|
Broads getting out soon. He's engaging spaz mode
|
# ? Jul 12, 2013 16:39 |
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2024 16:10 |
|
Is it just me or is Watson visibly limping? Stil bowling brilliantly though, looks dangerous
|
# ? Jul 12, 2013 16:56 |
|
The Duke is playing another devastating innings.
|
# ? Jul 12, 2013 16:56 |
|
How on Earth was that not out haha
|
# ? Jul 12, 2013 17:25 |
|
WOW WOW gently caress YOU
|
# ? Jul 12, 2013 17:25 |
|
That will make Broad even more popular with the Australians.
|
# ? Jul 12, 2013 17:25 |
|
hahaha wow that umpiring
|
# ? Jul 12, 2013 17:25 |
WHAT THE gently caress
|
|
# ? Jul 12, 2013 17:26 |
|
i think the ump thought the deviation was from the gloves
|
# ? Jul 12, 2013 17:26 |
|
He's clearly still pissed that he had to give Trott out and is loving with Erasmus.
|
# ? Jul 12, 2013 17:27 |
|
Decisions evening themselves out.
|
# ? Jul 12, 2013 17:27 |
|
Quanta posted:Decisions evening themselves out. Yes, and England are still owed in that regard.
|
# ? Jul 12, 2013 17:28 |
|
did he even hit it though? we know how fallible technology is
|
# ? Jul 12, 2013 17:28 |
|
thehappyprince posted:did he even hit it though? we know how fallible technology is I didn't see an edge on hotspot.
|
# ? Jul 12, 2013 17:29 |
|
Remember Agar also gets very, very late swing. Too tough to call for the umpire as the ball looked like it just swung extremely late into Haddin's gloves.
|
# ? Jul 12, 2013 17:31 |
|
It really obviously deviates on the replay, and there is a spot of heat. It was really out.
|
# ? Jul 12, 2013 17:33 |
|
Coucho Marx posted:It really obviously deviates on the replay, and there is a spot of heat. It was really out. We don't know that.
|
# ? Jul 12, 2013 17:34 |
|
i'm willing to give the umpire the benefit of the doubt on this one. i mean, they got the 2 england ones wrong. what are the odds of 3 bad decisions?
|
# ? Jul 12, 2013 17:36 |
|
This is basically as bad as Donald v Atherton. And just as hilarious.
|
# ? Jul 12, 2013 17:38 |
|
Well that's what happens when you waste reviews. Still gutting though. Of all the blokes to take the game away from us, Bell and Broad. Ugh.
|
# ? Jul 12, 2013 17:39 |
|
thehappyprince posted:i think the ump thought the deviation was from the gloves Nobody has quoted the rules to you yet and I'm sad
|
# ? Jul 12, 2013 17:43 |
|
Some stones on that lad Broad. (hi)
|
# ? Jul 12, 2013 17:44 |
|
What would be the prevailing wisdom for a plan for England here? Bat out the day then go as long into tomorrow session to allow Broad/Bell a chance to hit the nearest 50/100 before declaring? Or just let everyone bat since you still have the better portion of two days to bowl out the Aussies so you may as well let them run around in the field as much as possible before batting?
|
# ? Jul 12, 2013 17:45 |
|
Correction, random emailer into the TMS inbox, Broad should be dropped because he's poo poo, not because of a non-walk
|
# ? Jul 12, 2013 17:45 |
|
Hyperriker posted:Nobody has quoted the rules to you yet and I'm sad i meant the wicketkeeper gloves
|
# ? Jul 12, 2013 17:46 |
|
Antifreeze Head posted:What would be the prevailing wisdom for a plan for England here? Bat out the day then go as long into tomorrow session to allow Broad/Bell a chance to hit the nearest 50/100 before declaring? Or just let everyone bat since you still have the better portion of two days to bowl out the Aussies so you may as well let them run around in the field as much as possible before batting? just keep batting for as long as they can. there's still 2 days and the pitch is only going to get worse
|
# ? Jul 12, 2013 17:47 |
|
thehappyprince posted:just keep batting for as long as they can. there's still 2 days and the pitch is only going to get worse Yup. If you get to a lead of 300, pick up the pace a bit, but there's no reason to leave runs on the table here.
|
# ? Jul 12, 2013 17:49 |
|
broad is a better allrounder than botham imo
|
# ? Jul 12, 2013 17:50 |
|
Broad is basically Flintoff, but whereas Flintoff concentrated all his good performances into about 18 months from the start of the 2004 season, Broad is spacing his out evenly throughout his career.
|
# ? Jul 12, 2013 17:55 |
|
I've managed to miss most of the last 2 days, but I'm glad I haven't watched any of it today. Its the sort of innings that gets Boycott tumescent.
|
# ? Jul 12, 2013 17:57 |
|
thehappyprince posted:i meant the wicketkeeper gloves aw pogo posted:Some stones on that lad Broad. Rudi av, how I have missed it~
|
# ? Jul 12, 2013 18:01 |
|
I think you mean that broads got some bells on er
|
# ? Jul 12, 2013 18:01 |
|
I have a ticket for day 5
|
# ? Jul 12, 2013 18:06 |
|
Darren Lehmann reminds me so much of Minty from Eastenders.
|
# ? Jul 12, 2013 18:17 |
|
pogo posted:I have a ticket for day 5 I'll take it off your hands, I'd love to see Bell bat in the flesh
|
# ? Jul 12, 2013 18:37 |
|
tarbrush posted:Yup. If you get to a lead of 300, pick up the pace a bit, but there's no reason to leave runs on the table here. Where would the point of diminishing returns be? Clearly England wouldn't ever say they would never, ever declare or Australia could just let England score a billion runs and never even have to worry about putting themselves in a position to lose by batting. I don't follow a lot of test cricket because it is usually on at an inconvenient time so I'm not really clear where that sweet spot is for declaring.
|
# ? Jul 12, 2013 18:45 |
|
Antifreeze Head posted:Where would the point of diminishing returns be? Clearly England wouldn't ever say they would never, ever declare or Australia could just let England score a billion runs and never even have to worry about putting themselves in a position to lose by batting. When you're comfortably in front and the pitch starts getting poo poo. It depends on the captain. If you're 500 runs in front in any test it's not really worth continuing to go on as you still need to get 20 wickets. I'd be surprised if England declared, one of the Australians will remember how to bowl I think. But after the lead got to 250 in this one it was p much over already. Also I wasn't super duper mad (just bemused) at the Broad decision until Nasser said he showed 'great courage' to stay there. he was just being an arsey twat and got lucky.
|
# ? Jul 12, 2013 18:48 |
|
Antifreeze Head posted:Where would the point of diminishing returns be? Clearly England wouldn't ever say they would never, ever declare or Australia could just let England score a billion runs and never even have to worry about putting themselves in a position to lose by batting.
|
# ? Jul 12, 2013 18:55 |
|
I'd have declared with a 100 lead tbh
|
# ? Jul 12, 2013 19:02 |
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2024 16:10 |
|
England will probably aim for 300, but it's more likely that Broad & Swann will have spastic swipes at terrible deliveries and get caught at gully. I reckon Austrialia can actually bowl at tail-enders (or at least, Clarke will tell them what to do), so I doubt Finn & Anderson will last long, either.
|
# ? Jul 12, 2013 19:32 |