|
Jock has to be one of the best if not the best Batman artist in recent years.
|
# ? Jan 8, 2012 03:47 |
|
|
# ? May 13, 2024 05:51 |
|
cyberpunksurvivor posted:Jock has to be one of the best if not the best Batman artist in recent years. Jock carried the somewhat weak last year of the Losers squarely on his incredibly talented shoulders.
|
# ? Jan 8, 2012 04:59 |
|
Jock's covers are pretty good, but I just don't like his interiors. He seems more focused on stylish chiaroscuro than properly constructed drawings, and as a result his characters just feel like insubstantial sketches.
|
# ? Jan 8, 2012 06:40 |
|
I don't know. I quite like that rough look and to me he's one of the few artists who can pull it off and still have a strong sense of storytelling.
|
# ? Jan 8, 2012 13:58 |
|
Posted this in the derailed thread but figured I could post it here. I am reading the Day of Futures Past trade and we are introduced to Kitty Pryde. The art is by Byrne I believe and while I don't have issues with his artwork, his drawings of Kitty make her look like she has a face made of putty. This page is the worst part: (X-Men: Day of Futures Past trade)
|
# ? Jan 11, 2012 21:57 |
|
Also Storm has gigantic cat eyes
|
# ? Jan 12, 2012 00:47 |
|
Internet Wizard posted:Also Storm has gigantic cat eyes She was consistently drawn like that for a while. I thought it was kind of cool.
|
# ? Jan 12, 2012 00:48 |
|
JackDarko posted:He's one of Chris Burnham's biggest influences so in a way that's kind of fitting. Is he? We interviewed Chris and he mentioned Quitely as a primary influence, and I can see particularly from a Western tradition Geof Darrow in his work also... actually if you combined the two, Fisher was about that. I love Chris Burnham, although (and I hate when folk say this about Quitely) he does do wonky faces sometimes.
|
# ? Jan 12, 2012 23:29 |
|
Almost related: Not sure if there are any Philadelphia Goons here, but there was an -awesome- "Dedicated To Rob Liefield" art gallery here at Brave New World(LCBS in Olde City) at this past Frist Friday. Certainly should check it out if you're in the area.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2012 18:57 |
|
I hope someone attends covered in as many belts and pouches as they could find/buy/wear.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2012 20:14 |
Liefeld. Again. This thread could easily become drowned in this guy's stuff, but this single drawing pretty much exemplifies everything he does wrong, especially with female characters. Mazed fucked around with this message at 20:33 on Jan 13, 2012 |
|
# ? Jan 13, 2012 20:28 |
|
Mazed posted:Liefeld. Again. Bahahaha, I will never stop loving Rob Liefeld. Her legs have to be, what, like six feet long? Edit: oh man, it's even more hilarious compressed in the quote like that.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2012 20:54 |
|
Mazed posted:Liefeld. Again. This is 'shopped right? I know he sucks, but...
|
# ? Jan 13, 2012 21:52 |
jimcunningham posted:This is 'shopped right? I know he sucks, but... I'm afraid not. Here's the full page: It's hard to catch this, just because of the sheer horror of the rest of it, but check out how she's wearing gloves in that shot where in the earlier panels she isn't. Also, Loki's face in panel 4.
|
|
# ? Jan 13, 2012 22:32 |
|
Mazed posted:I'm afraid not. Here's the full page: Talking about continuity and whatnot, in the third panel where she is talking out of her rear end (the word bubble is pointed there) Loki is at the same levelher legs. And then we see that she is a 19 foot tall giant. That is weird.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2012 22:45 |
|
This art makes me want to start an assassin's guild.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2012 23:12 |
|
Rob Liefield is a treasure
|
# ? Jan 14, 2012 02:07 |
|
that's an entire new level of "legs are too long". like, they are literally as tall as the whole of her would be if she was correctly drawn. it must be a new record
|
# ? Jan 14, 2012 02:24 |
|
You can see the process behind it too, which is kind of fun. Like, he had this cool idea for a layout but he hosed it up and just went "oh well."
|
# ? Jan 14, 2012 03:15 |
|
Mr Wind Up Bird posted:You can see the process behind it too, which is kind of fun. Like, he had this cool idea for a layout but he hosed it up and just went "oh well." His career in a nutshell.
|
# ? Jan 14, 2012 04:51 |
|
This is not just a question designed to put him down, but how does he still work? The blame lies on whoever is in charge. They are obviously constantly drunk.
