Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
bobthethurd
Dec 27, 2007
Lovable Bob.

Sunning posted:

There are also references to racial segregation in the America. For example, Jim Crow law (including an actual murder of crows) and KKK imagery are seen in video #3. Going back to Mormonism, the song featured in this game, "God Only Knows", was the theme for HBO drama, Big Love. I don't know whether it's a coincidence or an in-joke.

All I took away from the God Only Knows thing is that I've had the song stuck in my head for the last month. drat the Beach Boys.

But I'm referring more to the religious side of things than the racism. I think that's just the writing giving Columbia a reason to be so insular. It goes back to the fascism being the ultimate result of "We're number one!"

What I was more wondering was whether the game is pulling a better executed MDickey or playing it fast and loose with Mormon stereotypes. They're pretty close to reality on the racist front so I wondered if they were doingthe religion any sort of justice.

Seems like they're doing a good job to outside eyes, but I wondered whether they were perhaps intentionally getting something really central to you wrong or if perhaps they might be doing that on purpose so it doesn't create controversy.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Bruceski
Aug 21, 2007

The tools of a hero mean nothing without a solid core.

Abilifier posted:

I just read about Wounded Knee on Wikipedia. Was this covered in the thread yet? Because that little bit of history really adds a lot to the characters of Slate, Booker, and Comstock. I'll add a quick summary if it seems appropriate.

It has not and oof, is it nasty. Having been both there and with the Pinkertons it's not surprising that the office flashbacks (hallucinations or whatever you wanna call them, definitely some dream/nightmare and reality intermixed) show him sitting there staring at a bottle.

Abilifier
Apr 8, 2008

Bruceski posted:

It has not and oof, is it nasty. Having been both there and with the Pinkertons it's not surprising that the office flashbacks (hallucinations or whatever you wanna call them, definitely some dream/nightmare and reality intermixed) show him sitting there staring at a bottle.

It's pretty appalling just how much Comstock rewrote history there, he literally reversed the roles played by the Indians and the Cavalry. I haven't taken American history (or any history) since high school, and that was over 10 years ago, so I don't really remember the details of the Wounded Knee incident, but it really does explain Booker's mental state. He could be suffering from some PTSD and his drinking, running up debts, and now going on a hopeless mission could be his own way of trying to kill himself. I'm still playing though, I'm only a little bit further ahead than Sundowner, so I'm sure more nasty and depressing revelations lie ahead.

Samovar
Jun 4, 2011

When I want to relax, I read an essay by Engels. When I want something more serious, I read Corto Maltese.


It's interesting how they used the Boxer Rebellion as the major area of 'jingoistic fervor' for Columbia, although I guess there weren't many other major international incidents at that time that involved the U.S., or at least U.S. citizenry. Alas, I'm not an expert on either U.S. and the world at that time, or indeed the Rebellion of the Harmonious Fists, so I can;t comment any further, really...

I guess it must also be pointed out that Comstock REALLY doesn't go for subtlety. Hell, most of the aesthetics in this game are outrageously bombastic - to a patronising, almost disgusting extent. I guess that is supposed to give feeling for 'ye olde propoganda', but I can't help but feel the game designers are essentially picking you up by the lapels, screaming 'HEY DID YOU SEE THIS?! BOY, THAT'S CERTAINLY A SET-PIECE AND TELLS A STORY!'. It's not like in Bioshock, when [spoilers]you find the bodies of that Jewish/Polish couple who commit suicide after they realise that their daughter was turned into a little sister[/spoilers], although I guess even THAT wasn't subtle. Maybe it is due to the lighting?

Hmmm. Oh yes! As an aside, something that I read in the Freeper thread of D&D which I think might be of an interesting aside as a little illustration of just how horrible old America could be - Octoroon balls! Like Miss Universe competitions, except whereby non-full black women could be granted social privilages through their beauty and beocming a mistress to more well-off whites. So ingrained was it in certain areas of Southern culture, they even had speific music for it!

pospysyl
Nov 10, 2012



Sundowner, I wouldn't edit out the scavenging runs. For my playthrough, that was the true essence of this game: constantly rifling through garbage cans and desks looking for hot dogs to eat. It's why I quit playing, actually. It's just so anti-thematic that it absolutely ruined what the game was going for (to me, anyway). I will say that looting corpses makes more sense in this game than in most. A lot of characters, including Slate in this update, want to paint Booker as this murderous psychopath, and corpse looting works to that end.

Sundowner
Apr 10, 2013

not even
jeff goldblum could save me from this nightmare
After a point what use is there in seeing me mash the interact button over a pile of dead bodies for ~30 seconds at a time?

CuwiKhons
Sep 24, 2009

Seven idiots and a bear walk into a dragon's lair.

Comstock trying to take credit for battles he wasn't involved in annoys the poo poo out of me. Not for any moral reasons but because it's such a loving stupid thing to do. If Slate and what appears to be every surviving soldier that was actually at those battles is in Columbia, why would you ever think it was a good idea to lie about being there while surrounded by people who could call you out on it? Oh sure, the average Columbian is going to take their Prophet's word over anybody else's but why would you even set yourself up for that kind of risk?

And speaking of risks and set ups - a one week gestation period? Sounds like Comstock got frisky with some other lady and his wife helped him cover it up. Such godly behavior.

Kopijeger
Feb 14, 2010

CuwiKhons posted:

Comstock trying to take credit for battles he wasn't involved in annoys the poo poo out of me.

Edit: even in tags, that apparently goes against the spoiler policy. Never mind.

