|
Anyone else getting IMDbDataAccessError when trying to add something to CouchPotato (v1, Win r36)? Edit: Nevermind, I guess that movie does not exist in the IMDB... Tapedump fucked around with this message at 02:46 on Jun 10, 2012 |
#
?
Jun 9, 2012 23:37
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 18, 2024 03:59 |
|
|
0.7.0 posted:SABnzbd will now display an icon in the task bar (system area).
|
|
#
?
Jun 10, 2012 01:07
|
|
|
inpheaux posted:So this is happening. Haha I noticed that too. There are few things nerdier than laughing at a commit diff.
|
|
#
?
Jun 10, 2012 01:14
|
|
|
So I forgot I had changed credit card numbers recently and my unlimited plan didn't renew. I just chewed through my 10GB backup block. Is there a way I can limit how much of a backup plan to use? Like if the backup is going to use 1GB for a download, instead just have the download pause.
|
|
#
?
Jun 10, 2012 02:29
|
|
|
Is there a download link for this beta? I think i am blind.
|
|
#
?
Jun 10, 2012 02:42
|
|
|
kri kri posted:Is there a download link for this beta? I think i am blind.
|
|
#
?
Jun 10, 2012 03:53
|
|
|
inpheaux posted:Betas live here, but based on that commit Shypike should be releasing 0.7 final any time now, so you might as well just wait. Is it feasible to run SABnzbd from source and just run `git pull` to grab new commits every now and then?
|
|
#
?
Jun 10, 2012 05:48
|
|
|
It's nice to see Growl support in there. Have y'all considered doing Prowl/Boxcar/etc like Sickbeard and CouchPotatoServer do?
|
|
#
?
Jun 10, 2012 14:34
|
|
|
Grayham posted:Is it feasible to run SABnzbd from source and just run `git pull` to grab new commits every now and then? EC posted:It's nice to see Growl support in there. Have y'all considered doing Prowl/Boxcar/etc like Sickbeard and CouchPotatoServer do?
|
|
#
?
Jun 10, 2012 16:10
|
|
|
What is it about Usenet that leads to files getting so corrupted while they're propagating around the servers? Like, in total I've gotten maybe a half dozen corrupted files over HTTP/FTP ever, if that, but I'd say at least a third of Usenet files need repair.
|
|
#
?
Jun 10, 2012 18:53
|
|
|
DMCA takedown requests, or a lovely provider.
|
|
#
?
Jun 10, 2012 20:19
|
|
|
nap.app posted:It sounds like they are saying they use 810p because it is higher quality than 720p in the same file size? It also sounds like they use filters to improve the quality? It sounds like they might be trying to touch the (apparent) fact that anamorphic resolutions use less bandwidth for the same quality of video than non-anamorphic resolutions. I seem to recall reading this when reading about some guy who was trying to push 720p through 500kbps of video data. Here is a presentation by the guy who did the above which gives a bunch of 'best practice' tips for h.264 encoding and the 8th last slide of the presentation touches on using anamorphic resolutions to save bandwidth for a given quality. Essentially, padding the top and bottom rather than having a non-anamorphic resolution yields better quality results for a given bandwidth or, equivalently, less bandwidth for a given quality level. In practice, that means that 1280x720 video stretched to 1440 yields an 810 vertical resolution. Hence encoding it at 810 vertical pixels per frame (an anamorphic ratio to 1440) even if the actual video is 600 vertical pixels high. I could completely be wrong because of the dodgy translation but that's what they seem to be trying to touch on to me.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2012 05:51
|
|
|
inpheaux posted:Totally, just pull from develop and party on. It's a bit of a bitch running from source on Windows, and on Win/OSX you lose the tray integration, but for Linux running from source is no big deal. Good to know. Thanks.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2012 06:00
|
|
|
I've just noticed my Sickbeard seems to have trouble adding the sort of TV shows that you might want to watch every day. I'm guessing this is down to the massive list of episodes it needs to add to the database. Is this a known issue?
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2012 14:03
|
|
|
MeKeV posted:I've just noticed my Sickbeard seems to have trouble adding the sort of TV shows that you might want to watch every day. I'm guessing this is down to the massive list of episodes it needs to add to the database. Is this a known issue? What sort of problems are you experiencing? It takes a lot of time to do the initial load of a show like that, but from there on out it all behaves normally. Just let it do it's thing and it'll load eventually, then you never have to go through that again.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2012 17:04
|
|
|
inpheaux posted:We've always had Growl-Growl support. 0.7 brings more generic Growl-ish support. I don't use it, so I can't comment on exactly how in-depth it is, but if you can point out what we're supposed to be implementing, enter an issue on GitHub or post about it on the forums. Is Growl in there on the Windows version? I never knew that. I'll have to go through it and take a look this evening. I'd love to have the ability to send a Boxcar notification if a download fails, or completes, on certain categories.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2012 17:42
|
|
|
MeKeV posted:I've just noticed my Sickbeard seems to have trouble adding the sort of TV shows that you might want to watch every day. I'm guessing this is down to the massive list of episodes it needs to add to the database. Is this a known issue? I have one of those on my SB list, it takes hours to add since this one has hundreds of episodes. Eventually it should be good, if you ever do a full refresh you just gotta sit tight. I have to set the one I watch with a custom quality, since the only copies that get regularly get uploaded are 720p rips, but divx encodes.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2012 21:49
|
|
|
EC posted:Is Growl in there on the Windows version? I never knew that. I'll have to go through it and take a look this evening.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2012 23:41
|
|
|
Fixed
stephenm00 fucked around with this message at 15:21 on Apr 21, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2012 04:29
|
|
|
stephenm00 posted:I am running SickBeard from source on Windows. Everything is working fine except post processing. When I used the precompiled versions, Sabnzbd used the .exe file. However, this is not included in the source version. Sabnzbd does not seem to be able to use the .py files and when I try to use the .exe it no longer works. Works fine here. Didn't have to change anything when I switched from compiled to source.
