|
this is everything that could possibly go wrong with a wikipedia article, on a single page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masturbation nsfw and dont ask me why i clicked through to this article
|
# ? Apr 17, 2012 16:44 |
|
|
# ? May 11, 2024 11:15 |
|
was it for a project
|
# ? Apr 17, 2012 16:46 |
|
Ruby got Railed posted:was it for a project dear bing how do I "jerk it"? sincerely nagato
|
# ? Apr 17, 2012 18:40 |
|
wikihow.com/wiki/Masturbation
|
# ? Apr 17, 2012 18:53 |
|
Panic! At The cisco posted:wikihow.com/wiki/Masturbation http://www.wikihow.com/Get-Rid-of-an-Unwanted-Erection
|
# ? Apr 18, 2012 13:05 |
|
|
# ? Apr 18, 2012 14:07 |
|
.lnk to the past posted:Truck nuts (トラック—NUTS?)
|
# ? Apr 18, 2012 14:13 |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_dates_predicted_for_apocalyptic_events#This_is_strange_stuff. (1) "This list is incomplete; you can help by expanding it." This sentence seems to recommend expanding the list by making more such predictions. Probably not what was meant. (1) Certainly not by predicting the end yourself. See Wikipedia:Original research. To me, it encourages adding widely reported predictions, predicted by others.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2012 18:51 |
|
.lnk to the past posted:Truck nuts (トラック—NUTS?)
|
# ? Apr 19, 2012 22:03 |
|
I just remembered there was a no original research infinite loop when "All Day" by Girl Talk came out because people successfully argued that there was no way to verify if the sample list was accurate without that verification effort counting as "original research" and therefore disqualifying it from wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:All_Day_%28Girl_Talk_album%29
|
# ? Apr 19, 2012 22:19 |
|
lol you read the talk page
|
# ? Apr 19, 2012 22:26 |
|
Wit_sponge posted:http://www.wikihow.com/Get-Rid-of-an-Unwanted-Erection Know that there are times that it will be next to impossible to avoid having your erection viewed, as when you are reclining at a dental appointment with a dentist and/or assistant; standing before a coach while auditioning; or inspecting a house for sale with a realtor, for examples.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2012 22:36 |
|
Aleksei Vasiliev posted:yep, this is the most worthless thing on wikipedia Holy gently caress i assumed that was a joke. what do truck nuts have to do with japan
|
# ? Apr 19, 2012 22:52 |
|
Hammerite posted:Holy gently caress i assumed that was a joke. what do truck nuts have to do with japan Truck Nuts: In Popular Culture: Anime
|
# ? Apr 19, 2012 22:53 |
|
some dude reverted part of my contributions to the truck nuts page
|
# ? Apr 20, 2012 02:40 |
|
qirex posted:I just remembered there was a no original research infinite loop when "All Day" by Girl Talk came out because people successfully argued that there was no way to verify if the sample list was accurate without that verification effort counting as "original research" and therefore disqualifying it from wikipedia so why didn't someone just post the sample list on a blog post or something and then it's "outside research"
|
# ? Apr 20, 2012 02:47 |
|
Nevergirls posted:so why didn't someone just post the sample list on a blog post or something and then it's "outside research" basically they came within a hair's breadth of an "Emperor's New Clothes" moment but managed to use twisted logic to weasel out of claiming that the act verifying any source would violate "no original research" for the whole of the site
|
# ? Apr 20, 2012 03:02 |
|
Wit_sponge posted:http://www.wikihow.com/Get-Rid-of-an-Unwanted-Erection http://www.wikihow.com/Hide-an-Erection
|
# ? Apr 20, 2012 03:19 |
|
Coffee Quack posted:http://www.wikihow.com/Hide-an-Erection http://www.wikihow.com/Make-a-Date-With-an-Escort-over-the-Phone
|
# ? Apr 20, 2012 05:41 |
|
qirex posted:because there was no way to verify that the blog post was not made specifically to be a source for wikipedia and no way to verify the data in the blog post does the wiki-justice system run under common law
|
# ? Apr 20, 2012 06:39 |
|
http://www.wikihow.com/Make-Yourself-Look-Pathetic-on-the-Internet
|
# ? Apr 20, 2012 13:18 |
|
* Write about How to Make Yourself Look Pathetic on the Internet.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2012 22:05 |
|
step one: have an avatar of a fat man on the phone
|
# ? Apr 20, 2012 22:16 |
|
i'm want to make a stink about the fact that in lists of software they show gpl in green and proprietary in red that's not neutral at all!!!!
|
# ? Apr 20, 2012 22:18 |
|
i dont need an article from wikihow to tell me how to look pathetic on the internet
|
# ? Apr 20, 2012 23:51 |
|
lol what kind of idiot needs help w/ that??
|
# ? Apr 21, 2012 06:15 |
|
daveftl
|
# ? Apr 21, 2012 06:16 |
|
Sweevo posted:step one: have an avatar of a fat man on the phone ay!
|
# ? Apr 21, 2012 07:50 |
|
Shaggar posted:daveftl faster than lose
|
# ? Apr 21, 2012 17:36 |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flatulist
|
# ? Apr 21, 2012 18:07 |
|
b0nes posted:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flatulist im roland the farter
|
# ? Apr 21, 2012 18:39 |
|
|
# ? Apr 21, 2012 21:37 |
|
reeking emission
|
# ? Apr 21, 2012 21:39 |
|
Carthag posted:
lol this one sucks
|
# ? Apr 21, 2012 21:40 |
|
Panic! At The cisco posted:reeking emission
|
# ? Apr 21, 2012 21:52 |
|
No, a hapax legomenon occurs only once in a corpus; embiggen is used repeatedly in the Simpsons, including several inflections ("embiggens", "enbiggened"). And look at this formal paper on superstring theory (see bottom of page 27), would be fairly simple to cite independent use. (WP has another reference to the use in D-brane theory. Robert Ullmann 12:38, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
|
# ? Apr 21, 2012 22:14 |
|
Deuterieux posted:No, a hapax legomenon occurs only once in a corpus; embiggen is used repeatedly in the Simpsons, including several inflections ("embiggens", "enbiggened"). And look at this formal paper on superstring theory (see bottom of page 27), would be fairly simple to cite independent use. (WP has another reference to the use in D-brane theory. Robert Ullmann 12:38, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
|
# ? Apr 22, 2012 03:51 |
|
Nomnom Cookie posted:a hand in the pants embiggens the smallest dilz luckily i know where you can get tips to hide it
|
# ? Apr 22, 2012 03:53 |
|
NOTinuyasha posted:some dude reverted part of my contributions to the truck nuts page knew it was too good to be true
|
# ? Apr 22, 2012 04:10 |
|
|
# ? May 11, 2024 11:15 |
|
amazed this isn't on Wikipedia http://home.earthlink.net/~mthyen/555frame.html
|
# ? Apr 22, 2012 12:48 |