Kopijeger fucked around with this message at 23:29 on Oct 5, 2013

Judge Tesla
Oct 29, 2011

:frogsiren:
It always makes me laugh when Slate calls Booker a killer just like him after setting a load of guys on him who run in guns blazing giving you no choice but to kill them, I mean, I get where Slate is coming from, its just rather amusing at the time he chooses to say it.

AndwhatIseeisme
Mar 30, 2010

Being alive is pretty much a constant stream of embarrassment.
Fun Shoe
I love how frustrated Elizabeth sounds when she says she wanted a puppy, but never got one. You can tell that's been stewing for a while. Who would she even ask about getting one? Songbird?

AndwhatIseeisme fucked around with this message at 23:30 on Oct 5, 2013

jjac
Jun 12, 2007

What time is it?!

Why do I get the feeling that Lady Comstock wasn't being at all genuine? It's almost like her voxophone was trying to fool me.

Epic High Five
Jun 5, 2004



Going back to a previous post, I think the Battle of Wounded Knee plays a bigger role in everything going on in this game than people realize. It's been interwoven either subtly (the military honors on the wall at the very beginning) or very obviously (Quest for Shock Jockey) throughout and has never been far from the forefront. Booker's not a talkative sort but you can tell he's not happy that it keeps coming up, and he seems to feel about the same about his distinguished service as he does about his cracking the skulls of the poor as a Pinkerton.

Abilifier posted:

I just read about Wounded Knee on Wikipedia. Was this covered in the thread yet? Because that little bit of history really adds a lot to the characters of Slate, Booker, and Comstock. I'll add a quick summary if it seems appropriate.

Please do, it's not really a "battle" and if most people don't know about it, it'll be pretty jarring compared to how it's portrayed in this.

Abilifier
Apr 8, 2008

Epic High Five posted:


Please do, it's not really a "battle" and if most people don't know about it, it'll be pretty jarring compared to how it's portrayed in this.
I am by no means an expert on American history, I haven't taken any classes since high school and that was over 10 years ago. I'm pretty sure I learned about Wounded Knee but I had to look it up in Wikipedia to remember anything. Anyway, I know it's kind of :effort: but the Wiki summary is a pretty good place to start:

quote:

The Wounded Knee Massacre occurred on December 29, 1890, near Wounded Knee Creek on the Lakota Pine Ridge Indian Reservation in South Dakota, USA. It was the last battle of the American Indian Wars. On the day before, a detachment of the U.S. 7th Cavalry Regiment commanded by Major Samuel M. Whitside intercepted Spotted Elk's band of Miniconjou Lakota and 38 Hunkpapa Lakota near Porcupine Butte and escorted them five miles westward (8 km) to Wounded Knee Creek, where they made camp.

The remainder of the 7th Cavalry Regiment arrived, led by Colonel James W. Forsyth and surrounded the encampment supported by four Hotchkiss guns.

On the morning of December 29, the troops went into the camp to disarm the Lakota. One version of events claims that during the process of disarming the Lakota, a deaf tribesman named Black Coyote was reluctant to give up his rifle, claiming he had paid a lot for it. A scuffle over Black Coyote's rifle escalated and a shot was fired which resulted in the 7th Cavalry's opening fire indiscriminately from all sides, killing men, women, and children, as well as some of their own fellow soldiers. Those few Lakota warriors who still had weapons began shooting back at the attacking soldiers, who quickly suppressed the Lakota fire. The surviving Lakota fled, but U.S. cavalrymen pursued and killed many who were unarmed.

By the time it was over, at least 150 men, women, and children of the Lakota had been killed and 51 wounded (4 men, 47 women and children, some of whom died later); some estimates placed the number of dead at 300. Twenty-five soldiers also died, and 39 were wounded (6 of the wounded would later die). It is believed that many were the victims of friendly fire,[citation needed] as the shooting took place at close range in chaotic conditions. At least twenty soldiers were awarded the Medal of Honor.

I also saw this quote from L. Frank Baum, you know, the guy who wrote The Wizard of Oz

quote:

The Pioneer has before declared that our only safety depends upon the total extermination of the Indians. Having wronged them for centuries, we had better, in order to protect our civilization, follow it up by one more wrong and wipe these untamed and untamable creatures from the face of the earth. In this lies future safety for our settlers and the soldiers who are under incompetent commands. Otherwise, we may expect future years to be as full of trouble with the redskins as those have been in the past.
I'd like to think he was being sarcastic. Anyway, this is all from the Wikipedia article, I'm looking through some other sources now. It was a pretty horrifying event, and it really was a stain on the military's history, which wasn't exactly all that great to begin with.

Edit: Here's another link, and it includes an eyewitness account from one of the US soldiers.
http://www.eyewitnesstohistory.com/knee.htm

Abilifier fucked around with this message at 00:19 on Oct 6, 2013

Flesnolk
Apr 11, 2012

Judge Tesla posted:

It always makes me laugh when Slate calls Booker a killer just like him after setting a load of guys on him who run in guns blazing giving you no choice but to kill them, I mean, I get where Slate is coming from, its just rather amusing at the time he chooses to say it.

Slate's whole thing here always seemed kind of dumb to me. Like, sure, I get the whole "I want my soldiers to die honourably without giving Comstock the satisfaction" thing on the face of it, but Booker's a friend of his who could very well provide a big help if not hosed with and Slate just asked, maybe enough to turn the attack on the Hall of Heroes into some semblance of a winnable battle - Booker'd already shot his way through the entire besieging force to get here after all. Sending his whole army to commit suicide-by-Booker the second the guy steps inside just never really made a whole lot of sense, and felt kind of forced. At worst, it makes Slate a lovely commander who throws his troops' lives away when they'd probably rather live if there's a chance to.

