|
incoherent posted:Yeah, its kind of loving wonky. There should be a test button to check if it can authenticate. Where does it fail at? The part that allows me to log in It just errors out with a generic username/password invalid error. It doesn't tell me anything else. I've tried every combination of domain/username, username@domain, etc etc I can think of to no avail. I'm going to be asking our Sr. Sysadmin about it but damnit I really wanted to do this myself
|
# ? Mar 30, 2012 15:00 |
|
|
# ? May 18, 2024 06:34 |
|
InfiniteDonkey posted:
I maintain my reference images in esx. Being able to use snapshots makes it invaluable. Using workstation would be no different. You'll never go back to using a physical machine.
|
# ? Apr 1, 2012 13:54 |
|
What's the main difference between SBS and 2008? Features for AD and GP?
|
# ? Apr 1, 2012 17:05 |
|
Swink posted:I maintain my reference images in esx. Being able to use snapshots makes it invaluable. Using workstation would be no different. You'll never go back to using a physical machine. Seriously. In my new/current job we don't use VMs at all. And we're testing software deployments. We have a lab of 60 computers to do the work of 5 VMs. It's a complete joke.
|
# ? Apr 1, 2012 20:09 |
|
We don't virtualise where I'm at. I can't talk anyone into it. The exact quote I get for why we're not doing it is "It's job security when the executives step into the server room and are intimidated by all of the servers". We could literally virtualise our 15 physical servers into two physical machines.
|
# ? Apr 1, 2012 20:29 |
|
psydude posted:What's the main difference between SBS and 2008? Features for AD and GP? As a side-note we've almost only sold SBS to our customers, which means almost all of them run SBS on a single server, which when Symantec Endpoint Protection client screws up access to/from the server means that _everything_ stops. Was a fun week to diagnose, was it hardware or software? Did the backups contain proper data or if it was a memory error, had the backups also been corrupted?.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2012 10:33 |
|
Not sure where else to ask this but this seems as good a thread as any; anybody have any recommendations for IM software that integrates with Active Directory? Free would be preferable! Note: I for the life of me cannot get Spark/Openfire to function correctly on my server with single sign-on, so something that isn't that, would be terrific.
|
# ? Apr 12, 2012 15:58 |
|
Furnok Dorn posted:Not sure where else to ask this but this seems as good a thread as any; anybody have any recommendations for IM software that integrates with Active Directory? Free would be preferable! Spark/Openfire is pretty much the most mature open source IM software out there. If your a MS Shop Office Communicator rocks, but can get pricy if your not on a big agreement with them. We have a big EA with Enterprise CALs for everyone, so we already pay for most of the crap we don't even use. Really though, I ran Spark/Openfire for 3 years authenticating against AD and had almost no issues at all. If you're trying to configure Spark for true SSO, the documentation on their site should be enough to get it working, if not I bet there's an answer somewhere in the forums.
|
# ? Apr 12, 2012 16:23 |
|
skipdogg posted:Spark/Openfire is pretty much the most mature open source IM software out there. If your a MS Shop Office Communicator rocks, but can get pricy if your not on a big agreement with them. We have a big EA with Enterprise CALs for everyone, so we already pay for most of the crap we don't even use. Yeah, I've done everything to the letter on their setup guide and keep getting the same error, what I've read points to it being a keytab issue but I can't for the life of me figure out what it is.
|
# ? Apr 12, 2012 19:59 |
|
I'm going to be migrating 35 or so clients from a lovely domain to a new domain (but they have the same name) so I have to remove the machines from the domain before I add it to the old domain. In case there are some workstations hiding that I don't discover until after the fact, is there a way to force a machine to leave a domain if it can't talk to that domain?
|
# ? Apr 13, 2012 03:01 |
|
FISHMANPET posted:I'm going to be migrating 35 or so clients from a lovely domain to a new domain (but they have the same name) so I have to remove the machines from the domain before I add it to the old domain. In my experience, if a machine is being unjoined and cannot contact the domain controller, once it times out it unjoins anyway.
|
# ? Apr 13, 2012 13:13 |
|
All the authentication prompt when unjoining a workstation is for is to disable (I think) the computer account on the network. You can enter gibberish in it even if the domain is contactable and the PC will still unjoin.
|
# ? Apr 13, 2012 13:27 |
|
quackquackquack posted:In my experience, if a machine is being unjoined and cannot contact the domain controller, once it times out it unjoins anyway.
|
# ? Apr 14, 2012 17:21 |
|
evil_bunnY posted:Yeah you only need local admin to unjoin. I tested this out and it does indeed seem to be the case. Excellent.
