|
I think part of it is a perceived quality issue. Cars with CVTs sound awful. There is no change in engine speed so it sounds like the transmission is slipping (which it is in a way).
|
# ? Jun 11, 2013 02:18 |
|
|
# ? May 26, 2024 16:43 |
|
thats why I like them. They sound like dragsters.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2013 02:20 |
|
I think the issue with CVTs is, although they have infinite ratios within a certain range, in order to widen that range (equivalent to adding higher gears) you need to make the transmission a lot bigger and heavier, and at that point it becomes easier to just make a conventional automatic with an extra set of planetaries that can produce more ratios, and doesn't have the design and packaging challenges. They're great for economy cars, not so much for sports cars and pickup trucks.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2013 04:40 |
|
Fucknag posted:I think the issue with CVTs is, although they have infinite ratios within a certain range, in order to widen that range (equivalent to adding higher gears) you need to make the transmission a lot bigger and heavier, and at that point it becomes easier to just make a conventional automatic with an extra set of planetaries that can produce more ratios, and doesn't have the design and packaging challenges. They're great for economy cars, not so much for sports cars and pickup trucks. yeah, the ZF 8 speed that everybody uses only has like 5 actual gears, but uses combinations of them to produce the different ratios.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2013 05:04 |
|
Yeah that's the cool thing about classic flavor autos. Most older 4-speeds just have 2 planetary sets with different reduction ratios. You run both in reduction for 1st, the higher-ratio one in reduction and the other direct for second, vice versa for third, and both in direct drive for fourth, plus a dedicated overdrive gearset. Add another full planetary and you can see how the combinations add up quickly, and that's ignoring adding, for example, a gear where 2 sets run in reverse for an additional ratio, or crazy poo poo like ravigneaux gears.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2013 05:10 |
|
IOwnCalculus posted:A CVT is the best theoretical transmission - who cares about power curves when you can spin the engine to where it performs best (or makes best economy or whatever) and then just vary the ratio as you get to the speed you want? Problem is making a CVT that holds up to a lot of power. There's another issue with CVTs, people loving hate them. If you have a CVT behave optimally it absolutely fucks with people's heads. Which is why you end up with CVTs that have "6 speeds" and gearshift paddles.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2013 07:29 |
|
I have an unhealthy obsession with French cars. Here's another. Peugeot decided to hop up the RCZ a bit, boosting the turbo 1.6L engine to 260hp, making it their most powerful road-legal car ever. It's still FWD, but there's a mechanical LSD in there as well as some suspension trickery, and the Frenchies have a history of making sweet-handling FWD rides. If you're going to the Goodwood Festival of Speed, the official reveal will happen there. The black with copper accents thing they started with the Onyx concept car is pretty nice, too. I like it.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2013 10:13 |
|
The RCZ is a beautiful car but it absolutely needs to be AWD or MR.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2013 10:46 |
|
Eh, with 260hp it doesn't really need to be. I think I would just drive it as is and take the extra storage space and lower cost.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2013 14:44 |
|
It does look like it could be made MR relatively problem-free, though. Being based on a FWD platform (from the 308), there are probably problems with doing that.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2013 15:08 |
|
angryhampster posted:What do these compete with? I can't seem to think of a CUV market that would fit into, given its size and price. It's almost the same specs as an Xterra actually (slightly longer, same width, slightly lighter, slightly more power) but looks much nicer inside...though only the Trailhawk version looks like it has any actual off-road ability.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2013 16:01 |
|
KozmoNaut posted:It does look like it could be made MR relatively problem-free, though. If anyone can do it, its the French.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2013 17:01 |
|
Coredump posted:If anyone can do it, its the French. they'd put the engine behind the seats and then run a driveshaft to the front to drive the front wheels, because they're French.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2013 17:25 |
|
Is that a real car? That double bubble rear window looks expensive. I like it. It kind of looks like someone took 1000 piece puzzles of a Nissan 350Z and an Audi TT and managed to put them together.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2013 21:12 |
|
It's real and 99% the same as the original concept car. They've been making it since 2010, with a facelift in 2012. It's assembled in Austria by Magna Steyr, who also assemble the Aston Martin Rapide. The 1.6L Prince engine is the same as the one in the current MINI and the BMW 1 and 3 series, it was developed jointly by PSA and BMW. I'm pretty sure the rear window is the single most expensive part on the entire car, I'd hate to pay for a replacement.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2013 21:22 |
|
The pillars are a close second and beautiful work if you get to see one off the car, incredible gentle complex compound curves
|
# ? Jun 11, 2013 22:34 |
|
They are beautiful cars, there's one that parks on my street, and the Peugeot dealer around the corner has some on their forecourt. Probably the most underrated car of the decade, performance notwithstanding (though this new one seeks to redress that).
