|
Opopanax posted:Darkness would be a good movie to adapt in the 90s but I don't really see it taking off at this point. Honestly even the games felt very much like a product of the 90s. They were fun, and I could see doing more of an adaptation of the games working really well, but I'm also not sure I see the point. Did The Darkness 2 even do all that well? I mean, it was a blast but it seemed to just kind of come and go rather quietly.
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2013 03:43
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 2, 2024 17:44 |
|
|
Opopanax posted:Darkness would be a good movie to adapt in the 90s but I don't really see it taking off at this point.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2013 03:59
|
|
|
Opopanax posted:Darkness would be a good movie to adapt in the 90s but I don't really see it taking off at this point. My throat hurts watching him contort his voice into those growls and I've seen him done much more insane poo poo with his voice I mean just look up John Zorn's Moonchild "Litany IV" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XaP8EwBJyWA Man was not meant to do that with his voice  I'm actually surprised by how much voice acting Patton has done: he was the monsters in I am Legend, angry sphere in Portal, and L4D2 zombies
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2013 04:08
|
|
|
If they do make a The Darkness movie I'd hope they make it more like the game and less like the comic. The game really toned down a lot of the stupider stuff, like when Jackie first gains the Darkness he doesn't get a stupid costume.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2013 04:35
|
|
|
muscles like this? posted:If they do make a The Darkness movie I'd hope they make it more like the game and less like the comic. The game really toned down a lot of the stupider stuff, like when Jackie first gains the Darkness he doesn't get a stupid costume. I would be very surprised if they didn't stick more to the games, for that reason. A black trench coat's a way cheaper costume than whatever the hell he had in the comics. Hell, I wouldn't be shocked if they didn't get some wrestler-turned-actor to play Jackie too. That's probably about the emotional range they'd need for the role.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2013 05:30
|
|
|
Waterhaul posted:High def versions of the Amazing Spider-Man poster are starting to circle around which give a proper look at mechca-Rhino A bit late on this, but this poster looks great and if ASM2 literally was just Metal Gear Rising but Spider-Man, it would be movie of the year.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2013 06:19
|
|
|
There better me an ASM2 poster with him wearing the fire helmet. 
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2013 06:25
|
|
|
Can't wait for Electro to spend all his screen time screaming about Lorentz Force and the Left Hand Rule.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2013 06:27
|
|
|
You know, people are talking about Kaine and Miles separately, but I could see them being able to do Miles as the hoodie wearing Scarlet Spider without having to murder Peter. Miles gets inspired but doesn't have the craftiness of Peter, so he tosses something together with some knock-off web shooters.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2013 06:42
|
|
|
A Miles in original Ben Riley duds would be pretty great.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2013 06:45
|
|
|
Mr. Maltose posted:Can't wait for Electro to spend all his screen time screaming about Lorentz Force and the Left Hand Rule. Can't wait for Paul Giamatti to be referred to as Spidey's rhino shaped robot buddy.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2013 06:46
|
|
|
Sex_Ferguson posted:A bit late on this, but this poster looks great and if ASM2 literally was just Metal Gear Rising but Spider-Man, it would be movie of the year. "Gwen, turn off my Great Responsibility inhibitors" *maniacal cackling* "
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2013 08:34
|
|
|
Die Laughing posted:Pretty sure anything created in a Spider-Man title, or using the name Spider-Man is under Sony's umbrella. This deal's getting worse all the time.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2013 16:48
|
|
|
I still wonder what would be all the legal hoops and everything needed to get Spider-man into an Avengers movie. It sounds like Sony may be willing to play ball on that front. I admit I'm surely ignorant on most of it, but they have their own profitable films with him and if they allow use of just Peter and the costume for one film in exchange for, say, a percentage of the profits, that would be easy money for them, yes?
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2013 18:14
|
|
|
You have issues of versimillitude in that case however since Sony controls the Spideyverse. After spidey appears ok avengers, they could do things completely incongruous and at odds with the MCU's direction in their own future film, and Marvel is very protective of its continuity.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2013 18:35
|
|
|
Wonder Woman is Officially in Batman Vs. Superman, played by Gal Gadot http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/notyetamovie/news/?a=90953  quote:Warner Bros. has officially announced that Gal Gadot has landed ONE of the female leads in Zack Snyder's still untitled Batman vs. Superman themed sequel to Man Of Steel..and that role is indeed, Wonder Woman! We don't have a whole lot more on this for now, but here are some quotes from Snyder: “Wonder Woman is arguably one of the most powerful female characters of all time and a fan favorite in the DC Universe. Not only is Gal an amazing actress, but she also has that magical quality that makes her perfect for the role. We look forward to audiences discovering Gal in the first feature film incarnation of this beloved character.” Gadot is relatively inexperienced, having appeared as Gisele in some of the Fast & Furious movies as well as Knight & Day. She certainly looks the part anyway, but will she be able to do this massive role justice? Sound off below.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2013 19:20
|
|
|
Throw all your poo poo at a wall into it sticks style screenwriting, oh boy!
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2013 19:22
|
|
|
It would be easier to get James Bond in an Avengers movie. My impression is that Hollywood is such a petty, bitchy, and litigious place that 'just work together' is a pretty high bar. Plus, the sum of Avengers + Spider-Man is no greater than the whole of the parts.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2013 19:24
|
|
|
Maybe the movie will be 200 minutes long and this will all work!
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2013 19:24
|
|
|
What, was Kiera Knightly unavailable?
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2013 19:28
|
|
|
quote:She certainly looks the part anyway The face, yeah maybe. No, she does not look like she can beat up anyone.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2013 19:29
|
|
|
Hip-Hoptimus Rhyme posted:The face, yeah maybe. No, she does not look like she can beat up anyone. There goes my dream casting of Linda Hamilton circa 1991.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2013 19:33
|
|
|
Hip-Hoptimus Rhyme posted:The face, yeah maybe. No, she does not look like she can beat up anyone. To be fair it's not like any superhero film has ended up with an actor that you can legitimately believe might beat someone up. With the exception of maybe Hardy as Bane.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2013 19:34
|
|
|
Hip-Hoptimus Rhyme posted:The face, yeah maybe. No, she does not look like she can beat up anyone. She can bulk up as easily as Affleck or Cavill
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2013 19:35
|
|
|
Hopefully she will bulk up a bit for the movie, but I don't really disagree.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2013 19:36
|
|
|
Waterhaul posted:To be fair it's not like any superhero film has ended up with an actor that you can legitimately believe might beat someone up.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2013 19:44
|
|
|
I don't care if she bulks up or not. She's fine. I am curious how she's gonna be and what they're going to do.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2013 19:46
|
|
|
Gatts posted:I don't care if she bulks up or not. She's fine. I am curious how she's gonna be and what they're going to do. Fair enough, this is what really matters. The side-by-side pictures just made me realize that the actress has no muscles, and Wonder Woman, you know, does.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2013 19:49
|
|
|
I don't know whether she needs to bulk up, but she's going to look like a broomstick next to Henry Cavill.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2013 19:53
|
|
|
It's an unfair side by side. There's much more slender designs of Wonder Woman out there and pictures of Gal where she doesn't look like a runway model.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2013 19:55
|
|
|
Olibu posted:I still wonder what would be all the legal hoops and everything needed to get Spider-man into an Avengers movie. It sounds like Sony may be willing to play ball on that front. I admit I'm surely ignorant on most of it, but they have their own profitable films with him and if they allow use of just Peter and the costume for one film in exchange for, say, a percentage of the profits, that would be easy money for them, yes? It isn't anything legal, it is that Sony owns the rights and Sony likes making money. Spider-Man films are going to do well financially and it'd probably take several films that financially flop before Sony even considers negotiating away the movie rights to Spider-Man.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2013 20:17
|
|
|
Hip-Hoptimus Rhyme posted:The face, yeah maybe. No, she does not look like she can beat up anyone. She did spend two years in the Israel Defense Force so she probably could.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2013 20:21
|
|
|
Holy jesus christ the next Superman film is going to be a clusterfuck of epic proportions. They are not going to be able to introduce all the new characters and be able to focus on Superman and his cast. This seems like such a bad bad idea. They are going to need an amazing director and writer to do this right.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2013 20:27
|
|
|
notthegoatseguy posted:It isn't anything legal, it is that Sony owns the rights and Sony likes making money. Spider-Man films are going to do well financially and it'd probably take several films that financially flop before Sony even considers negotiating away the movie rights to Spider-Man. I know that. I'm saying a one-time deal where the character of Spider-man appears in one Marvel studios movie.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2013 20:28
|
|
|
Forget Spiderman himself, I want them to strike a deal so we can have J. Jonah Jameson in the MCU.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2013 20:33
|
|
|
Did we know that Flash was being added as well? Can't remember if that was already confirmed. http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/JoshWildingNewsAndReviews/news/?a=90959
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2013 20:33
|
|
|
redbackground posted:Did we know that Flash was being added as well? Can't remember if that was already confirmed. I do not think so since they are having the Flash tv show.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2013 20:35
|
|
|
bobkatt013 posted:Holy jesus christ the next Superman film is going to be a clusterfuck of epic proportions. They are not going to be able to introduce all the new characters and be able to focus on Superman and his cast. This seems like such a bad bad idea. They are going to need an amazing director and writer to do this right. Yeah I mean I want a Wonder Woman movie really bad but considering Man of Steel barely even delved into Superman's character in a span of 2.5 hours where he was the only featured superhero, this does not bode well.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2013 20:42
|
|
|
Uncle Boogeyman posted:Yeah I mean I want a Wonder Woman movie really bad but considering Man of Steel barely even delved into Superman's character in a span of 2.5 hours where he was the only featured superhero, this does not bode well. I also realized that they are going to hook up Superman and Wonder Woman and waste an amazing Lois Lane. It is going to turn into mostly a Batman and Wonder Woman movie and Superman and his cast will be an afterthought.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2013 20:44
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 2, 2024 17:44 |
|
|
bobkatt013 posted:They are going to need an amazing director and writer to do this right. 
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2013 20:50
|
|