Bruceski
Aug 21, 2007

The tools of a hero mean nothing without a solid core.

Abilifier posted:

I also saw this quote from L. Frank Baum, you know, the guy who wrote The Wizard of Oz

I'd like to think he was being sarcastic. Anyway, this is all from the Wikipedia article, I'm looking through some other sources now. It was a pretty horrifying event, and it really was a stain on the military's history, which wasn't exactly all that great to begin with.


Here's the full text of Baum's editorials for Wounded Knee and Sitting Bull's death, taken from http://hsmt.history.ox.ac.uk/courses_reading/undergraduate/authority_of_nature/week_7/baum.pdf

quote:

The Sitting Bull Editorial
Sitting Bull, most renowned Sioux of modern history, is dead.

He was not a Chief, but without Kingly lineage he arose from a lowly position to the greatest Medicine Man of his time, by virtue of his shrewdness and daring.

He was an Indian with a white man's spirit of hatred and revenge for those who had wronged him and his. In his day he saw his son and his tribe gradually driven from their possessions: forced to give up their old hunting grounds and espouse the hard working and uncongenial avocations of the whites. And these, his conquerors, were marked in their dealings with his people by selfishness, falsehood and treachery. What wonder that his wild nature, untamed by years of subjection, should still revolt? What wonder that a fiery rage still burned within his breast and that he should seek every opportunity of obtaining vengeance upon his natural enemies.

The proud spirit of the original owners of these vast prairies inherited through centuries of fierce and bloody wars for their possession, lingered last in the bosom of Sitting Bull. With his fall the nobility of the Redskin is extinguished, and what few are left are a pack of whining curs who lick the hand that smites them. The Whites, by law of conquest, by justice of civilization, are masters of the American continent, and the best safety of the frontier settlements will be secured by the total annihilation of the few remaining Indians. Why not annihilation? Their glory has fled, their spirit broken, their manhood effaced; better that they die than live the miserable wretches that they are. History would forget these latter despicable beings, and speak, in later ages of the glory of these grand Kings of forest and plain that Cooper loved to heroism.

We cannot honestly regret their extermination, but we at least do justice to the manly characteristics possessed, according to their lights and education, by the early Redskins of America.
(Saturday Pioneer, December 20, 1890)

quote:

The Wounded Knee Editorial
The peculiar policy of the government in employing so weak and vacillating a person as General Miles to look after the uneasy Indians, has resulted in a terrible loss of blood to our soldiers, and a battle which, at its best, is a disgrace to the war department. There has been plenty of time for prompt and decisive measures, the employment of which would have prevented this disaster.

The Pioneer has before declared that our only safety depends upon the total extirmination [sic] of the Indians. Having wronged them for centuries we had better, in order to protect our civilization, follow it up by one more wrong and wipe these untamed and untamable creatures from the face of the earth. In this lies future safety for our settlers and the soldiers who are under incompetent commands. Otherwise, we may expect future years to be as full of trouble with the redskins as those have been in the past.

An eastern contemporary, with a grain of wisdom in its wit, says that "when the whites win a fight, it is a victory, and when the Indians win it, it is a massacre."
(Saturday Pioneer, January 3, 1891)

Hard to pin doiwn a man's mind a hundred and twenty-five years after the fact, but it sounds like someone disgusted at what had been done, but who felt that there was no way to redeem the Sioux.

Louispul5
Oct 10, 2012

Flesnolk posted:

Slate's whole thing here always seemed kind of dumb to me. Like, sure, I get the whole "I want my soldiers to die honourably without giving Comstock the satisfaction" thing on the face of it, but Booker's a friend of his who could very well provide a big help if not hosed with and Slate just asked, maybe enough to turn the attack on the Hall of Heroes into some semblance of a winnable battle - Booker'd already shot his way through the entire besieging force to get here after all. Sending his whole army to commit suicide-by-Booker the second the guy steps inside just never really made a whole lot of sense, and felt kind of forced. At worst, it makes Slate a lovely commander who throws his troops' lives away when they'd probably rather live if there's a chance to.

I'm not so sure they want to keep going. The entire city thinks them liars and frauds, because who's going to disbelieve the prophet. They're not a part of the Comstock cult, they just got stuck there after they attacked Nanking without Washington's approval, and Columbia seceded from the union, meaning they would be labeled traitors if they ever went back to America. So being Patriots of the maximum variety, they're screwed. Add in that they had to keep their uniforms and guns hidden, and hidden in Vox Populi hideouts no less, must mean they can't even be a part of the society they seceded from America into. And being Jingoistic military types of 1910's America, they probably hate the Vox as much as Comstock, and are at the end of their ropes.

That and they're trapped there, after a lost battle, falling back and back into the museum as a couple dozen soldiers try to hold out against all of Columbia's forces, that you had to kill your way through just to get inside, because the enemy's already at the doorstep. No way out, no reinforcements, no future but rotting slowly to death in a prison cell, so might as well go out with a bang. It's not the soundest reasoning, but then again they are fighting because they are PROUD of what they did at Wounded Knee and Nanking, and WANT people to know about it. They're not exactly a mighty military power to be reckoned, or right headed strategists, when their great plan was to attack a tourist attraction, with no exit strategy or actual further plans. Either crazies, or more likely, knew it was suicide and that was the point.