|
# ? Apr 14, 2012 17:58 |
|
IT Guy posted:We don't virtualise where I'm at. I can't talk anyone into it. The exact quote I get for why we're not doing it is "It's job security when the executives step into the server room and are intimidated by all of the servers". What about job security when you have a small cluster running in there, and they touch the KVM and there is literally nothing they can do from an ESXi screen? My new boss talked about how stepping into a heavily virtualized environment coming from a place that was mostly physicals is pretty overwhelming until you get a good understanding of virtualization.
|
# ? Apr 14, 2012 20:22 |
|
Moey posted:What about job security when you have a small cluster running in there, and they touch the KVM and there is literally nothing they can do from an ESXi screen? My new boss talked about how stepping into a heavily virtualized environment coming from a place that was mostly physicals is pretty overwhelming until you get a good understanding of virtualization. "Oh you need a test rig for that quick project, sure let me spin one up oh-wait-i-can't" IT Guy posted:We could literally virtualise our 15 physical servers into two physical machines. spidoman posted:Seriously. In my new/current job we don't use VMs at all. And we're testing software deployments. We have a lab of 60 computers to do the work of 5 VMs. It's a complete joke. evil_bunnY fucked around with this message at 22:34 on Apr 14, 2012 |
# ? Apr 14, 2012 22:32 |
|
My new Enterprise Windows Management is going to be Microsoft's Enterprise Windows Management. 500,000+ machines. I'm terrified.
|
# ? Apr 14, 2012 22:34 |
|
evil_bunnY posted:Going the other way around is the most depressing thing ever, too. There are very few cases where things need to remain physical in this day and age. I've never heard drivers as one of those.
|
# ? Apr 15, 2012 01:46 |
|
I'd say lovely drivers are a reason to go virtual. Not many developers will test their application with every weird network adapter there is out there, but almost everyone will at least try to test on Hyper-V and ESXi.
|
# ? Apr 16, 2012 11:13 |
|
peak debt posted:I'd say lovely drivers are a reason to go virtual. Not many developers will test their application with every weird network adapter there is out there, but almost everyone will at least try to test on Hyper-V and ESXi. I thought he was saying he didn't want to go virtual because of drivers, but in hindsight it looks like he meant testing applications in conjunction with bad drivers on physical servers? Sorry if I misunderstood.
|
# ? Apr 16, 2012 13:04 |
|
three posted:I thought he was saying he didn't want to go virtual because of drivers, but in hindsight it looks like he meant testing applications in conjunction with bad drivers on physical servers? Sorry if I misunderstood.
|
# ? Apr 16, 2012 14:44 |
|
I think I found my new workstation: Specs: HP ProLiant BL465 G7 (4) (16 processors, 192 cores and 2048 GB memory) Total (396) 146GB 15K SFF disks, 57 TB raw capacity In reality, just plug-in power and 4 10g ethernet connections and you've got your cloud in a box! MMS is such a fun time.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2012 04:00 |
|
How much does that thing cost.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2012 04:24 |
|
Yaos posted:How much does that thing cost. Quick and dirty guess would be 350K to 500K depending on how big of a discount you can swing from HP. That includes all the software and support fees from HP as well. The issue with something like that is power density. What kind of power reqs does that rack have? Dual 60A 208V?
|
# ? Apr 18, 2012 05:31 |
|
Is that HP's version of the VCE vBlock?
|
# ? Apr 18, 2012 15:42 |
|
skipdogg posted:Quick and dirty guess would be 350K to 500K depending on how big of a discount you can swing from HP. That includes all the software and support fees from HP as well. At least that much, I'd also assume they have requirements for floor structure as that thing must weigh a ton. I remember touring Burtons facilities in 2004 and they got some HP san, which was ridiculously expensive back then and HP had engineers sent out to the site to make sure everything was in place before the unit was put in. Have to say, seeing a piece of gear like that back then was pretty loving jaw dropping when they explained what it could do.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2012 16:24 |
|
They're running the MMS lab VMs on it. 12,000 VMs that are all reprovisioned every hour, in less than ten minutes.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2012 18:39 |
|
Can anybody make heads or tails of the System Center 2012 release? I want SCCM 2012 whatever that is, Ops Manager, Data Protection Manager, maybe Endpoint Protection, and maybe others. From what I can tell They're all included, but you still have to choose SC 2012 Datacenter of Standard. I asked our campus software people about an upgrade, they gave me the following options: System Center 2012 Client Management Suite System Center 2012 Config Mgr Client Mgmt System Center 2012 Datacenter System Center 2012 Endpoint Protection System Center 2012 Standard None of that meshes with my understanding, so I'm at a bit of a loss.