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2012 08:27
|
|
|
I don't think SAB comes with any post processors, they're provided by Sickbeard and CouchPotato and other programs like that.
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2012 15:35
|
|
|
stephenm00 posted:I am running SickBeard from source on Windows. Everything is working fine except post processing. When I used the precompiled versions, Sabnzbd used the .exe file. However, this is not included in the source version. Sabnzbd does not seem to be able to use the .py files and when I try to use the .exe it no longer works. Yeah I just used the same exe file.
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2012 15:38
|
|
|
stephenm00 posted:I am running SickBeard from source on Windows. Everything is working fine except post processing. When I used the precompiled versions, Sabnzbd used the .exe file. However, this is not included in the source version. Sabnzbd does not seem to be able to use the .py files and when I try to use the .exe it no longer works. I haven't done this, but... It makes me think maybe .py files aren't associated with pythonw.exe. Can you doubleclick a .py file in Explorer and have it run automatically? You could also try making a bat file with contents along these lines: code:
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2012 17:54
|
|
|
stephenm00 posted:I am running SickBeard from source on Windows. Everything is working fine except post processing. When I used the precompiled versions, Sabnzbd used the .exe file. However, this is not included in the source version. Sabnzbd does not seem to be able to use the .py files and when I try to use the .exe it no longer works. I had the same problem. Needed to add .PY to PATHEXT in the system variables.
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2012 17:31
|
|
|
Fixed
stephenm00 fucked around with this message at 15:20 on Apr 21, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2012 01:11
|
|
|
I finally got things running smoothly with the following combo 1. A Linux Debian Squeeze server in a data center somewhere running sabnzbdplus and transmission-daemon 2. My home desktop (win7) running a special fork of sickbeard with better anime support (http://sickbeard.lad1337.de/) and a monthly build of XMBC 12.0 (needed the 10-bit H264 support for anime unfortunately) I preferred to use sickbeard's post processor again because of anime (it allows me to name by season and absolute number, because sometimes episode numbering is ambiguous), so I just setup an NFS share and have it mounted in windows as a drive, and setup Sickbeard's post-processor to point to that share. I need to figure out if there is any significant overhead added as the download on my connection is only 25mbps. Also, sabnzbd has post-processing, but it is called sorting in the options
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2012 10:42
|
|
|
0.7 final is out: http://sourceforge.net/projects/sabnzbdplus/files/sabnzbdplus/0.7.0/
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2012 14:31
|
|
|
Biggest human being Ever posted:0.7 final is out:  who to blame? sourceforge or sab?
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2012 16:54
|
|
|
Download the file again? It worked fine for me, the 32bit windows installer that is.
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2012 17:12
|
|
|
What does BoxHD and BoxSD mean on nzbs.org?
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2012 21:45
|
|
|
kri kri posted:What does BoxHD and BoxSD mean on nzbs.org? I assume that stuff that's from box sets (of TV shows) instead of straight from the broadcast.
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2012 21:50
|
|
|
Really hesitant to upgrade to the new version of Sabnzbd until other people report back on how it goes. Want to make sure it's compatible with sickbeard post processing script and stuff like that.
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2012 01:56
|
|
|
Ingram posted:Really hesitant to upgrade to the new version of Sabnzbd until other people report back on how it goes. I upgraded earlier today, so we'll see how it goes tonight.
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2012 02:02
|
|
|
I've been running it for three days and I haven't seen any issues. Why don't you just zip up your current SAB folder and set it aside somewhere, and if you run into problems with the new one, just revert back?
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2012 02:19
|
|
|
To be honest unless the devs are colossally stupid, there's no way to gently caress up post processing, as long as it passes the parameters in the right order it's fine.
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2012 02:28
|
|
|
Ingram posted:Really hesitant to upgrade to the new version of Sabnzbd until other people report back on how it goes. Its working fine, I guess you can use it now?
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2012 03:06
|
|
|
ok thanks guys I will give her a spin 
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2012 03:33
|
|
|
Ingram posted:Really hesitant to upgrade to the new version of Sabnzbd until other people report back on how it goes. I've been using it since pre-beta and it's been solid. SAB really hasn't had a "bad" release I can recall in the entire "sabnzbdplus" era, the guys working on it are doing an excellent job. The worst update I can think of was a few major versions ago (0.4.0 or 0.5.0 IIRC) when there were enough changes that the queues weren't able to be transferred over. Really not a big deal unless you're the type to queue up a few days worth of downloading and then let it run, and even then it just meant wait to upgrade until it's done. wolrah fucked around with this message at 05:36 on Jun 15, 2012 |
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2012 05:32
|
|
|
Ingram posted:Really hesitant to upgrade to the new version of Sabnzbd until other people report back on how it goes. The only thing we've ever really broken between builds in the past was when we migrated between queue/history storage formats, but we haven't screwed with those for 0.7.
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2012 18:02
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 18, 2024 03:59 |
|
|
Confirming 0.7 works great. Thanks for all the hard work.
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2012 19:35
|
|
