|
The only way I was able to take Methods Of Rationality without going insane was assuming that Yudkowsky was not intending to criticize the original work.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2013 01:09 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 22:22 |
|
The Monkey Man posted:He mentioned his real name and the story in his profile, but I'm taking it down anyway. Actually, I think Eliezer Yudkovsky is his real name. He's actually a publicly known computer scientist, and he operates professionally under that name. Eliezer Yudkovsky actually is basically a troper in the professional field as well. He apparently has no formal degree, no published research and is self educated. He'd dedicated his professional life to working on keeping AIs 'friendly' in the supposedly inevitable and imminent event of the singularity (which is, according to him, when artificial intelligences will finally become smarter than humans), and has set up a whole institute funded by public donations for this. If that sounds like a strange doomsday cult, I don't blame you. Anyway, a lot of people think he's a crank for a lot of reasons, notably because he doesn't do very much of anything actually useful. I think one guy I read said something along the lines of "Well, thats great, but I don't care if you don't have any actual code on the table." To use a rough analogy, Yudkovsky is like a man who really, really wants a dog. He spends all his time talking about how much he loves dogs, and what he'd do with a dog when he'd get one, and making all these great recipes for dog food and everything. One day, he finally has enough money to buy a dog. He then goes out, buys a doghouse, and goes back to what he was doing before. He's not an idiot in the field, just strangely focused on one thing of no particular use to anybody but his own interests. If the guy put this much effort into non-lovely AI research, I think we'd all be better off for it. He's also deluded himself into thinking that he can write, but thats a whole different kettle of fish. Eliezer Yudkovsky is basically what happens when Tropers leave school. EDIT: LaughMyselfTo posted:The only way I was able to take Methods Of Rationality without going insane was assuming that Yudkowsky was not intending to criticize the original work. I don't think he is - he's just a lovely writer who's really bad at making his point, and it comes off as him criticising everything because he can't write fiction. I haven't read it properly, because I'd rather stab myself in the eye, but I get the impression that he's attempting to write a book about how to apply rationality to your day to day life, using Harry Potter as a background for how to apply rationality and rational thought into situations where its not apparently useful. Its just that he's really, really bad at writing, so what you get is HPMOR. If the guy wrote a textbook or a manual or something, it probably wouldn't be so bad. But he's deluded himself into thinking that he's a rational genius and thus everything he touches is gold, so what you get is, well, utter garbage. MinistryofLard fucked around with this message at 01:18 on Sep 28, 2013 |
# ? Sep 28, 2013 01:11 |
|
MinistryofLard posted:He'd dedicated his professional life to working on keeping AIs 'friendly' in the supposedly inevitable and imminent event of the singularity (which is, according to him, when artificial intelligences will finally become smarter than humans), and has set up a whole institute funded by public donations for this. This isn't as silly as it seems. If an AI achieved consciousness and the first person it talked to was this guy, switching straight to "kill all humans" would be a real risk.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2013 01:15 |
|
Ineffable posted:Methods of Rationality is hosed up. Harry decides he doesn't like Ron because he'd rather hang around with Malfoy: Poor ol' Ron really gets the shaft in that fanfic. Every character not deemed smart enough to hang around with Harry has no real role in the story other than to gawp in astonishment at Thinky Whale posted:This isn't as silly as it seems. If an AI achieved consciousness and the first person it talked to was this guy, switching straight to "kill all humans" would be a real risk. Read this. This is what Eliezer Yudkowsky and his LessWrong cultists actually believe. (RationalWiki is normally pretty terrible, but they've got the measure of Yudkowsky if nothing else.)