|
# ? Jun 11, 2013 23:10 |
|
KozmoNaut posted:I have an unhealthy obsession with French cars. Here's another. Goddamn. I want one of these! Also, I think that new Jeep Cherokee is kind of nice looking in a perverse sort of way. I'd take one over a RAV, CRV, or Forester.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2013 23:30 |
|
The single weirdest thing about the RCZ is that the gearbox is actually good. Nice precise shift feel and distinct, short throws. This is weird because it shows that Peugeot can do it, if they want. But in every other newer Peugeot I've driven, the shifter feels like you stuck a spoon in a bucket of porridge. (Tbf, the boxes in the Mi16 and the Gti6 I had weren't spectacular either, but they were miles better than the one in for e.g. the 307, 308 or the 208.)
|
# ? Jun 11, 2013 23:37 |
|
KozmoNaut posted:I have an unhealthy obsession with French cars. Here's another. The RCZ looks awesome on the road. The double bubble roof grabs your attention. The looks blow away the TT.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2013 23:42 |
|
God, if only that thing was RWD or AWD. It's so goddamn good looking.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2013 00:17 |
|
God drat that car is nice. Its how I would want the first gen TT to actually look.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2013 00:45 |
|
truck trucks Trucks TRUCKS TWUCKS http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.d...e#axzz2VqHeHgml quote:
http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/11/ram-mulling-superlux-pickup-above-laramie-longhorn/ quote:Looking at the fullsize pickup landscape, automakers are bringing more and more luxury to the mix. Ford has its King Ranch, GMC has the Denali and now Chevrolet is adding a High Country model, but it sounds like Ram might be looking to make a step up from its already posh Laramie Longhorn trim (shown above). Speaking with new Ram boss Reid Bigland, Automobile is reporting that Chrysler could be looking to reach even higher to add even more premium accoutrements to its truck line.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2013 02:16 |
|
Tekne posted:I'd take the Trailhawk Cherokee in granite metallic with the dark wheels. It really looks like a shark or ray in that color, but in a good way imo. drat, that's cheap.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2013 02:24 |
|
Throatwarbler posted:truck trucks Trucks TRUCKS TWUCKS This isn't a big surprise. The ranger, canyon, and dakota have all died since 2005. The sticker on my truck was $66k, although my next truck i intend to buy new, and don't expect to pay more than about $25k.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2013 02:40 |
|
It does say "large pickup trucks" which you would think would only include 1/2t and above, so if the small trucks are gone then the prices should have come down as previous small truck owners migrate to cheap large trucks.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2013 02:48 |
|
Kenshin posted:God, if only that thing was RWD or AWD. What do the following cars have in common? 205 GTi 309 GTi 106 Rallye 306 GTi6 306 Rallye All great handling cars, all FWD, all Peugeot. Things almost no one has ever said: "I wish the 205 GTi was RWD." Oversteer was only ever a lift away.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2013 03:47 |
|
Throatwarbler posted:truck trucks Trucks TRUCKS TWUCKS For as much as I hate "unnecessary" truck ownership, it's making the car companies a lot of money. Slap a couple hundred bucks of leather in there and charge an extra $10k+, print money.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2013 04:42 |
|
drgitlin posted:What do the following cars have in common? Yes, Peugeot can make brilliant FF shopping trollies and sell them to boy racers but the RCX looks like it should be competing with the R8. I know it offers supercar looks for a fraction of the price but it feels like they should be selling a 400hp MR version. Knowing Peugeot it'd be HDI as well
|
# ? Jun 12, 2013 10:22 |
|
Nidhg00670000 posted:(Tbf, the boxes in the Mi16 and the Gti6 I had weren't spectacular either, but they were miles better than the one in for e.g. the 307, 308 or the 208.) The GTi6 is the one where the gearbox gets in the way of the steering isn't it? I've never thought they had a particularly good box, certainly not close to FWD Honda quality.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2013 10:33 |
|
