|
Seconding that you start with season 3, the first couple seasons really weren't anything special or memorable. v Yeah, Batgirl's introduction was the two-part premiere of season 3. Urdnot Fire fucked around with this message at 21:38 on Sep 27, 2013 |
#
?
Sep 27, 2013 21:28
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 03:46 |
|
|
I don't remember when he picked up Batgirl as a sidekick, but if it was season three, then start there.
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2013 21:36
|
|
|
Crossposting this from the Superman thread 'cause it's awesome:Endless Mike posted:Here is a cool animated short film Zack Snyder and Bruce Timm did for Superman's 75th anniversary.
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2013 07:54
|
|
|
Stan Lee has created another Super hero cartoon.quote:Chakra: The Invincible tells the story of Raju Rai, a young Indian boy living in Mumbai. Raju and his mentor, the scientist Dr. Singh, develop a technology suit that activates the mystical chakras of the body. When Raju dons the suit, he discovers superpowers and vows to use his newfound abilities to protect and serve as he battles super villains. I am reminded lee's earlier endeavors in animation. I still can't forgive him over that striperella garbage he created. thelaughingman fucked around with this message at 15:55 on Oct 17, 2013 |
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2013 15:50
|
|
|
thelaughingman posted:Stan Lee has created another Super hero cartoon. I thought striperella actually had some funny jokes in it.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2013 00:15
|
|
|
The_Rob posted:I thought striperella actually had some funny jokes in it. Well to each their own I guess.
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2013 19:33
|
|
|
The_Rob posted:I thought striperella actually had some funny jokes in it. What was the name of the super low-rent villain? The Chisler? Cheapskate? The running gag that his crew only had one gun and they kept swapping it was genuinely hilarious.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2013 20:26
|
|
|
That name just sounds like someone voiced by Jon Lovitz. Edit: Or maybe I saw Stripperella at some point because IMDB is saying Jon Lovitz voiced Cheap-o. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2013 20:40
|
|
|
I was at New York Comic Con last week during the DC Animated panel and man, was it embarrassing all around. The audience kept asking questions only related to poo poo like "Will we see a Blackest Night movie?", "Will we see a Red Son movie?", "Will we see a Kingdom Come movie?" to which every reply was just "There has been discussion" after each one. You would think after the first or second of these questions, fans would have gotten the hint. All movies moving forward, which are just "Batman and Son" and "Aquaman" at this point, are going to be "New 52" (The word, "Modern", was thrown around constantly). They showed off a few clips from Justice League War, and on the panel was the new voice of Batman, who is going to be Batman for the foreseeable future and let me tell you, he's not Stephen Baldwin bad, but he's pretty close.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2013 23:16
|
|
|
Before the QA section of any panel for anything, someone on the panel needs to say the following, "We're going to open this to the audience. Before we begin, I'd like to just say that any current projects we're comfortable talking about we have already publicly shared. So, we'd prefer to not to have questions regarding projects we haven't announced. Also, it means a lot to have you all here. I know that [PROJECT] has meant a lot to you, and it means a lot to us too. Still, in the interest of time, please limit your questions though to only a few sentences, preferably one."
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2013 00:35
|
|
|
E the Shaggy posted:I was at New York Comic Con last week during the DC Animated panel and man, was it embarrassing all around. Why not get the guy from Arkham Origins? Or the guy who did Red Hood Batman? Why does DC insist on doing dumb poo poo like this constantly? I don't understand how a company can have such an active disdain for its fanbase when it makes such niche products to begin with. In other news, am I the only one left watching Avengers Assemble and Ultimate Spider-Man? I have actively avoided Agents of Smash.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2013 01:30
|
|
|
Timeless Appeal posted:Before the QA section of any panel for anything, someone on the panel needs to say the following, "We're going to open this to the audience. Before we begin, I'd like to just say that any current projects we're comfortable talking about we have already publicly shared. So, we'd prefer to not to have questions regarding projects we haven't announced. Also, it means a lot to have you all here. I know that [PROJECT] has meant a lot to you, and it means a lot to us too. Still, in the interest of time, please limit your questions though to only a few sentences, preferably one." Why don't they just cut to the chase and say "we all know that (NY/SF)CC is a glorified publicity stunt, so only ask us questions that can be answered in the form of a Twitter-friendly prepared verbal statement, about things you were already aware of before you showed up. Also, Johns is as creative as a Xerox so everything's adaptations of the New 52 from now on, have a nice day!"
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2013 04:49
|
|
|
Timeless Appeal posted:Remove the QA section of any panel for anything Q&As are terrible, always and forever.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2013 17:00
|
|
|
E the Shaggy posted:All movies moving forward, which are just "Batman and Son" and "Aquaman" at this point, are going to be "New 52" (The word, "Modern", was thrown around constantly). Oh well, at least this means I'll be saving money by skipping things like the inevitable H'El On Earth and Death of the Family movies.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2013 18:21
|
|
|
Timeless Appeal posted:Before the QA section of any panel for anything, someone on the panel needs to say the following, "We're going to open this to the audience. Before we begin, I'd like to just say that any current projects we're comfortable talking about we have already publicly shared. So, we'd prefer to not to have questions regarding projects we haven't announced. Also, it means a lot to have you all here. I know that [PROJECT] has meant a lot to you, and it means a lot to us too. Still, in the interest of time, please limit your questions though to only a few sentences, preferably one." The problem is that even if you say that you're still going to get people coming up and going "I know you said you're not talking about blank but what about it?"
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2013 20:12
|
|
|
Hope you weren't hoping for DC to have their poo poo together because Cartoon Network's pulled Beware the Bat and repeats from the schedule.quote:In what seems like DC Nation déjà vu, new episodes of Beware the Batman have been pulled from Cartoon Network next weekend (repeats too).
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2013 20:21
|
|
|
RevKrule posted:Hope you weren't hoping for DC to have their poo poo together because Cartoon Network's pulled Beware the Bat and repeats from the schedule. Is that really a surprise to anyone? Did people even really like the show? It had a lot of bad responses to it early on, which is TV poison.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2013 20:27
|
|
|
My girlfriend doesn't like Brave and the Bold and I don't know what to do about it. She thinks Aquaman is especially stupid. Edit: She's also dressing up as Harley Quinn from AC for Halloween and not TAS. Love can go a long way, man, but this is pushing it. omg chael crash fucked around with this message at 20:33 on Oct 21, 2013 |
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2013 20:31
|
|
|
ToastyPotato posted:Is that really a surprise to anyone? Did people even really like the show? It had a lot of bad responses to it early on, which is TV poison. People liked the show. (me included) But CN has no idea what to do with DC.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2013 22:53
|
|
|
MonsterEnvy posted:People liked the show. (me included) But CN has no idea what to do with DC. I think you are in the minority with that opinion. It was terrible ugly garbage. Just because a few people liked it, doesn't mean CN was wrong to cancel it.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2013 23:19
|
|
|
Now can I get Young Justice back?
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2013 23:26
|
|
jscolon2.0 posted:Now can I get Young Justice back? Not before I get The Tick back.
|
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2013 23:27
|
|
|
jscolon2.0 posted:Now can I get Young Justice back? Only if Green Lantern comes back too.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2013 23:29
|
|
|
YJ is too removed from the New 52 for them to consider it. The next series from DC will almost certainly be based off of new 52 designs and storylines. That's my guess.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2013 23:30
|
|
|
I kept hoping Beware the Bat would get better but it kept getting mired in its own bullshit. It had a lot of great ideas but did nothing with them. Even with Young Justice, I was quick to watch it from my DVR, with Beware the Bat, I seriously got backed up 3 or 4 episodes and begrudgingly decided to watch the other episodes. They're reasonable but they don't really go anywhere. MonsterEnvy is right though, CN has no idea what to do with DC. But on the other side, DC doesn't know what it wants either.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2013 23:32
|
|
|
RevKrule posted:I kept hoping Beware the Bat would get better but it kept getting mired in its own bullshit. It had a lot of great ideas but did nothing with them. Yeah I was going to say it is more that DC does not know what to do with itself anymore. DC is the one with all these weird rear end self imposed creative restrictions on itself.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2013 23:34
|
|
|
RevKrule posted:I kept hoping Beware the Bat would get better but it kept getting mired in its own bullshit. It had a lot of great ideas but did nothing with them. It was an interesting idea to use more obscure Batman villains. In theory, it'd be great to see fresh faces and not wonder what the newest redesign of the Joker is, but it wasn't a great effort on the show's part. Anarky was stupid chaos bullshit and nothing like his comic self, and Magpie was just Catwoman with the serial numbers filed off. Mainly, the art design kept me off. It was just too ugly for me to wade through the rest of the boring too. What about Agents of SMASH? Big Hulk fan but I haven't seen much of it.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2013 23:37
|
|
|
I have to give credit to Beware the Batman for focusing on more obscure villains rather than going for the safe and popular ones, but few of them were interesting. Either the show didn't do them justice, or they were obscure for a reason.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2013 23:43
|
|
|
Veotax posted:I have to give credit to Beware the Batman for focusing on more obscure villains rather than going for the safe and popular ones, but few of them were interesting. Either the show didn't do them justice, or they were obscure for a reason. Making Professor Pyg interesting would require TV-MA.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2013 23:54
|
|
|
I can't speak for the quality of the show since I haven't bothered to watch it after being turned off by previews, but remember that Cartoon Network has done incredibly stupid things with the release scheduling of pretty much every DC show they've had. Anybody else recall how the last few seasons of JL:U aired? This may not necessarily be a sign that it's cancelled or doing particularly poorly (I still wouldn't bet on it sticking around for long, though.)
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2013 00:06
|
|
|
Judgement posted:I can't speak for the quality of the show since I haven't bothered to watch it after being turned off by previews, but remember that Cartoon Network has done incredibly stupid things with the release scheduling of pretty much every DC show they've had. Anybody else recall how the last few seasons of JL:U aired? This may not necessarily be a sign that it's cancelled or doing particularly poorly (I still wouldn't bet on it sticking around for long, though.) Well, now that they're screwing around with the schedule the ratings are gonna drop and then they can cancel it and cite bad ratings, welp! Or it could be production issues I suppose. Young Justice was screwed around with a lot for instance, but they also had a lot of delays on their end too.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2013 00:08
|
|
|
Beware the Batman was absolute poo poo. Also gently caress DC/TW for not driving a dump truck full of cash to Conroy's house.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2013 00:08
|
|
|
Rhyno posted:Beware the Batman was absolute poo poo. That's the one smart thing they did with Beware. Kevin Conroy being Batman was great, but it's time to let go.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2013 00:14
|
|
|
I'm kind of surprised they didn't try to make a cartoon based on the Nolan films continuity. I know they had some animated shorts as a DVD extra or something, but sheesh, it just seems like the easiest possible money to me. You have any idea how many teens would have gobbled up a cartoon with the Heath Ledger version of the Joker?
|
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2013 00:17
|
|
|
MonsterEnvy posted:People liked the show. (me included) But CN has no idea what to do with DC. E: drat it beaten to it. I too wish Green Lantern TAS was still alive, so many good moments on that show.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2013 00:38
|
|
|
Lurdiak posted:I'm kind of surprised they didn't try to make a cartoon based on the Nolan films continuity. I know they had some animated shorts as a DVD extra or something, but sheesh, it just seems like the easiest possible money to me. You have any idea how many teens would have gobbled up a cartoon with the Heath Ledger version of the Joker? You can make a case that 'Under the Red Hood' Joker is the closest to an animated adaptation of Ledger's Joker. Unsurprisingly, that movie still is one of the best received (comercially and critically)
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2013 04:49
|
|
|
I got Under the Hood for free and I still thought it wasn't worth the money. I liked Ackles, though.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2013 05:59
|
|
|
Dan Didio posted:I got Under the Hood for free and I still thought it wasn't worth the money. I liked Ackles, though. Who's Ackles. Anyway I liked Under the Redhood. Black Mask was especially entertaining.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2013 12:51
|
|
|
MonsterEnvy posted:Who's Ackles. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3zCg3UL7s10 He's dreamy.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2013 16:02
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 03:46 |
|
|
The person who uploaded that video is a goddamn creepy my lord. Even calling herself married into ackles's Supernatural family. gently caress.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2013 16:44
|
|