|
Sulphuric Sundae posted:I didn't hear the term czar itself until Obama was in office, and I'm sure that has something to do with the mental connection one would make and its use in smearing Obama. Of course, Communism killed off the Czars, but I'm sure thats just an inconvenient point they're ignoring.
|
# ? Mar 26, 2012 22:10 |
|
|
# ? May 26, 2024 03:09 |
|
jojoinnit posted:Of course, Communism killed off the Czars, but I'm sure thats just an inconvenient point they're ignoring. Just like how Hitler was a Nazi-commie.
|
# ? Mar 26, 2012 22:41 |
|
Oh god I don't have time to reply to this poo poo. This reply I got actually is a FWD that looks like it originally came from here. I started this argument, breaking up their conservative circle-jerk. So I guess I shouldn't back down like the truth-hating, LIEberal pussy I am. It's a couple months old, so if there's any pre-existing response out there, I will be more than happy to copy-paste that onto Facebook.quote:• First President to Preside Over a Cut to the Credit Rating of the United States Government
|
# ? Mar 26, 2012 23:33 |
|
While most of those are idiotic or outright lies, this one stuck out to me as the worst: • First President to File Lawsuits Against the States He Swore an Oath to Protect (AZ, WI, OH, IN, etc.) We've had presidents send the army and national guard to invade states that were refusing to follow civil rights law. I'm pretty sure nearly every single president has sued a state over one thing or another. It's a very common thing.
|
# ? Mar 26, 2012 23:44 |
|
My favorite is the last one. Not only is he a dictator hell-bent on destroying the country and abridging our freedoms at every step tirelessly, but he is a lazy slacker who golfs a lot too! Imagine how few freedoms we would have if Obama wasn't golfing all the time! Golf may be this country's greatest protector. e: "First President to Arbitrarily Declare an Existing Law Unconstitutional and Refuse to Enforce It". I assume this is about the DOMA decision given by the DoJ: quote:Section 3 of DOMA has now been challenged in the Second Circuit, however, which has no established or binding standard for how laws concerning sexual orientation should be treated. In these cases, the Administration faces for the first time the question of whether laws regarding sexual orientation are subject to the more permissive standard of review or whether a more rigorous standard, under which laws targeting minority groups with a history of discrimination are viewed with suspicion by the courts, should apply. http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2011/February/11-ag-222.html Basically they still uphold the law but won't argue for that particular section's Constitutionality because they don't feel there are any reasonable arguments supporting Constitutionality. For reference, here's Section 3: quote:SEC. 3. DEFINITION OF MARRIAGE. http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c104:H.R.3396.ENR: Mo_Steel fucked around with this message at 00:11 on Mar 27, 2012 |
# ? Mar 26, 2012 23:55 |
|
Yes, it's almost as if these people subscribe to some sort of an ideology that paints their opponents as simultaneously completely inept and overwhelmingly strong...