Epic High Five
Jun 5, 2004



Most games would use this as something to bolster the player's spirit, to give them a lively fight with (doomed) allies who are clearly on the right side (ie, your side) of things before moving on to the next area.

BS:I instead uses it as another way to highlight how messed up everything is. Slate and his men are basically just the unruly military arm of Comstock's paradise, only now they're not needed. They're not good people - they're awful, horrible monsters who have gone a bit crazy under the weight of some stupid decisions and circumstances and now see no other way out.

I'm no historian, but considering the circumstances of Wounded Knee and the Boxer Rebellion, I had zero qualms about killing every last bastard in that hall. It's way harder to justify killing the countless police that the player has killed up to this point (you see, I suffer from NPC Empathy Syndrome and feel bad about killing supposed "bad guys" who are just grunts doing the best they can until a confused, possibly psychotic mass murderer crosses their path) than it is the soldiers.

Slate is a bit weird, but Slate is a bloodlust fueled crazy mass murderer who has been totally enabled in this his whole life. Now his balls have been cut off and this seems like the only real option to go out with "honor"

resurgam40
Jul 22, 2007

Battler, the literal stupidest man on earth. Why are you even here, Battler, why did you come back to this place so you could fuck literally everything up?

Abilifier posted:

I am by no means an expert on American history, I haven't taken any classes since high school and that was over 10 years ago. I'm pretty sure I learned about Wounded Knee but I had to look it up in Wikipedia to remember anything. Anyway, I know it's kind of :effort: but the Wiki summary is a pretty good place to start:


I also saw this quote from L. Frank Baum, you know, the guy who wrote The Wizard of Oz

I'd like to think he was being sarcastic. Anyway, this is all from the Wikipedia article, I'm looking through some other sources now. It was a pretty horrifying event, and it really was a stain on the military's history, which wasn't exactly all that great to begin with.

Edit: Here's another link, and it includes an eyewitness account from one of the US soldiers.
http://www.eyewitnesstohistory.com/knee.htm

Thanks for this; it really does put things in perspective. Shows how horrible and disingenous it is for Slate to say he "strode that battlefield like the heroes of Sparta." To add to this, that the massacre happened at all was just a misunderstanding between parties. You recall Slate using the term "Ghost Dancers?" That was a name given to a religious movement that occured when Wovoka of the Paiute had a vision of Jesus Christ- yep, that one- returning to the earth as a Native American. He woulkd raise all his believers up to heaven- kinda like the Rapture, only he'd put them back on earth, a promised land with plentiful animals to hunt, no white oppressors, and the ghosts of the ancestors walking the earth. Several people performed this dance throughout the great plains. Really, you'd think people would be happier about that- hey, we've spread Christianity, right? But they saw all these dances, they thought it was some freaky war dance, and even though there were no documented attacks of any white person or their property, the Army still thought it ought to disarm all the Native Americans doing this dance, just to be sure. (I wonder where the Second Amendment protestations were then?)

Another thing you should know: of the band of 350 or so Lakota that Forsyth detained, only 120 were men; the rest were women and children. And among those men, only 38 rifles were found. Tensions mounted, someone tried to perform the Ghost Dance, a shot was fired and, well... well. :smith: To be fair, there was one commanding officer (General Neson Miles, who was pretty cool about the Natives, actually; he'd sent a telegram lamenting their poor treatment and how we should really give them what we promised a few days earlier) who was just horrified by the whole thing, and tried to punish Col. Forsyth by stripping him of his rank. However the Court of Inquiry, although they criticized his tactics, exonerated him, and Forsyth went on to be a Major General. And 20 soldiers got Medals of Honor too. Booker probably has one.

Epic High Five
Jun 5, 2004



resurgam40 posted:

Booker probably has one.

If he does, it's not on display.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medal_of_Honor#Historical_versions

Though to be fair, from what we've learned of him so far, it wouldn't be on display if he'd got one

CuwiKhons
Sep 24, 2009

Seven idiots and a bear walk into a dragon's lair.

I'm surprised Booker has any of his army stuff up at all considering how (rightly) ashamed he seems to be of his participation in Wounded Knee.

Tarezax
Sep 12, 2009

MORT cancels dance: interrupted by MORT
It probably helps to have that out there when he's trying to land a job.

my dad
Oct 17, 2012

this shall be humorous
:stare: Holy poo poo, this game really does smack you in the face with racism.


Slate somehow manages to be as disgusting as Comstock.
:byodood: Comstock doesn't recognize the sacrifice 30 of my comrades made while we were joyfully slaughtering the people of Peking!

late edit: grammar :downs:

my dad fucked around with this message at 12:21 on Oct 6, 2013

GenHavoc
Jul 19, 2006

Vive L'Empreur!
Vive La Surcouf!
Round 7, ladies and gentlemen, round 7:


  1. I mentioned this in the last episode, but the defaced, body-strewn hall of heroes whores is a nice callback to the look-and-feel of the previous two Bioshocks. I feel right at home already. All I need now is a wrench (or a drill).

  2. Slate is confirmed to be working with the Vox Populi, which leads to a number of possibilities. Several people commented on how odd it is that you should show up right as this little rebellion of Slate's breaks loose, but if everything here was timed to Booker's appearance (as a convenient distraction), it would make sense. Fitzroy may be planning the Vox' strike to coincide with it as well, so as to hit Comstock from multiple directions at once. It's what I'd do.

    And I hate to bring up my apparently highly-controversial theory concerning the state of gender roles in Columbia (not really), but a theory was levied last time that Slate, being a Vox Populist, does not represent Columbia in general when he refers to his female lance corporals. Well, according to this voxophone, Slate is a Vox only by necessity, describing their relationship as the accord among Caesar's killers. No proof of anything insofar as the wider world of Columbia of course, but it does show that Slate is not simply some malcontented rebel who rejects Columbia in totality. Indeed, but for Comstock's distortions of history, he seems completely on board with the program of racism, massacre, and ethnic cleansing. Just food for thought.

  3. If this is answered later in the video I'll edit, but why in the hell are Slate's men attacking Booker and Elizabeth at all? I suppose it's possible they don't know who they are, but why wouldn't Booker make more of an effort to ID himself as an enemy of Comstock?

    EDIT: So... the answer is because Slate is insane? He went through all this trouble just so that the first badass could slaughter his troops? Why the hell wouldn't he give Booker the Shock Jockey (a vigor apparently) and send him on his way. Comstock's army will take care of the killing matter if he's that insistent, and how's he supposed to lead a revolution if his troops are slaughtered by Booker? Hell, Slate doesn't even seem to dislike Booker. What is this, a death-cult?


  4. So not only is Comstock representing himself as the commander of the famous 7th Cavalry, but by implication he's representing the Battle of the Little Bighorn as a victory for the army, no? Yet Columbia hasn't been in the air that long. How could people who presumably heard of Custer's Last Stand before coming to Columbia possibly swallow a lie like this?

    EDIT: I'm stupid. I automatically associated the 7th with Custer, forgetting completely that the 7th was also the unit responsible for the Wounded Knee Massacre. This didn't occur to me until I started calculating how Booker could possibly have been at Little Bighorn.

  5. Slate seems to be obsessed with Tin Soldiers. How they don't fight wars, how his men may be slain by them. Could just be a euphemism for Comstock's religious police. Or maybe...

    Wildly Unsupported Theory #20: The proximate cause of Slate's rebellion was Comstock preparing to replace his human troops with robotic (clockwork?) automatons such as the Songbird. This represents Comstock's efforts to ensure that the Columbian military is absolutely loyal to him and him alone.

  6. "Lady Comstock is cruelly murdered", says the timeline, giving a date of 1895. A "gang of anarchists" being convicted of her murder sounds awfully convenient given everything. Perhaps Comstock had her whacked as being no longer important? Fanatics have done worse things.

  7. The dates on that timeline make no sense. Comstock is quoted as having been born in 1874, which would make him 38 today (impossible, given his evident age), and sixteen when he supposedly commanded the US forces at Wounded Knee. I'm led thus to assume that "the prophet is born" may be a euphemism for some sort of religious re-birth, such as those of born-again christians.

  8. Jesus, Columbia razed Peking to the ground? Is that truth, or more ludicrous misrepresentations of history? On the one hand, Comstock has seen fit to lie about more than just this. On the other, there were those visions of airships attacking and destroying New York...

    EDIT: Slate seems to confirm that Peking was entirely destroyed. A hell of an alternate-history they're building here.

  9. A minor point, but note how the timeline ends with 1912 (present). This could mean that the Hall of Heroes was just built in 1912, and was thus brand new when Slate took it over. It could mean that the timeline is updated with each passing year. Or it could mean that the prophet foresaw that 1912 would be the last year of Columbia as he knew it...

  10. Just a request, to anyone who can read Chinese characters. What do the banners in the Peking exhibit actually say? I only noticed the ones on the side of the door in the room with the animatronic Washington, but there may have been others.

  11. I would mention all the ways in which Comstock's representation of Wounded Knee is wrong, but I suppose that would be a bit superfluous given everything else

  12. Elizabeth mentions that she didn't know Comstock had a child. I... thought it had pretty much been established that said child was Elizabeth, though plainly she doesn't know that (and I suppose it might not be the case). The line about how Lady Comstock only carried the child for a week however is plainly an attempt to render that child into some kind of miraculous Jesus-like virgin birth. My explanation would, as before, be that Lady Comstock, or Anna DeWitt as she was once known as, left Booker while still pregnant with his child, Elizabeth, and gave birth to her in Columbia. This would perhaps explain why she was with child for only a week. Judging from the evidence though, it's clear that neither Booker nor Elizabeth are aware of this theory yet, though I still believe it accurate, at least for now.

    EDIT: And no sooner do I say anything than Elizabeth at least realizes that she is the lamb in question. No confirmation on the rest yet.

  13. I am certain I've heard the music from the room with the fountain and the statue of Lady Comstock holding up the baby before. Some famous classical piece I can't place. Anyone? On the same note, the piece that begins playing as soon as you enter the room with the statue of Daisy Fitzroy and the red garrote is "Rex Tremendae Maiestatis" from Mozart's Requiem. Appropriate, given the context.

  14. The book under glass next to Lady Comstock's Voxophone is "Manners, culture and dress of the best American society", by Richard Wells and George Rippey Stewart, a sort of home-ec-for housewives book first published in 1891. This would seem to support Lady Comstock's representation as the ideal wife-and-homemaker, an element contrary to the overall impression I've argued for in Columbia regarding women's roles. Perhaps Columbia, like most societies, is a place of many contradictions? Or perhaps Columbia, like most theocracies, is not quite as uniformly controlled as the prophet might prefer. Given the number of rebellions currently ongoing, the latter seems clear.

  15. There's an odd element here though. If Fitzroy is being blamed (rightly or otherwise) for Lady Comstock's murder, then that means Comstock's emnity with her goes back to 1895, a full seventeen years before present and almost 90% of Columbia's total existence. How have the Vox been able to survive seventeen years of Comstock hunting them? Columbia is plainly a big city, but there are limits here.

    Of course, it's possible Comstock blamed Fitzroy for killing Lady Comstock quite a long ways after the actual murder, and rewrote history to accommodate his current enemies ("We have always been at war with Eurasia").

  16. I suppose we are to assume that the freight hook and crane assembly come from when this place was being built? Otherwise, as Booker mentions, it's awfully convenient. Then again, even if so, that doesn't explain where the turret came from. I guess she can pull things across space as well as time.

    That messed up vending machine she pulls in for you though, would seem to be smeared in blood. Is that Columbia's future? Perhaps its immediate future?

GenHavoc fucked around with this message at 12:08 on Oct 6, 2013

Loxbourne
Apr 6, 2011

Tomorrow, doom!
But now, tea.
Looking closely at the stuff Elizabeth pulls through the tears is remarkably interesting. That turret seems to be from somewhere surrounded by ruins draped in red banners.

bobbertoriley
Sep 6, 2011

GenHavoc posted:

Slate seems to be obsessed with Tin Soldiers. How they don't fight wars, how his men may be slain by them. Could just be a euphemism for Comstock's religious police. Or maybe...

Wildly Unsupported Theory #20: The proximate cause of Slate's rebellion was Comstock preparing to replace his human troops with robotic (clockwork?) automatons such as the Songbird. This represents Comstock's efforts to ensure that the Columbian military is absolutely loyal to him and him alone.

"Tin Soldier" is slang for someone who likes playing soldier. In context, Slate's just saying that Comstock likes taking the credit for the effort of the soldiers who actually did something.


I'm sure if we're going to get an answer for this, it'll come next update, but I'm curious as to what Booker's actual involvement was at Wounded Knee. Based on Slate's comments about "the hero takes no praise" or however it was said, I'm wondering if Booker was one of the reasons for the victory at Wounded Knee in this timeline? Considering how he said he hates what he did, wouldn't surprise me. (Also, I don't remember, was there any form of confirmation whether he was involved in The Boxer Rebellion or not?)

Shoeless
Sep 2, 2011

bobbertoriley posted:

"Tin Soldier" is slang for someone who likes playing soldier. In context, Slate's just saying that Comstock likes taking the credit for the effort of the soldiers who actually did something.


I'm sure if we're going to get an answer for this, it'll come next update, but I'm curious as to what Booker's actual involvement was at Wounded Knee. Based on Slate's comments about "the hero takes no praise" or however it was said, I'm wondering if Booker was one of the reasons for the victory at Wounded Knee in this timeline? Considering how he said he hates what he did, wouldn't surprise me. (Also, I don't remember, was there any form of confirmation whether he was involved in The Boxer Rebellion or not?)

Given that the Boxer Rebellion took place as Columbia's last action as an American city, and afterwards disappeared into the sky, I find it unlikely he was present there. As well, I'd think if he was, there's be more allusions to it, as there have been with him and Wounded Knee.

Thesaya
May 17, 2011

I am a Plant.
I wish they had in some way added in more of the actual history into the game itself. If you aren't from the US or a history buff, you miss a lot of the meaning of Comstocks (and Slates) version of the events. If I had been playing, I would probably have looked the actual events up, but I have a feeling most wouldn't bother, not realising how badly skewed what we are told is. I mean, I'd heard of wounded knee, but I didn't really know what it was, and the business with Peking I didn't even have an inkling of what happened. You don't learn that in school here in Sweden, or if you do, it isn't covered enough to make at least me remember it. And I love history.

It is really too bad if non US players doesn't realise that this isn't a battle and some kind of rebellion being told as if Comstock was a hero, but a massacre and ...something that sounds like another massacre being advertised as great American victories. (I would, as I said, look these things up if I was playing, but since I am following an LP, I am being lazy and just wait for someone to explain or link me to the actual events)

I might be wrong, and loads of people know what these things were really about, I never was that interested in war history, but from my general experience I am usually more knowledgeable when it comes to history, not the other way around. But yeah, I would be happy to be wrong.

Arglebargle III
Feb 21, 2006

Okay, I know it may not be popular, but I feel like the Boxer Rebellion and Wounded Knee are pretty different things. The Boxer Rebellion was more complicated than a massacre; it was actually an uprising against the Qing government mixed with anti-foreign sentiment. The Chinese at the time were angry at the Qing for a variety of reasons. Mostly they were angry because the Qing was a mess that had been running the country into the ground for 50 years, and because it was a foreign dynasty from Manchuria. They were also angry at the Qing for not repelling the foreigners from China, which is ironic because the main reason the Qing couldn't fight the foreigners was that the Chinese were in almost constant rebellion in the latter half of the 19th century.

Anyway, the event referenced in the game was the relief of a siege. The Boxers had overrun the capital and laid siege to the foreign legation. This is how it's known in Chinese history books and it doesn't sound that bad. What they often omit is that foreigners outside the foreign legation quarter were legitimately massacred. The people inside the legation didn't really help the situation by shooting cannon balls at the Imperial Palace, but given what happened to the foreigners outside the quarter it's hard to blame them.

The Qing was in a political bind here, mostly because the Qing at this point is just Empress Dowager Cixi who has managed to strangle any attempt to replace her as the power behind the throne over the decades. This was a problem because Cixi was a myopic and self-interested ruler who let the country go to hell so long as she could continue to enjoy her privileged life. So Cixi in this situation doesn't really have the power to fight the Boxers, and even if she did it would do little more than displace their ire onto what was left of the Imperial household in Beijing.

What the hell is anybody supposed to do? Well, seeing as the Chinese government was either unable or unwilling to control the open violence in its capital city, and there were British, Russian, French, American etc. nationals in mortal danger, the Great Powers sent in a small army to restore order. The force was only about 500 men, just marines from warships in the area. They arrived at Beijing but were unable to do more than join the legation under siege.

So the British send a force of 2,000, who due to Chinese infighting are cut off and attacked by the Chinese regular army who are supposed to be helping them. They barely make it out due to the timely arrival of reinforcements with about 15% casualties.

Finally, with hundreds dead or wounded and the situation still unresolved the Great Powers, mostly Japan, Britain and Russia, really put in the boot. They march an army of 55,000 into Beijing, seizing forts and towns along the way. The countryside is in chaos (there's a rebellion going on) and this is where the massacres happen. Chinese regular army units are in disarray and receiving conflicting orders, either resisting or not resisting, civilians are attacking the soldiers, and basically nobody has any idea who is on whose side. All Chinese become a target for the soldiers and there are massacres.

Then they get to Beijing and start randomly killing people, especially the Japanese and French and for some reason the German army, who show up too late to the fight but feel the need to randomly kill people. Most of the actual killing went on after the Boxer Rebellion is suppressed, with German, French, Japanese and Russian soldiers running around the countryside around Bejing killing and looting.

The Americans come out fairly well, since they were a small minority of the army and the American general ordered his troops not to loot, although they seem to have ignored him. One of the cultural atrocities recorded from this time is the burning and looting of the Summer Palace, but looted artifacts are ironically more likely to have survived the following 60 years of chaos and the Cultural Revolution. Chinese people looted the Summer Palace right after the foreigners got done with it, since again there was chaos and rebellion against the foreign Qing Dynasty. Those things are generally not taught in Chinese history classes.

What's also not recorded in Chinese history books is that the Chinese army also participated in the looting and massacres, since the whole thing started as a rebellion against the Qing state.

The Boxer Rebellion was a general breakdown in order and the rule of law that saw general murder and rape and theft, by all parties involved, and with nebulous beginning and end dates. It's on a different plane than Wounded Knee which is a more straightforward incident.

edit: Oh and the United States used the war indemnity from the Chinese government to establish Qinghua University (now one of the top two universities in China) and a scholarship for Chinese exchange students which exists to this day. So neener neener etc.

Arglebargle III fucked around with this message at 13:36 on Oct 6, 2013

The Unlife Aquatic
Jun 17, 2009

Here in my car
I feel safest of all
I can lock all my doors
It's the only way to live
In cars
The Boxer Rebellion is also where the slang deriding Germans as "Huns" comes from. In the aftermath, Kaiser Wilhelm made a godawful speech extorting German soldiers to be "as ruthless as the Huns".

We all know how well that went over. :v:

my dad
Oct 17, 2012

this shall be humorous
The thing with the Boxer rebellion in the game is that it apparently ended with Columbia nuking Peking or something like that, which simplifies thing a bit. :v:

The Unlife Aquatic
Jun 17, 2009

Here in my car
I feel safest of all
I can lock all my doors
It's the only way to live
In cars
I'm sure Kaiser Willheim found a way to make it look like his fault anyway.

Cardiovorax
Jun 5, 2011

I mean, if you're a successful actress and you go out of the house in a skirt and without underwear, knowing that paparazzi are just waiting for opportunities like this and that it has happened many times before, then there's really nobody you can blame for it but yourself.
The more videos of this I watch, the more I think that it really shouldn't even have been called Bioshock at all. It has plasmids and you shoot people, but what else does the game have in common with its predecessors? The atmosphere is completely different, you're constantly surrounded by other people, there's nothing of the sense of isolation that Bioshock 1 (and 2, kinda) had. There's no real exploration at all and you're on a really limited path of progression. They even went the CoD route of limiting you to two weapons at a time.

Does anyone else get the feeling that this game really wanted to be its own IP, but couldn't for marketing reasons?

GenHavoc
Jul 19, 2006

Vive L'Empreur!
Vive La Surcouf!

The Unlife Aquatic posted:

I'm sure Kaiser Willheim found a way to make it look like his fault anyway.

He was awful good at that, wasn't he?

resurgam40
Jul 22, 2007

Battler, the literal stupidest man on earth. Why are you even here, Battler, why did you come back to this place so you could fuck literally everything up?

Arglebargle III posted:

The Boxer Rebellion was a general breakdown in order and the rule of law that saw general murder and rape and theft, by all parties involved, and with nebulous beginning and end dates. It's on a different plane than Wounded Knee which is a more straightforward incident.

True, but I can see why they would use the Boxer Rebellion here, and not just because the dates are fairly similar. See, this was an international fight, as you said, but there was actually a religious interest too. See, the Society of Righteous and Harmonious Fists wasn't just a disgruntled group of guys displaced by imperialism, they were a spiritual group who believed that they would be assisted by the sprirts of their ancestors in purging China of the West. Sound familiar? (They also believed their regimen and diet would give them crazy powers like flight and immunity to pain) And part of what they did was massacre missionaries and converts to Christianity; they were famous for their opposition even before war was declared on the Western Powers, when the government was suppresing them (before the Dowager Empress turned on a dime and started supporting them). That, is where I suspect the interest to Comstock comes in; he probably advertised that this was a war on Christ himself, and razed Peking because of that. Here's some stuff from the Wiki on that front:

Wikipedia posted:

Protestant, Catholic, and Orthodox missionaries and their Chinese converts were massacred throughout northern China, some by Boxers and others by government troops and authorities. After the declaration of war on Western powers in June 1900, Yuxian, who had been named governor of Shanxi in March of that year, implemented a brutal anti-foreign and anti-Christian policy. On 9 July, reports circulated that he had executed forty-four foreigners (including women and children) from missionary families whom he had invited to the provincial capital Taiyuan under the promise to protect them.[55] Although the purported eye witness accounts have recently been questioned as improbable, this event became a notorious symbol of Chinese madness, known as the Taiyuan Massacre.[56]

By the summer's end, more foreigners and as many as 2,000 Chinese Christians had been put to death in the province. Journalist and historical writer Nat Brandt has called the massacre of Christians in Shanxi "the greatest single tragedy in the history of Christian evangelicalism."[57] A total of 136 Protestant missionaries and 53 children were killed, and 47 Catholic priests and nuns. Thirty thousand Chinese Catholics, 2,000 Chinese Protestants, and 200 to 400 of the 700 Russian Orthodox Christians in Beijing were estimated to have been killed. Collectively, the Protestant dead were called the China Martyrs of 1900.[58] The Boxers went on to murder Christians across 26 prefectures.[59] One specific rampage was set off after the German diplomat Clemens von Ketteler beat a Chinese boy to death. Anger against Chinese Christians set off again, and the Boxers burned down several churches, burning some victims alive.[60]

Interesting to note that the people who seem to suffer the most here are Chinese converts. I don't imagine ol' Comstock mentioned that. :v:

Nelson Mandela
Jun 4, 2007

SO SHINY
SO CHROME

Cardiovorax posted:

The more videos of this I watch, the more I think that it really shouldn't even have been called Bioshock at all. It has plasmids and you shoot people, but what else does the game have in common with its predecessors? The atmosphere is completely different, you're constantly surrounded by other people, there's nothing of the sense of isolation that Bioshock 1 (and 2, kinda) had. There's no real exploration at all and you're on a really limited path of progression. They even went the CoD route of limiting you to two weapons at a time.

Does anyone else get the feeling that this game really wanted to be its own IP, but couldn't for marketing reasons?

All I can say is "keep watching"...

Sundowner
Apr 10, 2013

not even
jeff goldblum could save me from this nightmare
I don't really know what you mean Cardiovorax? I think the running theme in all Shock games that ties them together is not continuity in the literal front facing themes but rather the idea that the world is built up and slowly degraded or shown of it's true colours and a lot of the plot is built up through ancillary means, through observation and through learning about it's past rather than it's immediate future (other than what relates to the pro/an-tagonist). It's as much a Shock game as any other, it's just a completely new world to play around in. I don't think it's necessarily contiguous with the first two games but I wouldn't say it's far enough from them to feel like it could have been a new IP.

Edit: And yes, keep watching :v:

Sundowner fucked around with this message at 14:49 on Oct 6, 2013

Cardiovorax
Jun 5, 2011

I mean, if you're a successful actress and you go out of the house in a skirt and without underwear, knowing that paparazzi are just waiting for opportunities like this and that it has happened many times before, then there's really nobody you can blame for it but yourself.

Sundowner posted:

I don't really know what you mean Cardiovorax? I think the running theme in all Shock games that ties them together is not continuity in the literal front facing themes but rather the idea that the world is built up and slowly degraded or shown of it's true colours and a lot of the plot is built up through ancillary means, through observation and through learning about it's past rather than it's immediate future (other than what relates to the pro/an-tagonist). It's as much a Shock game as any other, it's just a completely new world to play around in. I don't think it's necessarily contiguous with the first two games but I wouldn't say it's far enough from them to feel like it could have been a new IP.
I don't know, I just think it feels different, going from the gameplay we've seen so far. I'm not talking about the political themes or the setting, just the general atmosphere and the pacing. It seems a lot more straight-up shooterish than the older games, which tried to be more suspenseful, with a survival-horror aspect. A lot of minor things like hacking and research are gone. The visual design and the focus on politics is very similar to the other Bioshock games, but if not for the name I'm not sure I would've realized they belong to the same series. Maybe it's just me, though.

Albu-quirky Guy
Nov 8, 2005

Still stuck in the Land of Entrapment
Re: the turret and freight hooks in the tears, it's already hinted at that the tear to 1980's Paris was in an alternate world as well as an alternate time, so perhaps the freight hooks are from the initial construction of the Hall of Heroes Whores and maybe the turret is from alternate Columbia where Booker never shows up and Comstock's forces have moved in and fortified their position.

ynohtna
Feb 16, 2007

backwoods compatible
Illegal Hen
Could the discrepancy between Slate and Comstock's version of events be explained through them experiencing different alternate histories/dimensions?

And I'm sure Elizabeth could come up with better wishes for the tears to fulfil but, yeah, it's merely a new gameplay mechanic.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

BioMe
Aug 9, 2012


ynohtna posted:

Could the discrepancy between Slate and Comstock's version of events be explained through them experiencing different alternate histories/dimensions?

It's probably just blatant propaganda. It fits way too well with how insane cults twist history in real life.

  • Locked thread