|
A Winner is Jew posted:Now is this a dick measuring contest with or without the viagra he takes with him on caribbean sex tourism trips? He's a real capitalist CEO. He gets 8 kids to measure his dick for him for no pay.
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2013 20:33
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 03:36 |
|
|
A Winner is Jew posted:Now is this a dick measuring contest with or without the viagra he takes with him on caribbean sex tourism trips? It is both with Viagra and taint-to-tip.
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2013 20:35
|
|
|
Limbaugh's really been raging at Millenials the past month. One of my favorite current things is when he tells my generation how stupid we are and then segue into a LifeLock advertisement
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2013 20:51
|
|
|
"Millennials are stupid entitled idiot babies." "Why won't millennials vote for us?"
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2013 20:53
|
|
|
For once that's a valid question. Half of their entire base is made up of whiny entitled babies. Guess the problem is with the diagnosis. Or maybe that your policies disgust them across the board.
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2013 20:57
|
|
|
mr. mephistopheles posted:It is both with Viagra and taint-to-tip. I was gonna say, how hard are you leaning on the ruler to jam it into his abdomen?
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2013 21:08
|
|
|
mr. mephistopheles posted:"Millennials are stupid entitled idiot babies." I'm just amazed at how thickheaded they are about that age group. Greg Gutfield has been the one parroting that recently, and seemingly grouping everyone into the "Millenial" camp. Look, I don't have a problem if you're stating that some Adam Duritz dipshit with dreads, majoring in something fairly useless, and not "trying" is an rear end in a top hat. I'm sure everyone can agree with that. But he's the exception to the rule, and not in the majority. slightly unrelated but it's amazing how they'll twist something to fit their worldview., I swear on that "5" show they were claiming that the reason that "Duck Dynasty" had high ratings was because the family "prayed" together around the dinner table, and that Americans were searching for a way to view a normal american family. Rather than you..know, people wanting to yuck it up at the Antics of Rich White Trash.
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2013 21:17
|
|
|
FuzzySkinner posted:Look, I don't have a problem if you're stating that some Adam Duritz dipshit with dreads, majoring in something fairly useless, and not "trying" is an rear end in a top hat. I'm sure everyone can agree with that. I'm not sure what you mean by that. Can you clarify, please? I went to art school and majored in Illustration, which turned out to be largely "useless" in a practical sense but not entirely in an educational sense. I knew really good, smart, well meaning people with their heads screwed on straight that majored in theater, dance, pottery, music and what have you. Art school students who majored in Painting or Crafts were looked down upon by people majoring in Industrial Design, Graphic Design and, to some extent, Illustration, and often vice versa, where the kids majoring in more commercial and career oriented educations were looked down on by the "purists". Can you clarify "useless" for me? I'm not trying to be confrontational. I'm already aware my degree is useless in retrospect but the 'dipshit with dreads' comment struck me as weird and off-putting. Sort of like the stereotype of the OWS protesters.
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2013 21:40
|
|
|
mr. mephistopheles posted:"Millennials are stupid entitled idiot babies." Here's Rush back in May, Millennials simply haven't earned the right to be listened to by Republicans  . quote:I understand the desire and need for people of younger generations to be heard and acknowledged. I totally get that. But the truth is that it is up to you to be heard, up to you to get noticed, up to you to stand out. You are not entitled to be respected just because of your age. The only exception is the Seasoned Citizen population, which is the greatest collection of wisdom in the country (I don't expect you to believe that). You can demand to be respected, recognized, and listened to all day long, but understand that no one has any obligation to listen to you.
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2013 21:51
|
|
|
BiggerBoat posted:I'm not sure what you mean by that. Can you clarify, please? No, No, No, No. Not what I mean't at all. The Arts are very important in our society and provide quite a bit of beauty to our world. I too was a graphic arts major for a while, and switched when I found out it wasn't for me. Theatre, Ballet, etc. All are very important. Not what I mean't at all. I was saying there's a few degrees out there that are kind of narrow in focus, and kind of don't allow people much of an opportunity outside of attempting to be a College Professor (in which there's very few of those type of positions, because tenure).