|
# ? Mar 27, 2012 00:05 |
|
Mo_Steel posted:My favorite is the last one. Not only is he a dictator hell-bent on destroying the country and abridging our freedoms at every step tirelessly, but he is a lazy slacker who golfs a lot too! It's also wrong- Eisenhower golfed every chance he got, he'd blow that record out of the water.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2012 00:08 |
|
Kavak posted:It's also wrong- Eisenhower golfed every chance he got, he'd blow that record out of the water. Here's Ike's golf schedule during hs presidency: http://www.golfdigest.com/images/rankings/2008/04/gd200804ikechronology.pdf Wilson was a big golfer too, with over 1000 golf outings during his presidency.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2012 00:57 |
|
Kavak posted:It's also wrong- Eisenhower golfed every chance he got, he'd blow that record out of the water. And he wanted a tree cut down at Augusta.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2012 01:00 |
|
dur posted:Here's Ike's golf schedule during hs presidency: http://www.golfdigest.com/images/rankings/2008/04/gd200804ikechronology.pdf Three months out for a heart attack, a month and a half for illness, one week for a stroke. He got tougher as he got older.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2012 01:32 |
|
I think the "form response" to that particular email is a big list of "First president to..." and it's talking about George Washington.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2012 01:38 |
|
Sulphuric Sundae posted:Oh god I don't have time to reply to this poo poo. This reply I got actually is a FWD that looks like it originally came from here. I started this argument, breaking up their conservative circle-jerk. So I guess I shouldn't back down like the truth-hating, LIEberal pussy I am. It's a couple months old, so if there's any pre-existing response out there, I will be more than happy to copy-paste that onto Facebook. Almost all of those are shitthatneverhappened.txt or complete non-sequitur. Ask them for citations for the claims in that list. • First President to Preside Over a Cut to the Credit Rating of the United States Government Note that it says "Preside", they have to use this phrasing because the cause of the downgrade were the teaparty and republican shenanigans about threatening to let the US default instead of raising the debt ceiling. This is explicitly stated by S&P when they released their letter of downgrade http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/sandp-considering-first-downgrade-of-us-credit-rating/2011/08/05/gIQAqKeIxI_story.html quote:Lowering the nation’s rating to one notch below AAA, the credit rating company said “political brinkmanship” in the debate over the debt had made the U.S. government’s ability to manage its finances “less stable, less effective and less predictable.” • First President to Orchestrate the Sale of Murder Weapons to Mexican Drug Cartels The President "Orchestrated" this? It sounds like a pretty standard bust where illicit items are sold to dealers and then tracked and used to bring down a larger network of illegal traffickers, except in this case, whoever ran the operation royally hosed it up. • First President to issue an unlawful “recess-appointment” while the U.S. Senate remained in session (against the advice of his own Justice Department). It wasn't unlawful, it was issued during a pro-forma session, which is arguably a legal point at which to issue a recess appointment. The Republicans would have already taken this to the supreme court if they had a leg to stand on with these claims. • First President to be Held in Contempt of Court for Illegally Obstructing Oil Drilling in the Gulf of Mexico Infowars saying he is in contempt of court doesn't actually mean it's true. Ah gently caress it, I'm not going to hit all these line by line. Tell them to cite their BS claims if they aren't full of poo poo. Sarion posted:Yes, thank you. I would post them to Facebook if it wasn't being overwhelmed by porn at the moment. myron cope posted:First president quote:The Area Number, the first three digits, is assigned by the geographical region. Prior to 1973, cards were issued in local Social Security offices around the country and the Area Number represented the office code in which the card was issued. This did not necessarily have to be in the area where the applicant lived, since a person could apply for their card in any Social Security office. Since 1973, when SSA began assigning SSNs and issuing cards centrally from Baltimore, the area number assigned has been based on the ZIP code in the mailing address provided on the application for the original Social Security card. The applicant's mailing address does not have to be the same as their place of residence. Thus, the Area Number does not necessarily represent the State of residence of the applicant, neither prior to 1973, nor since. zeroprime fucked around with this message at 02:13 on Mar 27, 2012 |
# ? Mar 27, 2012 02:08 |
|
They're making a magazine to put all their bad ideas and chain letters now http://www.theconservativeteen.com/ http://krtins.longboys.net/Winter-2011-TCT/index.html#/1/
|
# ? Mar 27, 2012 05:43 |
|
Why did I waste time on this? He'll never read it Probably got a couple things wrong, but my Google history is now "did obama..." for like 20 lines.Sulphuric Sundae posted:-He was president during the credit rating decrease, but it wasn't solely his fault.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2012 15:35 |
|
Wasn't fast and furious started in the W administration? Not that it excuses Holder but to say ONLY PRESIDENT?
