|
I like the idea of the Super Rule 5 Draft but that would also us being able to know who is available and I am not sure if Smasher wants more work. Still if Smasher is up for it. Also, maybe we could do something with the chaff of feeder teams, like once you line ups are locked in, you can make 3 waiver claims off a feeder team that has been used.
|
# ? Nov 3, 2012 22:15 |
|
|
# ? May 10, 2024 07:13 |
|
We'd probably get more views if we did Super-League Wrestling. Would anyone want to be part of that? Super-League VII, Smasher League Week 20: Lonely and Depressed Games of the Week Don May posted:
Box Score Don May posted:
Box Score Don May posted:
Box Score Numbers: I'm sorry that Ryan Braun still sucks Analysis The Bobbleheads manage to split with the Landers this week. That's not great, but it could be a lot worse. They won't play the Landers again until the last series of the season. Analysis A good week. As you have acknowledged, it's going to be tough for them to survive, but it's not hopeless. Analysis Assuming we have at least one team drop out of the Expansion Cup, which is a fair assumption, the Coburns will be given a chance. We'll work out the exact composition of the team later. I'm think the Radbourns' hitters and the Comancheros' pitchers, basically. Analysis The Phoenixes aren't that good of a team. In fact, I plan on putting the strongest new team in the division next season to prove that Expansion teams can succeed. I'm sure that will backfire on me horribly. Analysis Since the Mooglies already got an obit back in Super-League I, do I have to give them another one? Analysis I wonder if this team could have been saved by a better rotation. Analysis Ugh. Analysis A split isn't great, but you're still just one good week away from taking the division lead. Analysis And now you will pay for your sins by playing the Bobbleheads and Landers consecutively and on the road. Analysis So...uh...how's the next EC update going? Analysis Hold on, it's going to get better some day. Analysis Given how badly the Mooglies and Bulldogs are doing, I might allow some talent to transfer. Analysis I didn't realize how much the Johnson-Rice trade had caused the engine to jumble your lineup until I was doing this update. Then again, I can't imagine you mind donating a couple of wins to the Superstars that much. Analysis Playing the Bobbleheads and Landers hasn't done much for the W's record this much, not that it matters even a tiny bit at this point. Alexander would be back for the Super-League Finals. Analysis You guys are hanging in there, and avoiding the Gauntlet is still a possibility for you. Chin up, moose, it's not over yet. Analysis It is over for you, though. Standings and Leaders
|
# ? Nov 3, 2012 22:58 |
|
Obviously I don't have a perfect grasp on things, but I think one of the big issues is depth: if I want to try to acquire a player without losing a starter, then I have to convince someone to take Norm Cash or Robin Roberts or someone off my hands. Top SL teams, though, often have guys on their bench that can improve an EC team. This makes it much easier for them to make up a package for elite talent, thus improving themselves even more. Proposal(s): a hard roster cap, coupled with a waivers/DFA system 1) Institute a cap on the number of players on a roster (combined MLB + AAA). This can be 28, or a little bit higher to give some wiggle room. If at any time a team would have more players than the limit, they must cut (call it DFA for baseball flavor) some until they reach it 2) When a player is cut, if they are from that owner's feeder team then they are simply "returned" to the feeder. If not, then they are sent to the next Dispersal Draft. 3) Whenever a player is sent from MLB to the minors, they must pass through waivers. The waiver period will last until two days after the update in which the player was sent down (that is, the next update from that league). Y'all can figure out waiver priority on your own. The waiver system would add a fair bit of overhead, and may not be needed, but I don't think the DFA system would be very difficult to administer--you only really need to check after unbalanced trades and at the start of a season. In return, it keeps a lid on teams' depth and also serves to filter players out of the league, which is important for keeping things fresh and making good feeders available. e: This winds up being roughly the same concept as the Rule V idea, but I think incorporating it into the existing roster and draft rules is probably cleaner. Mornacale fucked around with this message at 23:14 on Nov 3, 2012 |
# ? Nov 3, 2012 23:10 |
|
Luna Landers Set our Steal rate back to +2. Also, I totally called the "Bobbles fall back to Earth, Landers put together a run, and it all comes down to the last series of the season" scenario in chat a couple weeks ago.
|
# ? Nov 3, 2012 23:14 |
|
So, I'm hearing there's a lot of support for a Rule V type draft. Okay, here's what I think is a fair compromise. If a team keeps a player on his roster for an entire season without playing him for than say, 20 games, on his major league roster, then he'll be eligible for the Rule V draft, which we'll hold prior to the start of the next season. How about that?
|
# ? Nov 3, 2012 23:23 |
|
That sounds good. There's a lot of teams who have third-stringers who are better than a lot of EC backups!
|
# ? Nov 3, 2012 23:26 |
|
Smasher Dynamo posted:So, I'm hearing there's a lot of support for a Rule V type draft. Okay, here's what I think is a fair compromise. If a team keeps a player on his roster for an entire season without playing him for than say, 20 games, on his major league roster, then he'll be eligible for the Rule V draft, which we'll hold prior to the start of the next season. How about that? 20 games? Well, I'm suddenly glad I keep having short-term pitching injuries. Smasher Dynamo posted:Analysis They really are quite mediocre. Old Brian Giles is my offensive star. Smasher Dynamo posted:This is pretty great.
|
# ? Nov 3, 2012 23:40 |
|
Okay, then, here's the proposal: Super-League Rule V Draft The following players will be eligible for the draft: -Position Players who have appeared in 20 or fewer games over the preceding season -Pitchers who have pitched 10 or fewer innings over the preceding season -Each Team will be allowed to exempt one otherwise eligible player from the draft -No team can be reduced to 28 or fewer players on their roster as a result of the draft The draft order will be determined by: -Record over the course of the Expansion Cup -Record over the course of the preceding season -Expansion Teams will be given priority in the draft -The draft will last one round Compensation -Still working on that part
|
# ? Nov 3, 2012 23:43 |
|
What about players who suffered a major injury and fell short of the requirements? If a team loses Babe Ruth for the season in the first week of the year, I don't think it's fair to that team to have to protect him from the Rule V draft and let someone else go.
|
# ? Nov 3, 2012 23:52 |
|
Behold, the new and improved Elephants-Goose Egg anti-blockbuster: Trade Alert Goose Eggs receive: '03 Ichiro Suzuki '77 Dave LaRoche '78 Luis Tiant Elephants receive: '58 Jim Bunning
|
# ? Nov 4, 2012 00:46 |
|
2003 Ichiro isn't Baby Joe Carter who was about 3 seasons away from being a big time contributor. I'm okay with it if Smasher is.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2012 00:49 |
|
Armitage posted:2003 Ichiro isn't Baby Joe Carter who was about 3 seasons away from being a big time contributor. I'm okay with it if Smasher is. I'm fine with it.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2012 01:26 |
|
I've been unexpectedly busy the last few days, but I'm definitely working on the next EC update.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2012 02:31 |
|
Eh, let's put this up for vote! Official Super-League Referendum! Proposition #1 Should the playoff system (eight divisions, no wildcards) be reformed? The best solution would be each league having three divisions with two wildcards. A. Yes! B. No! Proposition #2 There has also been a talk about redistributing players from older teams to younger teams by various means. Would you prefer: A. A Rule 5 Draft B. A DFA system like the one proposed by Mornacale C. No change at this time
|
# ? Nov 4, 2012 04:44 |
|
You are all talking American with your Draft System thingymajiggies and I am officially lost...
|
# ? Nov 4, 2012 05:09 |
|
Okay lots of thingsquote:
Yeah all good quote:CBX being busy! If you need a hand mate, I'm happy to produce updates for you, I have all the gear ready to go. quote:Playoff Reform! Something with wildcards is good. quote:Rule 5 draft! IMHO we're missing the point here: what's the problem? It's teams that are good, but not quite good enough hanging around for ages and clogging up the arteries of the system. In real life they'd eventually get broken up by free agency. Here they just hang around perpetually winning divisional titles and never getting anything else done. See: The Ezy Ws Solution! 1) At the end of the season, you protect 28 guys and the rest go in the dispersal draft pool. If any are taken you get a compensation pick at the end of the 3rd round. 2) If a team hangs around with 2 seasons without winning anything they can protect 1 to 3 players (I think three is best, very good players will still go into the pool then) and then smasher picks 1 - 3 (number is fixed and decided in advance) guys from the roster. They go into the dispersal draft pool. You get a first round sandwich pick as compensation. For everything that win they get an extension on that - so a wildcard is worth 1 extra season, a divisional title another 1 season, a league championship another season. Obviously if you win the div title without the wildcard you get 2 seasons but are ineligable for the wildcard extension.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2012 05:19 |
|
Smasher Dynamo posted:Official Super-League Referendum! casting my ballot!
|
# ? Nov 4, 2012 05:23 |
|
Note: Referenda are not quite binding Also, CthulhuDream's plan is kind of bizarre, in that it penalizes teams who are struggling to break into playoff contention, while sparing teams that are already contenders. That does not seem like the best way to level the playing field.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2012 05:34 |
|
I still say split the divisions into old teams and new teams to prune the older teams back a little.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2012 05:53 |
|
Senerio posted:I still say split the divisions into old teams and new teams to prune the older teams back a little. That is never going to happen. Besides, I checked it out, there has never been a season (past Super-League I) where the majority of playoff teams have been rookie franchises. It has never happened. What we're seeing this year is a lot of factors colliding that have widened the gap between rich and poor teams, but those will pass.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2012 06:24 |
|
quote:Official Super-League Referendum! Casting my vote as well. As for balancing new vs old, I would say give all new owners 2 free challenges & limit the old franchises to one successful challenge per season; some of us have so much depth we can continually gamble & stockpile ** + *** players while the new owners want to get in on the action but really shouldn't be gambling what little depth they have to acquire middling-at-best talent.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2012 06:29 |
|
oldskool posted:Casting my vote as well. I don't want to have to do more challenges next season if I can avoid it.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2012 06:48 |
|
Smasher Dynamo posted:I don't want to have to do more challenges next season if I can avoid it. Theoretically, limiting those most likely to win challenges to one victory will severely diminish the challenges enough to offset the new teams getting free shots. You could also limit the new teams to their free challenges to lower that risk as well. Alternately you could run a one-round draft instead of a sea of challenges.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2012 07:30 |
|
Cthulhu Dreams posted:Okay lots of things As a new player, I'm not really concerned that some teams are elite: not only is that to be expected, but great teams help to build the stories that make SuperLeague interesting. What concerns me is that there are mechanisms for great teams to get better--in fact, as I mentioned earlier, it's easier for established/great teams to make favorable trades than new teams--but really nothing limiting them (like a salary cap system) or making them worse (like aging). To be honest, I don't see my Bloggers competing at the top level without either getting lucky on something high-risk/high-reward or ripping off one or two trade partners. Which is fine because it's my first try and I like teambuilding much more than doing trades, but it's pretty daunting. Now, of course, not all of these things are necessarily bugs, and this is just my take on things and there may be other issues. But certainly punishing the good-but-not-great teams is the exact opposite of solving the problem. Rather, we should be seeking to widen the band of such teams. Ultimately, if a rule doesn't either a) help bad teams get into that band or b) make elite teams work harder to stay above it, then it's not really helping. re: the referendum, what would the playoff structure look like with 5 playoff teams per league?
|
# ? Nov 4, 2012 09:05 |
|
Official Super-League Referendum! Proposition #1 A. Yes! Proposition #2 C. No change at this time I'm in favor of more teams making the playoffs, for purely selfish reasons. As for Proposition 2, I know I supported the Rule 5 thing before, but when we went through the team list the other day, Smasher convinced me that there's a good chance this season is just a fluke. With a wildcard, suddenly about half the teams in the Dynamo League are still in the race. The Smasher League is far more lopsided, but Smasher pointed out that a number of older, established teams are struggling, making it look more lopsided than it is. I'd be willing to put off a decision for a season to gather more evidence. That's probably an unpopular position, so in the likely event I get outvoted, I would prefer a draft system to a DFA system. The DFA system not only creates a lot of busywork for Smasher, its overly strict format makes larger scale trades somewhere between impractical and impossible. The six-player deal I made with Marauder last season to get Joe DiMaggio would have been impossible under the DFA rules, as neither I nor Marauder would have had the roster space to make the deal. Likewise, the George Brett trade I made a couple weeks ago never would have materialized, because I wouldn't have had the assets to trade for him--they'd have been DFA'd immediately after the draft. The only trades that would get made would be the small-scale, sideways, "neither team really gets better" type deals, and I think that'd make the league a lot less fun.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2012 14:22 |
|
Smasher Dynamo posted:
|
# ? Nov 4, 2012 16:27 |
|
Official Super-League Referendum! Proposition #1 Should the playoff system (eight divisions, no wildcards) be reformed? The best solution would be each league having three divisions with two wildcards. A. Yes! Proposition #2 There has also been a talk about redistributing players from older teams to younger teams by various means. Would you prefer: C. No change at this time
|
# ? Nov 4, 2012 17:21 |
|
Smasher Dynamo posted:
Truer words were never spoken. This'll be glorious. (and saves me from trying to create a monstrosity on my own) Proposition #1 A. Yes! I like wildcards. Proposition #2 A. A Rule 5 Draft Sometimes the only way to rest players, given we play a week at a time, is by sending starters down. I'm not sure the draft would have a lot of gems in it, but if people feel strongly about it....
|
# ? Nov 4, 2012 18:53 |
|
Proposition #1 A. Yes! Proposition #2 C. No change at this time Wildcards have always worked well, even if they do give me an extra round of work for the pick-'em. As for proposition #2, I have reasons for preferring no change, but really I just completely agree with what mrnoun said a few posts up.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2012 18:56 |
|
gingemidget posted:Proposition #1
|
# ? Nov 4, 2012 19:04 |
|
[Vice City Goose Eggs Yes to wild cards. Still thinking of how to even the playing field to make Smasher's life easier. Of course my roster changes won't make his life easier. Luis Tiant takes Bunning's place in the rotation. Send Frank Lary to the most wonderful place on earth, AAA so Dave LaRoche can hopefully step in and be somewhat decent. Ichiro Suzuki takes over in CF and leads off. Amos Otis moves to RF and bats 9th. Al 'Ow' Kaline rests on the bench this week and Rance Mullinicks goes to help the AAA team explore the deepest darkest parts of space. If he can get his Astro Cycle back, that is.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2012 19:09 |
|
Smasher League Week 21 Injury Report No new champions Chicago Bobbleheads Curt Schilling (SP) (Got into car with Mark Grace) - 36 days Great Googly-Mooglies Chief Bender (SP) (Closing time...) - 11 days Jeff Bagwell (1B) (Every new beginning...) - 13 days Mike Mussina (SP) (Comes from some other beginning's end) - 11 days Idaho Potatoes Joe Morgan (2B) (Mountain Madness) - Out for Season Luna Landers Manny Ramirez (OF) (One step forward, two steps back) - 34 days Madison Mudholes Al Leiter (SP) (Fell into K-Hole) - Out for Season Oxbridge Mathematicians Vince DiMaggio (CF) (Did you remember that he's still on your roster? Neither did I.) - 11 days Rated R Superstars David Cone (SP) (Drop) - 17 days Andruw Jones (CF) (Dead) - Out for Season South Bolton Eazy W's Lloyd Moseby (CF) (Armitage's final revenge) - 11 days
|
# ? Nov 4, 2012 19:44 |
|
Smasher Dynamo posted:Smasher League Week 21 Injury Report I...have no idea. It doesn't matter; these teams were doomed to the Gauntlet anyway. If Cthulhu or another Superstars owner has an idea what to do with them, I say do it. As for the Mooglies...gently caress, I don't care. I'll see you guys in the Gauntlet.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2012 20:11 |
|
Mosesby to the DL, Delahanty to DH, Whitaker to 2B.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2012 20:45 |
|
Oh no, not DiMaggio! Posey back in, Klein back in at RF. Really should've got Klein back for last week but I forgot about it. Edit: I should probably vote, too. I'm just going to go with whichever methods cause the least issue for Smasher (and future EC runners). The teams do seem unbalanced, but I can't really think of a good way to redress that without eliminating that imbalance too much. Revenant Threshold fucked around with this message at 01:01 on Nov 5, 2012 |
# ? Nov 4, 2012 20:51 |
|
Super-League VII, Dynamo League Week 21: Judgment Day Games of the Week Don May posted:
Box Score Don May posted:
Box Score Don May posted:
Box Score Team Statistics Analysis Shouldn't George Brett be starting at 3B if Traynor is out? Analysis How much damage was done by the pitching injuries you faced in the middle of the season? It's hard to say, but it's probably some. Analysis If you could ever fix your 3B problem, I'd run out of things to nag you about. Analysis The Unicorns run into two of the top three teams in their league. It does not end well. Analysis You're definitely getting your money's worth out of Gibson this year. He already has over 200 IP with a month left to go. Okay, you've experimented with Kamm, you've experimented with Yost, I think it's time to go to your Hall of Famer and put Perez at 3B. Analysis But seriously, you might as well starting praying to James Coburn because your team is in trouble. Analysis The Finger-Bangers win everything. Analysis If you can pick it up a bit more, you might escape the Gauntlet. Analysis Coburns! Analysis Beckley may kill your team all by himself. Analysis The Bulldogs have a good week, just a bit too late. Still, they'll play the exact same teams in the exact same stadiums next week, and that might help them out in the Gauntlet standings. Analysis And now the Superbas play the Dervishes and Bangers. Ouch. Analysis Well, okay, you aren't going to win your division, but you can still survive. Analysis The Losers make it look easy. Analysis What would Mick Foley say, if he saw you today? Analysis Ha! No. Standings and Leaders Playoff/Gauntlet Picture
|
# ? Nov 5, 2012 00:17 |
|
Alright, put Hornsby and Crawford back in the starting lineup. Hopefully that will be enough to keep us in the safe zone now that the Bangers have decided to close it out.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2012 01:11 |
|
That was disappointing, but with Garciaparra sore it can't be helped. Kent back to SS and Teufel to 3B for the coming week. Niekro ain't working, put Finley in the fourth slot if possible and call up Zambrano.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2012 01:13 |
|
I'm glad to see the Generics finally understand their place in the Dies Irae division. Much like last season, when we overcame the once-proud Oranges and put up a decent fight against the Losers in their greatest season, the Dervishes are not a team that will be denied their rightful playoff berth. And we even get a full series this time! In any event, indeed, perhaps it is time to put Tony Perez at 3B. That was something I thought about doing at the start of the season when I noticed that he had played quite a bit at third before becoming a full-time 1B, but Yost had proven himself so far and I didn't have a huge amount of faith in Perez repeating his EC performance. But, hey, why not. If anything, it will make him more attractive trade bait to get another great pitcher or elite shorstop. New all-HOF (+Shoeless Joe) lineup is as follows: pre:1. LF Joe Jackson 2. RF Stan Musial 3. CF Earl Averill 4. 1B Buck Leonard 5. 2B Joe Morgan 6. C Johnny Bench 7. 3B Tony Perez 8. SS Ozzie Smith Beet fucked around with this message at 04:35 on Nov 5, 2012 |
# ? Nov 5, 2012 04:31 |
|
|
# ? May 10, 2024 07:13 |
|
Now that Wetteland is healthy, call up Wetteland to replace JJ Putz in the bullpen. New vs RHP lineup to give Cronin some more rest... 2B Rose LF Speaker 1B Thomas CF Charleston RF Robinson C Torre/Martinez SS Tejada 3B Ventura P Pitcher
|
# ? Nov 5, 2012 04:53 |