Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Hellbunny
Dec 24, 2008

I'm not bad, I'm just misunderstood.

McCloud posted:



In the end, Superman has two choices if he wants a better world. He can either lead by example, and hope that one day humanity chooses to follow out of our own free will, or he can force us by becoming a benevolent (and probably violent) dictator.

It's the "Catch them if they fall" vs the "put the whole world in a bottle" approach.

As fantastic as these are (and that entire ...run? paperback? Collection?)they show pretty clearly supermans weakness: He's far to liberal for his own good. The fact that he reasons with dictator rather than overthrows them is pretty weird. And why would anyone object to him helping them? The essentially turned superman into a metaphor for the U.S. which IS pretty goddamn questionable.Superman should be above that.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Yancy_Street
Nov 26, 2007

drunk octopus
wants to fight you

Tatum Girlparts posted:

"The rocks shatter against me or bounce harmlessly off. Every one hurts."

Goddamned if that's not the perfect line to sum up that entire story.

The last scene of Clark Kent, not Superman, teaching a bunch of city kids how a farm works encapsulates everything I value about that character in one beautiful page.

Madkal
Feb 11, 2008

Fallen Rib

Hellbunny posted:

As fantastic as these are (and that entire ...run? paperback? Collection?)they show pretty clearly supermans weakness: He's far to liberal for his own good. The fact that he reasons with dictator rather than overthrows them is pretty weird.

I think that you might have missed the point on this one. Superman isn't here to overthrow governments. That leads to a whole grey area of "...well it's okay if he overthrows a government that is outright evil but where does he draw the line...". All Superman wanted to do there make sure that no-one goes hungry again, not act as the world police officer. Basically he is saying that he isn't here to rule the world, us humans have got to learn to make things work ourselves. He will catch us if we fall (ie help us out every now and again) but he won't do the walking for us.

Darth Nat
Aug 24, 2007

It all comes out right in the end.

You could post almost all the afterlife scenes in this thread. Especially the part when Glory reunites with her first love. :cry:

Mister Chompers
Sep 11, 2011

Hellbunny posted:

The essentially turned superman into a metaphor for the U.S. which IS pretty goddamn questionable.Superman should be above that.

Truth, justice, and the American way?

Bongo Bill
Jan 17, 2012

There is an acknowledged tendency for superheroes to reflect the cultural preoccupations of their country of origin. A country is a powerful thing, and the depiction of powerful characters like superheroes, in aggregate, can indicate how a country feels about power - typically its own power.

Superman is American, not because he was raised in Kansas but because he was invented and refined by American writers, and sold primarily to American readers, who all see the world from the various specific perspectives of Americans (and to a lesser extent inhabitants of countries with similar or compatible perspectives). Stories about him often reveal the aspirations and anxieties of (or about) the American zeitgeist, and they do so more accurately when he is not intentionally being used as a metaphor to represent America.

That kind of allegory is much more difficult for an individual writer telling a single story than for scores of them distilling the essence of the icon over eighty years, and superhero comics aren't known for always attracting top-quality talent.

Rhyno
Mar 22, 2003
Probation
Can't post for 10 years!

Bongo Bill posted:

Superman is American, not because he was raised in Kansas but because he was invented and refined by American writers,

Joe Shuster was CANADIAN.

Lurdiak
Feb 26, 2006

I believe in a universe that doesn't care, and people that do.


Rhyno posted:

Joe Shuster was CANADIAN.



There's nothing more American than co-opting the work of immigrants to serve corporate interests.

Bongo Bill
Jan 17, 2012

Rhyno posted:

Joe Shuster was CANADIAN.

He lived in the US from the age of 9 until he died. Time enough to go native.

poly and open-minded
Nov 22, 2006

In BOD we trust

Isn't Metropolis supposed to be based on Toronto?

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

Hellbunny posted:

As fantastic as these are (and that entire ...run? paperback? Collection?)they show pretty clearly supermans weakness: He's far to liberal for his own good. The fact that he reasons with dictator rather than overthrows them is pretty weird. And why would anyone object to him helping them? The essentially turned superman into a metaphor for the U.S. which IS pretty goddamn questionable.Superman should be above that.

Because at that point what ground does he have to stop Lex next time he tries to take over the country or whatever? Does it just become who can make their message the most palatable to the masses?

Superman doesn't heat-vision the dictator because he can't treat humans that way. What happens after the dictator's head is a smoking crater, does he stick around and monitor elections? Does he pick the new leader? Does he just fly off and leave the country to a civil war? Does he then have to do that to every country with a dictator? What about a country who freely elects someone lovely, does he come back to the US if we elect some guy who fucks something major up and heat-blast him?