|
# ? Mar 27, 2012 15:39 |
|
Sulphuric Sundae posted:Why did I waste time on this? He'll never read it Probably got a couple things wrong, but my Google history is now "did obama..." for like 20 lines. I'm sure there's an Iran-Contra comparison to be made with Fast & Furious. Also, I'm pissed. The Republicans said that they wanted a default. They said this repeatedly, reasoning, out loud, on TV, that the pain it would cause Americans would hurt Obama's reelection chances. Fox talking heads nodded sagely in agreement. After they got everything they wanted, they complained that they didn't get to cause a default, anyway. It's like bank robbers getting away with the money and then complaining that they didn't get to execute the hostages. When I'm looking for someone to blame for the credit downgrade, blame the people who worked out in the open to cause it. It's fine to not like Obama, but the petty destruction that the Republicans have been causing in their 3-year hissy fit is utterly inexcusable.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2012 15:45 |
|
Dr Christmas posted:It's fine to not like Obama, but the petty destruction that the Republicans have been causing in their 3-year hissy fit is utterly inexcusable. That's what pisses me off the most. I don't think Obama's doing a great job and I have some valid reasons why. But all the things I think Obama has done right, these guys hate. And the things I think he's done wrong, they hate for a completely different, terrible reason, or begrudgingly admit "I guess he had to do something right" like extending the Patriot Act or leaving Gitmo open.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2012 15:52 |
|
Dr Christmas posted:I'm sure there's an Iran-Contra comparison to be made with Fast & Furious. Please, everyone point this out every single time someone tries to blame the sitting President for the credit downgrade. Not just that "it wasn't his fault", but that it was the result of tea partiers and republicans actively using the threat of a US default as a bargaining chip. This game of chicken with a US default was explicitly stated by S&P as the reason for the downgrade.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2012 15:56 |
|
Dr Christmas posted:It's fine to not like Obama, but the petty destruction that the Republicans have been causing in their 3-year hissy fit is utterly inexcusable.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2012 15:57 |
|
zeroprime posted:Please, everyone point this out every single time someone tries to blame the sitting President for the credit downgrade. Not just that "it wasn't his fault", but that it was the result of tea partiers and republicans actively using the threat of a US default as a bargaining chip. This game of chicken with a US default was explicitly stated by S&P as the reason for the downgrade. The inevitable response "Obama should have agreed with the Tea Party."
|
# ? Mar 27, 2012 15:58 |
|
I found a version of that list that cites all the claims. It's funny, because some of the claims are debunked like right in the first line of the linked article. Like those fwds that go "Check Snopes! It's true!" expecting you not to actually go to Snopes.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2012 16:06 |
|
Why would I check Snopes when I already agree with everything it says?
|
# ? Mar 27, 2012 16:14 |
|
BrotherAdso posted:It's a dumb way to put it. Why not call them policy office directors or something? Czars are inherently bad-sounding.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2012 17:13 |
Mooseontheloose posted:Wasn't fast and furious started in the W administration? Not that it excuses Holder but to say ONLY PRESIDENT? In the right wing narrative, GWB is basically a democrat now.
|
|
# ? Mar 27, 2012 18:55 |
|
Leon Einstein posted:Why are they inherently bad sounding? Do you feel the same way about Caesar and Kaiser? Ten bucks most of them think Kaiser is a Nazi title.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2012 19:01 |
|
Also literally no one has complained about the name until Obama. This has never been a thing in the decades we've had 'Czars'. Oh, also, people saying Czar is a communist title, those people are functionally brain damaged.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2012 19:05 |
|
Leon Einstein posted:Why are they inherently bad sounding? Do you feel the same way about Caesar and Kaiser? They're inherently bad to most people because they are Russian and Russian means Commie and that's bad. It doesn't matter that Czar isn't a Communist title. And yes, they would say the same thing if someone decided they were going to be the Caesar of North Dakota or the Kaiser of the US. Caesar means Emperor which is bad and Kaiser means German which is bad. It's not complicated, people are pretty simple.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2012 19:15 |
|
Mike Fratello was a proud Czar. No one gave him poo poo about that.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2012 19:19 |
|
You'd think that people (Republicans) who hate government and think it can't do anything right would want to have a "czar", if the name would imply that they're a single person in charge of something, instead of having ten different agencies with directors and agendas and protocols and regulations and...
