drop ball by the touchline? 2. Stop play. The assistant's wellbeing is the most important thing. Restart with drop ball. 3. Should be fine.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2011 09:52
|
|
|
I agree with all 3 of those. So you're clearly wrong.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2011 10:35
|
|
|
I want to know two things; who squashed Adebayor's head in a vice, and did Pissflaps send in question 3? Cos it looks more than a little like "what if a Sikh player caught it in his turban".
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2011 13:23
|
|
|
1. I would do a drop ball. 2. Wait for the striker to blaze it over the crossbar, then stop play. 3. No way that goal stands.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2011 15:07
|
|
|
1. Drop ball 2. After play ends you stop play 3. Goal cant stand because he trapped the ball on a part of his body. Same as kicking the ball up and catching it on your shirt I would assume.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2011 15:45
|
|
|
1) Drop ball 2) A bit lovely but stop play and drop ball, can't continue when your assistant might have been shot or something. 3) There was that guy in a Brasil who could do that without the afro, just chip it up, balance it and run. I think they made that illegal. But this one? I'd say gently caress it, count the goal, its not like he is taking advantage, if he didn't have the afro I imagine he'd just have headed it in anyway.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2011 15:54
|
|
|
I think that goal in 3 should count, hair is part of your body (that isn't your hands/arms), it's not the same as a shirt. If he was bald or had short hair, had it balanced on his head, and ran over the line, would it count? If it would, then I think that should too. Can't make a disctinction between "hair" and "too much hair".
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2011 16:25
|
|
|
David James' afro saved a goal once that was definitely going in
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2011 16:42
|
|
|
Cast_No_Shadow posted:3) There was that guy in a Brasil who could do that without the afro, just chip it up, balance it and run. I think they made that illegal. But this one? I'd say gently caress it, count the goal, its not like he is taking advantage, if he didn't have the afro I imagine he'd just have headed it in anyway. There was Keirrison, who actually ended up signing for Barcelona and subsequently loaned out to 4 different eams, who could do the "seal dribble" where he would just run with the ball by bouncing it on his head repeatedly. He was pretty poo poo otherwise.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2011 16:53
|
|
|
GravityDaemon posted:There was Keirrison, who actually ended up signing for Barcelona and subsequently loaned out to 4 different eams, who could do the "seal dribble" where he would just run with the ball by bouncing it on his head repeatedly. He was pretty poo poo otherwise. I thought that was Kerlon who signed for Inter? In any case, I can't imagine you can let the goal in 3 stand. If that was the case you'd see players using huge amounts of hair gel to turn their head into a big cup, then just scoop the ball up and run into the goal with it all day.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2011 19:09
|
|
|
vyelkin posted:I thought that was Kerlon who signed for Inter? Oh, you're absolutely right. Got my K Brazilians mixed up.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2011 19:11
|
|
|
SteadfastMeat posted:It's Friday! 1) I've seen this happen in a match at least once, and the 100% correct decision is to just guess either way arbitarily. Any official who says otherwise is a loving liar. 2) Stop game for him to get treatment/replaced by fourth official as the game needs a full complement of officials. Drop ball. 3) Cool goal kid way to go.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2011 19:17
|
|
|
vyelkin posted:I thought that was Kerlon who signed for Inter? Yeah, it's Kerlon and now that I think about it, wasn't there a rule change to stop him doing it?
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2011 20:09
|
|
|
I remember he got elbowed for doing it, but I don't remember there being a rule change. Nani did it recently as well and there were no complaints from the referee.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2011 23:00
|
|
|
Scikar posted:I remember he got elbowed for doing it, but I don't remember there being a rule change. Maybe that's what I'm thinking of.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2011 23:03
|
|
|
SteadfastMeat posted:It's Friday! 1)Drop ball 2)Stop play and restart after the assistant is teated. 3)Let the goal stand.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2011 23:14
|
|
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYlqql38XkY They all just kick the poo poo out of him
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2011 23:24
|
|
|
Jose posted:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYlqql38XkY Wouldn't you?
|
|
#
?
Nov 12, 2011 00:31
|
|
|
Jose posted:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYlqql38XkY Couple of them would get you locked up on a friday night down the high street.
|
|
#
?
Nov 12, 2011 03:11
|
|
|
Psybro posted:If you want a vision of the future, imagine Mike Riley blowing his whistle for no discernible reason - forever. What's more important here is that clubs can pay the £10 administrative fee for cautions with a credit card.
|
|
#
?
