|
ahmeni posted:does it even have apps?? or is it just preloaded with Netflix or something
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2013 20:45
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 3, 2024 16:02 |
|
|
The XKCD Larper posted:hmm good point.i want to see all the posters in this thread shot in the face with high powered mpeg artifacts
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2013 20:48
|
|
|
ahmeni posted:so apparently if you connect something via hdmi the nvidia software will determine weather or not it's a tv by its support of hdmi audio and welp enjoy your forced 16-235 tbf this probablly fixes more issues then it causes
|
|
#
?
Mar 3, 2013 23:59
|
|
|
what am I saying? They should do an EDID handshake and GARRAR THIS MAKES ME SO ANGRY!!!
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2013 00:42
|
|
|
the apple tv supports tons of iphone/ipad apps beaming your pirated mkvs to it if thats what you guys were wondering
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2013 01:10
|
|
|
smdh if ur not transcoding ur Linux isos into mp4 so they play directly on the appletv
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2013 01:34
|
|
|
Install Gentoo posted:the apple tv: appletv youtube is useless any content with ads on it is silently deleted from search results i.e. any youtube content worth watching at all
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2013 02:58
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:appletv youtube is useless lol last time i used an apple tv it still handled videos with ads. nice to know they made it worse
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2013 03:04
|
|
|
pagancow posted:tbf this probablly fixes more issues then it causes im just glad i could fix it but goddamn everything is a fuckin' mess for colour management through nvidia i did some banding tests and it looks okay but shits gonna probably be a bit off until i get a proper color meter
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2013 04:17
|
|
|
oh and suprise suprise here we are in tyool 2013 and dual screen setups on windows still kind of suck
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2013 04:18
|
|
|
ahmeni posted:im just glad i could fix it but goddamn everything is a fuckin' mess for colour management through nvidia when you go to TV levels, it stops being 8-BPC and of course banding gets worse. herpa derp derp.
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2013 04:28
|
|
|
im immune to color banding affecting my enjoyment of things because i started pirating videos on computers with a 256 color display so it was inevitable
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2013 04:29
|
|
|
The XKCD Larper posted:hmm good point.i want to see all the posters in this thread shot in the face with high powered assualt rifles
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2013 04:33
|
|
|
Install Gentoo posted:im immune to color banding affecting my enjoyment of things because i started pirating videos on computers with a 256 color display so it was inevitable  even bill gates.avi has proper dithering
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2013 04:35
|
|
|
What's color banding Is it like livestrong
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2013 04:37
|
|
|
pagancow posted:
16 and 24 bit color videos being played back on a 256 color screen
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2013 04:37
|
|
|
Nomnom Cookie posted:What's color banding
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2013 04:38
|
|
|
 if your monitor sucks it could band on both sides. 6-bpc tn panel having MOTHAFUCKA!
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2013 04:38
|
|
|
this a good song https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dx11oNHPDrA
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2013 04:54
|
|
|
I'm legitimately surprised that none of my friends have access to a goddamn colorimeter to use for like an hour so I can have some semblance of color matching on my laptop screen to my external Korea-screen, because the colors supplied in built-in profiles are either unsaturated, or the blacks are washed out n stuff
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2013 04:56
|
|
|
gently caress i notice this all the time on netflix. didn't know it had a name but it's p annoying
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2013 04:56
|
|
|
slogsdon posted:didn't know it had a name but it's p annoying shameful that you didn't know this
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2013 07:58
|
|
|
pagancow posted:
my poo poo monitor isn't banding but my u2410 is 
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2013 10:09
|
|
|
so yeah mkv etc is a container for codecs and h264 is a codec but can h264 exist without a 'tainer like does .h264 exist and is it just video? and does that poo poo need large headers or something? and what is stopping it being used like a gif? like are the headers etc so big that small 5 second 200x300 h264 "vids" like huge as gently caress or what and can someone make a plugin so we can play these in yospos? and how am i going to make these files?