|
# ? Jan 14, 2012 05:27 |
|
dieFALKENATOR posted:Is he? We interviewed Chris and he mentioned Quitely as a primary influence, and I can see particularly from a Western tradition Geof Darrow in his work also... actually if you combined the two, Fisher was about that. I love Chris Burnham, although (and I hate when folk say this about Quitely) he does do wonky faces sometimes. He mentioned it on twitter, on the anniversary of his death. Talked about how he had never felt so crushed by a mans death he never met, and how much he loved the guys art. I see the influence in the backgrounds primarily.
|
# ? Jan 14, 2012 05:35 |
|
jimcunningham posted:This is not just a question designed to put him down, but how does he still work?
|
# ? Jan 14, 2012 05:49 |
|
Perhaps she's half-giant.
|
# ? Jan 14, 2012 09:31 |
|
What's the other half?
|
# ? Jan 15, 2012 00:47 |
|
SkellingTon Loc posted:What's the other half? Leg.
|
# ? Jan 15, 2012 01:08 |
|
I wonder if he has some sort of visual disorder, a bit like El Greco, but without shitloads of talent/hard work to back him up?
|
# ? Jan 15, 2012 12:16 |
|
Well, this doesn't totally excuse it, but from what I've seen on youtube he doesn't seem to use a drawing table that much. If you draw big drawings on a table without a slant they tend to become skewed and wonky cause you're looking at the paper from an angle and not directly.
|
# ? Jan 15, 2012 15:47 |
|
He draws parts of stuff, not the whole. Individual components of things make sense - like he'll draw two pretty decent eyes and then chuck them on a face without any regard for perspective or human anatomy. Basically I'm saying he draws like a little kid.
|
# ? Jan 15, 2012 19:13 |
|
DC is cancelling his Hawk and Dove...and giving him three of the other 52 titles. Including Grifter. I was enjoying Grifter too (read the first two issues, now I'm trade waiting for it) - I'm sure Liefeld is a nice guy,and unless I'm reading it wrong, he's not actually doing the art, but him getting his creative sticky fingers on a good title, in 2012, is depressing. This is his take on Deadpool (well, the Deadpool Corps). Bear in mind, he was the one who created the character....
|
# ? Jan 15, 2012 19:40 |
|
A deaddog? Really? And why can't anyone draw a normal loving gun? Also, lightsabers. I love Deadpool so much, but I am getting so sick of the oversaturation.
|
# ? Jan 15, 2012 20:36 |
|
To fully appreciate Liefeld you just have to stare at the amazaningness that is this picture:
|
# ? Jan 15, 2012 21:15 |
Madkal posted:To fully appreciate Liefeld you just have to stare at the amazaningness that is this picture: I think you mean this picture: http://i.imgur.com/ML7n8.jpg
|
|
# ? Jan 15, 2012 22:01 |
|
OldMemes posted:DC is cancelling his Hawk and Dove...and giving him three of the other 52 titles. I hate how his Deadpools always seem to have a black hole in the center of their face sucking the mask inward.
|
# ? Jan 15, 2012 22:12 |
|
OldMemes posted:
It looks like he stopped drawing when he got to the bottom inch of the image and the colourist had to make it up.
|
# ? Jan 15, 2012 23:02 |
|
Is that a disembodied head with a propeller beanie? That makes a surprising amount of sense.
|
# ? Jan 15, 2012 23:42 |
|
Yes, it had a propeller hat. Also, it was a zombie (the one from Marvel Zombies). That whole Corps storyline was the worst storyline of Deadpool I've ever read. As Gavok has said before, people need to stop putting Deadpool in space. The origin story with Kid Deadpool was awesome though.
|
# ? Jan 15, 2012 23:46 |
|
Yeti Yeti Yeti posted:It looks like he stopped drawing when he got to the bottom inch of the image and the colourist had to make it up.
|
# ? Jan 15, 2012 23:53 |
|
Looks like the wee deaddog has a humie bum? Not sure why I'm seeing that, but there you go. If that splash is actually a product of Liefeld's spazzy hands, I'm actually a bit impressed (all things relative).
|
# ? Jan 15, 2012 23:54 |
|
|
# ? May 13, 2024 05:51 |
|
Yeti Yeti Yeti posted:It looks like he stopped drawing when he got to the bottom inch of the image and the colourist had to make it up. That is probably true since he is notorious for not being able to draw feet.
|
# ? Jan 16, 2012 06:04 |