|
Ka0 posted:First thing that came to mind was Carrie Fisher. 
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2011 01:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 11, 2024 17:53 |
|
|
Rhyno posted:In my dreams Mike Allred would draw ever Legion and Trek comic until the end of time. I would read that until the day I died
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2011 10:48
|
|
|
What Manapul is doing with Flash is simply taking away from everything else I read because it's so good  Flash #4
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2011 19:49
|
|
|
Pacra posted:And ending this edition with Dan Jurgen's appalling lack of perspective in the Death of Superman arc: What's even worse is that Lois is having a conversation while standing less than a meter away from two titans beating the crap out of each other.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2011 21:36
|
|
|
Alhazred posted:His Emma Frost is pretty bad too: This is how I sit at my computer when I jack off to porn.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2011 21:42
|
|
|
MettleRamiel posted:I've always been partial to Chris Bachalo. I know it's kind of cartoony and exaterated, and that his costume designs can be very similar, but I just can't help loving his art! Whilst I like his character designs, the coloring is bad. It's hard to tell what's going on sometimes.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2011 21:59
|
|
|
 This is a cover Michael Turner did for the Batman/Superman arc that reintroduced Kara Zor-El to the post-Crisis DCU. Just look at Kara's abdomen: it's nearly twice as big as her chest! And the legs! I decided to "fix" Kara in GIMP by vertically compressing her body below the rib cage. Do you guys think this is better?: 
Baron Bifford fucked around with this message at 03:00 on Dec 30, 2011 |
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2011 22:11
|
|
|
Baron Bifford posted:I decided to "fix" Kara in GIMP by vertically compressing her body below the rib cage. Do you guys think this is better?:
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2011 22:19
|
|
|
Michael Turner was overrated.
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2011 01:11
|
|
|
Well, it's still a terrible cover, because "Dark Supergirl" is such a loving retarded idea that it makes angels weep, but at least she looks like a human being now.
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2011 01:19
|
|
|
I was never a fan of Turner's work, but his style is certainly distinctive.
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2011 01:48
|
|
|
Baron Bifford posted:Michael Turner was overrated. I never understood why people liked him anyway, all of the women's torsos he drew looked like jerky. Happy Noodle Boy posted:What Manapul is doing with Flash is simply taking away from everything else I read because it's so good
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2011 01:48
|
|
|
Turner's characters often have stiff poses. It's very 90s. It's like he's trying to draw pinups.
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2011 02:30
|
|
|
Frank Miller's art seems to grow progressively worse over time. I just read Holy Terror, and it's a mess. It's very hard at times to figure out what is going on in many panels, because he uses no color, omits background detail and distorts characters. There are also problems with perspective and unnatural character motions. Take this panel:  I'm guessing this is a shot taken from above of two characters leaping over debris. I think. From the context, they're supposed to be navigating through the ruins of a bombed city. But you'd have no loving clue looking at this alone. Another panel I hated: 
Baron Bifford fucked around with this message at 02:48 on Dec 30, 2011 |
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2011 02:43
|
|
|
Baron Bifford posted:Frank Miller's art seems to grow progressively worse over time. I just read Holy Terror, and it's a mess. It's very hard at times to figure out what is going on in many panels, because he uses no color, omits background detail and distorts characters. There are also problems with perspective and unnatural character motions. there is also the whole swirling vortex of rabid misogyny that is Miller's writing, but I suppose that's separate from his art, which has indeed gotten quite bad
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2011 05:12
|
|
|
Baron Bifford posted:Frank Miller's art seems to grow progressively worse over time. I just read Holy Terror, and it's a mess. It's very hard at times to figure out what is going on in many panels, because he uses no color, omits background detail and distorts characters. There are also problems with perspective and unnatural character motions. If you read his Dark Knight Strikes Again you will notice that as the book goes on his artwork gets a lot more....abstract.
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2011 06:52
|
|
Madkal posted:If you read his Dark Knight Strikes Again you will notice that as the book goes on his artwork gets a lot more....abstract. Is this where we got some hilarious post explaining that it was on purpose, and that Miller's deconstructing his own work? Because I love those.
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2011 06:58
|
|
|
Lurdiak posted:Is this where we got some hilarious post explaining that it was on purpose, and that Miller's deconstructing his own work? Because I love those. No it's because of 9/11. Seriously.
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2011 07:22
|
|
|
Just like Dennis Miller.
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2011 08:34
|
|
|
Baron Bifford posted:
Horrible with human anatomy, but the guy could draw some great looking monsters. I remember Krytpo, Batmans wetsuit, Darkseid, and Superman's exotic zoo looking pretty great. I remember his Marvel covers looking horrid, but I still miss the guy. Open Marriage Night fucked around with this message at 08:49 on Dec 30, 2011 |
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2011 08:45
|
|
Dr. Hurt posted:No it's because of 9/11. Seriously. Oh I know, I just think it was really funny to see all the posts talking about the "symbolism" and "deconstruction of his previous works" Miller was putting in DKSA when it was obvious it was simply incoherent because of incoherence, not some high minded artistic intent.
