|
Hard NOP Life posted:drat this is spergy as hell, I'm glad I don't gif a gently caress about my colors or sounds life gets real hard once you realize everything you look at is wrong.
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2013 03:21
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 3, 2024 14:54 |
|
|
then you need to see 4:2:2 or better encoded YUV material.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2013 03:21
|
|
|
then anything less than high bit rate disc encoded material is the only thing you will allow to graze your eyes.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2013 03:22
|
|
|
at a <1 ^E calibrated device
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2013 03:22
|
|
|
congradulations, you are now a video sperg
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2013 03:22
|
|
|
pagancow posted:life gets real hard once you realize everything you look at is wrong. i'm surprised peopel can look at interlaced video without barfing
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2013 03:23
|
|
|
mlyp
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2013 03:26
|
|
|
Suspicious Dish posted:i'm surprised peopel can look at interlaced video without barfing tbf it looks fine on a CRT, the device it was designed for.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2013 03:28
|
|
|
yo pagancow what do u use for calibrating
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2013 05:35
|
|
|
a big hug for colorhug
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2013 06:04
|
|
|
Detroit Q. Spider posted:yo pagancow what do u use for calibrating I1-display It's a special one made for the HP dreamcolor that supports "wide gamut"
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2013 06:42
|
|
|
i use "watching the programming and caring more about it than the delivery method as long as the video feed is OK" as a metric. if i care really little about a program and it looks semi-lovely, i wont watch it if i care a lot about a program and it looks semi-lovely, i'll still watch it hope this helps (btw the real world terms are not 4-x-x or wahtever its "semi-lovely" "really-lovely" and "i-am-in-a-theatre" the latter you can get if you go to a loving theatre
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2013 06:46
|
|
|
Sniep posted:(btw the real world terms are not 4-x-x or wahtever its "semi-lovely" "really-lovely" and "i-am-in-a-theatre" Snap a photo with any camera that has 2x the resolution of your monitor view it in any photo viewer "i-am-in-a-theatre" picture/chroma/luminance resolution 
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2013 02:01
|
|
|
so are avis or x264 better for anime i need to know for a project
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2013 03:35
|
|
|
svg
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2013 03:38
|
|
|
Nomnom Cookie posted:so are avis or x264 better for anime codecs =! containers thats like asking if mpeg-2 or a DVD case would be better for a movie. an SVG sequence would be baller for anime. not sure how you would do non vector effects like smoke, 3d, lighting, and all the other stuff you might want to do.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2013 03:57
|
|
|
pagancow posted:codecs =! containers with non vector graphics
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2013 03:59
|
|
|
pagancow posted:codecs =! containers also mpeg2 duh
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2013 03:59
|
|
|
pagancow posted:codecs =! containers so x264 is better then can you turn my avis into x264s, i can email them (gmail has an attachment limit so they'll have to be multipart rar files i think)
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2013 05:42
|
|
|
Nomnom Cookie posted:so x264 is better then
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2013 07:57
|
|
|
Nomnom Cookie posted:so x264 is better then http://handbrake.fr/
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2013 09:41
|
|
|
drop your avi file on the window, select iPad from the presets list, click start
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2013 09:43
|
|
|
satin666 posted:
there's some crazy spergin going on in her but this is pretty bad imho
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2013 14:26
|
|
|
hey also I watch the NFL via their official streams and just had a Super Bowl party and the consensus was that it looked "better than cable" according to my friends. Is this a thing, I rarely watch cable tv but would my high-quality stream beat it out in terms of bitrate
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2013 14:33
|
|
|
i just looked at a cable recording i have and it's about 3.5 Mbps, sd resolution, mpeg2 youtube seems to be about same bitrate for 1080p, h.264 of course this varies by cable operator and such
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2013 14:53
|
|
|
a 1080p cable recording from the same operator is about 7.5 Mbps, h264. so by this very thorough investigation, i'd say that streaming < cable
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2013 14:59
|
|
|
Blackula69 posted:there's some crazy spergin going on in her but this is pretty bad imho idk, did the matrix movies intend to use that yellow cast in the first place
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2013 15:05
|
|
|
Wheany posted:a 1080p cable recording from the same operator is about 7.5 Mbps, h264. what provider do you have that is on h264??