|
# ? Mar 27, 2012 19:19 |
|
Dominion posted:They're inherently bad to most people because they are Russian and Russian means Commie and that's bad. It doesn't matter that Czar isn't a Communist title.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2012 20:09 |
|
Leon Einstein posted:My point is that czar, caesar, and kaiser all mean the same thing, and are variations on the same word. They're not inherently bad just because some people are stupid. I think you'd find that the people who actually care about this distinction are a distinct minority of the whole US voting population
|
# ? Mar 27, 2012 20:12 |
|
Leon Einstein posted:My point is that czar, caesar, and kaiser all mean the same thing, and are variations on the same word. They're not inherently bad just because some people are stupid. It doesn't matter at all if they are inherently bad words. It only matters what the majority of people think about them, and the majority of people in the US would, in fact, think any of those titles were bad when applied to American officials.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2012 20:21 |
|
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/22/opinion/kristof-politics-odors-and-soap.html?_r=1&ref=opinion This got posted without comment on one of the vanishingly few Facebook friends of mine who posts Conservative stuff. (I don't avoid or de-friend them, it's just a happy coincidence, I guess). Anyway, the crux of it is that conservatives are better at guessing how liberals will answer questions than vice-versa.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2012 22:16 |
|
Dr Christmas posted:http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/22/opinion/kristof-politics-odors-and-soap.html?_r=1&ref=opinion Jonathan Haidt gave my favorite TED talk: http://www.ted.com/talks/jonathan_haidt_on_the_moral_mind.html Sudden Loud Noise fucked around with this message at 00:25 on Mar 28, 2012 |
# ? Mar 28, 2012 00:21 |
|
Got this gem from one of my old high school buddies on facebook this morning:My Terrible FB Friend posted:intresting... Natas Dog posted:Maybe it's because the guys who did that are in jail and not walking the streets without so much as being charged? Just a hunch.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2012 15:27 |
|
They have a point. Why didn't Fox News and CNN cover this issue more than 4 years ago? WHYYYY?! Also, the CNN story, if you watch it, points out that the genital mutilations mentioned in that image never took place and were the fabrication of white supremacy bloggers. The guy on the bottom right was only an accessory in the car-jacking and not involved in the rest. He got the maximum sentence of 18 years. The woman got 53 years. The guy at the top left is on death row. The other two both got life without parole. All of the sentencing was handed down more than two years ago. That's why no one is talking about it. It's been dealt with. George Zimmerman admitted to shooting Trayvon Martin; George Zimmerman is still free. But nope, don't see the difference at all!
|
# ? Mar 28, 2012 16:37 |
|
Not to mention the disparity between "white girl kidnapped" vs. "black girl kidnapped" Here's an example that actually did get pointed out: http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-201_162-512915.html
|
# ? Mar 28, 2012 17:28 |
|
Sarion posted:They have a point. Why didn't Fox News and CNN cover this issue more than 4 years ago? WHYYYY?! That pic popped up on my news feed, so I stole most of your post.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2012 18:36 |
|
Someone actually linked the snopes article about that story on my feed and I correctly pointed out that in the article they say the reason it didn't get national attention is because every murder can't get national attention, and also because punishment was handled relatively swiftly. The ones that do get national attention either involve celebrities or kids. They got mad and deleted my post.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2012 19:08 |
|
|
# ? May 26, 2024 03:09 |
|
One of my friends posted the same thing, I didn't even know it was false. I called her out for being racist and said if I ever get murdered I hope people don't use it as an excuse to say it sucks to be white. She quietly deleted the whole thing.
|
# ? Mar 28, 2012 19:55 |