For those truck prices, $31->39K over 8 years would fit with 3% average year over year inflation. Using official Fed year-year numbers a $31k truck in 2005 would be $37k today, a $2k increase isn't tremendous, and most consumer prices have shown a little higher rise than the Fed numbers anyway. Figure in the fancier engine tech / ICE features and the real price paid per nebulous value unit has probably dropped. This is more exaggerated if you use the 'industry average' numbers, that $27.6k truck should be about $33k in 2013 dollars, before any added features. Only getting $31k means either dropped profits on the basically same vehicle, that consumers are buying less options, or both.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2013 10:45 |
|
Q_res posted:There's another issue with CVTs, people loving hate them. If you have a CVT behave optimally it absolutely fucks with people's heads. Which is why you end up with CVTs that have "6 speeds" and gearshift paddles. No, when you let a CVT behave as it wants it's just plain loving bad. Wait I need power whhhhRRRRRRRRRRRR okay it's next week you can have overtaking power now. Oh you want to accelerate to get into another lane? whhhhhRRRRRRR gently caress missed it too slow to respond. Paddles makes them even somewhat drivable, even for highway tooling around. Yes I know how they are supposed to work but for a car they DONT loving WORK FOR CARS. Christ, I can not believe they came up with something worse than a traditional auto, but they have. A lot worse. And for what? Dubious marginal fuel saving? Dubious reduction in emissions? Absolute certain piss anyone who is even remotely interested in driving off immensely? 4 weeks of driving misreble CVT equipped cars? I'd rather drive a manual 70's Corolla.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2013 12:48 |
|
Linedance posted:they'd put the engine behind the seats and then run a driveshaft to the front to drive the front wheels, because they're French. That does sound like something the French would do if left to their own devices but Renault made it work with the Clio, I'm sure Peugot can pull it off too.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2013 14:04 |
|
I bet they could. But would you pay Porsche money for a Peugeot? I mean, I'd love a ~400hp MR RCZ R, but I think I'm an outlier.
|
# ? Jun 12, 2013 14:07 |
|
dissss posted:The GTi6 is the one where the gearbox gets in the way of the steering isn't it? I've never thought they had a particularly good box, certainly not close to FWD Honda quality. Yeah, it's that one. For those uninformed, the sixth gear is in an extra housing bolted onto the outside of the regular five gear box, and that extra gear gets in the way of the steering, giving you a far bigger turning radius when turning left than when turning right. The bigger of the two is actually quite enormous, but you learn to live with it quite fast. And as I was saying, although it wasn't a very impressive box, it is still better than the 308s. Linedance posted:they'd put the engine behind the seats and then run a driveshaft to the front to drive the front wheels, because they're French. If 4WD is a necessity, I guess they could go the route of the 3008 & 508 and use a hybrid system with an electrical motor driving the rear wheels?
|
# ? Jun 12, 2013 14:19 |
|
Cat Terrist posted:No, when you let a CVT behave as it wants it's just plain loving bad. Wait I need power whhhhRRRRRRRRRRRR okay it's next week you can have overtaking power now. Oh you want to accelerate to get into another lane? whhhhhRRRRRRR gently caress missed it too slow to respond. My wife had a CVT Mercedes A-class as her first car, and it was perfect for her. Underpowered, bulky, basically impossible to accidentally accelerate off a bridge (which is exactly what she did the first time she drove my car).
|
# ? Jun 12, 2013 16:14 |
|
Chris Harris drives the new 991 GT3 with the flappy paddles https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KVdme4ISq8Y Something about that exhaust sound seems uninspiring and not worth the seconds they spend showing it... maybe I'm broken
|
# ? Jun 13, 2013 04:18 |
|
Cakefool posted:Yes, Peugeot can make brilliant FF shopping trollies and sell them to boy racers but the RCX looks like it should be competing with the R8. I know it offers supercar looks for a fraction of the price but it feels like they should be selling a 400hp MR version. Knowing Peugeot it'd be HDI as well I've always thought the sheep in wolves clothing was a french car schtick
|
# ? Jun 13, 2013 05:26 |
|
sadnessboner posted:I've always thought the sheep in wolves clothing was a french car schtick Looking fast is always chic, actually going fast is so déclassé
|
# ? Jun 13, 2013 06:13 |
|
|
# ? May 26, 2024 16:43 |
|
Hog Obituary posted:Chris Harris drives the new 991 GT3 with the flappy paddles Chris Harris is the best. I haven't watched a review of his so far that I haven't liked. The DRIVE network has become my go to video channel on youtube. They are putting out quality video consistently.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2013 07:19 |