|
Bob Shabazz posted:Nope that's Dave Kingman. Always the correct answer for any team. Even teams that don't have Dave Kingman.
|
# ? Apr 11, 2012 16:05 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 12:31 |
|
OK, I know I had talked about this a while back, but work got me sidetracked and poo poo and I had put this on the back burner because I was getting weird results and didn't have time to debug. Anyhow, a few bug fixes later and I now have what I believe to be an accurately compiled database of WIS open league stats comprising the past 360 or so open leagues. The only caveat I have is that in order to get salary data in here I had to do a simple sql join with the wis provided salary sheets. However, there is nothing in the league spreadsheets that indicates which stint of a player you are looking at. So anyone with multiple seasons has the potential to have an incorrect salary listed. Please let me know of any of these that you find, I will add them to a silly sql update adjustment list at the end of each update phase. I will probably run updates weekly or so (have to actually write the auto updater), and put the resulting db in the same place for all to enjoy. Here it is: http://sidehack.gweep.net/~toad/wis/wis.zip Inside the zip are 10 files: wis_league_hitting.sql wis_league_hitting_splits.sql wis_league_pitching.sql wis_league_pitching_splits.sql wis_league_fielding.sql wis_league_hitting.csv wis_league_hitting_splits.csv wis_league_pitching.csv wis_league_pitching_splits.csv wis_league_fielding.csv I included both SQL and CSV format so even people with excel can play along. I think access can read in SQL statement files. Does google have a cool online database thing like they do for spreadsheets? We could maybe make it public that way. Also share you favorite awesome queries and such. Also recommend any fields you want me to compute and include on the baseline sheet.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2012 12:37 |
|
So I'm just looking at the .csv data, but I suspect that something weird is happening in the RC calculation (and consequently RC27). I can vaguely understand '08 Joss being way at the top due to heavy usage, but not so much someone like '15 McCabe and when I run the fomula for RC based on the wis stats legend I get different numbers. Also, it looks like all the 2011 players have salary 0. In total though this looks like a super useful resource that I could imagine spending huge chunks of time playing with. e: The only real outlier apparent so far: in 10 uses 1902 Charlie Hickman (costing ~850k) has hit .365/.386/.521 over ~600ab/season. foolish_fool fucked around with this message at 15:56 on Apr 17, 2012 |
# ? Apr 17, 2012 14:40 |
|
Hmm, you know I didn't double check the RC data so that could very well be messed up, will have a go at it. I think I can fix the salary thing fairly easily as well if WIS has an updated salary sheet up. EDIT: Yah, I see where the RC thing was getting messed up. Was tallying up the wrong field from the originating spreadsheet. That does mean though that I'll have to do another full run of the db, so that will be done overnight and the update will be ready tomorrow. toadee fucked around with this message at 14:50 on Apr 17, 2012 |
# ? Apr 17, 2012 14:46 |
|
Pick Six best league
|
# ? Apr 17, 2012 15:16 |
|
Eric Plunk
|
# ? Apr 17, 2012 15:21 |
|
I agree with Bob
|
# ? Apr 17, 2012 15:52 |
|
I had a terrible draft and my team sucks. But Fulton County so dingers. Atheistdeals is going to win the league.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2012 16:02 |
|
Brook Jacoby at 2B is going to be ugly.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2012 16:05 |
|
Where we're going we don't need defense
|
# ? Apr 17, 2012 16:10 |
|
foolish_fool posted:So I'm just looking at the .csv data, but I suspect that something weird is happening in the RC calculation (and consequently RC27). OK, actually was able to: code:
edit: exporting this now, should be in the zip shortly. edit2: done toadee fucked around with this message at 16:29 on Apr 17, 2012 |
# ? Apr 17, 2012 16:20 |
|
Devo posted:Atheistdeals is going to win the league. Here's hoping! I want to destroy every pitcher in Coors.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2012 20:59 |
|
e: I passed on this so everybody move on.
