|
Really, in this day and age having been ambassador to China should send his electability through the roof.
|
# ? Dec 14, 2011 20:20 |
|
|
# ? May 19, 2024 04:21 |
|
jojoinnit posted:Really, in this day and age having been ambassador to China should send his electability through the roof. Ahahaha, you and your rational reasons for electing someone to governmental office.
|
# ? Dec 14, 2011 20:26 |
|
jojoinnit posted:Really, in this day and age having been ambassador to China should send his electability through the roof. On pure experience, Huntsman should be the top candidate: Governor with conservative record, foreign policy experience as our Ambassador to our largest trade partner and potentially largest threat, and experience under three other Republican administrations. But all people hear is "ex-Governor, Mormon, 'moderate'" and they go "But I don't like Romney!"
|
# ? Dec 14, 2011 20:28 |
|
No, see, he worked with Obama so he necessarily agrees with and supports everything Obama has ever done!
|
# ? Dec 14, 2011 20:29 |
|
jojoinnit posted:Really, in this day and age having been ambassador to China should send his electability through the roof.
|
# ? Dec 14, 2011 20:37 |
|
Sarion posted:On pure experience, Huntsman should be the top candidate: Governor with conservative record, foreign policy experience as our Ambassador to our largest trade partner and potentially largest threat, and experience under three other Republican administrations. But all people hear is "ex-Governor, Mormon, 'moderate'" and they go "But I don't like Romney!" Second largest. Canada is our largest trade partner
|
# ? Dec 14, 2011 20:55 |
|
Huntsman also has the benefit of being the only Republican candidate who isn't insane or a hypocrit or both. Of course he's considered unelectable.
|
# ? Dec 14, 2011 23:58 |
gnome7 posted:Huntsman also has the benefit of being the only Republican candidate who isn't insane or a hypocrit or both. Of course he's considered unelectable. I guess insane is a bit extreme of a label for Huntsman, but he's so far from moderate. He has some really out there economic plans but because he's not super bombastic and in your face he is a total non-factor in the election. That and Mitt Romney is still running.
|
|
# ? Dec 15, 2011 00:19 |
|
ts12 posted:I guess insane is a bit extreme of a label for Huntsman, but he's so far from moderate. He has some really out there economic plans but because he's not super bombastic and in your face he is a total non-factor in the election. That and Mitt Romney is still running. Well of course he's not a moderate. He's still definitely a conservative. He is also, however, completely sane and means what he says without irony or hypocrisy. What I am saying is I kind of like Huntsman, he is a reasonable, possibly even good, candidate in a field of extremely scary ones.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2011 00:28 |
That much is true. I struggle to actually dislike him because at least he means well
|
|
# ? Dec 15, 2011 02:09 |
|
ts12 posted:That much is true. I struggle to actually dislike him because at least he means well In all likelihood he means well for himself and his friends. He is a multimillionaire "Washington insider", totally representative of the capitalist class. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44836853/ns/business-us_business/t/net-worth-gop-presidential-contenders/ Yes, he's the best of a bad bunch, the lesser evil, but still an evil.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2011 04:47 |
|
Huntsman's tax plan is insanely regressive. Like frighteningly bad for the poor. He doesn't mean well.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2011 04:52 |
I phrased that poorly. I think he's probably a nice guy in person but yeah his tax plan is outrageously bad. I think I'm so jaded in regards to the whole primary that a guy like Huntsman who at least doesn't outright call for the death of the poor is so relieving. I'd never support him or anything, it's just... nice. I guess.
