The Football Shirt/Kit/Box/Tube/Denim/Books Thread!

The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Sports Argument Stadium > The Ray Parlour > The Football Shirt/Kit/Box/Tube/Denim/Books Thread!

«‹›653 »

WHAT A BREAKFAST: Jan 13, 2006

New Bayern M�nchen away is going to be white with orange stripes/number :barf:

No pictures yet, but a source good enough that one of Munich's newspapers wrote an article about it.

# ? Apr 25, 2012 17:31

Adbot: ADBOT LOVES YOU

# ? May 19, 2024 01:11

the: Jul 18, 2004; by Cowcaster

Wanna get this kit:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batman_Petrolspor

# ? Apr 25, 2012 20:20

BigStu: Apr 16, 2011

TwoDogs1Cup posted:

So what's the alternative to soccer triads if they don't have the kit you want?

http://www.shootjerseys.com/

Have had good service from these guys.

# ? Apr 25, 2012 23:18

TwoDogs1Cup: May 28, 2008; DOUGIE DOUGIE DOUGIE! MY LOVE, HE MAKES MY EMPTY HEART FULL! DOUGIE! THE BEST FOREVER THE BEST DOUGIEEE! <3 <3 - TwoDougies1Cup

BigStu posted:

http://www.shootjerseys.com/

Have had good service from these guys.

Wow, those shirts look good. Even got the France away kit I'm after. That's being bought right now

# ? Apr 26, 2012 00:19

Borzou: Aug 22, 2010; Iranian Dentist

BigStu posted:

http://www.shootjerseys.com/

Have had good service from these guys.

Do they use authentic numbering?

# ? Apr 26, 2012 04:54

Ninpo: Aug 6, 2004; by FactsAreUseless

Borzou posted:

Do they use authentic numbering?

Roman numerals.

# ? Apr 26, 2012 09:54

Total Meatlove: Jan 28, 2007; Rangers died, shoujo Hitler cried ;_;

Rangers new home/goalie kit - based off the kit of the '72 cup winners.

I'm torn, the picture looks great but the actual kit on McCabe is a bit plain.

# ? Apr 26, 2012 11:35

Jose: Jul 24, 2007; Adrian Chiles is a broadcaster and writer

Seems a bit mean getting people to buy a new kit for a club that won't exist next season

# ? Apr 26, 2012 11:38

Total Meatlove: Jan 28, 2007; Rangers died, shoujo Hitler cried ;_;

Scott Bakula posted:

Seems a bit mean getting people to buy a new kit for a club that won't exist next season

every 44.99 helps

# ? Apr 26, 2012 11:41

Mickolution: Oct 1, 2005; Ballers...I put numbers on the boards

Especially when you're not paying any tax on it.

# ? Apr 26, 2012 13:46

Hoops: Aug 19, 2005; A Black Mark For Retarded Posting

That's not a football kit.

# ? Apr 26, 2012 14:45

Gigi Galli: Sep 19, 2003; and then the car turned in to fire

Hoops posted:

That's not a football kit.

Yeah, that's just a shirt. Very plain.

# ? Apr 26, 2012 14:46

Insanely Sikh: Aug 26, 2009; Winner, SA's Sikh Of the Year, 2013

EvilHawk posted:

This is an updated version, with away and third kits:

Would be happy with all three of those. The Home's a bit plain but I still like it.

# ? Apr 26, 2012 15:44

Mutande: May 3, 2006; Why don't you get a sponge?

New AC Milan

I don't mind it, collar seems a bit big though.

# ? Apr 26, 2012 18:01

Gigi Galli: Sep 19, 2003; and then the car turned in to fire

Mutande posted:

New AC Milan

I don't mind it, collar seems a bit big though.

not bad, better than this years anyway. I like the thick strips much more than the thin ones. The white piping on each strip is annoying though.

# ? Apr 26, 2012 18:02

BlueBayou: Jan 16, 2008; Before she mends must sicken worse

Mutande posted:

New AC Milan

I don't mind it, collar seems a bit big though.

Is it just me, or do those shorts seem mighty see-thru?

# ? Apr 26, 2012 18:09

TheGoatFeeder: Mar 16, 2005; "One Zaba, Two Zaba, Three Zabaleta, Four Zaba, Five Zaba, Six Zabaleta, Seven Zaba, Eight Zaba, Nine Zabaleta, Heeeeeeeeeey Zabaleta"

New City kit? Not sure I like it personally.

# ? Apr 26, 2012 19:32

grvm: Sep 27, 2007; The violent young pony.

Black crest city rules.
The Milan shirt really bothers me, when I saw the leak I loved it but seeing it worn it looks... Awkward. The fit just looks stupid, the stripes don't look right, the pipping I don't like, it just looks like it should have been a rough draft and not the final product.

Those ranger shirts are nice, I might get one because I like it that much. Looks more like a training top than a match shirt though, which I'm fine with.

# ? Apr 26, 2012 19:56

dilbertschalter: Jan 12, 2010

GravityDaemon posted:

not bad, better than this years anyway. I like the thick strips much more than the thin ones. The white piping on each strip is annoying though.

pretty much, thick stripes own, thin stripes look lame.

# ? Apr 26, 2012 20:14

hyper from Pixie Sticks: Sep 28, 2004

New Celtic home:

Crest looks stupid, but at least the sponsor's (relatively) unobtrusive.

# ? Apr 26, 2012 20:28

Tsaedje: May 11, 2007; BRAWNY BUTTONS 4 LYFE

TheGoatFeeder posted:

New City kit? Not sure I like it personally.