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2013 10:25
|
|
|
Moist von Lipwig posted:my poo poo monitor isn't banding but my u2410 is it's supposed to band on the right side. shouldn't on the left
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2013 15:10
|
|
|
oh EuCK!!!! MOTHER FUCKerhttp://forums.macrumors.com/showpost.php?p=16081776&postcount=47 ahaah :puke
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2013 15:12
|
|
|
echinopsis posted:so yeah mkv etc is a container for codecs and h264 is a codec but can h264 exist without a 'tainer woah, slow down there hoss. you can have raw h.264 but without a header it's difficult to tell what framerate to play it back at. I bet VLC can try to auto guess a raw .264 stream and play it back, but if you have a raw stream it's because you're going to multiplex it into a blu-ray for disc creation. Containers give context to what to do with a raw stream. When you do author the blu-ray disc it puts it in it's own transport stream which the blu-ray player knows what to do with it. Headers are small, in the range of killobytes. It wont matter when you're trying to deliver some 3+mbps stream video. as for looping a video like a gif, when you embed a video into html, you would still have to create some code to act as a player. There is no "please loop this file" functionality like a gif has. a video file is more complex than the gif standard because it could contain
Having a default behavior and control setup for it is essential since most video files are longer than 1 second. It's not a technical issue, but a herp derp standards issue with browsers etc.
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2013 15:15
|
|
|
satin666 posted:oh EuCK!!!! MOTHER FUCKerhttp://forums.macrumors.com/showpost.php?p=16081776&postcount=47 ahaah :puke wait does 720P material have the exact same bitrate as 1080P material from the itunes store?
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2013 15:18
|
|
|
pagancow posted:
this is the dumbest thing and pre-CS6 versions of premiere puke their guts out when they encounter an iphone video with variable frame rate. apple, just loving film at one frame rate, jeeze
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2013 15:32
|
|
|
lol you expect apple to obey standards
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2013 15:56
|
|
|
pagancow posted:wait does 720P material have the exact same bitrate as 1080P material from the itunes store? I don't think so, but it isn't much higher. When they first started offering 1080p downloads people commented on how they aren't really any better than their 720p content and nowhere near blu-ray quality, and evidently the situation hasn't improved. It's not like watching a TV broadcast where it's macro block city or anything, though.
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2013 16:01
|
|
|
hey are there any tv providers that dont compress the poo poo out of everything and turn it into macroblock hell? i just dumped uverse and have just been watching ota tv and apple tv lately, and holy poo poo are both waaaaaaaayyyyyyyy better than uverses blocky lovely mess. any fast motion was rendered unwatchable mess because of the compression. are there any tv providers (either cable/dsl/satellite) that arent complete trash with regards to compression?
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2013 17:10
|
|
|
probably not many if any. they don't have any real immediate need to go to h264 and most consumers probably don't care that much about video quality.
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2013 17:15
|
|
|
*pays extra for HD channels* *gets super compressed blocky tv that looks like realmedia from the 90's* "Heh, yeah, this HD is great"
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2013 17:17
|
|
|
Jim Silly-Balls posted:*pays extra for HD channels* more like *watches SD channel stretched to fill their new sceptre 50" LCD* "dang man this HD stuff is great, look how big it is"
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2013 17:19
|
|
|
dur posted:more like -Every person over 50 ever
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2013 17:25
|
|
|
then you fix it for them and put them on the HD channel and stop the stretching and one of two things happens: 1) "This looks great, thanks!" *is back to the SD channel literally 10 minutes later and calling you on the phone because they cant get rid of the black bars* 2) "Looks the same to me  "
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2013 17:27
|
|
|
Jim Silly-Balls posted:hey are there any tv providers that dont compress the poo poo out of everything and turn it into macroblock hell? i just dumped uverse and have just been watching ota tv and apple tv lately, and holy poo poo are both waaaaaaaayyyyyyyy better than uverses blocky lovely mess. any fast motion was rendered unwatchable mess because of the compression. my comcast system displays them just fine, but i've been to other regions and watched comcast there and it was all compressed?? though our local comcast systems have completely removed all analog signals from the distribution, so I think they have a lot more bandwidth available to send out hd channels than places that still have analog channels available
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2013 17:31
|
|
|
moving to h264 would require new equipment and probably would happen at the same time as a docsis 3 migration (which should always be accompanied by an analog switch off). you'd want docsis 3 anyways before h264 cause you probably cant get the bandwidth savings of h264 over mpeg2 w/out the smaller channel widths of docsis3
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2013 17:34
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 3, 2024 16:02 |
|
|
that could be, our uverse still had like 500 analog channels
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2013 17:40
|
|