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2013 15:06
|
|
|
I watched the stupor bowl on DirecTV at my sister's house and the quality was terrible. Way way way over compressed, macro block city. Even when the camera was still and nothing much was happening on screen it was YouTube quality at best. "B-b-but it's digital HD! Satellite! It's gotta be good." was my sister and brother-in-law's response whenever anyone asked why the picture was "so blocky."
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2013 15:07
|
|
|
gently caress social problems and all that other bullshit, i just want people to stop using the term "digital" as a measure of quality 
Panty Saluter fucked around with this message at 15:27 on Feb 9, 2013 |
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2013 15:21
|
|
|
also make analog hd a thing. we only need three channels anyway. how awesome would tv be if it wasnt stretched to paper thin-ness over 500 channels
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2013 15:22
|
|
|
answer: still not very good but at least you could surf through all of the channels faster and turn it off and do something else
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2013 15:23
|
|
|
Detroit Q. Spider posted:what provider do you have that is on h264?? sonera
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2013 16:11
|
|
|
Wheany posted:a 1080p cable recording from the same operator is about 7.5 Mbps, h264. I bet the 4-5 Mbps h264 on YouTube looks the same or better than that 7.5 because 2pass, x264 encoder, google engineers being better than stuff in an expensive hardware box, etc Bitrate efficiency is heavily dependent on 2 things: source quality/pre processing and encoder efficiency.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2013 17:07
|
|
|
Doc Block posted:I watched the stupor bowl on DirecTV at my sister's house and the quality was terrible. Way way way over compressed, macro block city. Even when the camera was still and nothing much was happening on screen it was YouTube quality at best. When I argue video stuff with my family that's a "true fact". Guess my family knows not to go toe to toe with pagancow with video poo poo. Unless your sister is an x264 engineer she got owned.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2013 17:09
|
|
|
guys they arent gonna make a vector based movie format for anime, it would make it too easy for creepy spergs to rip the 2d waifus or put their original character do not steal into the animes ugh i feel sick
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2013 17:47
|
|
|
pagancow posted:I bet the 4-5 Mbps h264 on YouTube looks the same or better than that 7.5 because 2pass, x264 encoder, google engineers being better than stuff in an expensive hardware box, etc probably. except i doubt they use 2-pass encoding, since they are not aiming for a specific file size. i hear constant rate factor is what the cool kids use these days
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2013 18:21
|
|
|
pagancow posted:I1-display what software do you use for calibration and profiling? i have the i1 display 2 and have been using colorHCFR for my theater and the regular x-rite stuff for monitors.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2013 18:30
|
|
|
Carthag posted:guys they arent gonna make a vector based movie format for anime, it would make it too easy for creepy spergs to rip the 2d waifus or put their original character do not steal into the animes we have that anyway its called flash
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2013 19:05
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 3, 2024 14:54 |
|
|
Visual GNUdio posted:what software do you use for calibration and profiling? i have the i1 display 2 and have been using colorHCFR for my theater and the regular x-rite stuff for monitors. Ugh i hate colorHCFR its so hard to use and take up so much time. We use the Hp Dreamcolor software that comes with that just profiles your monitor based of the native coloremetry of your display. All of our artists work in color managed software so its all good. I'm just calibrating displays for comptuers since work is authored on that. For consumer displays I think it's a big waste to calibrate it because you have no baseline for doing a sanity check for your own work. The Pagancow TV at home is just eyeballed to some color bars. It's saturated more than the rec.709 standard, but hey I have to also be 3b in to watch anything without analyzing the editing/sound design/VFX work. Don't calibrate unless you're working collaboratively and producing content and all need to aim for one standard. The TV manufacturers get closer to the standard the more money you spend on a display (usually). If you have a sRGB or rec.709 mode enable it if you hate your life and like desaturated colors for home viewing. pagancow fucked around with this message at 19:16 on Feb 9, 2013 |
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2013 19:14
|
|