Superman is better than Lex because he thinks about those things, Lex's answer to all those is 'it's cool, I'm Lex Luthor, I got this' and to send in robots, Superman lets humanity be humanity, and hopes that in our worst we can remember our best.

As for people not liking him, it's a blend of propaganda from their leaders and the general factor of hey some random poor guy in a former soviet territory doesn't keep up to date with a lot of stuff, some dude in a funny costume flying down with a huge pile of food saying 'go on, eat' makes them go 'uh no, this is a trick or something'.

Avulsion
Feb 12, 2006
I never knew what hit me

McCloud posted:



In the end, Superman has two choices if he wants a better world. He can either lead by example, and hope that one day humanity chooses to follow out of our own free will, or he can force us by becoming a benevolent (and probably violent) dictator.

It's the "Catch them if they fall" vs the "put the whole world in a bottle" approach.

Things Superman could do to improve the lives of the people in that comic, with varying degrees of ultraviolence and superdickery:

* Spend an hour using x-ray vision to locate and destroy all of the army's weapons, thus putting them on equal footing with the people they've been oppressing.
* Fly the dictator to the other side of the planet and drop him, naked, in a country where no one knows him and he doesn't speak the language. Chances are, by the time he gets home he'll no longer be president.
* Rip off the dictator's head and have a nice long chat with his 2nd in command on the subject of civil rights and fair elections. Maybe arrange some pro-american-business reforms to keep the US government and, by extension, the rest of the world happy.
* Use his fame and influence to call attention to human rights abuses in 3rd world countries and endorse American politicians that actually give a poo poo.

What he actually does in comics:

* Make some speech about his role in human affairs, then fly away and leave innocent people to suffer and die for the sake of his ideals.

Avulsion fucked around with this message at 08:01 on Apr 4, 2013

Mister Roboto
Jun 15, 2009

I SWING BY AUNT MAY's
FOR A SHOWER AND A
BITE, MOST NATURAL
THING IN THE WORLD,
ASSUMING SHE'S
NOT HOME...

...AND I
FIND HER IN BED
WITH MY
FATHER, AND THE
TWO OF THEM
ARE...ARE...

...AAAAAAAAUUUUGH!
This is why Superheroes are typically seen as "juvenile" fantasy. They solve problems in ways that are obviously far too simplistic and irresponsible to work in a complex world. It's better when they stay away from politics and law, because, being fair, most sci-fi/fantasy writers aren't experts in those fields and end up writing at a high school level understanding. You can be great at drama and pathos and excitement but still have zero real understanding of the socio-economic power structure of the world.

I'd post some The Boys panels if I had any handy, Ennis brutally takes down the idea that any Superhero could possibly lead to a functional government.

Mister Roboto fucked around with this message at 10:20 on Apr 4, 2013

Saoshyant
Oct 26, 2010

:hmmorks: :orks:


Mister Roboto posted:

I'd post some The Boys panels if I had any handy, Ennis brutally takes down the idea that any Superhero could possibly lead to a functional government.

Please do, either you or someone else. I never read The Boys and that would be a good way to see if it's worth dipping on it.

prefect
Sep 11, 2001

No one, Woodhouse.
No one.




Dead Man’s Band

Arctic Baldwin posted:

Isn't Metropolis supposed to be based on Toronto?

I like the idea (can't remember where I read it) that Metropolis is New York City in the daytime, and Gotham is New York City at night.

7744
Mar 27, 2003

It had no choice. Their defense grid was smashed. We'd won. Taking out Carr then would make no difference. Skynet had to wipe out his entire existence!

prefect posted:

I like the idea (can't remember where I read it) that Metropolis is New York City in the daytime, and Gotham is New York City at night.

It seems more like Metropolis is New York City in the present and Gotham is New York City in the 1980s.

Avulsion
Feb 12, 2006
I never knew what hit me

Mister Roboto posted:

I'd post some The Boys panels if I had any handy, Ennis brutally takes down the idea that any Superhero could possibly lead to a functional government.

Superman can't lead the government because he's an illegal immigrant, but there's nothing stopping him from using his investigative reporter skills and super powers to find a slightly more honest politician and then use his super-popularity to campaign on their behalf. Of just endorse a regular politician and say "Hey, you work for me, not the corporations."

There are a lot of ways superman or any other hero could improve the world, but the stories ultimately devolve into lifting heavy things, punching bad guys and making speeches because that poo poo sells comics. If they were able to effect any meaningful change on the world around them it would threaten the long term financial viability of the franchise, so they just keep pushing that boulder up the hill.

bobkatt013
Oct 8, 2006

You’re telling me Peter Parker is ...... Spider-man!?

7744 posted:

It seems more like Metropolis is New York City in the present and Gotham is New York City in the 1980s.

I always liked how in the animated series Batman is in the 40s while Superman in the present.

Hellbunny
Dec 24, 2008

I'm not bad, I'm just misunderstood.

Tatum Girlparts posted:

Because at that point what ground does he have to stop Lex next time he tries to take over the country or whatever? Does it just become who can make their message the most palatable to the masses?

Superman doesn't heat-vision the dictator because he can't treat humans that way. What happens after the dictator's head is a smoking crater, does he stick around and monitor elections? Does he pick the new leader? Does he just fly off and leave the country to a civil war? Does he then have to do that to every country with a dictator? What about a country who freely elects someone lovely, does he come back to the US if we elect some guy who fucks something major up and heat-blast him?
Things might go wrong, so dictatorships should remain, with horrible suffering as a result. Not to mention the
idea that it's this horrible crime to kill a horrible dictator, so it's better to let him kill and murder people
everyday. I could go on, but the point is: superman could smash the status quo like a wet tissue, but he doesn't,and that makes him a part of the problem. It's not like I don't get why they did this, but it is kinda sad.

As it is Luther would be a much better revolutionary hero than Superman, since he would at least try to do something rather then mope about how hard everything is and how he wants to help us but can't. And yes, I know fully well that Luther is an awful human being, since pretty much everyone and their dog points out how consumed he is by his hatred for superman...but this really seems like a weird overreaction. Isn't it strange that every other big super villain (doctor doom, the joker) gets to have sympathetic qualities while Luther ,the guy who could change everything for the better must be this complete monster(again, obviously, there are probably some issue or whatever were Luther save the girl scout or something, I'm generalizing a bit here)?

The sad fact is that the very reason superman is a hero (his purity and innate goodness) is also the one thing that forever handicaps him. The end result of comics like the one we talk about makes it seem that it is more important that superman remains pure rather then dirting himself for the sake of humanity. This incidentally why it's probably best for superman stories to ignore these kinds of things.

Tatum Girlparts posted:

Superman is better than Lex because he thinks about those things, Lex's answer to all those is 'it's cool, I'm Lex Luthor, I got this' and to send in robots, Superman lets humanity be humanity, and hopes that in our worst we can remember our best.
As for people not liking him, it's a blend of propaganda from their leaders and the general factor of hey some random poor guy in a former soviet territory doesn't keep up to date with a lot of stuff, some dude in a funny costume flying down with a huge pile of food saying 'go on, eat' makes them go 'uh no, this is a trick or something'.
How are you more horrible the hitler? How do you repress people harder than the soviets did? Starve north koreans harder then Kim jong? again, there really is no good answer to that. Fetishising humanity really doesn't help anyone. Why do anything then?

Mister Chompers posted:

Truth, justice, and the American way?
Well he IS an american. I meant more than he usually isn't a literal representation of american humanitarian efforts.


This too.



Hellbunny fucked around with this message at 15:22 on Apr 4, 2013

ImpAtom
May 24, 2007

Mister Roboto posted:

I'd post some The Boys panels if I had any handy, Ennis brutally takes down the idea that any Superhero could possibly lead to a functional government.

The only argument the Boys makes is a bitter and childish one.

The reason that no superheroes are allowed to have any long-term positive effect is because the status quo doesn't allow it, not because it's impossible. Secret Identity, for example, ends with the idea that superhumans are becoming a part of society and that superpowers can be used for things beyond punching dudes. (Super speedsters functioning as couriers, for example.) It's allowed to, however briefly, explore something like that because it isn't beholden to a status quo.

7744
Mar 27, 2003

It had no choice. Their defense grid was smashed. We'd won. Taking out Carr then would make no difference. Skynet had to wipe out his entire existence!
I want to read an Elseworlds where Superman lands in New England instead of Kansas and grows up in a blue blooded, white collar family. Instead of growing up in Smallville, he goes to a private high school and then is accepted into Harvard Business School. He goes to work for a Fortune 500 where he uses his powers to secretly sabotage other employees / companies in his quest to rise through the corporate ranks / rule the business world. In the end though, he is undone by a merger between LexCorp and Wayne Enterprises that puts him out of business and traps him in the Phantom Zone after it's found out most of his funding comes from running a Ponzi scheme.

CharlestheHammer
Jun 26, 2011

YOU SAY MY POSTS ARE THE RAVINGS OF THE DUMBEST PERSON ON GOD'S GREEN EARTH BUT YOU YOURSELF ARE READING THEM. CURIOUS!

Mister Roboto posted:



I'd post some The Boys panels if I had any handy, Ennis brutally takes down the idea that any Superhero could possibly lead to a functional government.

I doubt it, many books have tried, but they ultimately just end anti-climatically with most just falling back on the nebulous concept of "but my freedom!". Red Son is the best example of this. Which is a shame, until the end it was rather decent.

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

Avulsion posted:

Superman can't lead the government because he's an illegal immigrant, but there's nothing stopping him from using his investigative reporter skills and super powers to find a slightly more honest politician and then use his super-popularity to campaign on their behalf. Of just endorse a regular politician and say "Hey, you work for me, not the corporations."

There are a lot of ways superman or any other hero could improve the world, but the stories ultimately devolve into lifting heavy things, punching bad guys and making speeches because that poo poo sells comics. If they were able to effect any meaningful change on the world around them it would threaten the long term financial viability of the franchise, so they just keep pushing that boulder up the hill.

So instead of running the country in a public, accountable, way he'd run it in some shadow leader position. Yea, that'd be better.

The point of this is, aside from the basic problem of 'who decides who the bad guy is in world affairs', giving one dude with the power to punch you into orbit total control over governments is basically the exact opposite of everything Superman believes in. What happens if he backs the wrong guy? He's not a mind reader, what if the dude he backs is just another dictator who is smarter than the last and knows how to hide it better at first? Does he get a do-over? Does he get to freeze breath anyone who goes 'uh maybe we get to pick our leader and not some rear end in a top hat from space?'

SirDan3k
Jan 6, 2001

Trust me, you are taking this a lot more seriously then I am.

Tatum Girlparts posted:

He's not a mind reader,

But he is best friends with one, or was before Nu52. Yeah Supes would face dissension and would end up having to treat us like children but on the other hand we loving act like children. How about we assume dissension is not going to be met with immediate murder when Supes is in charge and would even be tolerated untill it turns violent where they end up in the world's nicest jail.

There is a a tiny bit a space between not doing anything and turning into a Nazi and frankly Superman could probably manage it.

Madkal
Feb 11, 2008

Fallen Rib
It sounds like some posters want Superman to act like Bush did in the lead-up to the war in Iraq. Yeeeesh.

StumblyWumbly
Sep 12, 2007

Batmanticore!
If Black Adam were a bit less of an rear end in a top hat, or if we could just see a transition from nice guy Black Adam to rear end in a top hat Adam, I think he'd perfect for the kind of stories you want to see.

Comics aren't really a great medium for these foreign policy/fix the world stories anyway because they're too abstract, and comics are at their best focusing on people, dialog, and awesome looking stuff. Just look at the Superman panels that started this, that's a good but simple look at the situation, and every panel needs an explanation of what's going.

Having said that, Hickman could probably do a great job at it because he isn't afraid to get into odd graphic design, as in Pax Romana.

cisneros
Apr 18, 2006

Avulsion posted:

Things Superman could do to improve the lives of the people in that comic, with varying degrees of ultraviolence and superdickery:

* Spend an hour using x-ray vision to locate and destroy all of the army's weapons, thus putting them on equal footing with the people they've been oppressing.
* Fly the dictator to the other side of the planet and drop him, naked, in a country where no one knows him and he doesn't speak the language. Chances are, by the time he gets home he'll no longer be president.
* Rip off the dictator's head and have a nice long chat with his 2nd in command on the subject of civil rights and fair elections. MaybeIr arrange some pro-american-business reforms to keep the US government and, by extension, the rest of the world happy.
* Use his fame and influence to call attention to human rights abuses in 3rd world countries and endorse American politicians that actually give a poo poo.

What he actually does in comics:

* Make some speech about his role in human affairs, then fly away and leave innocent people to suffer and die for the sake of his ideals.

All that has been done by non-supermen IRL and it didn't work.

massive spider
Dec 6, 2006

Avulsion posted:

Superman can't lead the government because he's an illegal immigrant, but there's nothing stopping him from using his investigative reporter skills and super powers to find a slightly more honest politician and then use his super-popularity to campaign on their behalf. Of just endorse a regular politician and say "Hey, you work for me, not the corporations."