|
# ? Apr 24, 2012 22:24 |
|
I've set up MDT a couple times over the the last 4 years, so I decided this time I would make it a challenge! Win7-32 and 64, 16 different computer models need to be supported (thankfully all Dell), 20 applications (I have "packaged" 15 of them before, but I don't have access to that previous work), but luckily no user state crap, it's for "fresh" computers only at this point in time. Can I do it in 8 working hours? Do I really just need a more challenging job instead?
|
# ? Apr 24, 2012 22:37 |
|
Unfortunately, Dell has made it really easy to get all your drivers in a single package; it's not really a challenge. http://en.community.dell.com/techcenter/enterprise-client/w/wiki/2065.dell-driver-cab-files-for-enterprise-client-os-deployment.aspx Gumshoes, here's your challenge, create a silent install for any Adobe product.
|
# ? Apr 24, 2012 22:46 |
|
gently caress Adobe products forever
|
# ? Apr 25, 2012 00:48 |
|
I was aware of the system CABs (thank god), but that link is way better than going to each model's page, thanks. Use the Adobe Customization Wizard?
|
# ? Apr 25, 2012 00:58 |
|
FISHMANPET posted:Can anybody make heads or tails of the System Center 2012 release? I want SCCM 2012 whatever that is, Ops Manager, Data Protection Manager, maybe Endpoint Protection, and maybe others. From what I can tell They're all included, but you still have to choose SC 2012 Datacenter of Standard. http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/server-cloud/system-center/configuration-manager-2012-buy.aspx http://download.microsoft.com/download/1/1/1/11128EC7-2BE7-480C-9D46-4ECECA9E481A/System%20Center%202012%20Licensing%20Datasheet.pdf http://download.microsoft.com/download/8/7/0/870B5D9B-ACF1-4192-BD0A-543AF551B7AE/System%20Center%202012%20Licensing%20FAQ.pdf
|
# ? Apr 25, 2012 07:41 |
|
"[oMa posted:Whackster"] This is something you shouldn't read right away when you get out of bed and figure out the licensing model best for you. ghostinmyshell fucked around with this message at 15:56 on Apr 25, 2012 |
# ? Apr 25, 2012 14:37 |
|
I think the confusion on those documents comes from most of the start being about server management licences (SMLs), where most people I know (ie. those not running datacentres) are most interested in client management (MLs): Standard and Datacenter licences are for machines running server OSs you manage and cover all the available System Center 2012 components, but you're limited to controlling 2 VMs on a server with a Standard licence. The table 'Licencing Managed Clients' is what desktop people are interested in - it shows which MLs you need for which components, and which might already be included if you have Core/Enterprise CAL suites. As far as I understand, there's no cost/licence associated with the actual System Center servers themselves, including running the SQL server to host the database for SCCM 2012 as an example. I think that's correct, anyway!
|
# ? Apr 25, 2012 16:47 |
|
Crap like that makes me happy we just buy Enterprise CAL's for the whole company. We don't really have to worry about too much of the licensing crap. Downside is we hardly use any of the stuff we actually pay for and it's expensive as hell.
|
# ? Apr 25, 2012 17:04 |
|
So, I'm in my office win paris, and they bought a server from Dell, but everything is in French. I can generally figure stuff out but this is killing me with error checking. I tried installing a MUI, but, it won't install. Am I stuck with this?
|
# ? Apr 25, 2012 17:11 |
|
How can I find the vSphere version a Windows guest is running on? I've got two different vSphere environments that people use for testing MDT deployments, 4.1 and 5. In the Task Sequence, I want to install the VMware tools, but I can't think of how I would determine what version I need to install, since WMI only returns "VMware Virtual Platform" as the model.
|
# ? Apr 26, 2012 16:08 |
|
quackquackquack posted:How can I find the vSphere version a Windows guest is running on? VMware Tools is pulled from the host when you install/upgrade through vSphere, so the host will feed it whatever version is needed. Are you trying to push out the installer in some other way? Also, the newest Tools version is compatible with both 4.x and 5 hypervisors, so you can just stick it on the template/image.
|
# ? Apr 26, 2012 16:34 |
|
|
# ? May 18, 2024 06:34 |
|
$1300 for a server license when you can buy decent 1U servers for $3000 is a bit silly. I sure hope you can get big discounts off that price...
peak debt fucked around with this message at 16:45 on Apr 26, 2012 |
# ? Apr 26, 2012 16:37 |