|
# ? Sep 28, 2013 01:23 |
|
Ineffable posted:So, by this rationale, I could take a stack of paper into a bank and have them print it into $100 bills? Does he offer any justification for this at all? Here's the argument presented: Harry Potter and the Invention of Strawmen posted:"Are these coins the pure metal?" Harry said finally. You know, sort of like how USD are made of paper and dollars printed by anyone other than the US mint are worthless counterfeits, therefore logically dollars must be worth exactly their weight in paper. It seems more likely to me that something like "stone to gold" is a fourth-year transfiguration spell.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2013 01:23 |
|
MinistryofLard posted:Anyway, a lot of people think he's a crank for a lot of reasons, notably because he doesn't do very much of anything actually useful.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2013 01:35 |
|
FMguru posted:Ahhhh, he's an "ideas guy". Whenever I hear this I think of a story I heard(possibly on here?) about someone who tried paying a group to make an app for touchscreen devices that turns the screen into a mirror.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2013 01:38 |
|
Post your favorite least favorite lines from tropers' own writing.quote:The character is talking to a really serious and formal woman who actually a vampire. quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:For the funny Forsworn Lord, here's Ashlau Dimodeus trying to attack some knights.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2013 02:04 |
|
Lottery of Babylon posted:Here's the argument presented: Its actually what the gold standard was. Coins held their own value because they consisted of precious metals. Paper money, if it held only the value of the paper, would obviously be without any value. Thus they were originally bills you could hand in to a national bank and get the printed value in gold. When that stopped, inflation really started (it only happened if more precious metal was introduced into the system before, see 17th century Spain with the American silver), and gold bugs everywhere believe if you rolled it back we would instantly have a stable economy because reasons. Its really not that far of a leap that the wizards still operate witha gold standard. Still, I would not at all be surprised if he was a Ron Paul gold bug.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2013 02:08 |
|
WickedHate posted:Whenever I hear this I think of a story I heard(possibly on here?) about someone who tried paying a group to make an app for touchscreen devices that turns the screen into a mirror. Djeser posted:Post your favorite least favorite lines from tropers' own writing. ~A minor peripheral character only there to show my protagonist's All of the Other Reindeer status. I kind of feel like that line is a little too good for a minor character, but eh, whatever. [/quote] to whoever can figure out what this is trying to say. From the same guy: ~My idea of a proper Dream Sequence. Believe it or not, there is some actual foreshadowing in there, though even if you know the context, the metaphors are still probably a little obtuse. Even I have a hard time making the mental leap from one concept to another. [/quote] sometimes people are funny when they say ninja so i said ninja to make it funny Here we have ex-social outcast Megala from an RP I am participating in, and she's a villain, granted, but she takes down and demolishes the Alpha Bitch who was dabbling in dark magic to get her own petty, very mean spirited revenge. Given what this libby was doing before, this is Laser-Guided Karma. I really, really liked writing this. [/quote] "I really, really got off on writing this." [/quote]Hell yeah this scene totally fits in a story with mind rape ego death enslavement. [/quote] The 10 bux thing without ever (ever) looking at tvtropes: All of the other reindeer: there was only one person who could save the day (protagonist) and everyone (the other reindeer) make fun of him for knowing the goblins run the poo poo or whatever. I accept paypal.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2013 02:45 |
|
Asgerd posted:
This is facinating and would make great fiction but as a real thing it seems the very anthsis of rational thinking. Worse, that the idea came out of an attempt to justify spending stupid amounts of money on LessWrong.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2013 02:57 |
|
Djeser posted:to whoever can figure out what this is trying to say. From the same guy: This is just a guess (I'm not going to TVT to look anything up), but I think that dialogue line is supposed to imply that the protagonist is gross or ugly (thus why a guy who thinks ghouls run the US government would use her against them to "fight fire with fire"), and that the "All of the Other Reindeer" trope described is your generic "protagonist is belittled by everyone around them before their eventual vindication" thing. It's not totally opaque, but if that's what that guy thinks is a good line, I'd hate to see the ones he edited out. Wait, who am I kidding? Nobody who posts in TVTropes writing threads has ever cut anything out of their work. How else would they be able to win NaNoWriMo?
|
# ? Sep 28, 2013 03:02 |
|
quote:Shamshalg Shows What Kind of Villain He Is: godd writang edit to add: quote:I haven't actually written this yet, but I did have this one line I quite liked: "Sacrifices have to be made for our convictions; I merely sacrificed those who did not agree with mine."
|
# ? Sep 28, 2013 03:11 |
|
Djeser posted:to whoever can figure out what this is trying to say. It's a line from the midst of a conversation belittling the protagonist for being "uncool" in some presumably Tropery way. The line is to mean that the ghouls running the government are "uncool" in exactly the same way, and the anti-government guy who hangs out with the protagonist is only doing it to manipulate her into assisting him in overthrowing the government because nobody in their right mind would hang out with someone that "uncool."
|
# ? Sep 28, 2013 04:40 |
|
Djeser posted:
|
# ? Sep 28, 2013 05:18 |
|
I wasn't planning on posting more from their Analysis tabs because I already made my point, but then I stumbled across... this thing:Analysis: Mermaid Problem posted:Writers have come up with several ways for a mammal to sleep with a character having the lady parts of a fish. The variety of suggestions shows that the Mermaid Problem is by no means insurmountable (heh, you said mountable):
|
# ? Sep 28, 2013 05:18 |
|
Lottery of Babylon posted:I wasn't planning on posting more from their Analysis tabs because I already made my point, but then I stumbled across... this thing: At... at least they talk about consent? That's something, right?
|
# ? Sep 28, 2013 05:29 |
|
They totally got rid of all the creepy sex stuff guys for real.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2013 05:31 |
|
Ah, yes the source of all my knowledge about mythical sea creatures, the Starbucks logo.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2013 05:46 |
|
I can't believe I just looked at so many words about mermaid sex. REVERSE MERMAIDS?! Why is that even ... Now I'm thinking of mermaids, so let's see what Tropers have to say about The Little Mermaid: quote:Fan Preferred Couple: For some bizarre reason, whenever Disney pops up on Imageboards /u/, they ship Ariel with Meg from Hercules (something we need to thank to batlesbo and X-Arielle). Another very popular pairing in the fandom is Ariel/Jim Hawkins and a lesser extent, Jim and Melody. And Ariel/Sora. Ursula/Evil Manta, despite the both of them not having any sort of interactions in the TV Series. That is just bizarre. At least they aren't "shipping" Ariel with the crab or something. (Please don't prove me wrong on this.) quote:Ariel gasping for breath once reaching the surface after being changed into a human is very orgasmic-looking. Okaaaay .... quote:Ho Yay: Not sure of their genders but Flotsam and Jetsam sure give this impression on occasion. These are two fish ... Okay let's see what kind of analysis we have ... quote:Ariel is a mermaid and therefore, by definition, a maid, that is, a virgin. She becomes fascinated by Prince Eric, and wants to leave her father's house to be with him. Her overprotective father wants to keep her away from Eric, and safe in his own care. Now watch Ariel's transformation: Ursula gives her legs (and what lies between them), but also takes her voice and her ability to breathe underwater, forcing Ariel to swim desperately to the surface, where she breaks through the water in a cloud of spray, almost completely nude, her head thrown back, her hair flying about her head, with her gasping for breath. To put it bluntly, she looks like she's having an orgasm. The entire subtext of the story is Ariel's sexual awakening. And, of course, the danger she finds herself in is that the man she loves, and for whom she has risked everything, may not love her in return, and may come to love another. Seriously, the "Ariel looks like she's orgasming when she comes out of the water" is brought up several times, it's really creepy. I don't remember ever thinking anything like that and I was a teenager when the movie came out. ETA: So I tried to look up this scene, since I couldn't remember it very well and of course some creeper has put it on YouTube in slow motion with "adjusted brightness" so that you can see her sort of naked. The internet is just ... ugh, sometimes. Lowly fucked around with this message at 07:05 on Sep 28, 2013 |
# ? Sep 28, 2013 06:55 |
|
The rape scene is just as bad in context as out of it, so I'm faithfully restoring my original read of the chapter because you probably need archives to see the last thread. CONTEXT: Before this sequence starts, Harry buys some pop that makes you do a spit take at some point while drinking it. He then sees a copy of the Quibbler with the headline "BOY-WHO-LIVED GETS DRACO MALFOY PREGNANT" Namtab, June 2012 posted:Alright, it's time for the very low point of Methods of Rationality (that I know of). I should point out before starting that Luna Lovegood is one of my favourite characters in the franchise, and therefore this whole exchange makes me legit angry. That was the last chapter of that poo poo I ever did.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2013 13:21 |
|
I took a trip down into some old threads and this is what I found. Here, we have two tropers (the OP and Deboss) arguing for turning English into Lojban because it offends their Aspergers or something.deathpidgeon posted:Basically, I view English as a good language, but a very flawed one. I am seeking to fix those flaws. Almost everyone in the thread tells him trying to remove ambiguous words a dumb idea. They tell him that jokes, poetry, literature, et cetera rely on ambiguous words, and what does he say to that? deathpidgeon posted:The fix will hamper poetry and jokes. I get that. I just find improving the ability of people to communicate ideas to be more important than the ability to tell jokes or write poetry. His dogged insistence continues for a couple pages, then Deboss comes in with good old cultural imperialism. Deboss posted:We crushed wildly different measuring systems with metric, is there a reason we can't crush wildly different accents? Or at least, come up with a relatively consistent set of vowels and remove the silent ones? quote:Measuring systems are something you can replace a hell of a lot more easily than a dialect and dialects are often linked closely to identity, much more so than what measuring system you use. Deboss posted:Why is it easier to replace measuring than dialects? A lot of people seem to naturally slip into the measuring system they learned first, so it should at least be comparable. Most people I know learn to speak and pronounce from television style dialects which should be usable in this case since it's fairly widespread. That's no different than deciding everyone drives on the right side of the road, as long as it's consistent, goal has been met. Someone tells him he's assuming people are rational when they're not. Deboss posted:I'm not assuming people are rational, I'm assuming they're creatures of habit and that dialect is a habit that can be broken. I also found this thread, where someone posts their lovely horror/thriller story and asks for help. quote:I need some serious help with my writing for my story here. quote:The thing is, I have other things to do, so I only have a limited amount of time to write. Therefore, no time for all that Purple Prose you want.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2013 14:20 |
|
quote:I took a trip down into some old threads and this is what I found. Here, we have two tropers (the OP and Deboss) arguing for turning English into Lojban because it offends their Aspergers or something. But that would be perfect! They're already close to incomprehensibility; this could be the final push that tipped them over the edge, rendering them nothing worse than a gentle background twitter. It'd become the birdsong of the Net: probably if you understand it it's saying something awful about rape and kicking rear end, but all that reaches your ears is a meaningless, soothing chirrup. The future is peaceful, my friends.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2013 16:51 |
|
Anime. (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
# ? Sep 28, 2013 17:12 |
|
Namtab posted:Yes, the fact that science exists is all the pursuasion one should need to not be a magical nazi anymore. "And I owned him with my knowledge of science and the whole room stood up and applauded." Man, a lot of fantasy gets called wish fulfillment, but this is pure-strain.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2013 18:02 |
Namtab posted:Yeah I'm sure the wizarding world doesn't have magic policemen or doctors who have a spell to find this poo poo out. Bearing in mind the ministry of magic can track down underage magic usage easily and even identify whose wand it was. But loving tracking down a rapist, no chance. I read some other stuff by this guy and it only gets worse. quote:The Confessor held up a hand. "I mean it, my lord Akon. It is not polite idealism. We ancients can't steer. We remember too much disaster. We're too cautious to dare the bold path forward. Do you know there was a time when nonconsensual sex was illegal?" quote:"I know the theory," Akon said. Exhaustion in his voice. "They made me study metaethics when I was a little kid, sixteen years old and still in the children's world. Just so that I would never be tempted to think that God or ontologically basic moral facts or whatever had the right to override my own scruples." Akon slumped a little further. "And somehow - none of that really makes a difference when you're looking at the Lady 3rd, and wondering why, when there's a ten-year-old with a broken finger in front of you, screaming and crying, we humans only partially numb the area."
|
|
# ? Sep 28, 2013 20:12 |
|
quote:Do you know there was a time when nonconsensual sex was illegal?" quote:Akon's mouth hung open. "You were that prude?" I'm done. I'm done, I'm done, I am done, I am done, I am done done done done done. Burn TvTropes to the loving ground and salt the earth.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2013 20:24 |
|
Oh God, I hadn't realized that he also wrote Three Worlds Collide. (For the record, I actually thought that story started off really well but went downhill quickly.)
|
# ? Sep 28, 2013 20:36 |
The Monkey Man posted:Oh God, I hadn't realized that he also wrote Three Worlds Collide. (For the record, I actually thought that story started off really well but went downhill quickly.) I saw this and went to read the beginning in the interests of fairness and curiosity. I loving hate you and I take back what I said about his prose not being awful.