There are a lot of ways superman or any other hero could improve the world, but the stories ultimately devolve into lifting heavy things, punching bad guys and making speeches because that poo poo sells comics. If they were able to effect any meaningful change on the world around them it would threaten the long term financial viability of the franchise, so they just keep pushing that boulder up the hill.

Superman can't go around freeze breathing people and making them good because then his function as an inspirational Jesus analogue doesn't make any sense.

Yes it "doesn't sell comics" to have a story about an infallible benevolent dictator, but the fundamental reason it doesn't sell comics is because its a bad story.

SirDan3k
Jan 6, 2001

Trust me, you are taking this a lot more seriously then I am.

Madkal posted:

It sounds like some posters want Superman to act like Bush did in the lead-up to the war in Iraq. Yeeeesh.

The difference being one was a powerhungry warmonger and the other is a fictional embodiment of all that is good in us.

Choco1980
Feb 22, 2013

I fell in love with a Video Nasty
Hey I sure like those comics where superman punches a bad guy in the face, amiright?

McCloud
Oct 27, 2005

Choco1980 posted:

Hey I sure like those comics where superman punches a bad guy in the face, amiright?

Holy Hannah, I leave for half a day and this thread implodes!

This thread is the inspiring panels thread. It's for posting cool panels that you think inspire and / or are touching. This discussion, although very interesting, is also a derail, so please either take it to the off topic thread, or make your own thread. Either way, cut it out and post cool stuff!

Waterhaul
Nov 5, 2005


it was a nice post,
you shouldn't have signed it.



Post good things.
Contribute to the thread.

Read Glory.

Read Glory.


Anyway in conjunction with what Mr Wind Up Bird posted Glory visits the afterworld to try and rescue her dead friends, no matter what the price.



Glory meets her friends only find out that they've come to terms with their death and both them and her one true love will wait for her until she dies and returns. Except she never can.



Glory 34.

Darth Nat
Aug 24, 2007

It all comes out right in the end.
:cry:

I want to believe that if the gods decide that she'll never get to return to the afterlife, she'll just hulk out and dive down their throats and beat them to death from the inside out until they go "Whoa okay you can go already"

Atmus
Mar 8, 2002
Or, you know... She'll 'earn' her afterlife back somehow, or the supposedly supreme beings of the universe will realise that asking people to make important life decisions in moments of extreme emotional duress is a dick move, and will cancel it. Or I guess those same gods will get killed and replaced by better ones, whatever.

Van Kraken
Feb 13, 2012

Doom Patrol vol 2 #63

A few issues before, Crazy Jane (Kay Challis) was sent to another dimension by a demon. This issue, we see where she ended up: here. Someone finds her wandering the streets and she gets institutionalized. They try conventional therapy, but she's uncooperative, so one doctor proposes ECT.







For God's sake, read Doom Patrol 19–63

Karnegal
Dec 24, 2005

Is it... safe?

Waterhaul posted:

Post good things.
Contribute to the thread.

Read Glory.

Read Glory.


Glory 34.

It really bums me out that this is probably not going to get an hardcover (much less an over-sized hard cover).

Darth Nat
Aug 24, 2007

It all comes out right in the end.

Karnegal posted:

It really bums me out that this is probably not going to get an hardcover (much less an over-sized hard cover).

They keep talking about maybe getting a hardcover collection next year, so I wouldn't rule it out entirely. Image/Liefeld seem to go above and beyond the call of duty for it given how mostly overlooked it is.

Rhaka
Feb 15, 2008

Practice knighthood and learn
the art that dignifies you

EDIT: I'm an idiot and this is probably the wrong thread for this! Like, the exact opposite of inspiring. Ah well.

Locke & Key, Volume 6, Issue 3.

For context, Nina Locke, mom of the family, has been struggling with alcoholism for the whole series after her husband got murdered while she got raped. Earlier this day she had a bonding moment with her eldest son, for being 30 days sober. Tonight is prom night, and all the kids are gone, except for her youngest who unknown to her has been possessed by the Big Bad for the last few months.




Later on, after the prom, her daughter comes home to find this:


Rhaka fucked around with this message at 16:48 on Apr 7, 2013

haitfais
Aug 7, 2005

I am offended by your ham, sir.

Acknowledging that she doesn't know what really happened, that is a horrible young woman.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

SpazmasterX
Jul 13, 2006

Wrong about everything XIV related
~fartz~
How does someone look at that and not immediately go "Jesus gently caress what happened to my mother?" Nope, I HATE YOU MOM.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply