|
Not a lot of positive subject matter up here in the frozen north during the winter, as far as I'm concerned.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2013 23:11 |
|
|
# ? May 10, 2024 17:47 |
|
from my 2nd roll of doing portraits for the first time. 20131205-Scan-131204-0005 by Jordan_t_Brown, on Flickr 20131205-Scan-131204-0001 by Jordan_t_Brown, on Flickr Ziggy Smalls fucked around with this message at 00:52 on Dec 6, 2013 |
# ? Dec 6, 2013 00:42 |
|
What would be a good developing tank and reels to ask for for Christmas? Both 120 and 35mm. Any particular changing bag that's head and shoulders above the rest?
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 17:02 |
|
I like Paterson tanks. I used metal ones on occasion in high school and always remember hating them.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 17:24 |
|
Anyone that uses a Paterson Tank without one of these is a drat fool.http://www.freestylephoto.biz/100400-Paterson-Force-Film-Washer-Hose
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 17:56 |
|
I use Paterson tanks but definitely needed the Arista reel that has the wider flanges. The standard one is absolutely horrible and will devour and mangle a roll of 120.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 18:59 |
|
8th-snype posted:Anyone that uses a Paterson Tank without one of these is a drat fool.http://www.freestylephoto.biz/100400-Paterson-Force-Film-Washer-Hose I swear some of you guys are like stealth advertising agents for photography gear companies. i've thrown so much money down on recommendations from you guys dammit. *gets out credit card to buy film washing hose*
|
# ? Dec 7, 2013 01:02 |
|
pootiebigwang posted:I use Paterson tanks but definitely needed the Arista reel that has the wider flanges. The standard one is absolutely horrible and will devour and mangle a roll of 120. i have never understood this. i use the narrow flanged reels and i hate using the wide flanged ones. i feel like the only one.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2013 01:11 |
|
Another member of Team Narrow Flange here. (really doesn't sound right).
|
# ? Dec 7, 2013 03:08 |
|
Holistic Detective posted:Anyone tried developing HP5+ at 1600? I've got a roll I decided to shoot at 1600 but having loaded it into the tank and pulled out my bottle of Ilfosol 3 I've found that the Massive Dev Chart only has times for 200, 400, 800 and 3200. I'm assuming that somewhere midway between the 13.5 for 800 and the 24.5 for 3200 should be about right but it would be good to be certain. Finally got around to developing this. Because I'm a lazy cheapskate I decided to ignore most of the thread's advice and just push it using the Ilfosol 3 I have. Actually pretty pleased with how it came out: Stuck Leaf by Tim Breeze, on Flickr Granted, I've never tried pushing anything before so that might be a ludicrous amount of grain for film pushed to 1600. I'll post a few more once I've got them processed. edit: A few more Flower by Tim Breeze, on Flickr Fishmonger's Window by Tim Breeze, on Flickr Kitty! by Tim Breeze, on Flickr Not really sure what happened with this one: Hands by Tim Breeze, on Flickr Holistic Detective fucked around with this message at 18:08 on Dec 7, 2013 |
# ? Dec 7, 2013 13:40 |
Any good free/cheapware suggestions for scanning and processing into individual frames? Should I just use the HP software? I haven't gotten a Vx00 yet. Hoping to get one for xmas, but I have some stuff to scan before.
|
|
# ? Dec 8, 2013 06:56 |
|
Holistic Detective posted:Granted, I've never tried pushing anything before so that might be a ludicrous amount of grain for film pushed to 1600. no
|
# ? Dec 8, 2013 09:10 |
|
Sludge Tank posted:I swear some of you guys are like stealth advertising agents for photography gear companies. i've thrown so much money down on recommendations from you guys dammit. You're doing the right thing here. I have a slightly more expensive JOBO branded hose, but it does the same thing. It creates turbulence and then forces the water through the tank, thus it washes your film better and quicker than you ever could manually. Cuts wash time in half, too. Less drying spots, wastes less water. It's win squared!
|
# ? Dec 9, 2013 03:31 |
|
Tony Two Bapes posted:Not a lot of positive subject matter up here in the frozen north during the winter, as far as I'm concerned. If you don't know how to shoot in a Canadian winter, I don't know what's wrong with you. From a couple of years ago, I'm way behind on developing. I'm not claiming any greatness here, just competence at shooting film at sub-zero temperatures. Fuji Velvia 50 Late Winter-11 by Execudork, on Flickr Kodak Gold 200 3 023 by Execudork, on Flickr Fujicolor 100 1 012 by Execudork, on Flickr Minus 30 Commute (14 of 14) by Execudork, on Flickr
|
# ? Dec 9, 2013 03:45 |
|
how do you expose velvia in those conditions (ie: all white snow terrains)? do you leave it rated at 50
|
# ? Dec 9, 2013 03:48 |
|
Sludge Tank posted:how do you expose velvia in those conditions (ie: all white snow terrains)? do you leave it rated at 50 Meter the snow. Stop down ~3 stops if it is pure white. Hopefully, you'll not have anything too dark in the same photo. Alternative is portra at sunny 16.
|
# ? Dec 9, 2013 04:18 |
|
Ive just been reading a lot about velvia being rated at 40 or 32. Would it be safer to leave it at 50?
|
# ? Dec 9, 2013 05:01 |
|
I am so wary of pushing/pulling slide film as I've never got a decent result. Saying that, I've never shot Velvia 50 so I say go for it! Photography's all about trying weird stuff.
|
# ? Dec 9, 2013 12:17 |
|
Sludge Tank posted:Ive just been reading a lot about velvia being rated at 40 or 32. Would it be safer to leave it at 50? I've found that with my camera's metering rating velvia 1/3 under (both 50 and 100, so at 40 and 80) and doing standard development gives better results. Maybe do some experimentation with a roll and figure what works for you?
|
# ? Dec 9, 2013 13:47 |
|
I can't develop while I'm down south is all. I was just worried that rated slower it was going to overexpose especially in really intense all-white/bright high-UV conditions like this where the sun is not really a 'winter sun' and it's high & bright as all poo poo: TBOY1-s by Alex Gard, on Flickr
|
# ? Dec 9, 2013 19:15 |
I have a few rolls of some generic c-41 color film I've been meaning to get developed. I'm getting an Epson scanner in a month or so, so if I just want the film developed and the negatives back, is CVS or something similar safe enough?
|
|
# ? Dec 9, 2013 19:18 |
|
mr. stefan posted:I have a few rolls of some generic c-41 color film I've been meaning to get developed. I'm getting an Epson scanner in a month or so, so if I just want the film developed and the negatives back, is CVS or something similar safe enough? You're rolling the dice. It's a definite maybe. If you'd be mad if they messed up your negatives then I'd say no.
|
# ? Dec 9, 2013 19:20 |
ZippySLC posted:You're rolling the dice. It's a definite maybe. It's 90% random snapshots and street stuff I've taken around Philly whenever I'm up there for first Friday, so while I'd be a bit mad it's not as if I'd be blowing a paid gig or losing priceless shots.
|
|
# ? Dec 9, 2013 19:24 |
|
I'm getting ready to finally buy a scanner too. Is there anything else I might need along with it? Something to wipe down the negatives before scanning, or any other quality of life sort of accessories?
|
# ? Dec 9, 2013 19:27 |
|
Yeah, get some nice gloves for handling your negs, like the kind you see dudes at auctions wearing, a can of compressed air, one of those glasses cloths for the bed of the scanner and a film mask if one doesn't come with the scanner.
|
# ? Dec 9, 2013 19:42 |
|
Sludge Tank posted:I can't develop while I'm down south is all. I was just worried that rated slower it was going to overexpose especially in really intense all-white/bright high-UV conditions like this where the sun is not really a 'winter sun' and it's high & bright as all poo poo: So don't be an idiot and bring some film with latitude and use an incident meter. It's not like Velvia makes your snow look more like snow.
|
# ? Dec 9, 2013 20:19 |
|
Or just underexpose like you're supposed to when shooting slide films and also when you're shooting a subject that is either backlit or extremely bright or where the average reading isn't actually middle grey (i.e. snow or beaches). Slides are an additive process, when you blow the highlights they aren't pushed up onto the shoulder, they just go clear and they're gone. I've used Provia in snowy environments and it looks fine, you just can't treat it like negative film because the latitude is quite narrow. Paul MaudDib fucked around with this message at 21:01 on Dec 9, 2013 |
# ? Dec 9, 2013 20:45 |
|
Quantum of Phallus posted:Yeah, get some nice gloves for handling your negs, like the kind you see dudes at auctions wearing, a can of compressed air, one of those glasses cloths for the bed of the scanner and a film mask if one doesn't come with the scanner. or hold the edges of the film, blow on it, and wipe the dust off with a clean sock Sludge Tank posted:I can't develop while I'm down south is all. I was just worried that rated slower it was going to overexpose especially in really intense all-white/bright high-UV conditions like this where the sun is not really a 'winter sun' and it's high & bright as all poo poo: if I were you, I would try do not bring slide film to antarctica
|
# ? Dec 9, 2013 20:58 |
|
LOL shooting velvia in antarctica. Take something Not Slide Film
|
# ? Dec 9, 2013 23:16 |
|
Still getting used to the new scanner. Although it does mean I may never learn to judge a negative via loupe (Inverted 50mm) and lightbox (white screened tablet.) Cork8thDecember2013Working003 by mrendatious1, on Flickr AshleyHotelCork by mrendatious1, on Flickr Edited in a version of the first one without a colour cast. Mrenda fucked around with this message at 05:12 on Dec 10, 2013 |
# ? Dec 9, 2013 23:51 |
|
Velvia would be fine in Antarctica and so is minor overexposure.
|
# ? Dec 10, 2013 01:30 |
|
Sludge Tank posted:I can't develop while I'm down south is all. I was just worried that rated slower it was going to overexpose especially in really intense all-white/bright high-UV conditions like this where the sun is not really a 'winter sun' and it's high & bright as all poo poo: gently caress the haters. Shoot slide film all 24-hour-daylight day long. You're doing well, and I'm jealous you get to go and be bored at the bottom of the world.
|
# ? Dec 10, 2013 06:36 |
|
ExecuDork posted:gently caress the haters. Shoot slide film all 24-hour-daylight day long. You're doing well, and I'm jealous you get to go and be bored at the bottom of the world. haters do not exist. i am trying to maximize art. when art is ruined, we all weep.
|
# ? Dec 10, 2013 10:56 |
|
There's definitely a lot of weeping whenever you post, mang.
|
# ? Dec 10, 2013 14:50 |
|
Portra 800 may not be Portra 400, but it's still righteous yo!
|
# ? Dec 11, 2013 16:24 |
|
Sup filmgoons. Started seeing a lady who's into film and it prompted me to get into the attic and pull out my old Nikon FE. Bashed the dent out of the floorplate which was causing the film advance to stick and loaded up some Delta 3200 because it's dark when I'm not at work and theres all the christmas nightlife going on. (Mostly) straightened floor plate. Think I did this falling down a mountain in Andorra when I was skiing. Grabbed a developing tank and some chemicals from my old dark room kit too. I think most of them are expired by at least a year. Am I going to get crazy results?
|
# ? Dec 12, 2013 22:10 |
|
I shot some portraits of a friend and her parrots on 4x5.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2013 14:10 |
|
Awww so cute. What kind of parrots are those?
|
# ? Dec 22, 2013 00:08 |
|
maxmars posted:Awww so cute. Quaker parrots.
|
# ? Dec 22, 2013 05:22 |
|
|
# ? May 10, 2024 17:47 |
|
Seeing as the wet printing thread has fallen into the ether, I'll post these here. I'm starting to get into some alt printing processes, and these are the first few I've made using the Argyrotype process: They're made using some Foma 100 4x5 negs contact printed with a cheap photo frame and some sunlight. I'm hoping to get into salt printing with wet plate negs, but I'll need to work up to that.
|
# ? Dec 22, 2013 07:30 |