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2013 22:12
|
|
|
Apparently every hack is making a children's book: http://www.dickmorris.com/a-perfect-christmas-gift-whats-it-like-to-be-president/quote:In What’s It Like To Be President, your child will learn:
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2013 22:39
|
|
|
MaxxBot posted:Here's Rush back in May, Millennials simply haven't earned the right to be listened to by Republicans *joins an OWS protest in order to be provocative and take action* *is beaten within an inch of life by cops* *cops are praised by Limbaugh and co. for dealing with non-genuine American appropriately and jokes are made about the potential benefit of another Kent State incident*
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2013 22:43
|
|
|
Phone posted:Apparently every hack is making a children's book: http://www.dickmorris.com/a-perfect-christmas-gift-whats-it-like-to-be-president/ quote:• What role lobbyists play in legislation I'd take that bet.
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2013 22:58
|
|
|
BiggerBoat posted:It means Democrats can appoint judges, committee members and pass the legislation that they were elected to do. Even legislation previously championed and advocated by the GOP. Basically, it means the majority elected government can function and write laws. This has reminded me of the end of the Joe Pesci character in Casino: "The word was out. The bosses had enough of Nicky. They had enough. How much were they going to take?" As some radio host pointed out this morning, the notable thing here was how suddenly it happened, without giving the GOP much advanced warning to engage in their specialty of ginning up their media machine for some epic long cable news talking head media war, the Great Filibuster Fight! Granted this has been an ongoing issue for years and has heated up in the last year or so since the GOP Senators basically pulled the football away from Harry Reid yet again after a gentleman's agreement, but I really wonder if the 3 straight blockages of DC Circuit nominees was really the last straw and suddenly put into motion a plan that had been drawn up a while ago.
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2013 23:24
|
|
|
Zwabu posted:This has reminded me of the end of the Joe Pesci character in Casino: Wouldn't surprise me if there was a deal made with the traditionalists in the senate where Reid put one last compromise in place but if they republicans went back on that then they had to vote to nuke em from orbit.
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2013 23:28
|
|
|
Zwabu posted:This has reminded me of the end of the Joe Pesci character in Casino: That's funny because Harry Reid was totally a character in Casino. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1KDmG4bxXY
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2013 23:34
|
|
|
FuzzySkinner posted:I was saying there's a few degrees out there that are kind of narrow in focus, and kind of don't allow people much of an opportunity outside of attempting to be a College Professor (in which there's very few of those type of positions, because tenure). So...Arts degrees then? Which degrees were you talking about specifically? Again, I'm not trying to pick on you or gently caress with you at all and you made it clear that I have you wrong, so no dram here. I'm just trying to understand your post. I assume you're speaking to things like Humanities and Philosophy degrees? Stuff like that? Can you define "worthless" and "narrow" for me so I can better understand your point and what you're driving at? What did you switch to and why? Thanks.
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2013 00:11
|
|
|
I know you all have been wondering just what noted racist columnist John Derbyshire has been up to since getting fired from his National Review gig, for, uh, being a racist, and not a very subtle one at that... Apparently he's been writing pieces for Vdare.com! Like this one, in which he uses a movie he hasn't seen as a starting point for making the case that slavery, the U.S. antebellum Southern version, wasn't all that bad:quote:Plainly there was more to American race slavery that white masters brutalizing resentful Negroes. How much more, though? What was slavery actually like?
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2013 00:34
|
|
|
BiggerBoat posted:So...Arts degrees then? Business degree. Mainly because I found that while I could use Photoshop very well, I wasn't very artistically inclined. Was trying to construct a very narrow straw man and I think I failed in regards to my point.
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2013 00:35
|
|
|
Zwabu posted:I know you all have been wondering just what noted racist columnist John Derbyshire has been up to since getting fired from his National Review gig, for, uh, being a racist, and not a very subtle one at that... Apparently he's been writing pieces for Vdare.com! Like this one, in which he uses a movie he hasn't seen as a starting point for making the case that slavery, the U.S. antebellum Southern version, wasn't all that bad: "You know... slavery and Communism ain't bad if you're at the top."
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2013 01:36
|
|
|
Zwabu posted:I know you all have been wondering just what noted racist columnist John Derbyshire has been up to since getting fired from his National Review gig, for, uh, being a racist, and not a very subtle one at that... Apparently he's been writing pieces for Vdare.com! Like this one, in which he uses a movie he hasn't seen as a starting point for making the case that slavery, the U.S. antebellum Southern version, wasn't all that bad: As an American historian specializing in antebellum studies, I actually started shouting as I read this. I have never seen someone so willfully misinterpret and cherrypick, ever, the scholarship they are reading. And I live in the ex-capitol of the Confederacy.
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2013 01:50
|
|
|
Zwabu posted:I know you all have been wondering just what noted racist columnist John Derbyshire has been up to since getting fired from his National Review gig, for, uh, being a racist, and not a very subtle one at that... Apparently he's been writing pieces for Vdare.com! Like this one, in which he uses a movie he hasn't seen as a starting point for making the case that slavery, the U.S. antebellum Southern version, wasn't all that bad: I can't think of many worse places to go if you're trying to prove how not racist you are than vdare. Maybe AmRen and Stormfront, but that's about it. FFS, go write at WND or some poo poo, at least they still pretend they're not open racists.
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2013 01:56
|
|
|
ReidRansom posted:I can't think of many worse places to go if you're trying to prove how not racist you are than vdare. Maybe AmRen and Stormfront, but that's about it. FFS, go write at WND or some poo poo, at least they still pretend they're not open racists. I don't know if vdare is Derbyshire's regular gig now but he's written more than one piece for them, all racist screeds. I don't think he's trying in any way to prove how NOT racist he is. He's going the other way, owning it and letting his (Confederate) freak flag fly.
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2013 02:00
|
|
|
Zwabu posted:I don't know if vdare is Derbyshire's regular gig now but he's written more than one piece for them, all racist screeds. Ah, well spot on then.
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2013 02:10
|
|
|
http://nationalreview.com/article/364579/history-knockout-alec-torres This is really loving racist. I know I should be shocked.
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2013 02:52
|
|
|
The outrage over "Knockout" is really absurd. Even if the game existed and was widespread, how could you possibly be more afraid of knockout than actually getting mugged? If the game has really been popular since the 1990s, there must be 10s of thousands of victims and only a handful are dead or seriously injured. There must be hundreds if not thousands of deaths where robbery was the motive in the same time period. If you're already someone who crosses the street when you see black youths headed your way, why would Knockout even be news to you? It reminds me of a couple of weeks ago when I got 7 emails in one day about that Cryptolocker malware like it was the worst virus ever. I would much rather have my computer immediately notify me that my hard drive has been encrypted for ransom than unknowingly be a zombie in a botnet or bitcoin mining network like most of the nasty malware does.
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2013 03:28
|
|
|
psychic chasms posted:http://nationalreview.com/article/364579/history-knockout-alec-torres Apparently every documented case of a black guy punching someone is now the knockout game. This just in:  Will Smith confirmed to have participated in knockout game 
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2013 03:48
|
|
|
wixard posted:The outrage over "Knockout" is really absurd. Even if the game existed and was widespread, how could you possibly be more afraid of knockout than actually getting mugged? If the game has really been popular since the 1990s, there must be 10s of thousands of victims and only a handful are dead or seriously injured. There must be hundreds if not thousands of deaths where robbery was the motive in the same time period. If you're already someone who crosses the street when you see black youths headed your way, why would Knockout even be news to you? I'm imagining that soon enough, I'm going to see random old white people on the street react like this whenever a black kid older than 7 walks by. e: Like, I'm really thinking there's going to be a stand your ground case where some old dude with a concealed pistol is going to be on trial for manslaughter, and people on the internet are gonna be like "it's a tragedy what happened to that young man, but what was the reason he walked up to that man so quickly? He had a bus schedule in his hand, but the shooter had a reasonable fear that the bus schedule could have been weighted with lead pellets, to use as a kind of 'cosh', or 'blackjack'. Dont laugh; It Happens. The game of 'Knock-Out' is real." woke wedding drone fucked around with this message at 04:20 on Nov 23, 2013 |
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2013 04:15
|
|
|
Zwabu posted:I know you all have been wondering just what noted racist columnist John Derbyshire has been up to since getting fired from his National Review gig, for, uh, being a racist, and not a very subtle one at that... Apparently he's been writing pieces for Vdare.com! Like this one, in which he uses a movie he hasn't seen as a starting point for making the case that slavery, the U.S. antebellum Southern version, wasn't all that bad: Looking forward to Richard Cohen citing this in his retraction of his "I guess slavery was bad after all" article.
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2013 05:50
|
|
|
The Australian media is currently freaking out about the same thing but it's white people doing it so it's blamed on isolated incidents of drunken violence instead of crazy racist poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2013 06:38
|
|
|
SedanChair posted:I'm imagining that soon enough, I'm going to see random old white people on the street react like this whenever a black kid older than 7 walks by. Somehow this post reminded of the Millwall Brick; a weapon soccer hooligans would make out of a newspaper.
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2013 07:06
|
|
|
I decided to tune into Glenn Beck's Blaze channel earlier today just to see what their "Real News" show was like, foolishly thinking it would be a momentarily objective respite from the rest of the Beckian horrors (I mean, "Real News," it's right in the name!  ). Instead what I found was a panel of people, including either a psychologist or social sciences professor, I forget which, literally putting the blame for the "epidemic" of the knockout game on LBJ's Great Society, liberalism generally, and, yes, wait for it, you know it's coming, Barack Obama. Their underlying apolitical point was that it was due to the absence of fathers and the disintegration of the family in African American communities, but they never failed to link that to liberals liberals liberals. Supposedly liberalism fosters not just family fragmentation but a lack of repercussions for harmful actions. It was an insane discussion.The reason they linked it to Obama was his justice department's opposition to "stop and frisk." Needless to say, I didn't stick around to watch the rest of the show.
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2013 07:40
|
|
|
Von Sloneker posted:The reason they linked it to Obama was his justice department's opposition to "stop and frisk." Needless to say, I didn't stick around to watch the rest of the show. Yes, if only the cops could search all black youths for hands that could be potentially balled into fists. But of course everyone else should be able to carry concealed guns without question.
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2013 07:57
|
|
|
Von Sloneker posted:Their underlying apolitical point was that it was due to the absence of fathers and the disintegration of the family in African American communities, but they never failed to link that to liberals liberals liberals. Supposedly liberalism fosters not just family fragmentation but a lack of repercussions for harmful actions. It was an insane discussion. Of course this is a hugely self-serving and distorted view of what happened and why, and they toss in everything including the kitchen sink, but it's not even necessary to elucidate with that generation when referencing the topic. It's baked in to their world view. EDIT: On a tangentially related note, if you didn't catch the little headline, Bernie Goetz was arrested the other day for selling drugs on the mean streets of New York. Irony: still dead. ReindeerF fucked around with this message at 08:12 on Nov 23, 2013 |
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2013 08:09
|
|
|
What's the best way to refute the conservative talking point that black people are kept in perpetual poverty by welfare? It's sometimes combined with: "Democrats supported slavery!" or "Planned Parenthood is committing black genocide!" which I know are easily refutable.
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2013 16:01
|
|
|
Giving people money makes them poor? Giving people money makes jobs vanish from the market? 
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2013 17:01
|
|
|
Eponymouse posted:What's the best way to refute the conservative talking point that black people are kept in perpetual poverty by welfare? It's sometimes combined with: "Democrats supported slavery!" or "Planned Parenthood is committing black genocide!" which I know are easily refutable. Paul Ryan.
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2013 17:42
|
|
|
Eponymouse posted:What's the best way to refute the conservative talking point that black people are kept in perpetual poverty by welfare? You can't collect TANF for more than 60 months and you have to be either working or educating yourself 30 hours a week in order to qualify for TANF benefits. Also, only 1/3rd of TANF recipients are Black. The rest are mostly White and Latino.
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2013 21:22
|
|
|
Eponymouse posted:What's the best way to refute the conservative talking point that black people are kept in perpetual poverty by welfare? It's sometimes combined with: "Democrats supported slavery!" or "Planned Parenthood is committing black genocide!" which I know are easily refutable. Well, let's imagine we took away that awful welfare. Since there's not an abundance of jobs available at this point, crime would increase. This would put huge pressure on local governments to come up with more money during a time of recession. Uh oh, looks like we created a new problem! Also, think about local businesses in those areas that take food stamps. Their revenue would drop drastically, forcing some of them to close down. Oh no, more inner city blight! More reasons for people to be angry, dispirited and less likely to bootstrap themselves out of poverty.
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2013 21:40
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 03:36 |
|
|
beatlegs posted:Well, let's imagine we took away that awful welfare. Since there's not an abundance of jobs available at this point, crime would increase. This would put huge pressure on local governments to come up with more money during a time of recession. Uh oh, looks like we created a new problem! Also, think about local businesses in those areas that take food stamps. Their revenue would drop drastically, forcing some of them to close down. Oh no, more inner city blight! More reasons for people to be angry, dispirited and less likely to bootstrap themselves out of poverty. If you feel like bending the truth a little, remind them that food riots are A Thing and played a part in the Arab Spring. Play up the fact that people who have literally nothing to lose, not even food off their table, are more than willing to commit crime. You know, crime that lands them in courts and jails, both of which are far more expensive than just handing out food stamps like candy.
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2013 21:54
|
|