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2011 09:04
|
|
|
Madkal posted:If you read his Dark Knight Strikes Again you will notice that as the book goes on his artwork gets a lot more....abstract. But at least in DKSA he used color. It made it easier to understand what was going on. Baron Bifford fucked around with this message at 12:27 on Dec 30, 2011 |
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2011 11:14
|
|
|
Endless Mike posted:I was never a fan of Turner's work, but his style is certainly distinctive.
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2011 11:21
|
|
|
Lurdiak posted:Oh I know, I just think it was really funny to see all the posts talking about the "symbolism" and "deconstruction of his previous works" Miller was putting in DKSA when it was obvious it was simply incoherent because of incoherence, not some high minded artistic intent. Because that was what people THOUGHT Miller was doing...until he revealed it was written during 9/11. Up til that point, his works had been decent and seeing him completely devolve into incoherence was jarring.
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2011 13:46
|
|
|
Lurdiak posted:Is this where we got some hilarious post explaining that it was on purpose, and that Miller's deconstructing his own work? Because I love those. I'm not going to defend that work, but I absolutely love the art in Sin City. Sure the stories were all the traditional Miller fare of Jerks and Whores, but I'm such a sucker for noir that I still enjoy the books.
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2011 13:47
|
|
Gorilla Salad posted:I'm not going to defend that work, but I absolutely love the art in Sin City. Sure the stories were all the traditional Miller fare of Jerks and Whores, but I'm such a sucker for noir that I still enjoy the books. I'd never suggest Miller never produced good material, he was one of the greats, I was simply talking about defending the bad recent stuff.
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2011 13:52
|
|
|
Aaron Lopresti is my favorite Wonder Woman artist. Not many artists can draw a Wonder Woman who is feminine yet obviously a powerful warrior.
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2011 15:14
|
|
|
Todd Nauck's art got pretty weird in his Wildguard books. It came as a shock because generally his art is good and it was what got me hooked on Young Justice. Do these people's heads look a little too small? Also, I think the women in the purple top has a dislocated shoulder.: Baron Bifford fucked around with this message at 18:24 on Jan 1, 2012 |
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2011 12:26
|
|
|
The heads are too small, the arms are too small and shoulders don't work that way, and the legs are made out of gigantic noodles. The only person that doesn't look freakish is the stretchy guy.
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2011 16:19
|
|
|
The legs, particularly on the females, look like fun-house mirror reflections. I can't quite figure out what's going on there. The woman in the middle is the worst. Between the legs, odd torso, and breasts bigger than her head, she has some real problems. Also, while I appreciate the fact that the characters actually have fingers as opposed to the club hands some artists draw, it seems weird that half the characters are violently clawing the air. Edit: And yeah, THS. Tiny Head Syndrome. They could start an awareness group.
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2011 16:29
|
|
|
I finished reading Wizard of Oz last night with Skottie Young and I find the art to be mindblowingly good. After I read a page I would go back to the top of the page and just look at the pictures. The style was cartoonish and charming, and created a great atmosphere in the comic. Each character design seems perfect (for me the lion was the best) and is something out a cartoon that would appeal to kids and adults alike.   
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2011 19:20
|
|
|
This is from Birds of Prey #42, with awful art by Glenn Fabry. Fabry is generally a good artist and has done some excellent covers for Preacher, but he made a bad decision by drawing Power Girl like a steroid-chugging female bodybuilder. But not only is the work fugly, it also makes gaffes. In this panel, the artist forgot Power Girl's boob window:  And in this one, he gave her leggings: 
Baron Bifford fucked around with this message at 01:38 on Jan 1, 2012 |
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2011 21:40
|
|
|
I actually really like it when Power Girl is drawn so that she looks, well, powerful, but I prefer it when she doesn't look like a lumpy sack of potatoes.
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2011 22:11
|
|
|
Darth Nat posted:I actually really like it when Power Girl is drawn so that she looks, well, powerful, but I prefer it when she doesn't look like a lumpy sack of potatoes. Did you say a sack of mashed potatoes?  Deadpool MaX-Mas Art by Kyle Baker
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2011 23:32
|
|
|
What the gently caress is wrong with her arm 
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2012 01:15
|
|
|
Holy gently caress. What the gently caress 
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2012 01:18
|
|
|
From Flashpoint: Lois Lane and the Resistance #1, art by Eddie Nunez. While not really terrible art per se, it was rather striking to see Lois drawn with such voluptuous curves and gigantic boobs.
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2012 01:33
|
|
|
Thalidomide arms, rickets legs, tiny heads, and lumpy potato bodies. Have these artists ever seen a human being, or just had one vaguely described to them?
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2012 01:35
|
|
|
I have to assume that Kyle Baker was on a deadline or something because I know he can do better than that.
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2012 01:35
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 11, 2024 17:53 |
|
|
IUG posted:Did you say a sack of mashed potatoes? Maybe it's a hallucination caused by whatever he's smoking out of that hookah.
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2012 01:36
|
|