|
Shbobdb posted:"not getting it" Don't try to understand it, that way lies madness. Vore fetishism is one of the things that pushes my "no" button hardest, and I want this thread to stop the nightmare flow. Instead, have some Sam and Max-themed fanart from an early 90's toy vehicle, The Visionaries: 
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2013 07:41
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 21:02 |
|
|
Shbobdb posted:Killing someone and eating them. That is, like, total dominance. Total dominance. You can't gently caress that. Eating someone alive and having them squiggle around inside you? What the hell? Sure you can, just jam a dick down your throat or eat a tentacle monster or something. E: LOOK AT WHAT YOU loving MADE ME WRITE.
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2013 07:48
|
|
|
I can't speak for all of the object-transformation fetishists (especially since I'm not one), but in a lot of the cases I've seen it's been coupled with a humiliation or, for lack of a better word, nullification (making the other person non-sentient or otherwise 'useless', even sexually) fetish. Either the artist finds humiliating or nullifying others to be erotic, or they find the thought of having that done to them arousing. In other words, it's about the domination (either given or received), not the sexual act, as the erotic component.
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2013 08:41
|
|
|
Shbobdb posted:B) I'll repeat my question: why are people so broken? Like, I get it. Maid Marion + Cheetara = Furry. RC + creepy Japanese poo poo = robot stuff. Repressed sexuality (either Japanese or Puritan) + Japanese censorship laws = tentacle porn. The list goes on. I don't "get" it but I "get it" in term of it is explicitly and overtly sexual. A buddy of mine likes super skinny women. Like, you can see bones and poo poo. Not my scene but I "get it". Right? There is something there to like. At worst you can gently caress it. All of the things I've talked about so far can clearly be hosed. "Someone turning into a space suit" . . . I can't gently caress that. I don't think anyone can gently caress that. What the hell? Killing someone and eating them. That is, like, total dominance. Total dominance. You can gently caress that. Eating someone alive and having them squiggle around inside you? What the hell? I quoted this to a friend with the appropriate image. He gave me this back.
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2013 08:45
|
|
|
Shbobdb posted:B) I'll repeat my question: why are people so broken? Like, I get it. Maid Marion + Cheetara = Furry. RC + creepy Japanese poo poo = robot stuff. Repressed sexuality (either Japanese or Puritan) + Japanese censorship laws = tentacle porn. The list goes on. I don't "get" it but I "get it" in term of it is explicitly and overtly sexual. A buddy of mine likes super skinny women. Like, you can see bones and poo poo. Not my scene but I "get it". Right? There is something there to like. At worst you can gently caress it. All of the things I've talked about so far can clearly be hosed. "Someone turning into a space suit" . . . I can't gently caress that. I don't think anyone can gently caress that. What the hell? Killing someone and eating them. That is, like, total dominance. Total dominance. You can gently caress that. Eating someone alive and having them squiggle around inside you? What the hell? "I'm never getting laid! Might as well use my imagination!"
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2013 08:54
|
|
|
Non-EuclideanCat posted:I quoted this to a friend with the appropriate image. He gave me this back. At some point in the future, something I say will be misconstrued and I will be permabanned from SomethingAwful. I'll spend literally tens of dollars trying to sneak by, but it will be to no avail. I will not be allowed on SA anymore. But that one picture. That is worth it all. I don't get it. But drat, that is a piece of art. And by "art" I mean "all about me". And that appeals to my narcissism.
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2013 09:06
|
|
|
Captainsalami posted:Can we pretty please stop all the horrible vore poo poo out there? Jesus christ that's horrifying. If I found out a friend was into that I'm pretty sure I'd stop talking to them. it never stops. there's too much of it. like, for instance, this:  what the gently caress. why. Snake? WHY? WHY SNAKE? At least this artist has reasonably decent technical quality even if the subject matter is... not. I'm afraid to click through that site to any of the other hundreds of artists on it, considering the kind of people who generally enjoy this stuff. There's only so much poorly drawn fetish anime a man can tolerate. Edit: "Nyow copyright her player" atomicthumbs has a new favorite as of 10:06 on Jul 16, 2013 |
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2013 09:30
|
|
|
Say Nothing posted:This is what happens when the Chinese company you outsourced your product to mistakes fanart for real art.  Captainsalami posted:Can we pretty please stop all the horrible vore poo poo out there? Jesus christ that's horrifying. If I found out a friend was into that I'm pretty sure I'd stop talking to them. At first I thought, "Hey, all he does is post terrible gmod poses and Thomas the Tank, this can't be that bad!" but then I saw his favorites. Oh god, his favorites. It turned out that he commissioned more than twelve pictures of him as a pokemon being eaten by ponies or being inflated.   So, I tried to pretend that this never happened and still talked to him, until he started asking awkward questions such as "What would you do if you came across a pony twice your size?" 
Aphtonites has a new favorite as of 10:15 on Jul 16, 2013 |
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2013 09:44
|
|
|
I dunno if the thread ever came back but there was a thread on weird knock offs.
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2013 09:47
|
|
|
 quote:....Oh yeah, by the way, case your wondering, they're both fine. Spyro's got a sore throat and Randall opened up some of his minor wounds, but a good tranq later and they calmed down. Only other thing they both needed was a diaper change, and they're both use to that by now.  I have no idea.
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2013 09:58
|
|
|
crowfeathers posted:I have no idea. Pikachu, at least, has an appropriate expression.
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2013 10:01
|
|
|
Kugyou no Tenshi posted:I can't speak for all of the object-transformation fetishists (especially since I'm not one), but in a lot of the cases I've seen it's been coupled with a humiliation or, for lack of a better word, nullification (making the other person non-sentient or otherwise 'useless', even sexually) fetish. Either the artist finds humiliating or nullifying others to be erotic, or they find the thought of having that done to them arousing. In other words, it's about the domination (either given or received), not the sexual act, as the erotic component. If there isn't already jargon for what you use "nullification" for, I suggest "floccinaucinihilipilification."
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2013 10:04
|
|
|
crowfeathers posted:
Weirdly enough, that cover makes sense in the context of a story.
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2013 10:04
|
|
|
Bongo Bill posted:If there isn't already jargon for what you use "nullification" for, I suggest "floccinaucinihilipilification." It's a fetish, so wouldn't it be floccinaucinihilipiliphilia?
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2013 10:19
|
|
|
atomicthumbs posted:it never stops. It can if you let it.  Theon and Ramsay, book version.
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2013 10:26
|
|
|
Forgall posted:Weirdly enough, that cover makes sense in the context of a story. Please, tell me more. I don't want to know, but I have to know.
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2013 10:52
|
|
|
crowfeathers posted:Please, tell me more. I don't want to know, but I have to know. Eh, it's not what you think. It's a post-modern novel about life in modern Russia. Main character is numerology-obsessed banker. Pokemon imagery comes from his British girlfriend who considers replacement of your own personal identity by commercially developed characters to be highest duty of capitalist citizen. Hence her calling herself Meowth, and him Pikachu. Forgall has a new favorite as of 11:02 on Jul 16, 2013 |
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2013 11:00
|
|
|
LateToTheParty posted:Let's move onto something that is not vore for the sake of our collective health. Here is some goofy-rear end fanart to cleanse the pallet. I like this one. 
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2013 11:04
|
|
|
Forgall posted:Eh, it's not what you think. That sounds pretty great actually. For those of us not versed in Russian, do you happen to have the English title of that?
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2013 11:05
|
|
|
Serperoth posted:That sounds pretty great actually. For those of us not versed in Russian, do you happen to have the English title of that? It's "Numbers" by Victor Pelevin. But I don't think this particular novel has been translated into English, though some of his other books are.
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2013 11:12
|
|
|
Forgall posted:Eh, it's not what you think. Is there a justification for the shrugging Rayquaza?
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2013 11:43
|
|
|
Captain Pissweak posted:Is there a justification for the shrugging Rayquaza? Not really, he's supposed to be a Jedi, not Pokemon.
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2013 11:47
|
|
|
Holy poo poo that wasn't a joke??????????
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2013 12:52
|
|
|
BAKA FLOCKA FLAME posted:Holy poo poo that wasn't a joke?????????? You mean my post? No, it's a real book. So is this 
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2013 13:32
|
|
|
Forgall posted:Eh, it's not what you think. Wrong Ash got turned into a female meowth because meowth raped him. Copyright (C) 2002 Squeekdamouse
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2013 14:18
|
|
|
 WAHAHA~
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2013 15:02
|
|
|
Shbobdb posted:B) I'll repeat my question: why are people so broken? Like, I get it. Maid Marion + Cheetara = Furry. RC + creepy Japanese poo poo = robot stuff. Repressed sexuality (either Japanese or Puritan) + Japanese censorship laws = tentacle porn. The list goes on. I don't "get" it but I "get it" in term of it is explicitly and overtly sexual. A buddy of mine likes super skinny women. Like, you can see bones and poo poo. Not my scene but I "get it". Right? There is something there to like. At worst you can gently caress it. All of the things I've talked about so far can clearly be hosed. "Someone turning into a space suit" . . . I can't gently caress that. I don't think anyone can gently caress that. What the hell? Killing someone and eating them. That is, like, total dominance. Total dominance. You can gently caress that. Eating someone alive and having them squiggle around inside you? What the hell? Let us, for a moment, acknowledge that vore fetishists equate vore with sex. It makes sense that some of them may enjoy having their victims struggle, as nonconsensual vore would amount to rape. As for transformation, it's usually a matter of disempowerment and humiliation. Being turned into an inanimate object to be USED encapsulates both of these well.
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2013 16:43
|
|
|
It almost always comes down to power dynamics. For whatever reason, sex and power are closely entwined in our cultural psyche; basic dominant/submissive sex is among the simplest and "healthiest" expressions of that dynamic, but it's really just the tip of the psychological iceberg. Even fixations stemming from a fascination with embarrassment and shame can arguably be linked to social power and/or powerlessness in many cases. Fetishists fantasize about transforming people into objects because that fully and utterly disempowers the transformed and gives whoever acquires the object total power over them. They fantasize about foreverial delitization because that involves the delitizee completely losing or relinquishing all power, foreverially. They fantasize about vore because the eaten individual is rendered powerless, trapped within the eater, who has supreme power over them and eventually exerts the ultimate expression of power over another: taking his or her life. Human sexuality is super interesting and weird.
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2013 17:04
|
|
|
 [Pacific Rim][Gravity Falls] The weirdest part is that the limb movements aren't right 
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2013 17:13
|
|
|
Someone mentioned Russian novels. quote:This is based on a novella by Yuri Olesha called Envy. The Red Duck is Andrei Babichev, and the Blue Duck is Kavalerov. Red Duck is trying to force one of his sausages on Kavalerov, who is meekly offering a pillow in return, like Ivan Babichev was talking about. Volodya's football is sitting next to the couch where Kavalerov used to live. In the background, Ophelia is busting through some sort of room/sky thing. Another work by this artist:  quote:This is the final panel in my triptych about how single-minded obsession can destroy a man
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2013 17:15
|
|
|
Level Slide posted:
They didn't handshake yet.
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2013 17:20
|
|
|
Fair enough, I feel better now. That aside, I can't get enough of Mabel's expression. She's ready to Elbow Rocket some Kaiju.
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2013 17:28
|
|
|
Aphrodite posted:They didn't handshake yet. They also already appear to be walking. This just seems dangerous all around.
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2013 17:43
|
|
|
Level Slide posted:
Most Pacific Rim fanart seems pretty tame...so far.    
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2013 21:37
|
|
|
Shoulda been "Bigger bot"
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2013 21:40
|
|
|
Forgall posted:It's "Numbers" by Victor Pelevin. But I don't think this particular novel has been translated into English, though some of his other books are.  Holy hell you weren't joking.
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2013 21:43
|
|
|
Chinston Wurchill posted:Most Pacific Rim fanart seems pretty tame...so far. Yeah, everything's pretty much par for the course so far. Let me just get out my checklist... "Fetishization: [X]"   "Crossovers: [X]"   "  : [X]" " horse edition: [X]" "???: [X]"  "Ponies: [XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX]"     
dijon du jour has a new favorite as of 22:36 on Jul 16, 2013 |
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2013 22:11
|
|
|
...How is the swimsuit one Pacific Rim?
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2013 22:25
|
|
|
Aphrodite posted:...How is the swimsuit one Pacific Rim? Not having seen the film (Comes out in September here...) I presume those are from the film? Also the Tyranitar/Golurk one is a pretty cool idea. If only it was better-drawn... Just noticed something on that. It's probably accidental, but the G on Golurk's wrist looks like the G from GaoGaiGar...
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2013 22:36
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 21:02 |
|
|
Aphrodite posted:...How is the swimsuit one Pacific Rim? The image was labeled "Pacific Rim Women" so I figured they were supposed to be characters From Pacific Rim (I haven't seen the movie yet). Further research indicates that apparently this is not the case? Oops. v  v
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2013 22:38
|
|