|
Fister Roboto posted:Whenever a new thread gets made the title should be "Previous thread died of natural causes." "Your Plot to Kill The Previous Thread Has Succeeded!"
|
# ? Jun 28, 2013 05:00 |
|
|
# ? May 28, 2024 12:58 |
|
SpaceViking posted:"Your Plot to Kill The Previous Thread Has Succeeded!" "Now to make sure the posters remain silent..." ...Hmm, perhaps a little too ominous? Since we do want more posters in here, right? Major Isoor fucked around with this message at 05:06 on Jun 28, 2013 |
# ? Jun 28, 2013 05:04 |
|
You know, the ability to tutor jailed children definitely makes possible some interesting plans. Such as kidnapping the one-year-old bastard child of a gigantic caliphate spanning Africa, Mauretania, Spain, and most of France, personally bringing him up as a good Norseman, matrilineally marrying him to one of your daughters, and hopefully one day soon pressing his claim to the whole thing. I'm about midway through it at present - the kid is twelve years old, and Norse Norse. Unfortunately, I started a war for the Jarldom of Normandy about three years back, and my Manchurian candidate is close enough to the current Caliph to be considered a hostage, I guess, because when I actually win the war he's automatically returned. I can't chance letting him be tutored four years under a mullah, so I have to drag this war out a while longer. Or a lot longer, really.
|
# ? Jun 28, 2013 05:13 |
|
Noreaus posted:Something somebody just pointed out in the Ck2+ thread on paradox plaza: "The AI never forms secondary duchies or kingdoms whether gavelkind or otherwise, it's not as noticeable in Vanilla because of different CB's which give duchy titles." Yeah, I've been forced to switch over to AI rulers and just form all of their poo poo for them. It's a fix, because once they get kingdoms they will form their own duchies, but it's a lovely fix. I wonder what is causing the problem. edit: Doomdark has recognized the problem and it looks like it will be fixed next patch. MLKQUOTEMACHINE fucked around with this message at 05:25 on Jun 28, 2013 |
# ? Jun 28, 2013 05:19 |
|
SpaceViking posted:"Your Plot to Kill The Previous Thread Has Succeeded!" "The previous thread has died in a suspicious accident. Long live the new thread!"
|
# ? Jun 28, 2013 05:56 |
|
Mister Bates posted:Yeah, pretty sure that's the issue, I'm playing as Rurik and almost all the unmarried women in the world are considered 'heathens' relative to me. So is that intended behavior for the game? Are we not allowed to marry outside of our religion any more? What about my medieval eugenics program? Kidnap them in raid, make them concubines and then marry and ask to convert
|
# ? Jun 28, 2013 06:13 |
|
DontMockMySmock posted:"The previous thread has died in a suspicious accident. Long live the new thread!" "Success! The story we concocted about a 'lone poster' killing the old thread seems to be working perfectly!"
|
# ? Jun 28, 2013 06:15 |
|
SpaceViking posted:"Your Plot to Kill The Previous Thread Has Succeeded!" I like this one.
|
# ? Jun 28, 2013 06:56 |
|
I'm having fun in my latest attempt at a game that lasts more than two hundred years. Formed the Scandinavian Empire, and have taken over Ireland to kill time while waiting for truces and claims to mature against Denmark. I'm currently debating spreading into Russia and taking over the rest of Brittannia and then chilling for a while, consolidating my family's position within the Empire while waiting for Brittannia and Russia to become de jure Scandinavian. Oh, and for added hilarity I've absorbed all of de jure Norway into de jure Sweden, and effectively took one of my sons' inheritance away by holding both titular Norway and Sweden and the first son got two of my counties and my duchy as well as Sweden and the Empire while the second got one county and titular Norway, while the third got several counties in Ireland/Wales. So that's one pretender to the throne that it's gonna be easy to kick over.
|
# ? Jun 28, 2013 11:20 |
|
Okay, dumbass question time: I just started a Republic (Venice, 867 start). It's babby's first Republic, so I've been kind of learning as I go along. I've been tearing up Italy, and it just occured to me... Can Republics form Empires at all? Or have I just wasted a lot of time and money?
|
# ? Jun 28, 2013 12:25 |
|
TLM3101 posted:Okay, dumbass question time: I just started a Republic (Venice, 867 start). It's babby's first Republic, so I've been kind of learning as I go along. I've been tearing up Italy, and it just occured to me... Can Republics form Empires at all? Or have I just wasted a lot of time and money? You totally can, don't worry. Generally it's just for show though since you can't use Medium Crown Authority to push de jure claims, but eh, it shows those bluebloods that Empires aren't only for nobles. toasterwarrior fucked around with this message at 12:41 on Jun 28, 2013 |
# ? Jun 28, 2013 12:39 |
|
SpaceViking posted:"Your Plot to Kill The Previous Thread Has Succeeded!" "The thread has died of severe depression." Likely as a result of: BI NOW GAY LATER fucked around with this message at 13:00 on Jun 28, 2013 |
# ? Jun 28, 2013 12:54 |
|
BI NOW GAY LATER posted:"The thread has died of severe depression." "The previous thread died an inbred freak." BI NOW GAY LATER posted:Likely as a result of:
|
# ? Jun 28, 2013 13:03 |
|
Sebastian Flyte posted:"The previous thread died an inbred freak." Likely the most moment I've had in 700+ hours of gameplay.
|
# ? Jun 28, 2013 13:06 |
|
Trauma Tank posted:I'm having fun in my latest attempt at a game that lasts more than two hundred years. Formed the Scandinavian Empire, and have taken over Ireland to kill time while waiting for truces and claims to mature against Denmark. I'm currently debating spreading into Russia and taking over the rest of Brittannia and then chilling for a while, consolidating my family's position within the Empire while waiting for Brittannia and Russia to become de jure Scandinavian. Oh, and for added hilarity I've absorbed all of de jure Norway into de jure Sweden, and effectively took one of my sons' inheritance away by holding both titular Norway and Sweden and the first son got two of my counties and my duchy as well as Sweden and the Empire while the second got one county and titular Norway, while the third got several counties in Ireland/Wales. So that's one pretender to the throne that it's gonna be easy to kick over. Just a heads up, there's a bug that makes it pretty much impossible for kingdoms to drift between de jure empires. You'll be waiting a while. On a side note, would it be possible to mod in an event chain to bypass the bug? I'm waiting to absorb Britannia too.
|
# ? Jun 28, 2013 13:13 |
|
Nolanar posted:Just a heads up, there's a bug that makes it pretty much impossible for kingdoms to drift between de jure empires. You'll be waiting a while. On a side note, would it be possible to mod in an event chain to bypass the bug? I'm waiting to absorb Britannia too. In that case I'll just hold onto it for years then mod the save game. Nothing will stop my desires to mutilate the de jure map mode!
|
# ? Jun 28, 2013 13:19 |
|
toasterwarrior posted:You totally can, don't worry. Is there some sort of weird complication or requirement (like holding all De Jure territory) or something? Because I hold over 80 % of the territory of Italia at the moment, and it still won't let me form the empire.
|
# ? Jun 28, 2013 13:28 |
|
TLM3101 posted:Is there some sort of weird complication or requirement (like holding all De Jure territory) or something? Because I hold over 80 % of the territory of Italia at the moment, and it still won't let me form the empire. Hover over create button and you'll see what are you missing, probably having 2 kingdom titles or required amount of piety
|
# ? Jun 28, 2013 13:37 |
|
... Oho. So I do need the kingdoms of Sicily and Italy. Welp! Time to go a-stabbin' Byzantine Emperors. Edit: Stabbing complete! Two Byzantine Emperors, One king of Italy, four fabricated claims and 5000 Ducats later... Edit 2: Not shown, the Serene Grand Republic of Jerusalem. You can just about see Scotland up there. My last two rulers had to step in to win two Crusades and stop one Reformed Norse holy war for Germany. TLM3101 fucked around with this message at 15:08 on Jun 28, 2013 |
# ? Jun 28, 2013 13:43 |
|
BI NOW GAY LATER posted:"The thread has died of severe depression." There have been a lot of funny screenshots to come out of CKII, but in my book this is still the funniest.
|
# ? Jun 28, 2013 15:12 |
|
It's a photoshop...
|
# ? Jun 28, 2013 15:15 |
|
There sure are some weird CK2 mods on the Paradox forums:
|
# ? Jun 28, 2013 15:20 |
Bicycle archery would be pretty tough to master, particularly if traversing uneven terrain. I would fear a horde who mastered such an art.
|
|
# ? Jun 28, 2013 15:22 |
|
Knuc If U Buck posted:It's a photoshop... I stand firm.
|
# ? Jun 28, 2013 15:24 |
|
Knuc If U Buck posted:It's a photoshop... It's not a photoshop, it's an old mod plot.
|
# ? Jun 28, 2013 15:25 |
|
Knuc If U Buck posted:It's a photoshop... It's actually not! There is a mod that adds more plots and ambitions, it's called additional plots and ambitions, I think.
|
# ? Jun 28, 2013 15:27 |
|
nutranurse posted:It's actually not! There is a mod that adds more plots and ambitions, it's called additional plots and ambitions, I think. Additional Objectives has Make a Friend as an ambition (so you don't need to recruit people for it anymore) but I remember it being a plot before.
|
# ? Jun 28, 2013 15:28 |
|
Dallan Invictus posted:It's not a photoshop, it's an old mod plot. nutranurse posted:It's actually not! There is a mod that adds more plots and ambitions, it's called additional plots and ambitions, I think. I don't know why I thought it was a photoshop because I've seen it posted a lot on another site and I thought then that it must be a mod.
|
# ? Jun 28, 2013 15:30 |
|
Flippycunt posted:There sure are some weird CK2 mods on the Paradox forums: Well, that's obviously a photoshop... *checks CK2 forums* Yep, somebody is actually making that. Really do have some of the weirdest fans.
|
# ? Jun 28, 2013 15:35 |
|
Knuc If U Buck posted:It's a photoshop... No it's not. It's from one of my games. I have the original somewhere on a hard drive at home. I think you can prolly find it one of the previous threads, too. Knuc If U Buck posted:I don't know why I thought it was a photoshop because I've seen it posted a lot on another site and I thought then that it must be a mod. Wat?
|
# ? Jun 28, 2013 15:46 |
|
Leb posted:Well, that's obviously a photoshop... *checks CK2 forums* I thought that was a goon mod from a few years back? I remember we once had a few USA mods that were being produced that nothing ever came of
|
# ? Jun 28, 2013 15:48 |
|
I think I've beaten the Karlings
|
# ? Jun 28, 2013 16:38 |
|
Whenever I run CK2+, the only Republic it will let me play in 867 is that one Archon in southern Italy. It's driving me nuts. CK2+ can rot for all I care. e: As I've just discovered, Vanilla is running only a modest improvement over CK2+, because I'm getting "cannot play Republics!" when I want to roll as a Lord Mayor of some ho-dunk county. Protagorean fucked around with this message at 17:24 on Jun 28, 2013 |
# ? Jun 28, 2013 17:20 |
|
Anyone ever played as a zoroastrian republic by any chance? I can only imagine how hilarious everyone having 3 concubines is for making trade posts.
|
# ? Jun 28, 2013 17:27 |
|
Hot Dog Day #82 posted:I thought that was a goon mod from a few years back? I remember we once had a few USA mods that were being produced that nothing ever came of "few years back" This game came out last year.
|
# ? Jun 28, 2013 17:35 |
|
Protagorean posted:Whenever I run CK2+, the only Republic it will let me play in 867 is that one Archon in southern Italy. It's driving me nuts. CK2+ can rot for all I care. You have to be a Duke bordering the coast to play a Republic
|
# ? Jun 28, 2013 17:36 |
|
Beamed posted:"few years back" This game came out last year. Yikes! It feels like it has been a lot longer than that! Still, I want to say that I remember seeing that picture before in a previous thread.
|
# ? Jun 28, 2013 17:41 |
|
Protagorean posted:Whenever I run CK2+, the only Republic it will let me play in 867 is that one Archon in southern Italy. It's driving me nuts. CK2+ can rot for all I care. Only republics duchy-level and above are Merchant Republics and thus playable. This is hardcoded and has nothing to do with CK2+.
|
# ? Jun 28, 2013 17:41 |
|
A Tartan Tory posted:Anyone ever played as a zoroastrian republic by any chance? I can only imagine how hilarious everyone having 3 concubines is for making trade posts. If it's anything like a Norse Merchant Republic, you'll have effectively unlimited trade posts if you can manage to not expand. The downside of course is that expansion is fun, and making sure every province is a city owned by a relative is also fun, so you won't have as many trade posts as you would think.
|
# ? Jun 28, 2013 17:46 |
|
|
# ? May 28, 2024 12:58 |
|
Protagorean posted:Whenever I run CK2+, the only Republic it will let me play in 867 is that one Archon in southern Italy. It's driving me nuts. CK2+ can rot for all I care. If you still want to give CK2+ a try, I found out that the reason you can't play Venice in the 867 start is that Wiz forgot to add the new families and their holdings as vassals to the Serene Doge. I posted instructions how to fix it; just check my post history in this thread.
|
# ? Jun 28, 2013 18:11 |