|
I'm just saying, as the world of nasty sex acts go, tit loving is pretty tame. This girl I was dating read in Cosmo or whatever an article that suggested arm-pit humping as a "safe sex alternative". Of course we tried it and it was pretty much impossible to keep an erection with all the laughing and screaming. The same thing happened when we tried using a female condom, but I think the puppet show was what ruined that.
|
# ? Mar 15, 2012 17:48 |
|
|
# ? May 13, 2024 10:16 |
|
bunnielab posted:This girl I was dating read in Cosmo or whatever an article that suggested arm-pit humping as a "safe sex alternative". Of course we tried it and it was pretty much impossible to keep an erection with all the laughing and screaming. so basically tit loving is the same as arm-pit sex
|
# ? Mar 15, 2012 18:24 |
|
No. Tits don't usually have stubble between them. I mean sure, there's often a stray nipple hair every once in a while, but if you get a brush burn from tit loving you might end up with a restraining order keeping you 300 feet away from zoos, SPCAs and Alabama.
|
# ? Mar 15, 2012 18:28 |
|
mindphlux posted:so basically tit loving is the same as arm-pit sex
|
# ? Mar 15, 2012 18:41 |
The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Goons With Spoons > GWS Culinary Chat: basically tit loving is the same as arm-pit sex
|
|
# ? Mar 15, 2012 18:45 |
|
I would venture to say that the armpit tends to be a more ticklish area then the tit. Also did a tit-fucker like break into your car or kill your dog or something?
|
# ? Mar 15, 2012 18:52 |
|
Phummus posted:No. Tits don't usually have stubble between them. I mean sure, there's often a stray nipple hair every once in a while, but if you get a brush burn from tit loving you might end up with a restraining order keeping you 300 feet away from zoos, SPCAs and Alabama. I really did not know women can get nipple hair. Or are you talking about men giving titfucks.
|
# ? Mar 15, 2012 18:54 |
|
Darval posted:I really did not know women can get nipple hair. I made a girl cry in college because of this. I'm a horrible person.
|
# ? Mar 15, 2012 19:00 |
|
Darval posted:I really did not know women can get nipple hair. Or are you talking about men giving titfucks. Women are mammals.
|
# ? Mar 15, 2012 19:05 |
|
Seriously, titty-loving looks uninteresting. Now I cannot attest to that fact myself, since none of my previous lovers has had boobs which were long enough to actually wrap around my junk. I am having hopes from my wife though, as gravity seems to gradually elongate them. We may get there when she's 60 at the rate they're approaching her waistline. Also, a question, is then and than interchangeable? Happy Hat fucked around with this message at 19:11 on Mar 15, 2012 |
# ? Mar 15, 2012 19:07 |
|
Happy Hat posted:Seriously, titty-loving looks uninteresting. Now I cannot attest to that fact myself, since none of my previous lovers has had boobs which were long enough to actually wrap around my junk. I am having hopes from my wife though, as gravity seems to gradually elongate them. We may get there when she's 60 at the rate they're approaching her waistline. I'm not gonna question what any two consenting adults do in their bedrooms. If you both enjoy it, then go for it. No, they are not interchangeable. "Then" indicates the next in order as a function of time. "I ate my entree, then I had my dessert" "Than" is a conjucntional particle that usually accompanies a comparison. "My entree was better than my dessert"
|
# ? Mar 15, 2012 19:28 |
|
Phummus posted:Show of hands. How many of you cut a hole in a sheet so that you can procreate with the womenfolk without all that sinful nudity? I gently caress like Louis the XVI, I put it in for two minutes, don't move, don't ejaculate and then leave. From a letter from Joseph II* quote:"Imagine, in his marriage bed--this is the secret--he has strong, perfectly healthy erections; he introduces the member, stays there without moving for two minutes, withdraws without ejaculating but still erect, and bids goodnight. It's incredible because he sometimes has nighttime emissions; it is only when he is actually inside and going at it that nothing happens. Nevertheless the King is satisfied with what he does...If only I could have been there! I could have seen to it. The King of France would have been whipped so that he would have ejaculated out of sheer rage like a donkey." *From another thread, can't remember which.
|
# ? Mar 15, 2012 20:03 |
|
That Cock2Cock thing is amazing. I have been entertained all loving afternoon.
|
# ? Mar 15, 2012 21:15 |
|
Happy Hat posted:Also, a question, is then and than interchangeable?
|
# ? Mar 16, 2012 15:52 |
|
Heh, exactly. I can often spot the Brits on EU gaming servers from their atrocious English compared to other Europeans.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2012 18:46 |
|
Ohh, local fancy fried chicken place is doing a lunch special of a fried green tomato BLT... I think I'll have to check that out.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2012 18:55 |
|
Darval posted:Heh, exactly. I can often spot the Brits on EU gaming servers from their atrocious English compared to other Europeans.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2012 18:55 |
|
I like turtles posted:Ohh, local fancy fried chicken place is doing a lunch special of a fried green tomato BLT... I think I'll have to check that out. I am often disappointed with fried green tomatoes. Most of the time they're cut way too thick and underseasoned.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2012 19:07 |
|
It's confusing, that's all.. Kind of like using "x is different than y" - shouldn't it be "x is different from y" instead? Or is it ok to use than when you compare two? I could understand it if it was in the form of comparing a difference from a subject between two other subjects, but then I guess it should still be from? And affect and effect is interchangable too... Also - pronounciation of certain words doesn't make sense either! Kinda like.. beer... Beard is pronounced as beer with a d. Bared is pronounced as bear with a d.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2012 19:13 |
|
Happy Hat posted:It's confusing, that's all.. poo poo man, I moved around so much as a kid I never got a proper education into all this weird, technical English poo poo. I just read so much I've been able to fake it by feel. I mean, what the gently caress is a split infinitive, anyway? Or a dangling participle? And plus, I seem to have done just fine without knowing. Although there was an embarrassing moment in fifth grade when I was reading aloud in class and pronounced 'chaos' as 'chao-os', because my Korean parents didn't exactly speak English at home and I never heard the word aloud before. I mean, I knew what the word meant because I read a lot, but man, did I feel ashamed.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2012 20:03 |
|
Happy Hat posted:It's confusing, that's all.. effect and affect are not interchangeable. effect is most often a noun and affect is most often a verb. This page explains it well: http://grammar.yourdictionary.com/style-and-usage/affect-effect-grammar.html
|
# ? Mar 16, 2012 20:29 |
|
Affect and Effect are not interchangeable. Affect (a verb) means 'to influence' "The shaved truffle affected the taste of my pasta dish" Effect (a noun) means ... hmmm ... an outcome. "I didn't use enough oil in the pan, the effect was that my scallops stuck" A split infinitive is typically when you have an adverb (it ends in 'ly') after the word 'to'. The classic example is "To boldly go where no man has gone before". It really should be "To go boldly where no man has gone before" to be correct. A dangling participle just means that the subject of a participle (usually ending in ING) is not evident. "Wishing I could cook, the broken oven taunted me" is a dangling participle, because the "wishing" applies to me, but the only subject in the sentence. "Wishing I could cook, I cursed at the broken oven" is correct.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2012 20:30 |
|
Phummus posted:Affect and Effect are not interchangeable. Pedant high five.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2012 20:37 |
|
I know, but people use them as if it was the same, without discerning between the different meanings - affect surely is different from effect. The effect of using affect when you mean effect is negatively affecting the effectiveness of bringing your meaning across. With regards to the dangling stuff, it leaves me limp. Edit: I may mean limb, but I cannot hear the difference between the two! Happy Hat fucked around with this message at 20:50 on Mar 16, 2012 |
# ? Mar 16, 2012 20:47 |
|
English is the shattered brandy-glass in the roaring fireplace of language.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2012 20:51 |
|
Halalelujah posted:English is the shattered brandy-glass in the roaring fireplace of language. The only real answer to all "WTF English" questions.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2012 20:54 |
|
Mr. Wiggles posted:We pay $5.99 for 12 packs of PBR, Hamm's, Olympia, and Busch here. If you're into nasty beer though you can get 24 pack suitcases of Natural Ice for $8.99 or $9.99 depending on which gas station you're buying from. Quarts of Coors, Carta Blanca, etc. are usually 89 to 99 cents. This is a good place for yard beer. 12 cans of PBR here are $18.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2012 21:09 |
|
Halalelujah posted:English is the shattered brandy-glass in the roaring fireplace of language. Stupid cat got the tip of her tail bitten off this morning. The vet had to amputate more to get a clean wound. Now she has a cone collar on which she hates, and she is clingy. Poor little thing.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2012 21:29 |
|
Happy Hat posted:It's confusing, that's all.. They are used interchangeably by the less evolved among us. Phummus posted:A split infinitive is typically when you have an adverb (it ends in 'ly') after the word 'to'. The classic example is "To boldly go where no man has gone before". It really should be "To go boldly where no man has gone before" to be correct. Come on. Don't start talking infinitives. Now you open the door to some really messy language issues. You can start talking about gerunds, and verbals, and it can participles. I mean, in many languages, things we call nouns are actually verb participles functioning in the nominative. That all can become quite confusing. Here is a fun exercise: Emphasize each word differently in this sentence to change the meaning: "I didn't say he stole the money." "I didn't say he stole the money." "I didn't say he stole the money." "I didn't say he stole the money." "I didn't say he stole the money." "I didn't say he stole the money." "I didn't say he stole the money." Each emphasis completely changes the meaning of the sentence.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2012 21:37 |
|
Happy Hat posted:The effect of using affect when you mean effect is negatively affecting the effectiveness of bringing your meaning across.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2012 21:47 |
|
therattle posted:Quite. My god, it must be a hard language to master. One of my cats has some kind of cat-flu, and I have to give him cat medicine for like ten days. Fortunately he feels too crappy to put up much of a fuss about it. Poor sneezy guy.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2012 22:04 |
|
i shoot friendlies posted:"I didn't say he stole the money." Hah, this is great
|
# ? Mar 16, 2012 22:05 |
|
There's an episode of HIMYM where Marshall is apparently super bugged about Affect verus Effect... I have to admit it bothers me too, but nowhere near as much as people using Accept/Except interchangeably. ESPECIALLY in situations where it completely reverses the meaning of their message. "Pay by cash/debit/credit: We now except Mastercard" *facepalm*
|
# ? Mar 16, 2012 22:33 |
|
Phummus posted:A split infinitive is typically when you have an adverb (it ends in 'ly') after the word 'to'. The classic example is "To boldly go where no man has gone before". It really should be "To go boldly where no man has gone before" to be correct. This is a split infinitive, yes. However, banning the use of the split infinitive is an attempt by English grammarians to impose Latin syntax (where it is impossible to split an infinitive) on the English language. See, e.g., http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/split-infinitives.aspx ulmont fucked around with this message at 23:17 on Mar 16, 2012 |
# ? Mar 16, 2012 23:13 |
|
Veggie girl wants some more hits on her blog, so check it out: http://melomeals.blogspot.com/ She hasn't been blogging as much, because she hasn't been doing the $3.33 a day thing lately due to her new job. At the moment, I don't think she knows what direction to take it. Also, here is her writeup on Boston's Haymarket: http://melomeals.blogspot.com/2012/01/haymarket-finds-and-chipotle-spit-pea.html
|
# ? Mar 16, 2012 23:34 |
|
Phummus posted:Affect and Effect are not interchangeable.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2012 23:38 |
|
Squashy Nipples posted:Veggie girl wants some more hits on her blog, so check it out: Oh, Haymarket. How I miss thee (sort of). The last refuge for every star market's manager specials. Your girlie's blog reads like an afterthought, is this a project for her or what? No recipe? No commentary on how Haymarket came to be, no narrative of fighting the crowd?
|
# ? Mar 16, 2012 23:45 |
|
Darval posted:I really did not know women can get nipple hair. Or are you talking about men giving titfucks. They can.
|
# ? Mar 17, 2012 01:30 |
|
Some girls get lil wispy hairs around their nipples, so loving what? I tweeze that poo poo with my teeth.
|
# ? Mar 17, 2012 03:11 |
|
|
# ? May 13, 2024 10:16 |
|
Every girl has nipple hair. It's just usually almost invisible.
|
# ? Mar 17, 2012 03:34 |