|
My facebook feed is busy explaining to me how the shutdown was a fake inside job because federal workers were just itching for a little paid vacation time.
|
# ? Oct 17, 2013 04:14 |
|
|
# ? Jun 2, 2024 04:25 |
|
BrotherAdso posted:My facebook feed is busy explaining to me how the shutdown was a fake inside job because federal workers were just itching for a little paid vacation time. 9/11 was an inside job because the passengers wanted to get out of the plane quicker.
|
# ? Oct 17, 2013 04:16 |
|
archangelwar posted:The whole site seems to have site wide https so unless they decided to turn it off specifically for some part that includes your SSN then this sounds like a myth. Its possible that happened on one of the state run websites, only states that didn't set up their own exchange use the federal website, but I haven't actually heard that before.
|
# ? Oct 17, 2013 05:43 |
|
greatn posted:Didn't John McAfee literally murder a guy and run to Venezuela? He ended up in Belize and spent his time trying to create an ultimate form of "Bath Salts." He then consumed this new ultimate drug by injecting it up his rear end. I don't take McAfee very seriously.
|
# ? Oct 17, 2013 05:52 |
|
BrotherAdso posted:My facebook feed is busy explaining to me how the shutdown was a fake inside job because federal workers were just itching for a little paid vacation time. I'm going to preach to the converted again and say that a vacation where you don't know if you are going to get paid, have to hang around in case it is called off, and all your co-worker hate you for your "free time off" when theywere the ones with the solid paycheck, (I qualify for broadcasting the hate rays), and the public hates you as a do nothing bureaucrat, is no vacation.
|
# ? Oct 17, 2013 05:57 |
|
OOPS MY BAD, I DIDN'T REALIZE I WAS DEALING WITH A LIBERAL THERE ROBERT, BUT WHEN YOU MISH/MASH WORDS TO MAKE YOURSELF LOOK SMART WHILE MAKING OTHERS LOOK STUPID, YOU REALLY ONLY MAKE YOU LOOK DUMB!!! YES THERE ARE CHRISTIANS, WHICH I CAN TELL YOU MUST NOT BE, ALL OVER THE WORLD, BUT I AM TALKING ABOUT THE ONES PRAYING TO ALLAH JUST BEFORE THEY PUSH THE BUTTON ON THEIR BACK PACK BOMB!!! FOR ONE AM TIRED OF HAVING TO CHANGE MY WAY OF LIFE TO ACCOMMODATE OTHERS THAT CHOOSE TO LIVE THE AMERICAN LIFE!!! OUT OF RESPECT FOR MY FRIEND MIKE I WON'T GET INTO A PISSING CONTEST WITH YOU ON HIS POST, BUT YOUR WAY OF THINKING IS WHAT IS DESTROYING OUR COUNTRY!!!
|
# ? Oct 17, 2013 07:40 |
|
Hello I work in Communications. How do I comma?Todd Winer, Communications Director for Rep. Raúl R. Labrador (ID-01) posted:LABRADOR VOTES AGAINST OBAMACARE, ADDING MORE DEBT
|
# ? Oct 17, 2013 08:06 |
|
If I lived in Labrador, I wouldn't want Obamacare, either.
|
# ? Oct 17, 2013 09:55 |
|
Shalebridge Cradle posted:This is making to rounds on the right wing media sites from a Fox News interview, I can't find it on any non-crazy sources. Dad posted:I did searches on it and did not find anything disputing the claims and it's been out there for a while, so assumed it was factual.
|
# ? Oct 17, 2013 13:38 |
|
You should tell your dad how absurd that statement is and show your dad the bit Gilbert Godfried did during the roast of Bob Saget (Bob Saget did not rape and kill a girl in 1990, if you have evidence that Bob Saget raped and killed a girl in 1990, you should step forward, because he did not do it, etc.)
|
# ? Oct 17, 2013 19:16 |
|
They're not denying it because a denial would spread and lend credence to the false information. Ask your dad how he thinks this headline would go over: "Administration Denies Obamacare Identity Theft Scam." A lot of people would probably: A. Assume the government was lying. B. Eventually not recall the first two words because of how memory works. Either way, it'd do nothing to actually quell the rumor. Better to wait and let it die out on its own.
|
# ? Oct 17, 2013 19:37 |
|
BrotherAdso posted:My facebook feed is busy explaining to me how the shutdown was a fake inside job because federal workers were just itching for a little paid vacation time. It wasn't a shutdown at all! quote:How was it not a shutdown? Well...
|
# ? Oct 17, 2013 20:32 |
|
The "83%" figure comes from an anonymous Republican. The percentage actually comes from, not surprisingly, his rear end. It's not actually "83%" of the government personnel or programs. It's "83%" of money being spent by the government. Including mandatory spending that isn't affected by the CR.
Xombie fucked around with this message at 20:50 on Oct 17, 2013 |
# ? Oct 17, 2013 20:42 |
|
Xombie posted:The 83% figure comes from an anonymous Republican. The percentage actually comes from, not surprisingly, his rear end. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, there are a little over 2.6 million full-time employees. And assuming an initial furlough of 800,000 people (before they started doing piecemeal refunding for high-visibility things that look good to the voters at home), that means that about 31% of all federal employees were sent home. Of course, this doesn't begin to cover the number of federal contractors whose incomes were affected as well, but the 85% number is wildly overestimated (SURPRISE!).
|
# ? Oct 17, 2013 20:47 |
|
CarterUSM posted:According to the U.S. Census Bureau, there are a little over 2.6 million full-time employees. Several agencies still had enough money to keep running, and many of the ones that weren't furloughed were working without pay. As the debt limit was reached and the shutdown dragged on, that number would have increased. They would still be giving that 83% figure as if it meant anything, because the vast majority of it is mandatory spending, and has nothing to do with personnel numbers. Xombie fucked around with this message at 20:59 on Oct 17, 2013 |
# ? Oct 17, 2013 20:53 |
|
gradenko_2000 posted:It wasn't a shutdown at all! See, the government was running without all of its dead weight. Clearly the Post Office and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services are the best departments.
|
# ? Oct 17, 2013 20:58 |
|
If the government had to stop all of it's nonessential services, and 83% of the government was still running, I'd say that the government does some pretty essential things.
|
# ? Oct 17, 2013 21:28 |
|
It must be "hate on people on public assistance" week on Facebook. [IMG].[/IMG] She posted a nice message about not judging people and made it mean nyquil hangover fucked around with this message at 21:18 on Nov 14, 2013 |
# ? Oct 17, 2013 22:34 |
|
What was that line? "Judge not lest ye be judged"? Eh...this is different. They didn't have welfare then.
|
# ? Oct 17, 2013 22:37 |
|
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=655474791130257 Video about a vet and cop tellin' it strait
|
# ? Oct 17, 2013 23:23 |
|
Anyone have a quick and dirty (with numbers if possible) retort to this "church of Reaganomics" blog post? http://factreal.wordpress.com/2012/01/30/reaganomics-the-success-of-president-reagans-economic-policies/ Apparently the blog post is sourcing this Forbes article: http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterferrara/2011/05/05/reaganomics-vs-obamanomics-facts-and-figures/ aBagorn fucked around with this message at 01:48 on Oct 18, 2013 |
# ? Oct 17, 2013 23:57 |
|
aBagorn posted:Anyone have a quick and dirty (with numbers if possible) retort to this "church of Reaganomics" blog post? I wonder how those numbers compare for Clinton? Hmmm, let's look at GDP, going by these numbers http://www.multpl.com/us-gdp-inflation-adjusted/table Both Reagan and Clinton had the economy grow by about 26%, which I guess is close enough to a 1/3 for them. Also the reduction in inflation was near entirely because of Volcker contracting the money supply and massively increasing interest rates, the Volcker appointed by Jimmy Carter. Also the debt under Reagan went up near 300% all so he could do things like reactivate WW2 battleships and kick mentally ill people onto the streets. Meanwhile they it only went up around 20% under Clinton and is currently only around 70% for Obama. This is my favorite part though quote:The Reagan Recovery kicked off a historic 25-year economic boom (with short recessions in 1990 and 2001.) Recessions totally don't count after the country has been baptized by Reagan, especially not the one that happened when Reagan was president.
|
# ? Oct 18, 2013 02:48 |
|
One of my facebook friends is some horrible intersection of internet atheist/libertarian/monsanto/common core poster. I never try to interact with him though, because I wouldn't want to stanch my access to absolute gems of batshittery like this blog he linked. I have no idea how he squares this with his atheism. I guess old religions are crazy, but this one old power diagram of concentric circles totally looks like this other science thing that looks like concentric circles and that is TOTALLY MEANINGFUL for some ill-defined reason I guess.quote:Unless you were hanging out in a cave all of last year, you might remember seeing this contraption in the news:
|
# ? Oct 18, 2013 03:06 |
|
Lansdowne posted:One of my facebook friends is some horrible intersection of internet atheist/libertarian/monsanto/common core poster. I never try to interact with him though, because I wouldn't want to stanch my access to absolute gems of batshittery like this blog he linked. I have no idea how he squares this with his atheism. I guess old religions are crazy, but this one old power diagram of concentric circles totally looks like this other science thing that looks like concentric circles and that is TOTALLY MEANINGFUL for some ill-defined reason I guess. Dammit, he got us. We thought we could sell mankind concentric circle patterns as a new scientific discovery. And we would have gotten away with it, too, if it wasn't for those meddling bloggers.
|
# ? Oct 18, 2013 03:14 |
I saw this anti-vaccine website posted by a friend. http://thepeopleschemist.com/reasons-dont-vaccinate-children-vaccine-supporters-shouldnt-give/
|
|
# ? Oct 18, 2013 04:44 |
|
pillsburysoldier posted:https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=655474791130257
|
# ? Oct 18, 2013 05:03 |
|
Bizarro Kanyon posted:I saw this anti-vaccine website posted by a friend. I just love his justification for not immunizing against measles, the mumps, and such. It all revolves around the idea that we are stronger people if we are exposed to more stuff. It's true that our immune systems can become stronger if we are exposed to bad things, which is what vaccines do. So instead of having a potentially life-altering bout of measles, children can be exposed to it through a method that is very unlikely to hurt them.
|
# ? Oct 18, 2013 05:23 |
|
Indeed, if exposing us to more stuff makes us stronger, then wouldn't exposure to TOXINS be a good thing?
|
# ? Oct 18, 2013 05:35 |
|
Mornacale posted:Indeed, if exposing us to more stuff makes us stronger, then wouldn't exposure to TOXINS be a good thing? No, because the mooching class shouldn't be reliant on the government to strengthen their immune systems. It weakens the natural Social Darwinism that society needs to survive. True citizens use their own toxins. Wait, did I do do this right?
|
# ? Oct 18, 2013 06:34 |
|
Lansdowne posted:One of my facebook friends is some horrible intersection of internet atheist/libertarian/monsanto/common core poster. I never try to interact with him though, because I wouldn't want to stanch my access to absolute gems of batshittery like this blog he linked. I have no idea how he squares this with his atheism. I guess old religions are crazy, but this one old power diagram of concentric circles totally looks like this other science thing that looks like concentric circles and that is TOTALLY MEANINGFUL for some ill-defined reason I guess. I liked this comment: Some kid on facebook posted:With out going into to much detail this is the same reason why the earlier civilizations were compromised. And also the same reason why the Mayans vanished into thin air. This is another move by the ones that are still playing the polarity game recreating similar timelines so that they can esablish control through this technology. You can't imagine the impact this has on dimensions and the universal matrix and the effects. And this symbol is not the end all either. Geometry it self has been manipulated through act of the polarity game that was created on both dark and light sides. So it became fragmented and there are many that get caught up into these things, which is just part of the journey as the continue to reveal these things.
|
# ? Oct 18, 2013 06:45 |
|
Lansdowne posted:One of my facebook friends is some horrible intersection of internet atheist/libertarian/monsanto/common core poster. I never try to interact with him though, because I wouldn't want to stanch my access to absolute gems of batshittery like this blog he linked. I have no idea how he squares this with his atheism. I guess old religions are crazy, but this one old power diagram of concentric circles totally looks like this other science thing that looks like concentric circles and that is TOTALLY MEANINGFUL for some ill-defined reason I guess. That's just one of the 7 detectors circling the LHC. What about the other 6 detectors, that look only vaguely similar? (In that they're round and have wires)
|
# ? Oct 18, 2013 06:56 |
|
This is happening: I'm Reed Iculous Any suggestions for continuing to troll Scotch Tape here? I feel kind of guilty about it because I was always on him to read Ayn Rand years ago in my Randroid days but he never did until just last year and now he has to work through the usual period of hyperventilating about slavery every time the EPA doesn't let the market sell him contaminated drinking water or whatever. Oh keep in mind we're both white and the OP is a black woman so I'm afraid of making it a "white boys arguing about who totally knows more about being a slave"
|
# ? Oct 18, 2013 07:17 |
|
VitalSigns posted:This is happening: A good way to troll him is bring up quotes from right wingers talking about how slavery was ultimately a good thing for African Americans.
|
# ? Oct 18, 2013 07:57 |
|
TheMadMilkman posted:I liked this comment: WHat the hell was that insanity?
|
# ? Oct 18, 2013 08:09 |
|
AShamefulDisplay posted:A good way to troll him is bring up quotes from right wingers talking about how slavery was ultimately a good thing for African Americans. Nice try, you scamp, but I'm not going to risk even accidentally looking pro-slavery on a public forum.
|
# ? Oct 18, 2013 08:25 |
|
KomradeX posted:WHat the hell was that insanity? http://www.bryandeflores.com/ ? I was guessing time cube at first, but it looks more like this guy.
|
# ? Oct 18, 2013 09:35 |
|
VitalSigns posted:Nice try, you scamp, but I'm not going to risk even accidentally looking pro-slavery on a public forum. Just keep hammering on the fact that the CSA were traitors.
|
# ? Oct 18, 2013 09:48 |
|
VitalSigns posted:Any suggestions for continuing to troll Scotch Tape here?
|
# ? Oct 18, 2013 14:59 |
|
Lansdowne posted:One of my facebook friends is some horrible intersection of internet atheist/libertarian/monsanto/common core poster. I never try to interact with him though, because I wouldn't want to stanch my access to absolute gems of batshittery like this blog he linked. I have no idea how he squares this with his atheism. I guess old religions are crazy, but this one old power diagram of concentric circles totally looks like this other science thing that looks like concentric circles and that is TOTALLY MEANINGFUL for some ill-defined reason I guess. It's mostly charming until Hindu nationalists use them as propaganda and start fights IRL.
|
# ? Oct 18, 2013 15:15 |
|
|
# ? Jun 2, 2024 04:25 |
|
http://clotureclub.com/tea-party-insult-generator/ I could just read this instead of going to facebook.
|
# ? Oct 18, 2013 15:47 |