Nov 12, 2011 08:42
|
|
|
It's Monday!quote:Keith Hackett's verdict
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2011 17:52
|
|
|
Why is that unsporting behavior?
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2011 18:02
|
|
|
His response to three is ridiculous, but then the entire question is ridiculous, unless you believe that black people can grow four-foot afros with birds nesting in them. I guess it does answer The Pissflaps Question, though. Although again that's totally hypothetical as any Sikh playing sport would wear a tight turban (see Monty Panesar) and not a giant loving ceremonial thing with a dagger down his shorts.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2011 18:49
|
|
|
Keith Hackett is a racist, if you had a skinhead with superglue on there he'd have nothing to say (apologies to any old school skinheads who still resent their movement's misappropriation by fascism).
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2011 18:53
|
|
|
pik_d posted:Why is that unsporting behavior?
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2011 22:45
|
|
|
Hi I'm KH. 1) DONT BE STICKLER FOR A RULES IT WILL MAKE YOU A oval office 2) Meh 3) YOU GOT TO FOLLOW THE RULES TO THE LETTER. WHO CARES IF YOU ARE A oval office THOSE KIDS GOTTA LEARN. I hate him.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2011 23:43
|
|
|
Semprini posted:Because while the law may say 'Unsporting behaviour', it means 'Don't think you can discover some cunning ruse we forgot to legislate against and expect to get away with it' Yeah, I think it's basically "OK, this is clever, but do I want players trying to repeat this?" What he misses is yes, yes we want players growing huge fros to carry balls around.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2011 00:31
|
|
|
Semprini posted:Because while the law may say 'Unsporting behaviour', it means 'Don't think you can discover some cunning ruse we forgot to legislate against and expect to get away with it' What I mean is why is this particular thing unsporting? If someone has enough skill to balance a ball on their head while running, with or without the use of their own cushy hair, and walk it into the net, why shouldn't they be rewarded for that? Obviously none of you here are Keith Hackett but maybe someone understand why that's a bad thing and can explain it to me.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2011 06:13
|
|
|
Well, if a player is balancing the ball on his head, how is a defender supposed to take it off him in a vaguely safe fashion? You can't. Either you have to kick him, charge him, or stand back and let him run. Same reason as you get pinged if you trap the ball between your legs and start hopping upfield.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2011 14:15
|
|
|
I get why you need to disallow the last goal. The yellow card for it is incredibly harsh for a U14 game though. It wasn't dangerous nor the rule against it obvious - give the kid a break.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2011 20:03
|
|
|
Could argue the "better to teach them at a young age" line to defend the harshness.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2011 20:31
|
|
|
Newbori posted:Could argue the "better to teach them at a young age" line to defend the harshness. Pretty sure they gonna remember it if you just explain it to them  . If not, you still got that yellow card.
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2011 22:14
|
|
|
Caution not really essential for that one. Just give the IDFK for playing in a dangerous manner. Easy to sell due to the fact tht no-one can challenge safely for the ball when the guy is doing that.
|
|
#
?
Nov 16, 2011 01:49
|
|
|
It's Friday!
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2011 10:59
|
|
|
1: Thassa goal. 2: Tell the attacking team to gently caress off. 3: Thassa goal.
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2011 11:03
|
|
|
SteadfastMeat posted:It's Friday! (I'm not actually a ref) #1: Did the ball stop moving or had you whistled the play dead? If not, award it. #2: Dropped balls should be taken on the edge of the area. Beyond that, I don't think there's anything saying that goalies can't pick up a dropped ball restart (as long as it hits the ground). #3: Re-take the corner since the striker
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2011 11:08
|
|
|
Goalkeeper edition! 1+3. The keeper is a loving idiot. Goal. 2. Pretty sure the ball is in play as normal from the drop ball, so it's kosher.
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2011 11:11
|
|
|
I don't think I've ever seen a sneezing footballer. I've seen footballers coughing and being sick on the pitch, but never sneezing. Strange that.
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2011 11:20
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 9, 2024 15:25 |
|
|
1. Not a goal. In a shootout, once the ball starts to move away from the goal, the kick is over. 2. No idea, guess it's an indirect free kick to the attacking team. 3. Similar to the hair one last week, though not deliberate. I'd say no goal.
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2011 12:16
|
|