Cocoa Crispies posted:

sublime is good because out of the box all you gotta do is pick a different color theme and it already works better than vim or emacs default config

i would have no problem paying $200 for an emacs config that worked as well as sublime defaults

Jerry SanDisky posted:

vs 2012 would be great if it shipped with a functional compiler

VanillaKid posted:

why would anyone use Emacs

VanillaKid posted:

why

Mr SuperAwesome posted:

different color theme? :getout3:

OBAMA BIN LinkedIn posted:

same but replace 'text editor' with 'lovely 70 dollar program that does the exact same thing as programs 40 years its senior'

Jerry SanDisky posted:

vs 2012 would be great if it shipped with a functional compiler

dur posted:

this client has terrible data so today i wrote a bad script to count annotations with bad geometry

code:

mxd = arcpy.mapping.MapDocument('Current')
layers = arcpy.mapping.ListLayers(mxd)

zerolength = 0

for lyr in layers:
	if lyr.isGroupLayer:
		if arcpy.Describe(lyr).featureType == "Annotation":
			arcpy.SelectLayerByAttribute_management(lyr, "NEW_SELECTION", ' "SHAPE_Length" = 0 ')
			result = int(arcpy.GetCount_management(lyr).getOutput(0))
			zerolength = zerolength + result
		
arcpy.AddMessage(zerolength)

it works, sort of

Helicity posted:

seems to compile my lovely code just fine, i dunno what this even means

PleasingFungus posted:

backseat scriptin'

code:

mxd = arcpy.mapping.MapDocument('Current')
layers = arcpy.mapping.ListLayers(mxd)

def layer_length(layer):
    arcpy.SelectLayerByAttribute_management(layer, "NEW_SELECTION", ' "SHAPE_Length" = 0 ')
    return int(arcpy.GetCount_management(layer).getOutput(0))

layer_lengths = sum(layer_length(layer) for layer in layers
                    if layer.isGroupLayer and "Annotation" == arcpy.Describe(layer).featureType)
arcpy.AddMessage(layer_lengths)

haven't worked with arcpy so not sure what's going on with the ' "SHAPE_Length" = 0 ' line, looks horrifying though

hth

fakeedit: this is a bad post but w/e

Jerry SanDisky posted:

vs 2012 would be great if it shipped with a functional compiler

Ronald Raiden posted:

when did sulk start thinking he had any ground to stand on? Looks like hes been talking some poo poo in this thread. Who is in charge here? Someone needs to clean up this mess.

Nomnom Cookie posted:

someone gave him a paycheck so his ego got all puffy. inflamed zit ego

Dirk Pitt posted:

Jerry SanDisky posted:

perfectly cromulent code doesn't compile because microsoft is years behind apple and foss neckbeards

C++ code:

int main() {
	auto foo = vector<string>{"visual", "c++", "doesnt", "work"};
	copy(begin(foo), end(foo), ostream_iterator<string>{cout, " "});
}

Jerry SanDisky posted:

perfectly cromulent code doesn't compile because microsoft is years behind apple and foss neckbeards

C++ code:

int main() {
	auto foo = vector<string>{"visual", "c++", "doesnt", "work"};
	copy(begin(foo), end(foo), ostream_iterator<string>{cout, " "});
}

Shaggar posted:

that's not valid code

Nomnom Cookie posted:

someone gave him a paycheck so his ego got all puffy. inflamed zit ego

Cocoa Crispies posted:

alabama php money

Cocoa Crispies posted:

alabama php money

Cold on a Cob posted:

i'm a terrible coder but everyone i work with is worse (i don't work at google or apple btw)

OBAMA BIN LinkedIn posted:

we have 2 platforms that our c++ code has to compile on before it gets into production, one of which uses an ancient gcc extension that still complains if u don't specify a compile time const value when u initialise arrays.

polpotpi posted:

VS2012 + C# + Resharper is literally the holy triumvirate of programming

OBAMA BIN LinkedIn posted:

holy poo poo

bad programmer (me) expose time

C++ standard requires compile time constants for all arrays wow this is embarassing gently caress u g++ for misleading me for years