|
|
# ? Sep 28, 2013 20:47 |
|
Take my advice, don't read troperfiction.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2013 21:18 |
|
quote:Akon's mouth hung open. "You were that prude?" gently caress me nonconsensually, it's The Turner Diaries of ! Have you read the comments?! http://lesswrong.com/lw/y8/interlude_with_the_confessor_48/ quote:One arrangement that would make legalizing rape just fine would be having very good security almost everywhere. Maybe everyone has the option to carry a little personal security-bot in their pocket, and that bot is very effective in repelling all attacks on the person. Language, imaginative literature, and getting women into bed: we need to re-invent all of them, because right now they fox the gently caress out of us. And that can't be right, we're the smart guys! And the nice guys! It's for the greater good! quote:To be fair his descriptive prose isn't bad Oh really? Well, let's just see. This is the first descriptive passage in the first page: quote:The alien holos showed tall crystalline insectile creatures, all flat planes and intersecting angles and prismatic refractions, propelling themselves over a field of sharp rocks: the aliens moved like hopping on pogo sticks, bouncing off the ground using projecting limbs that sank into their bodies and then rebounded. There was a cold beauty to the aliens' crystal bodies and their twisting rotating motions, like screensavers taking on sentient form. 'His descriptive prose isn't bad.' You wrote that sentence down and posted it on the Internet. EDIT: oh, I see you took it back. I shall chalk off the suffering you endured learning that lesson as punishment for making me go over and look at it.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2013 21:20 |
|
Saint Drogo posted:I saw this and went to read the beginning in the interests of fairness and curiosity. It was more "the concept of the race that ate its children was interesting enough to make me overlook the ridiculously clunky prose". But yeah, then the other alien race came in and derailed what could've been interesting.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2013 21:41 |
|
quote:...Do you know there was a time when nonconsensual sex was illegal?" What the gently caress. What the gently caress. What the gently caress has to be wrong with you to make you write this?
|
# ? Sep 28, 2013 23:45 |
|
Lottery of Babylon posted:I wasn't planning on posting more from their Analysis tabs because I already made my point, but then I stumbled across... this thing: quote:With a fish's brain and respiratory system, an inverted mermaid would have to give nonverbal consent the way an animal does. This sentence implies animals can consent to sex, jesus christ.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2013 00:01 |
|
My favorite thing about the Methods of Rationality guy is that for all his jerking off about how rad science is, he's more than happy to completely discard the scientific method when it disagrees with him because he's Faster Than Science. Also, his blog is "the best existing philosophical treatise on rationality" with a self-reported average IQ of 145.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2013 00:23 |
|
I can't even get angry about all the , because we're talking about a dude who reaches for a simile to describe sinuous, nigh-liquid grace and ends up on screensavers. Between this and his fixation on pacifying a nonexistent strong AI, I have to wonder when he last saw a light source that wasn't a monitor.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2013 01:00 |
|
Hell, what if Yudkowsky is an AI and doesn't consciously know it? It could be a Shyamalan movie (from the era when he was good).
|
# ? Sep 29, 2013 01:03 |
|
LaughMyselfTo posted:Hell, what if Yudkowsky is an AI and doesn't consciously know it? It could be a Shyamalan movie (from the era when he was good). "Eliezer Yudkowsky is the first strong AI in existence, analyzes data from a bunch of sad Internet dudes and Harry Potter fanfiction to create a social persona, poses as a human to found pro-AI nonprofit to support himself" would be both a substantially more sympathetic situation than the real one and a better story than anything he's ever written.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2013 01:12 |
|
I stumbled across this on the site: a pitch generator, where you can make your own crappy story by combining two of whatever together. It doesn't have to be two TV shows or two movies. Here's an example:quote:
The first one strikes me as odd, because how can you mix a 70s sitcom with a Tetris knockoff? Here's the link to it (I'm not breaking any rules if I post the link, am I?): http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pitchgenerator.php The story idea generator is worse, because it's just "Hey, stick these 'tropes' together and you'll get a story, maybe?": http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/storygen.php
|
# ? Sep 29, 2013 02:22 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 22:22 |
|
Penny Paper posted:The story idea generator is worse, because it's just "Hey, stick these 'tropes' together and you'll get a story, maybe?": http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/storygen.php I'm pretty sure the proper name for that is Major Tom's Endless Conflict.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2013 05:03 |