AlleyViper fucked around with this message at 23:43 on Apr 18, 2012 |
# ? Apr 17, 2012 22:57 |
|
Regarding Wascar, 1st year pros are particularly tough to project with low advance scouting. If his splits start going up 1 or 2 points an update, I like the trade. But who knows if one or both of them is already near topped out? Honestly in Dimaggio I was flying blind getting Iago H. from you last season and trading him for Fred McGehee since they were 1st year pros in the preseason and even with a few updates I can only guess how I did in that series of trades. How much did Wascar get in IFA? That might help gauge if he's got some bigger flaw.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2012 23:07 |
|
gyroball posted:How much did Wascar get in IFA? That might help gauge if he's got some bigger flaw. That was something I was trying to gauge myself. He got 13m+ as a bonus.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2012 23:12 |
|
toadee posted:Also recommend any fields you want me to compute and include on the baseline sheet. If I'm reading this right, '07 and '09 Cy Morgan are hugely more efficient than any other options.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2012 07:29 |
|
Well... this is certainly an IFA And here's one that came IN THE VERY SAME CYCLE OF THE SAME WORLD Quasimango fucked around with this message at 08:19 on Apr 18, 2012 |
# ? Apr 18, 2012 08:17 |
|
$20M starting demand for Pulido, bolstered by the "probably won't sign." Imagine being the leading bidder on him only to have him eventually not sign. Good lord.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2012 09:04 |
|
Meanwhile Dimaggio gets Jumbo Cho...
|
# ? Apr 18, 2012 12:52 |
|
Argh the HBD servers crashed while I was trying to sign free agents
|
# ? Apr 18, 2012 13:26 |
|
Alright, here's another player valuation question. I'm trying to rank the top of my board for the Greenwell draft tomorrow morning. The top choice is pretty obvious. After him, though, I'm not sure how to rank the next three guys. Here is who I'm looking at, 13/13 scouting: Ibanez seems like the obvious #3 of those three but he's intriguing with that projected control, vel/GB, 4 strong pitches and his health/durability/makeup. Schneider could be awesome but I'm not confident about him hitting his splits and I really don't like flyball pitchers. Franco's not going to hit all his projections but the one thing my org does not have at any level is a good corner OF bat.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2012 23:43 |
|
Franco/Schneider/Ibanez looks like the right order to me and I think there's a huge gap between Schneider and Ibanez. Schneider's numbers are already presently way better than Ibanez and Schneider's the HS guy.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2012 23:46 |
|
Yeah, I like Schneider more, Ibanez just looks like the kind of guy who could outperform his numbers if he progresses correctly, though I'm not sure he even would anyway. Those starting splits are blehhhhh. It may be a non-issue anyway since I'm drafting 8th.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2012 00:00 |
|
Quasimango posted:Well... this is certainly an IFA I wish I could've signed this Fautino, holy poo poo. He can even run!
|
# ? Apr 19, 2012 00:42 |
|
I don't think you could go wrong with either Franco or Schneider.Popero posted:I wish I could've signed this Fautino, holy poo poo. He can even run! His ceiling is basically a 1.100 OPS hitter who can play every game, steal 70 bases and play right field. Thank christ no-one in my division has the budget for him.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2012 02:43 |
|
He'll steal a lot more than 70 bases unless he's handcuffed by an owner that never runs. Easy triple digits per year on a running team at 100 speed/90+ baserunning getting on base a ton.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2012 02:46 |
|
Quasimango posted:His ceiling is basically a 1.100 OPS hitter Let's not go too crazy here. He's basically Al Garces, they're actually remarkably similar. Fautino has lower starting splits, though he'll have a better eye. Of course Garces gets dinged playing half his games in Oakland but asking anyone not named Leo Egan to put up an 1.100 OPS every year is a lot. (now go look at what Garces signed for and try not to let your jaw hit the floor)
|
# ? Apr 19, 2012 02:49 |
|
$17M and change?! The hell?!
|
# ? Apr 19, 2012 03:28 |
|
toadee posted:The only caveat I have is that in order to get salary data in here I had to do a simple sql join with the wis provided salary sheets. However, there is nothing in the league spreadsheets that indicates which stint of a player you are looking at. So anyone with multiple seasons has the potential to have an incorrect salary listed. Please let me know of any of these that you find... https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmFozEGXCxjEdHUxaGQtd3pucVVXQUkwT2dQUjNmQUE * actually I wrote a program to construct the optimal 10-pitcher staff costing less than 40M and throwing more than 1250 innings, and the results all contained 1890 Elton Chamberlain or 1994 Pedro Martinez or 1909 Cy Morgan and that seemed somewhat odd... I uploaded some (somewhat messy) R code.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2012 04:01 |
|
ThatsMyBoye posted:$17M and change?! The hell?! Yeah, I dunno how that happened, he was only the fourth biggest bonus that season. You'd have to ask Nasboat how exactly that unfolded.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2012 04:16 |
|
foolish_fool posted:I started to find some of these, the really obvious ones for pitchers are in the spreadsheet below. Basically I calculated cost per pitch thrown* and the unreasonably low ones (given non-terrible era) all appear to be a problem. yah I think actually Im going to hack together a system to add salaries more intelligently and do another import. I'm planning on taking PA or IP/uses, then comparing it to the PA/162 or IP/162, and whatever has the smallest difference betwee PAorIP/uses compared to actual per 162 is going to be the most likely salary to choose. Still won't be perfect but I think it'll solve a lot of issues. Im curious about this R code, gonna take a look now, I'm not the mathiest guy ever so Im not familiar with a good algorithm for creating the best group for under X $$$.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2012 11:44 |
|
toadee posted:Im not familiar with a good algorithm for creating the best group for under X $$$. I tried to do hitters as well but they are rather more complicated, even without thinking about positions. foolish_fool fucked around with this message at 12:54 on Apr 19, 2012 |
# ? Apr 19, 2012 12:50 |
|
=bats()
|
# ? Apr 19, 2012 13:25 |
|
So, I ended up with Ibanez at pick 8. Vaughn, Franco, Schneider and one other guy I ended up ranking ahead of Ibanez all went in the top five. Now, after the first cycle he is already in wait and see mode for signing a contract. If he raises his demand and I simply don't meet it, will that give me Type D compensation or does he have to refuse to sign for Type D to kick in? There's a decent IFA out there that I could use the extra money from his pick for and I wouldn't mind taking the shot that someone better is there for the 9th pick of the next draft.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2012 14:32 |
|
You can't withdraw your offer at any time before he refuses. So in theory that could work but that IFA might be gone by the time Ibanez officially declines.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2012 14:39 |
|
Withdraw Offer is there for me But the bigger issue is whether or not it works like that. I don't know if you only get Type D comp if the player himself refuses to sign or if you get it in any scenario where you don't end up signing him.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2012 14:45 |
|
I'm saying if you click Withdraw Offer at any time you won't get the type D. You've got to sit on that money until he outright rejects.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2012 14:49 |
|
Oh, right, I assumed that much, I didn't think I could just withdraw but the way you worded that threw me off.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2012 14:58 |
|
http://www.whatifsports.com/slb/Boxscore.aspx?gid=17349164&pid=1&pbp=0&tf=9.95 gorm
|
# ? Apr 20, 2012 03:07 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 12:31 |
|
I'm trying to patch together my offense in Hometown before spring training and I'd like some defensive recommendations. I'm in the NL and I'm playing with 14 position players. There's platoons all over the place and I actually think it's going to be pretty fun. My main question has to do with my outfield against righties. Irv Rooney Roland Green Albert Espinosa Rooney has been my CF since I took over the team but he's getting older and his range has slipped off enough that I'm not sure he should be playing CF anymore. I picked up Green in a trade last season and he has monster range but not as much glove as Rooney. I'd like Espinosa's bat in the lineup over my other vR options but he doesn't really have the arm I like in RF. Rooney doesn't either for that matter but his is a little better than Espinosa's. Right now I'm thinking: CF: Green RF: Rooney 2B: Espinosa Thoughts?
|
# ? Apr 20, 2012 16:43 |