Looks more like a training top to me, but who knows?

# ? Apr 26, 2012 20:29

TheGoatFeeder: Mar 16, 2005; "One Zaba, Two Zaba, Three Zabaleta, Four Zaba, Five Zaba, Six Zabaleta, Seven Zaba, Eight Zaba, Nine Zabaleta, Heeeeeeeeeey Zabaleta"

Tsaedje posted:

Looks more like a training top to me, but who knows?

They've already unveiled the new training top I think, it isn't really like that, but I see what you are saying.

# ? Apr 26, 2012 20:32

Tsaedje: May 11, 2007; BRAWNY BUTTONS 4 LYFE

White shorts at least

# ? Apr 26, 2012 20:39

Mickolution: Oct 1, 2005; Ballers...I put numbers on the boards

Semprini posted:

New Celtic home:

Crest looks stupid, but at least the sponsor's (relatively) unobtrusive.

How on Earth did Tennent's agree to that?

That City shirt's really nice, they've had lovely kits the last few years. How long is their contract with Umbro?

Also, is there any time frame for when Liverpool's new shirt might be unveiled? I guess the Adidas contract stops them doing it before a certain date, so probably early June?

Mickolution fucked around with this message at 21:07 on Apr 26, 2012

# ? Apr 26, 2012 21:05

mA: Jul 10, 2001; I am the ugly lover.

Isn't Ibra sponsored by Nike?

# ? Apr 26, 2012 21:17

Gigi Galli: Sep 19, 2003; and then the car turned in to fire

mA posted:

Isn't Ibra sponsored by Nike?

He definitely was last year; I imagine this year too. You can't see the Adidas logo on his shirt in that pic, or his shoes for that matter. I wonder how that's reconciled.

# ? Apr 26, 2012 21:23

trem_two: Oct 22, 2002; it is better if you keep saying I'm fat, as I will continue to score goals; Fun Shoe

mA posted:

Isn't Ibra sponsored by Nike?

Presumably that's why you can't see his or KBP's boots.

E: yeah, what he said

# ? Apr 26, 2012 21:24

the sex ghost: Sep 6, 2009

Lots of rumours going around that this could be the new Leeds kit

If it is I'd be well pleased with that, as long as we get rid of the black and green away kit as well

# ? Apr 26, 2012 21:24

ShutteredIn: Mar 24, 2005; El Campeon Mundial del Acordeon

That looks like something you'd play tennis in.

# ? Apr 26, 2012 21:33

Tsaedje: May 11, 2007; BRAWNY BUTTONS 4 LYFE

Mickolution posted:

That City shirt's really nice, they've had lovely kits the last few years. How long is their contract with Umbro?

Hopefully forever?

Umbro are based in Manchester. The more "international" the club becomes with the new money the more the PR people are going to want to emphasise local connections, so I can't see the Umbro deal going anywhere.

# ? Apr 26, 2012 22:44

euroboy: Mar 24, 2004

Tsaedje posted:

Hopefully forever?

Umbro are based in Manchester. The more "international" the club becomes with the new money the more the PR people are going to want to emphasise local connections, so I can't see the Umbro deal going anywhere.

I could see Nike taking over if City become the most dominant club in england though.

# ? Apr 26, 2012 22:48

ChuckNade376: Mar 13, 2008; MOTHERFUCKER. It is going to happen.

Doesn't Nike own Umbro?

# ? Apr 26, 2012 22:52

CAMiasm: Oct 5, 2006; Go MC Saints!

ChuckNade376 posted:

Doesn't Nike own Umbro?

Umbro is an English sportswear and football equipment supplier based in Cheadle, Greater Manchester, England, and a subsidiary of Nike, Inc..

# ? Apr 26, 2012 22:54

hyper from Pixie Sticks: Sep 28, 2004

Mickolution posted:

How on Earth did Tennent's agree to that?

125th anniversary, so probably got told something like "Do it this way, or we'll offer a sponsorless version and flood the market with it"

Or for the same reason Etihad agreed to it, whatever that was.

# ? Apr 26, 2012 23:23

Butterfly Valley: Apr 19, 2007; I am a spectacularly bad poster and everyone in the Schadenfreude thread hates my guts.

Semprini posted:

Or for the same reason Etihad agreed to it, whatever that was.

For their part I imagine they didn't care because as beautiful as that shirt was we only wore it a few times. I have one with Ireland 7 on the back signed by him haha what a dumb gently caress I am.

# ? Apr 26, 2012 23:28

TheGoatFeeder: Mar 16, 2005; "One Zaba, Two Zaba, Three Zabaleta, Four Zaba, Five Zaba, Six Zabaleta, Seven Zaba, Eight Zaba, Nine Zabaleta, Heeeeeeeeeey Zabaleta"

Semprini posted:

125th anniversary, so probably got told something like "Do it this way, or we'll offer a sponsorless version and flood the market with it"

Or for the same reason Etihad agreed to it, whatever that was.

Yeah it was a third shirt that was hardly ever worn, and it was a bit of a tribute, so I guess they didn't kick up a fuss over it.

# ? Apr 26, 2012 23:43

Hoops: Aug 19, 2005; A Black Mark For Retarded Posting

I'm used to central sponsors, I factor it in to my appreciation of a kit. Having it under the badge now just looks awkward. Imagine the old United tops without "SHARP" on the front for example. The Tennents logo in block white letters was fine, it didn't detract from any kit imo. A decent sponsor logo can break up the colour a bit, for the better.

# ? Apr 27, 2012 00:12