Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
woke wedding drone
Jun 1, 2003

by exmarx
Fun Shoe
How the gently caress people, I try to troll: nothing. I talk about a fat lady at Wal-Mart: burning controversy?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

SilentD
Aug 22, 2012

by toby

ReindeerF posted:

Is there a Wal-Mart in existence without a water fountain? I haven't seen one. It's always right up there next to the shitter, the Mart Karts and the no-doubt-very-qualified optometrist.

There are laws that require a business to have water and restrooms.

eviltastic
Feb 8, 2004

Fan of Britches
Taxchat reminds me. In sorta-thread-related news, the Urban Institute was sufficiently annoyed by the prominent misuse of their 47% number during election season that they've put out a video trying to educate folks. I can't watch it right now, but apparently it also notes that that percentage is dropping and is projected to fall further.

HootTheOwl
May 13, 2012

Hootin and shootin

Hieronymous Alloy posted:

You only pay the additional percentage on the income past the bracket cutoff.

Example:

Let's say there are two brackets, one at 10% for income below $100,000, one at 20% for income above that.

You make $50,000 a year and pay 10% income tax. You get a promotion and are now making $110,000 per year.

You pay 10% income tax on the first $100,000 you make and 20% income tax on the remaining $10,000 of income above the first bracket, for a total of ($10,000 + $2000) = $12000 yearly income tax due, for a net total income of 98k or so.

Compare with the way everyone thinks it works, i.e., making 110k and you owe %20 on all income. That way you'd have to pay 22k income tax rather than the 12k you would actually owe -- which would put your net income at 88k/year. You'd be better off just taking a 99k/year salary (which would give you a net income of about 90k).

Important thing here is this means there's no situation under the law as it stands where you can work more and earn less; the second scenario can't happen. If someone thinks it can they don't understand tax law.

Ok this makes sense now. I thought it worked like everyone else too. Thank you.

Eggplant Squire
Aug 14, 2003


eviltastic posted:

Taxchat reminds me. In sorta-thread-related news, the Urban Institute was sufficiently annoyed by the prominent misuse of their 47% number during election season that they've put out a video trying to educate folks. I can't watch it right now, but apparently it also notes that that percentage is dropping and is projected to fall further.

It's too late to undo that damage. You will hear about how half the country literally pays no taxes at all for at least another decade.

Hulk Krogan
Mar 25, 2005



poo poo, right after that Romney video came out, I and others I know posted articles on social media sites explaining in detail why it was wrong and misleading. I saw more than a few sarcastic "heh I gotta figure out how to get into that group" type comments in response to articles explaining why it's a bullshit statistic.

The reality denial field surrounding conservatives is truly a modern marvel.

Eggplant Squire
Aug 14, 2003


I explained to two people exactly why that statistic was misleading and the Republican message was absolutely incorrect and at the end they conceded that maybe they were mistaken. No less than a week later they were trotting it out again as if the previous conversation hadn't occurred and they were bringing it to my attention for the first time.

Taerkar
Dec 7, 2002

kind of into it, really

eviltastic posted:

There are very specific circumstances involving poorly designed tax credits where it can happen. But that has little to do with the bracket structure.

To be more specific those situations do exist but they're almost entirely ones that screw over lower income earners, not those making the big bucks. Most of the stuff that expires in the 50k+ range has a graduated drop ($1 of credit/discount loss for every $4 of additional income, for example)

mr. mephistopheles
Dec 2, 2009

So someone linked this in an awkward and ugly thread and I thought it was semi-relevant to this thread. It's an episode of MTV True Life titled "I Hate The Government" and it's three conservative youths and it basically just confirms what this thread has confirmed over and over again that conservatism seems to require a blatant and possibly even intentional misreading of reality.

One guy is opposed to Obama because "Obamacare provides funding for abortions" and "we are a Christian nation and we need to go back to the principles of Christ by banning abortion."

Another is a high school kid in California who started the country's first Tea Party high school club and his complaints don't go anywhere beyond "Obama is a socialist and that is bad because obviously."

The most interesting is a woman who has some actual solid fears of the government like the Patriot Act, but she follows through by joining a militia and trying to start a congressional militia lobby. The best line so far has been one of her old man militia buddies saying "you have the conviction of a man, but you are a woman."

It's really interesting if you want to see what conservative ideas look like beyond the old white men that this thread tends to focus on and it's a good reality check if you think conservatism isn't continuing in the younger generations.

Agents are GO!
Dec 29, 2004

HootTheOwl posted:

Ok this makes sense now. I thought it worked like everyone else too. Thank you.

You wanna know what's really sad? You know what does in fact work like that?

Programs that benefit the poor! Oh, sorry, you made 2 bucks too much this week, we're taking away your food stamps!

PhazonLink
Jul 17, 2010

SilentD posted:

There are laws that require a business to have water and restrooms.

Those laws are holding us back. We should go back to Free Market solutions.

Like emptying chamber pots into the street. Dumping waste into our water supply, taking a poo poo while barefoot.

Phone
Jul 30, 2005

親子丼をほしい。
Water? Like out of the toilet?

Sir Tonk
Apr 18, 2006
Young Orc
Have the AM guys been talking about the fast food strikes at all? It's perfect for them, if I had to guess. Easy meat for the listeners.

Drudge sure wasn't holding back with the clever headlines.

Parachute
May 18, 2003

Sir Tonk posted:

Have the AM guys been talking about the fast food strikes at all? It's perfect for them, if I had to guess. Easy meat for the listeners.

Drudge sure wasn't holding back with the clever headlines.



TARGET: Obama....

Edit: I still can't believe in 2013 that Drudge Report still uses the same page layout it did in 1998.

Alec Bald Snatch
Sep 12, 2012

by exmarx

Parachute posted:

TARGET: Obama....

Edit: I still can't believe in 2013 that Drudge Report still uses the same page layout it did in 1998.

I'm more impressed he used a picture of McDonald's fries from 1998.

Dr.Zeppelin
Dec 5, 2003

Parachute posted:

TARGET: Obama....

Edit: I still can't believe in 2013 that Drudge Report still uses the same page layout it did in 1998.

It subconsciously plants the notion that he's too busy focusing on the important stuff you actually care about to bother with window dressing. It's sort of like how Walmart gets people to think they're getting the best possible prices because the stores aren't well-kept.

SpRahl
Apr 22, 2008
I realize intervention in Syria is a huge bag of worms but I gotta vent.

So Im at my parents for this weekend and one of the consequences of that is occasionally being forced to listen to :foxnews: if I cant convince them of a good reason to change the channel.
No idea what the hell the show was but this guys starts saying, so 14000 people died from gas attacks in Syria and John Kerry said this is unacceptable, where was this outrage when 4 Americans lost their lives in Benghazi :smug:. Jesus gently caress they just wont stop talking about Benghazi and apparently 4 American lives>than 14000 "mooslum" lives. Oh and then the female host starts talking about how we will shoot some missiles at some camels behinds... :wtc:.

I cant do it, watching :foxnews: or listening to talk radio just sends my blood pressure through the roof and grows me several grey hairs. Whats worse is that I actually used to unironically watch/listen to these shows. I know it was bad then but it really seems like the right wing rhetoric has been getting worse, please tell me it has dont tell me I was even more of a little poo poo when I was younger than I think. The blatant race baiting during the march on Washington anniversary also nearly sent me into a rage.

Business Gorillas
Mar 11, 2009

:harambe:



I listened to Levin for the first time today and he was talking about the concussion settlement the NFL just did. Some guy came on and started :argh:-ing about how these guys got millions of dollars but ARE TROOPS don't get any sort of help whatsoever with their head injuries.

If only there was some sort of government-funded group that gave troops returning home medical help :allears:

Phone
Jul 30, 2005

親子丼をほしい。
If one were to analysis Master Shake's complaints, you can come to the conclusion that both professional football and war are merely bloodsport... However, it's Levin so you can just assume "oh, black people" and be 100% certain of it because your dog was barking off in the other room.

Pander
Oct 9, 2007

Fear is the glue that holds society together. It's what makes people suppress their worst impulses. Fear is power.

And at the end of fear, oblivion.



Business Gorillas posted:

I listened to Levin for the first time today and he was talking about the concussion settlement the NFL just did. Some guy came on and started :argh:-ing about how these guys got millions of dollars but ARE TROOPS don't get any sort of help whatsoever with their head injuries.

If only there was some sort of government-funded group that gave troops returning home medical help :allears:
Yes, and too bad the right are so opposed to drat TAXES that actually PAY THE loving TROOPS' MEDICAL HELP.

The sequester has been the Tea Party wet dream, and it hosed over the troops harder than anything else in...well...ever?

EngineerSean
Feb 9, 2004

by zen death robot

Business Gorillas posted:

I listened to Levin for the first time today and he was talking about the concussion settlement the NFL just did. Some guy came on and started :argh:-ing about how these guys got millions of dollars but ARE TROOPS don't get any sort of help whatsoever with their head injuries.

If only there was some sort of government-funded group that gave troops returning home medical help :allears:

Actually I unironically agree with this, the level of care ARE TROOPS get is atrocious and it is a shame compared to the level of care and settlements that ARE FUTBALL PLAYERS have got.

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

EngineerSean posted:

Actually I unironically agree with this, the level of care ARE TROOPS get is atrocious and it is a shame compared to the level of care and settlements that ARE FUTBALL PLAYERS have got.

Of course the answer should be 'both of those guys should get excellent medical care because both of them are in jobs that involve their bodies having high risk of being ruined by age 40', right?

ToxicSlurpee
Nov 5, 2003

-=SEND HELP=-


Pillbug

Tatum Girlparts posted:

Of course the answer should be 'both of those guys should get excellent medical care because both of them are in jobs that involve their bodies having high risk of being ruined by age 40', right?

No, the correct answer is to deny the football players any sort of health care at all, ever, because they CHOSE to enter a profession with a high rate of injury and then deny the soldiers any sort of health care because if a person making millions doesn't get care, why should a person making thousands? What are you, a communist?

EngineerSean
Feb 9, 2004

by zen death robot

ToxicSlurpee posted:

No, the correct answer is to deny the football players any sort of health care at all, ever, because they CHOSE to enter a profession with a high rate of injury and then deny the soldiers any sort of health care because if a person making millions doesn't get care, why should a person making thousands? What are you, a communist?

the free market has spoken

hseiken
Aug 25, 2013
Has anyone seen right wing echochamber reporting calling John Kerry a hypocrite for visiting Assad on several occasions? They're usually accompanied by a photo of Kerry, his wife and Assad and his wife at a restaurant. Smear is fun, boys and girls! Sometimes I wonder if the monkeys realize the paint they're using on to decorate their echochamber cave walls is actually their own poo poo...Kerry's made bad judgement calls, but you would think that he was committing high treason in that lobster dinner photo.

I was going to post a video of a gorilla eating it's own poo poo, but I thought that might not be appropriate.

SilentD
Aug 22, 2012

by toby

Tatum Girlparts posted:

Of course the answer should be 'both of those guys should get excellent medical care because both of them are in jobs that involve their bodies having high risk of being ruined by age 40', right?

I generally think that if you're serving the nation in a critical function, in a public institution, that is dangerous, the nation drat well has a responsibility to make sure you have top of the line care, a good wage, and a proper retirement.

I don't think that if you're in a private industry which makes billions because stupid poo poo like stadiums that are massively subsidized if not given away, directly owned by billionaires, has tax breaks thrown at it, and you make millions of dollars a year you need anymore loving handouts. I don't think you should have been subsidized in the first place, and the public sure as gently caress isn't responsible for you.

Malmesbury Monster
Nov 5, 2011

hseiken posted:

Has anyone seen right wing echochamber reporting calling John Kerry a hypocrite for visiting Assad on several occasions? They're usually accompanied by a photo of Kerry, his wife and Assad and his wife at a restaurant. Smear is fun, boys and girls! Sometimes I wonder if the monkeys realize the paint they're using on to decorate their echochamber cave walls is actually their own poo poo...Kerry's made bad judgement calls, but you would think that he was committing high treason in that lobster dinner photo.

I was going to post a video of a gorilla eating it's own poo poo, but I thought that might not be appropriate.

I always respond with the picture of Ronald Reagan meeting with leaders from the Taliban in the White House. At the very least, you get some feverish doublethink.

ReindeerF
Apr 20, 2002

Rubber Dinghy Rapids Bro
Every time I see that photo I think, "Dude in white up next to Reagan is wearing a fake mustache."

EDIT: Also looks like a young Ian McShane.

ReindeerF fucked around with this message at 13:38 on Aug 31, 2013

skaboomizzy
Nov 12, 2003

There is nothing I want to be. There is nothing I want to do.
I don't even have an image of what I want to be. I have nothing. All that exists is zero.
I believe there's also a nice video of Rumsfeld grinning and shaking hands with Saddam Hussein in the 80s out there.

Alastor_the_Stylish
Jul 25, 2006

WILL AMOUNT TO NOTHING IN LIFE.

SilentD posted:

I generally think that if you're serving the nation in a critical function, in a public institution, that is dangerous, the nation drat well has a responsibility to make sure you have top of the line care, a good wage, and a proper retirement.

I don't think that if you're in a private industry which makes billions because stupid poo poo like stadiums that are massively subsidized if not given away, directly owned by billionaires, has tax breaks thrown at it, and you make millions of dollars a year you need anymore loving handouts. I don't think you should have been subsidized in the first place, and the public sure as gently caress isn't responsible for you.

Yes yes yes, but keep in mind that this isn't a public handout from you and I to the damaged former players. The NFL settled the case on its own.

DynamicSloth
Jul 30, 2006

"Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth."

Malmesbury Monster posted:

I always respond with the picture of Ronald Reagan meeting with leaders from the Taliban in the White House. At the very least, you get some feverish doublethink.



That photo was taken 11 years before the Taliban was founded. The Saddam-Rumsfeld photo is such an easier go to without the casual racism.

ToxicSlurpee
Nov 5, 2003

-=SEND HELP=-


Pillbug

hseiken posted:

Has anyone seen right wing echochamber reporting calling John Kerry a hypocrite for visiting Assad on several occasions? They're usually accompanied by a photo of Kerry, his wife and Assad and his wife at a restaurant. Smear is fun, boys and girls! Sometimes I wonder if the monkeys realize the paint they're using on to decorate their echochamber cave walls is actually their own poo poo...Kerry's made bad judgement calls, but you would think that he was committing high treason in that lobster dinner photo.

I was going to post a video of a gorilla eating it's own poo poo, but I thought that might not be appropriate.

Nothing short of "sever all contact with all white people and bomb the rest of the world into a barren wasteland" will satisfy the right. All Muslims are the enemy. Why would you speak to the enemy?

Zeroisanumber
Oct 23, 2010

Nap Ghost

Malmesbury Monster posted:

I always respond with the picture of Ronald Reagan meeting with leaders from the Taliban in the White House. At the very least, you get some feverish doublethink.



This one's better:

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

SilentD posted:

I generally think that if you're serving the nation in a critical function, in a public institution, that is dangerous, the nation drat well has a responsibility to make sure you have top of the line care, a good wage, and a proper retirement.

I don't think that if you're in a private industry which makes billions because stupid poo poo like stadiums that are massively subsidized if not given away, directly owned by billionaires, has tax breaks thrown at it, and you make millions of dollars a year you need anymore loving handouts. I don't think you should have been subsidized in the first place, and the public sure as gently caress isn't responsible for you.

You, uh, do know that the players don't see the returns in the stadium subsidies and poo poo right? Like yea they make good money but the idea that their bosses aren't responsible for their injury is just cartoonishly evil.

Ramadu
Aug 25, 2004

2015 NFL MVP


Zeroisanumber posted:

This one's better:



I feel dumb. but I don't recognize the people in this photo. Who is it?

Nonsense
Jan 26, 2007

Ramadu posted:

I feel dumb. but I don't recognize the people in this photo. Who is it?

I believe that's Chief Justice Roberts in between Woodrow Wilson and Pancho Villa.

LP97S
Apr 25, 2008
No, clearly it's Alec Baldwin meeting the soup nazi.

Gen. Ripper
Jan 12, 2013


Ramadu posted:

I feel dumb. but I don't recognize the people in this photo. Who is it?

GHWB with a slick haircut meeting Zombie Hitler.

It's Saddam and Rumsfeld

paranoid randroid
Mar 4, 2007
The obvious counter to that Rumsfeld picture is some kind of permutation of that quote about England having no natural allies, nor intractable enemies, only eternal interests.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

BiggerBoat
Sep 26, 2007

Don't you tell me my business again.

BiggerBoat posted:

I'm waiting to see who the first right wing pundit will be that claims that the chemical weapons Syria used were the ones Saddam smuggled there back in 2002-2003 before the invasion. The ones we never found. Hannity was beating that drum pretty hard a while back when it became clear that Iraq had no WMD's; that he shipped them to Iran or Syria.

Someone's going to suggest this soon I bet.


From the GOP thread:


Ramadu posted:

Who was it that asked a few days ago when someone would claim the gas used in Syria were the fabled WMDs from Iraq?

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/08/30/nebraska-republican-lawmaker-my-gut-feeling-says-syria-got-chemical-weapons-from-iraq/

Looks like you weren't far off the mark!

It's hilarious watching these guys twisting themselves into knots trying to figure out what to be for or against but finding themselves having to wait until Obama comes out on the issue one way or the other.

Last week all I heard was how Obama was a hypocrite because he needed Congressional approval and now he's a big paper tiger pussy for not going GWB with the whole matter.

Sir Tonk posted:

Have the AM guys been talking about the fast food strikes at all? It's perfect for them, if I had to guess. Easy meat for the listeners.

Herman Cain is all over it every loving day and rails that if we have to pay 40 cents more for a Quarter Pounder, people will stop eating them and McDonalds will close. Or some such dumb poo poo. I guess it hits close to him and is dear to his heart since he built his fortune by somehow making a pizza tastes worse than a loving Big Mac.

He talks about it a lot. I'll try and dig up some transcripts.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply