Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Star War Sex Parrot
Oct 2, 2003

What the gently caress is Newegg doing to those drives that so many are bad out of the box? :psyduck:

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Moxie Omen
Mar 15, 2008

On second look at the serial #'s it's actually one of the drives I bought from Amazon, but still :(

Gonna power down and file an RMA w/ WD later today once ZFS finishes this stupid scrub.

code:
  pool: zvol1
 state: ONLINE
status: One or more devices has experienced an unrecoverable error.  An
        attempt was made to correct the error.  Applications are unaffected.
action: Determine if the device needs to be replaced, and clear the errors
        using 'zpool clear' or replace the device with 'zpool replace'.
   see: [url]http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-9P[/url]
  scan: scrub in progress since Fri May 17 22:57:40 2013
        1.33T scanned out of 2.66T at 77.1M/s, 5h1m to go
        38.0M repaired, 50.03% done
config:

        NAME                                            STATE     READ WRITE CKSUM
        zvol1                                           ONLINE       0     0     0
          raidz1-0                                      ONLINE       0     0     0
            gptid/5e54230a-bc16-11e2-8ab3-6805ca03696c  ONLINE       0     0     2
            gptid/5ea3c3f6-bc16-11e2-8ab3-6805ca03696c  ONLINE       0     0     0  (repairing)
            gptid/5ef1e7d0-bc16-11e2-8ab3-6805ca03696c  ONLINE       0     0     0
            gptid/5f3f0cd0-bc16-11e2-8ab3-6805ca03696c  ONLINE       0     0     0
            gptid/5f9d30fc-bc16-11e2-8ab3-6805ca03696c  ONLINE       0     0     0
            gptid/5ff3388c-bc16-11e2-8ab3-6805ca03696c  ONLINE       0     0     0
            gptid/604b0f1d-bc16-11e2-8ab3-6805ca03696c  ONLINE       0     0     0
            gptid/60a12476-bc16-11e2-8ab3-6805ca03696c  ONLINE       0     0     0
            gptid/60f80740-bc16-11e2-8ab3-6805ca03696c  ONLINE       0     0     0

errors: No known data errors
code:
(da0:mps0:0:2:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 0 12 46 69 e8 0 0 20 0 length 16384 SMID 812 terminated ioc 804b scsi 0 state 0 xfer 0
(da0:mps0:0:2:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 0 12 46 6a 8 0 0 20 0 length 16384 SMID 1023 terminated ioc 804b scsi 0 state 0 xfer 0
(da0:mps0:0:2:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 0 12 46 6a 28 0 0 20 0 length 16384 SMID 548 terminated ioc 804b scsi 0 state 0 xfer 0
(da0:mps0:0:2:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 0 12 46 69 c8 0 0 20 0
(da0:mps0:0:2:0): CAM status: SCSI Status Error
(da0:mps0:0:2:0): SCSI status: Check Condition
(da0:mps0:0:2:0): SCSI sense: MEDIUM ERROR info:124669e0 asc:11,0 (Unrecovered read error)
repeat ad infinitum

yaaaaaaay :saddowns:

smartctl -a /dev/da0 for giggles:
code:
SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 16
Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds:
ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME          FLAG     VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE      UPDATED  WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
  1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate     0x002f   163   163   051    Pre-fail  Always       -       2875
  3 Spin_Up_Time            0x0027   245   176   021    Pre-fail  Always       -       2750
  4 Start_Stop_Count        0x0032   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       20
  5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct   0x0033   188   188   140    Pre-fail  Always       -       364
  7 Seek_Error_Rate         0x002e   200   200   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
  9 Power_On_Hours          0x0032   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       129
 10 Spin_Retry_Count        0x0032   100   253   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
 11 Calibration_Retry_Count 0x0032   100   253   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
 12 Power_Cycle_Count       0x0032   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       20
192 Power-Off_Retract_Count 0x0032   200   200   000    Old_age   Always       -       19
193 Load_Cycle_Count        0x0032   200   200   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
194 Temperature_Celsius     0x0022   120   120   000    Old_age   Always       -       30
196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032   198   198   000    Old_age   Always       -       2
197 Current_Pending_Sector  0x0032   200   200   000    Old_age   Always       -       4
198 Offline_Uncorrectable   0x0030   100   253   000    Old_age   Offline      -       0
199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count    0x0032   200   200   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
200 Multi_Zone_Error_Rate   0x0008   100   253   000    Old_age   Offline      -       0
2875 raw_read_error_rate, that's bad, right?

Star War Sex Parrot
Oct 2, 2003

Moxie Omen posted:

2875 raw_read_error_rate, that's bad, right?
Nah these are your bad ones:
code:
ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME          FLAG     VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE      UPDATED  WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
  5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct   0x0033   188   188   140    Pre-fail  Always       -       364
196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032   198   198   000    Old_age   Always       -       2
197 Current_Pending_Sector  0x0032   200   200   000    Old_age   Always       -       4

Moxie Omen
Mar 15, 2008

Star War Sex Parrot posted:

Nah these are your bad ones:
code:
ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME          FLAG     VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE      UPDATED  WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
  5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct   0x0033   188   188   140    Pre-fail  Always       -       364
196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032   198   198   000    Old_age   Always       -       2
197 Current_Pending_Sector  0x0032   200   200   000    Old_age   Always       -       4

Ahhh, good to know. Thank you based sex parrot.

Combat Pretzel
Jun 23, 2004

No, seriously... what kurds?!

Star War Sex Parrot posted:

What the gently caress is Newegg doing to those drives that so many are bad out of the box? :psyduck:
WD disks park their heads off platter, so there shouldn't be anything that could happen when off. This DOA poo poo is the reason I paid premium and got the RE4 versions.

Star War Sex Parrot
Oct 2, 2003

Combat Pretzel posted:

WD disks park their heads off platter, so there shouldn't be anything that could happen when off.
That's what I don't understand. I've handled hundreds of Reds over the last year and never seen failure rates like what people are getting here. I honestly believe that the Reds are the best drive WD has put out in years. It's just alarming to see so many issues here.

PitViper
May 25, 2003

Welcome and thank you for shopping at Wal-Mart!
I love you!
Fwiw, when I bought my Reds on Amazon, they came shipped in individual boxes, packed in plastic containers/shells inside the boxes, and the individual boxes were in a big box filled tight with packing paper and bubble wrap. Newegg seems to just toss their OEM drives in a box with paper, and they're packaged in a static bag. Maybe that accounts for the difference? I've had mine now for 6 months with no issues at all, 5x2TB in a raidz1.

Master Stur
Jun 13, 2008

chasin' tail

kill your idols posted:

Cool thanks. I have a Samsung 840 (non-pro) now as my boot drive, but it seems to be a waste of space for just the OS install and some packages.

I'm gonna grab one off Newegg dispit their awful reviews about failure rate.

Yeah I saw those newer reviews complaining about dead drives, hopefully just a vocal minority :( at least it's a well received drive in the ssd megathread too.

And yeah, when we ordered our Reds from CDW they all came in individual boxes inside a much larger box similar to Amazon. The two smaller ones from newegg we got awhile ago came in static bags and bubble wrap.

kill your idols
Sep 11, 2003

by T. Finninho
With all the horror stories, I refuse to buy anything that spins from Newegg. I'm lucky enough to be 5 minutes from the nearest MicroCenter. If they are out, Amazon is my second choice. Prime shipping is amazing.

I picked up a AOC-SAS2LP-MV8 to have some Sata 3 ports. What you goons think: 6 drive RaidZ2, Raidz1, or 3 sets of vdev mirrors?

Pudgygiant
Apr 8, 2004

Garnet and black? More like gold and blue or whatever the fuck colors these are
I've had 9 reds running for about a year now in the harshest environment possible, and the only issue I had was when a retard thought rocking a NAS with his foot was a good idea and it killed a drive.

Of course they were all from Amazon though :clint:

Kreeblah
May 17, 2004

INSERT QUACK TO CONTINUE


Taco Defender

NAS4Free posted:

pre:
  pool: AllDisksPool
 state: ONLINE
  scan: none requested
config:

	NAME        STATE     READ WRITE CKSUM
	AllDisksPool  ONLINE       0     0     0
	  raidz1-0  ONLINE       0     0     0
	    ada0    ONLINE       0     0     0
	    ada1    ONLINE       0     0     0
	    ada2    ONLINE       0     0     0
	    ada3    ONLINE       0     0     0
	    ada4    ONLINE       0     0     0

errors: No known data errors
Total: 13.6T | Used: 113G | Free: 10.6T | State: ONLINE

:getin:

Master Stur
Jun 13, 2008

chasin' tail

kill your idols posted:

With all the horror stories, I refuse to buy anything that spins from Newegg. I'm lucky enough to be 5 minutes from the nearest MicroCenter. If they are out, Amazon is my second choice. Prime shipping is amazing.

I picked up a AOC-SAS2LP-MV8 to have some Sata 3 ports. What you goons think: 6 drive RaidZ2, Raidz1, or 3 sets of vdev mirrors?

I definitely wouldn't use Raidz1 with an even number of disks. If you want good enough redundancy and scads of disk then stick with Raidz2, but I am fairly sure 3x2 vdev mirrors will give better read performance (I think, not an expert) and redundancy but you lose more disk space. So it'll depend what your priorities are really!

necrobobsledder
Mar 21, 2005
Lay down your soul to the gods rock 'n roll
Nap Ghost
I got two reds off of Amazon and they're fine. I've ordered only one or two from Newegg but have ordered from basically anyone else. Got like 4 WD20EARS drives from Dell a few years ago when they hit about $100 each then.

I think WD is going to have to send a representative to Newegg warehouses to determine wtf they're doing to them eventually.

no go on Quiznos
May 16, 2007


Pork Pro
Any recommendations on a cheapish 2-4 TB NAS that I can run Time Machine backups to?

kill your idols
Sep 11, 2003

by T. Finninho

Silver95280 posted:

Any recommendations on a cheapish 2-4 TB NAS that I can run Time Machine backups to?

Synology DS212j or DS112j and WD Red's. Should come under $400 shipped from Amazon for the 1-Bay unit. I've had the DS112j, DS212j, and DS713+; all have been great pieces of hardware. The GUI is straight forward and set and forget.

HOWTO: http://www.synology.com/us/solutions/backup/time_machine/time_machine.php

tarepanda
Mar 26, 2011

Living the Dream

Star War Sex Parrot posted:

That's what I don't understand. I've handled hundreds of Reds over the last year and never seen failure rates like what people are getting here. I honestly believe that the Reds are the best drive WD has put out in years. It's just alarming to see so many issues here.

It's probably confirmation bias here. Between the Reds my friends and I have gotten, I know at least 16 that WEREN'T DOA.

Civil
Apr 21, 2003

Do you see this? This means "Have a nice day".

kill your idols posted:

Synology DS212j or DS112j and WD Red's. Should come under $400 shipped from Amazon for the 1-Bay unit. I've had the DS112j, DS212j, and DS713+; all have been great pieces of hardware. The GUI is straight forward and set and forget.

HOWTO: http://www.synology.com/us/solutions/backup/time_machine/time_machine.php

Such a solid unit. Someone asked me to set up a "server" for them, and I went with a DS212j and a couple 3TB reds for them. After using a few other nas appliances in the past, the Synology unit was worlds ahead in all aspects.

Rolling your own seems to be the popular option in this thread, but for nas appliances, Synology is amazing. Great balance of ease of use and tons of features.

sanchez
Feb 26, 2003
The synology web interface really is something, it's a whole different world when compared to iomega etc.

kill your idols
Sep 11, 2003

by T. Finninho

Civil posted:

Synology is amazing. Great balance of ease of use and tons of features.

I like the fact they offer a demo of the web interface on their site. Geting to play with it before buying is a major plus. I really would like to see all the role-your-own options offer something similar. They could just get a VM up and running somewhere on their servers and allow demo access.

My HBA is on a UPS truck today for delivery. I think im going to go 2 raidz vdevs of 4 disks each. I lose 2 drives of space as with raidz2 but might gain some performance with the mirror/stripping.

edit: Installing Ringtail now.. Oh the smell of new hardware. :jiggled:

kill your idols fucked around with this message at 21:21 on May 20, 2013

Megaman
May 8, 2004
I didn't read the thread BUT...
I have to chime in on synology. I had a 15xx+, it was drat amazing, of course until it started randomly rebooting from what looked like a power issue. I then broke down and bought 7 drives and put them into 2 supermicro 5 slot bays and loaded up freenas via usb on a poo poo computer, I now have a raid z3 of my dreams backed up to a n54l 5 disk raid z1 and 2 offsite 2tb greens

Farmer Crack-Ass
Jan 2, 2001

this is me posting irl

tarepanda posted:

It's probably confirmation bias here. Between the Reds my friends and I have gotten, I know at least 16 that WEREN'T DOA.

Did they come from Newegg?

tarepanda
Mar 26, 2011

Living the Dream

Farmer Crack-rear end posted:

Did they come from Newegg?

Only two of them did, so I guess if you're specifically looking at Newegg it's not really significant at all.

LastCaress
May 8, 2004

bonobo
I was thinking of buying an external HD enclosure, something like this:

http://www.amazon.es/Sharkoon-8-BAY-RAID-BOX-4044951012916/dp/B008ENU0XM/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1369133924&sr=8-1&keywords=sharkoon+8-bay
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Sharkoon-St...=sharkoon+5-bay

It's basically a NAS without the network part. (I already have 3 NAS) - However I don't know if there are many alternatives to this - I also have some HD docks but this would allow me an extra 5 or 8 HDs to be connected via USB3.0 - I don't really plan to do a RAID right now so alternatives that don't do RAID are ok as well. Anyone have any experience with these devices? Anywhere I can find it cheaper (EU)? Thanks!

BJA
Apr 11, 2006

It has to start somewhere
It has to start sometime
What better place than here
What better time than now
I have a 2TB HD in my old desktop that I used as a shared network drive for all of our laptops on stuff (home network). we just bought another laptop which leaves no one using the desktop anymore, so I may get rid of it, but I want to keep the drive networked since it has movies, music, backups, etc would I need anything more than something like these:

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002MUGUFK/ref=oh_details_o01_s01_i03?ie=UTF8&psc=1
http://www.amazon.com/Netgear-WNDR3...ds=netgear+n600

Moxie Omen
Mar 15, 2008

Another thing I'm not enjoying so far: FreeNAS just straight up dropping drives at the device level and ZFS being like 'lol zpool status shows everything online!!! just dandy!!!!'

Mr Shiny Pants
Nov 12, 2012
It seems like the new HP Microserver G8 is coming out in a short while.

It's Intel based and seems to support ECC ram. Don't know the Max but 32GB would be awesome.

The chipset is supposed to support 32GB, but they might cripple it artificially like they did with the SATA ports in the old one.

Can't find a picture online, found it through Facebook of all places.

It looks pretty good to be honest.

FISHMANPET
Mar 3, 2007

Sweet 'N Sour
Can't
Melt
Steel Beams

Moxie Omen posted:

Another thing I'm not enjoying so far: FreeNAS just straight up dropping drives at the device level and ZFS being like 'lol zpool status shows everything online!!! just dandy!!!!'

I'm loving how on my M1015 and Solaris ZFS can't find my disks if I move them to different ports. If I want to move drives around I have to export and import the pool.

evol262
Nov 30, 2010
#!/usr/bin/perl

FISHMANPET posted:

I'm loving how on my M1015 and Solaris ZFS can't find my disks if I move them to different ports. If I want to move drives around I have to export and import the pool.

File a bug against whichever distro you're using (or more likely, Illumos itself). ZFS explicitly should not have that problem.

FISHMANPET
Mar 3, 2007

Sweet 'N Sour
Can't
Melt
Steel Beams

evol262 posted:

File a bug against whichever distro you're using (or more likely, Illumos itself). ZFS explicitly should not have that problem.

This is Solaris 11, so...

I think it has something to do with the way the driver assigns disk IDs. Instead of cXtYd0 I've got c0t50014EE2B2CB594Ed0.

evol262
Nov 30, 2010
#!/usr/bin/perl

FISHMANPET posted:

This is Solaris 11, so...

I think it has something to do with the way the driver assigns disk IDs. Instead of cXtYd0 I've got c0t50014EE2B2CB594Ed0.

Which shouldn't matter. ZFS is supposed to record which pool it belongs to in the superblock. It's been there since the beginning, when Sun had their "look at us plug and unplug USB drives into a 48 port hub willy-nilly and ZFS never breaks" Youtube video. If changing the path in /dev/rdsk breaks it, it's a ZFS bug (c0t5fdklsafjlkdajfklajlfjsadlfdasl is normal multipath disk assigning, so your bug would also crop up if a FC/iSCSI path dropped or changed). ZFS doesn't care. File a bug if you have a Oracle support contract.

necrobobsledder
Mar 21, 2005
Lay down your soul to the gods rock 'n roll
Nap Ghost

Mr Shiny Pants posted:

It seems like the new HP Microserver G8 is coming out in a short while.

It's Intel based and seems to support ECC ram. Don't know the Max but 32GB would be awesome.
The G-series servers aren't really Microservers though is the thing - they're using mainline Xeons like the E3-1230/1235 rather than the low-TDP models. A new HP Microserver on Intel hardware would probably be based on an E3-1220L probably which will drive up power consumption over the current AMD-based Microservers but with a lot more possibilities like transcoding and better ZFS performance. At 20w TDP it should still kick the AMDs in the market segment in the pants. They're hardly some one-off for Intel either, they're part of Intel's microserver strategy http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/xeon/xeon-processor-e3-family/micro-server-resources.html

Poor AMD, they can't ever get a break when anything good's happening for them.

Longinus00
Dec 29, 2005
Ur-Quan

necrobobsledder posted:

The G-series servers aren't really Microservers though is the thing - they're using mainline Xeons like the E3-1230/1235 rather than the low-TDP models. A new HP Microserver on Intel hardware would probably be based on an E3-1220L probably which will drive up power consumption over the current AMD-based Microservers but with a lot more possibilities like transcoding and better ZFS performance. At 20w TDP it should still kick the AMDs in the market segment in the pants. They're hardly some one-off for Intel either, they're part of Intel's microserver strategy http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/xeon/xeon-processor-e3-family/micro-server-resources.html

Poor AMD, they can't ever get a break when anything good's happening for them.

A real Intel microserver in the same vein as the Nxx series would probably be based on the new Silvermont atoms which support XOR and AES offloading as well as VTx and ECC. An AMD counter would probably be Jaguar based with a comparable feature set but with an unknown (probably higher?) power consumption.

Gendo
Feb 25, 2001

His place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who know neither victory nor defeat.

Civil posted:

Rolling your own seems to be the popular option in this thread, but for nas appliances, Synology is amazing. Great balance of ease of use and tons of features.
I really love their products and it is tempting, but at some levels the price gap is too significant to ignore.

I'm looking at a 12 drive system and building my own would cost around $500 (not including disks). If I picked up say a DS1812+ and a DX513 I'd be at almost three times the cost.

PitViper
May 25, 2003

Welcome and thank you for shopping at Wal-Mart!
I love you!

LastCaress posted:

I was thinking of buying an external HD enclosure, something like this:

http://www.amazon.es/Sharkoon-8-BAY-RAID-BOX-4044951012916/dp/B008ENU0XM/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1369133924&sr=8-1&keywords=sharkoon+8-bay
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Sharkoon-St...=sharkoon+5-bay

It's basically a NAS without the network part. (I already have 3 NAS) - However I don't know if there are many alternatives to this - I also have some HD docks but this would allow me an extra 5 or 8 HDs to be connected via USB3.0 - I don't really plan to do a RAID right now so alternatives that don't do RAID are ok as well. Anyone have any experience with these devices? Anywhere I can find it cheaper (EU)? Thanks!

Something like this? They're cheaper here in the US, but I'm not sure about over there.

http://www.amazon.com/Sans-Digital-...=sans+digital+8

I've been considering one of these, and consolidating my NAS machine into a smaller case and using the Sans Digital towers as expansion chassis. They've got a 5 bay USB/eSATA version, as well as an 8-bay SAS version. My other choice is a Norco case, but it depends on how I can setup the network closet at our new house. Currently I'm limping along with 8 HDDs crammed in a midtower chassis with a pair of SATA controller cards, but airflow and cooling are lacking.

FCKGW
May 21, 2006

Mr Shiny Pants posted:

It seems like the new HP Microserver G8 is coming out in a short while.

It's Intel based and seems to support ECC ram. Don't know the Max but 32GB would be awesome.

The chipset is supposed to support 32GB, but they might cripple it artificially like they did with the SATA ports in the old one.

Can't find a picture online, found it through Facebook of all places.

It looks pretty good to be honest.

Here's what I found

http://blog.themonsta.id.au/hp-proliant-g8-microservers-leaked/


Mr Shiny Pants
Nov 12, 2012
That's the one, it looks pretty good.

32GB of RAM would be awesome if It's supported.

LastCaress
May 8, 2004

bonobo

PitViper posted:

Something like this? They're cheaper here in the US, but I'm not sure about over there.

http://www.amazon.com/Sans-Digital-...=sans+digital+8

I've been considering one of these, and consolidating my NAS machine into a smaller case and using the Sans Digital towers as expansion chassis. They've got a 5 bay USB/eSATA version, as well as an 8-bay SAS version. My other choice is a Norco case, but it depends on how I can setup the network closet at our new house. Currently I'm limping along with 8 HDDs crammed in a midtower chassis with a pair of SATA controller cards, but airflow and cooling are lacking.

Yep, that's the type of thing I'm looking for! I'm going to compare prices with the Sharkoon and I'm still undecided on 5 vs 8 bays.

Goon Matchmaker
Oct 23, 2003

I play too much EVE-Online
Matrox G200 video? WTF? Matrox is still around? How old is that chip anyways? Why not just use the integrated intel graphics? :psyduck:

thebigcow
Jan 3, 2001

Bully!

Goon Matchmaker posted:

Matrox G200 video? WTF? Matrox is still around? How old is that chip anyways? Why not just use the integrated intel graphics? :psyduck:

Probably part of the ilo hardware.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Star War Sex Parrot
Oct 2, 2003

Yeah for whatever reason I still see Matrox being used in server motherboards quite a bit.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply