|
Penpal posted:
Works best for me when it's all evened out. I try to leave at least 10 - 20 lines as they are before I delete another one. Sometimes I also add some more lines. EDIT: I don't know if it works for TIFs, but it does work for JPGs. Zoolfox fucked around with this message at 15:39 on Dec 17, 2012 |
# ? Dec 16, 2012 18:00 |
|
|
# ? May 11, 2024 16:06 |
|
Penpal posted:So editing with audacity, anyone have any pointers? Because I was opening JPGS and TIF's in notepad and it was brutal, the JPG's always get TOO corrupted and the TIF's take forever to load and also get corrupted. Am I doing something wrong w/the text editing aspect? I've got another photo I'm working on. Always use .bmp it makes life so much easier Oh, also, data bending fuckin' RULEZ Also, something tells me you dudes might dig slit-scan cinematography as well https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NSesvu_uqLo
|
# ? Dec 17, 2012 15:04 |
|
Cute as heck posted:
Haven't seen this before. But it looks very interesting.
|
# ? Dec 17, 2012 15:34 |
|
You can do the Slit-Scan effect in AE with "time warp" and a gradient for the mask,
|
# ? Dec 26, 2012 21:48 |
|
I noticed that nobody has suggested that these images are not Art. From the OP, "Glitch art is defined as, 'the aestheticization of digital or analog errors, such as artifacts and other 'bugs', by either corrupting digital code/data or by physically manipulating electronic devices." That isn't Art, or at least, the concept behind the aesthetic isn't explained at all in your opening post. Why add digital corruption to these images? Without an answer to that, this seems more like a photoshop tips & tricks thread. Art is a mode of expression, not a photoshop layer.
|
# ? Dec 26, 2012 21:55 |
|
Cozy Hemp Mines posted:I noticed that nobody has suggested that these images are not Art. I think you're getting a little too deep. You're trying to define art in a thread for what is essentially intentional mistakes.
|
# ? Dec 27, 2012 01:02 |
|
It is the expression and embrace of seldom-seen spontaneous errors in digital media in the absence of proper error detection & correction and the subsequent creation of new forms of visual media arising thereof
|
# ? Dec 27, 2012 07:17 |
|
Cozy Hemp Mines posted:I noticed that nobody has suggested that these images are not Art.
|
# ? Dec 27, 2012 09:32 |
|
casa de mi padre posted:gently caress you I literally cried at some of these images ... viewed in the proper context they are DEFINITELY art!!! Could you explain the context for the pictures? Maybe I just don't "get" the aesthetic. Resplendent Spiral posted:It is the expression and embrace of seldom-seen spontaneous errors in digital media in the absence of proper error detection & correction and the subsequent creation of new forms of visual media arising thereof Yes, but to what end? What is the meaning of these uncorrected errors? Can you explain to me why this is Art, but an actual, "spontaneous" corrupted image would not be?
|
# ? Dec 27, 2012 18:05 |
|
Let's start posting some pics again, no? Original: Modified: Here's a gif. A gif. Zoolfox fucked around with this message at 01:34 on Dec 28, 2012 |
# ? Dec 28, 2012 01:25 |
|
Cozy Hemp Mines posted:Yes, but to what end? What is the meaning of these uncorrected errors? Can you explain to me why this is Art, but an actual, "spontaneous" corrupted image would not be? I dunno man, I would argue that a spontaneous corruption could result in something that could be considered "art." But why worry about it? These are images that look cool, that are interesting to look at, but you don't see any of us asking for deep analysis of these pieces. (full disclosure: I definitely had meaning in mind with the images I posted. I don't think anyone would say that makes them more "artful.")
|
# ? Dec 28, 2012 02:14 |
|
I like to think of glitch art as gestural abstraction in digital form. Instead of whipping a paintbrush into a canvas, we're creating chaos within the pre-existing chaos of image data, to create beauty amoung the wretched. Or wretched amoung the beauty.
|
# ? Dec 28, 2012 03:13 |
|
Planned art is like a garden - created purposefully by a man. But glitch art exposes the true laws of the universe - that there is no plan. Glitch art is the unplanned garden of NATURAL THINGS brought to the artificial world of the digital. To denote things into "good glitch art" or "bad glitch art" is to undermine the message of naturality. Natural things remove themselves from our ability to judge. The animals do what they will without knowing our judgement. Can you judge a mountain range or a waterfall? Only humans can judge and only human expression can be judged. Glitch art removes a layer of human expression from the work and thereby allows the viewer to appreciate it in and of itself.
|
# ? Dec 28, 2012 08:01 |
|
Cozy Hemp Mines posted:
|
# ? Dec 28, 2012 08:53 |
|
This is an image I glitched and then dragged through a scanner for a book I made.
|
# ? Dec 28, 2012 13:43 |
|
^ That rules Here's some stuff stolen from the raddest thing ever
|
# ? Dec 28, 2012 14:07 |
|
I wrote butts in a hipstermatic jpg with a hex editor a bunch of times. Then I saved it as a bitmap and XOR'd the whole thing past the header with "butts"
|
# ? Dec 29, 2012 01:15 |
|
San Fran?
|
# ? Dec 29, 2012 01:17 |
|
Bartle Hall Pylons in Kansas City
|
# ? Dec 29, 2012 01:28 |
|
Grabbed the first GIF I saw on reddit to start tinkering. I think it worked out pretty well.
|
# ? Dec 30, 2012 05:23 |
e: Ping is a little trickier, if you don't edit it in hex it tends to just black out. e2: poo poo out one more ok, this is an interesting one, because I just inserted "boner" "titties" and "rear end" on a few lines. The thing is, there is no pixelized effect on my computer, its very smooth. So a real glitch happened on the way through imgur, I guess. e3: print screen'd into paint and resaved the above 4. ok, last goddamned edit. It looks like imgur has been doing something to all the uploaded files, because that second one looks a lot different compared to what I have on my hard drive, all the detail is mud. Are they just upping the compression? SniperWoreConverse fucked around with this message at 06:32 on Dec 30, 2012 |
|
# ? Dec 30, 2012 05:26 |
|
It might be best to capture the resulting images to PNG, which imgur seems to tamper with the least, as long as the final image is "small" (under 1mb), and then you won't have to worry about differences in decoding due to platform/etc that COULD occur.
|
# ? Dec 30, 2012 10:31 |
|
Resplendent Spiral posted:It might be best to capture the resulting images to PNG, which imgur seems to tamper with the least, as long as the final image is "small" (under 1mb), and then you won't have to worry about differences in decoding due to platform/etc that COULD occur. From experience I have found that opening glitched images in different programs can result in different outcomes. Different programs seem to have different ways of dealing with unexpected changes in code.
|
# ? Dec 30, 2012 15:29 |
|
Since finding this thread I've been having lots of fun figuring things out. I'm nowhere near savvy enough to know which parts do what but the instant feedback from a thumbnail really helps. I guess my best results are and These two are exceptions. I haven't figured out how to invoke this effect in any other image I've played with. That said, I worked on one for some friends and got this:
|
# ? Dec 31, 2012 05:03 |
|
I decided to revisit an old artwork I did. (The text is different because it's another variation on the above picture.) I erased some chunks after attempting to add lines of text just completely scrambled the image. However, this still remains in from my previous experimentation...
|
# ? Dec 31, 2012 17:13 |
|
glitch cat
|
# ? Jan 3, 2013 09:47 |
|
Cute as heck posted:Always use .bmp This is great. What format is this artifact? I haven't seen it before.
|
# ? Jan 3, 2013 10:11 |
|
I finally made something I like! Made it with Decim8 on my iPhone though :/ The original image (Wall of an elevator at some swanky uppity bitch of a country club):
|
# ? Jan 3, 2013 15:55 |
|
Cozy Hemp Mines posted:Yes, but to what end? What is the meaning of these uncorrected errors? Can you explain to me why this is Art, but an actual, "spontaneous" corrupted image would not be? Wasn't paying attention to my thread and then this happens. The Dada movement in 1916 demonstrated through readymades and randomness that art could be found in anything. If anything the randomness of glitch art is re-enforcing this point made a century ago. Also I love glitch art and there's an ethereal quality to all of the images shared here.
|
# ? Jan 29, 2013 06:16 |
|
Wolfgang Pauli posted:Grabbed the first GIF I saw on reddit to start tinkering. I think it worked out pretty well. I couldn't get anything out of animated gifs.. Every time I try it just blacks out. After about a hundred attempts I finally gave up altogether.
|
# ? Jan 29, 2013 06:18 |
|
My video player glitches out when fast forwarding high-res files.
|
# ? Jan 29, 2013 09:37 |
|
More A Clockwork Orange. I haven't had success with other methods, so these are 'organic glitches' just from fast forwarding in my video player. Click for bigger.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2013 02:21 |
|
nvrmind this post!
|
# ? Jan 31, 2013 05:50 |
|
This thread's made some amazing stuff. I've bookmarked a lot of it to come back to and study. Really good. Here's three gifs and a not gif. GIMP and Audacity. http://i.imgur.com/XnSO79h.jpg (possibly text)
|
# ? Feb 2, 2013 20:28 |
|
hahahah glitched titantic is a cool effect and also I could see myself using that image randomly. and to the guy with the clockwork orange screencaps... any idea how to replicate that effect? It's like looking through strange glass windows of some kind. I'm rather fond of it
|
# ? Feb 5, 2013 19:07 |
|
space invaders
|
# ? Feb 5, 2013 19:41 |
|
here was the original animation: (which is already glitch art sort of) and here's what I managed to do: I really kind of suck with animated gifs.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2013 19:56 |
|
Yeah, animated gifs are a pain. What I've been doing is using Audacity for edits, because Notepad++ is just awful for me, I can't use it competently, but before that I do minor edits in GIMP. GIMP will make each frame of the animation its own layer, so it's really simple to colorize or manipulate certain parts. Then I grab certain parts of the image from certain frames, isolate them as new images, then take them to Audacity for further edits. Then I export them back into GIMP into their rightful place. It's very tedious! The non animated Space Invaders is nice. It's got that "looking at traffic through a rainy car window" thing going, with almost recognizable shapes blobbing around in a big sea of vagueness.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2013 23:33 |
|
Zip posted:
By having a bad video card, probably. I was just skipping around a 1080p video in VLC and it does that for a second before going correct.
|
# ? Feb 6, 2013 00:47 |
|
|
# ? May 11, 2024 16:06 |
|
Zip posted:here was the original animation: What is the top image from? (These are kinda cool, which is why i ask)
|
# ? Feb 8, 2013 11:44 |