|
|
# ? Dec 15, 2011 05:05 |
|
Kavak posted:Ahahaha, you and your rational reasons for electing someone to governmental office. I don't think people realize what kind of position ambassador is. These ambassadorships are mostly cushy gigs giving speeches, shaking hands, and eating expensive dinners. There's an entire non-appointed staff under these guys that basically does their schedule, gives them token lessons in the local language, and tells them what to say at various events. I had the occasion to meet the current ambassador to Japan, and about the only nice thing I can say about him is that I appreciated his candor. He basically said, "I did a bunch of favors for Obama during his presidential campaign, and so now I have this post. I didn't have any real experience with Japan before being named ambassador." An ambassadorship on someone's political resume means more about their ability to schmooze and pull strings to get favors returned than anything about their knowledge of the region. So it's not surprising that Huntsman's mandarin wouldn't be fantastic. The really sad part is that even with the shallowness of his actual credentials on China he still knows more about China than all the other GOP presidential candidates combined.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2011 05:05 |
|
Z-Magic posted:I get furious when it's the 25th of December and there are people not celebrating the birthday of the most important person to ever live. ...oh. Yeah he's cool too I guess.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2011 05:12 |
|
ErIog posted:I don't think people realize what kind of position ambassador is. These ambassadorships are mostly cushy gigs giving speeches, shaking hands, and eating expensive dinners. There's an entire non-appointed staff under these guys that basically does their schedule, gives them token lessons in the local language, and tells them what to say at various events. Well, it depends on the ambassadorship. For close allies like the UK, France, and Japan, it's a chushy gig because we get along. For tiny countries like say, Jamaica, it's also relatively chushy because no one cares. For a country as important and testy as China, I've been under the impression that those ambassadors have plenty of work to do.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2011 05:25 |
|
Soylent Pudding posted:Well, it depends on the ambassadorship. For close allies like the UK, France, and Japan, it's a chushy gig because we get along. For tiny countries like say, Jamaica, it's also relatively chushy because no one cares. For a country as important and testy as China, I've been under the impression that those ambassadors have plenty of work to do. This is true, but my overall point is that I think people give too much credit to the political office that has the title of Ambassador. The people below the ambassador that are hired for their skills, I think, accomplish far more day to day without anyone ever knowing who they are. Some of these people have worked for the last 20 years with someone new being appointed as their "boss" every time the administration changes. The ambassador is the public face of what's going on, but I think most of the real decisions are made by people under them that have more experience and knowledge of the situation. So I'll admit it's probably a different gig depending on the location, but the things I'm pointing out are part of the overall system and would apply to an ambassadorship in any country. I also think Huntsman has more China credentials than Roos has Japan credentials. I won't dispute that. I just think Huntsman's credentials need to viewed within the context of what the office of ambassador really is as far as political offices go. It is a political office. I guarantee all the people that worked with Huntsman in China as aides are more qualified to be ambassador than he ever was, but since they aren't politicians magically they'll never be the ambassador to China. ErIog fucked around with this message at 05:42 on Dec 15, 2011 |
# ? Dec 15, 2011 05:37 |
more of this rear end in a top hat. click the pic for the article (american studies majors are very real, I was considering becoming one! they aren't at all what this guy probably thinks they are though ) just for those who are unaware, Tora Tora Tora is a fictionalized account of Pearl Harbor (it also was really bad) again, click for article heh. WOMEN. Kill me.
|
|
# ? Dec 15, 2011 06:05 |
|
I have a few friends who post bullshit conservative memes/images. It's usually not worth the drama of defriending them though - typically I just click to 'hide' their status updates. Solves all my problems. I've blocked/defriended a few people though for completely egregious bullshit - no hesitation if I realistically never have to interact with that person in real life.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2011 06:13 |
He's not my friend, mutual friend kind of thing. I just read his poo poo opinions out of some sick masochism or something idk
|
|
# ? Dec 15, 2011 06:15 |
|
Jay is what happens if a 12th century farmer was time-warped to today, found this wonderful Faced-Book device, and started just streaming whatever was on his mind. "A HAIRCUT?! WITHOUT YOUR HUSBAND'S PERMISSION?! SELFISH WHORES!"
|
# ? Dec 15, 2011 08:35 |
|
ts12 posted:more of this rear end in a top hat. This is the best one.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2011 08:36 |
|
Wait. That commenter talked about "other marriages"...as in, this guy is married?
|
# ? Dec 15, 2011 09:31 |
|
ErIog posted:This is true, but my overall point is that I think people give too much credit to the political office that has the title of Ambassador. Probably true, but it does give him more foreign policy credentials than say... Mitt Romney.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2011 14:03 |
|
I honestly never thought I'd read or hear the phrase 'solipsism of the female mind', much less in the context of a hair cut, but, well, here I am...
|
# ? Dec 15, 2011 14:21 |
|
Guilty posted:I honestly never thought I'd read or hear the phrase 'solipsism of the female mind', much less in the context of a hair cut, but, well, here I am... 'Solipsism of the female mind' is the new 'Kantian Nihilism'.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2011 14:23 |
|
Z-Magic posted:'Solipsism of the female mind' is the new 'Kantian Nihilism'.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2011 15:27 |
|
Pfirti86 posted:I have a few friends who post bullshit conservative memes/images. It's usually not worth the drama of defriending them though - typically I just click to 'hide' their status updates. Solves all my problems. I've recently had to do this to my brother. His extreme right wing viewpoints and absolute hatred of muslims just got to be way too much. I've tried arguing with him, but figured it wasn't worth it.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2011 16:26 |
Cup of Hemlock posted:Wait. That commenter talked about "other marriages"...as in, this guy is married? Oh boy are you in for a treat!!! A picture he shared: click the picture for the article click for article Yes, his son is named HROTHGAR Our Ron Paul Men's Rights hero in person I posted this earlier in the thread but if you didn't see it: The Worst Person Alive posted:Though, really, I'm sick of this bitching and moaning about how bad women in Africa have it. Same guy: quote:Who I Am: another guy posted:"I use game on my wife. It works." Well, she's your wife, so apparently it did indeed work. You can probably stop now. Jay posted:Wrong. Stopping would be a mistake. What about getting married changes the fundamental ways we are attracted to those of the opposite sex? Absolutely nothing. Jay posted:[WIFE] and I have been stalking PUA and MRA sites for a couple years now. Ironically, she's the one who introduced me to most of them. We've generally shied away from the single guys and gals who post; the married ones have information that is far more applicable to us and to the people we usually interact with. Jay's wife posted:Yeah, PUA and MRA blogs, especially Roissy (heartiste.wordpress.com), convinced me NOT to reduce my market value by being a whore when I was in college. Started reading them around age 17. Yes, I was pursing a pretty aggressive career-oriented path for a while because I wanted a backup plan in case the marriage and kids thing didn't come fast enough, but my primary goal was always marriage and baby making. Apparently, I didn't make that very clear to friends and family, so everyone was shocked when I got married at 20 and had my first kid at 22. :P ts12 fucked around with this message at 17:25 on Dec 15, 2011 |
|
# ? Dec 15, 2011 17:22 |
|
DOOM SCIENCE
|
# ? Dec 15, 2011 17:27 |
XyloJW posted:DOOM SCIENCE George Soros -> Chicago Politics -> Barack Obama Net Neutrality -> Animals Have Equal Legal Rights
|
|
# ? Dec 15, 2011 17:29 |
|
We should force women in the military to take birth control. An IUD is de facto abortion. Abortion is murder.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2011 17:31 |
So he's one of those guys who wants to live his life without interference, but has no qualms about telling everybody else how to live, and makes his life as public as possible. Wait, he named is son "Hrothgar?" And, what the gently caress does this mean? DB posted:I think that "Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free?" is the best piece of advice a father can gave to his daughter. Armyman25 fucked around with this message at 17:36 on Dec 15, 2011 |
|
# ? Dec 15, 2011 17:32 |
Armyman25 posted:So he's one of those guys who wants to live his life without interference, but has no qualms about telling everybody else how to live, and makes his life as public as possible. Yes. He is every possible awful thing on earth combined.
|
|
# ? Dec 15, 2011 17:35 |
|
Why do you still get his feed again?
|
# ? Dec 15, 2011 17:40 |
|
Armyman25 posted:And, what the gently caress does this mean? It's every slut-shaming tactic wrapped up in one. Your sexuality is a commodity that you dispense like a cow dispenses milk; if you give away this commodity for free, people won't think it has any value and that is your fault.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2011 17:43 |
|
ts12 posted:Net Neutrality -> Animals Have Equal Legal Rights Yeah, it was either that there or DOOM SCIENCE that did it for me. History books will look back and assert that Net Neutrality famously lead to animals having equal legal rights in 2009. That's why no one eats hamburgers or drinks milk anymore. Because of net neutrality.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2011 17:47 |
Slaan posted:Why do you still get his feed again? ts12 posted:He's not my friend, mutual friend kind of thing. I just read his poo poo opinions out of some sick masochism or something idk
|
|
# ? Dec 15, 2011 18:01 |
|
Posted on a friend's facebook today, this is full of material from poo poo-that-never-happened.txt http://thecollegeconservative.com/2011/12/13/my-time-at-walmart-why-we-need-serious-welfare-reform/ The College Conservative posted:My Time at Walmart: Why We Need Serious Welfare Reform We've got the usual suspects from the conservative welfare greatest hits: people with cell phones (why didn't they immediately sell every non-essential item when they started collecting TANF?!), people buying steaks (eat ramen and like it, lazy assholes!), and of course people being upset that their card didn't ring as expected, which in my years as a cashier I NEVER encountered with people not on welfare. The one that jumped out at me the most though was the claim about someone have a "welfare card" from 1991. That strikes me as impossible, and though she doesn't say EBT card, she references them in other places and never mentions welfare cards again. If she meant EBT card here, then it's literally impossible because those didn't even exist until the late 90s.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2011 18:12 |
|
|
# ? May 19, 2024 04:21 |
|
ts12 posted:Horror. This guy is a literal monster, who would marry him? I unironically hope he gets metastatic pancreatic cancer and dies or maybe prostate cancer or something. Really he is a horrible human being.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2011 18:15 |