Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Grand Prize Winner
Feb 19, 2007


I am a racist and:

fade5 posted:


I'm guessing almost every single kid you'd ask would call these two guys "Santa".

One on the left, yeah. I'm not so sure about the Santa on the right. Either give him the traditional Santa clothes and the sombrero or the Manta hat and the serape.


edit: oh crap, this post sounds vaguely racist. italics added to clarify.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Grand Theft Autobot
Feb 28, 2008

I'm something of a fucking idiot myself

Atlas Hugged posted:

Is "natural born citizen" actually an unsettled bit of constitutional law? I always took it to mean you had to be born in a US territory.

It's just a fancy way of saying "white"

eggyolk
Nov 8, 2007


And of course it should be clarified that the term "white" really just means "one of the good ones."

JediTalentAgent
Jun 5, 2005
Hey, look. Look, if- if you screw me on this, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine, you rat bastard!

The_Rob posted:

It just baffles me that the Highest rated news channel is a white supremacy channel.


There's a bit from the documentary, "Blood in the Face" where they've got a meeting from various white separatist spokesmen and one of them discusses about how they'll never get their own channel on TV, but to get the message out they're to use a tactic of exchanging their video tapes between themselves to share with friends and family to bring them on board.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a844g6dz_x0
(8m10s mark)


There's one thing in all that that gives me the chills, and that's the guy who is giving the advice on bringing your friends into it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYg_9U1_9oE
(50 second mark)

ErIog
Jul 11, 2001

:nsacloud:
Thanks to whoever linked the Jamie Johnson wealth documentaries. I'm surprised I hadn't seen them or heard of him before, but I just spent the morning riveted by both. I'll link both again since I think the second one wasn't linked.

Born Rich:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xhuSxyHWRw

The One Percent
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmlX3fLQrEc

pentyne posted:

The guy who created the documentary, Jamie Johnson, is the only person who in either of his films manages to come across as someone genuinely bothered by his wealth and confused as how to deal with it. He talks about how his 18th birthday was spent with him signing massive amounts of legal documents, drawing up a will, forming trusts and various accounts, etc. He ended up giving up on school and worked on an oil rig for 6 months before going back to resuming his wealthy life.

The follow-up, The One Percent, he interviews a lot more and actually landed one of Milton Friedman's last interviews, though Friedman dismissed everything Johnson said and then accused him of advocating socialism and stormed out. Johnson really isn't the most eloquent or intelligent film-maker, but no one else really had the personal connections or prestige to get a hold of most of those billionaire heirs/heiress and get them on camera revealing how they really feel about their wealth.

The Condé-Nast guy didn't seem so insane, and seemed to be pretty reasonable. It also made me like Ivanka Trump more than I did before. It's really easy to just look at her on The Apprentice, and not really think about the trauma she's been through in terms of having Donald Trump as her father. The cardinal sin of that doc is just that most everyone in it is so young that it's hard to get a read on what pieces of them being a lovely human being would persist and which they'd grow out of.

In the second doc, the interview with Friedman was really good even if Jamie is in over his head in terms of economics. It really exposes Friedman as a useful Yes-man for the rich when he calls returning to a more progressive tax structure socialism.

The thing that surprised me was what a dick Warren Buffett turned out to be. There's been some anti-Buffett posts here and there in D&D recently, and those + the second Jamie Johnson doc definitely made me rethink how I feel about him and the Gates Foundation. Instead of seeming like an ultra-progressive, it seems to me like Buffett is just one of the rare guys who actually believes in some of the bootstraps social theory without exempting himself or his family. It seems like the most important thing for him is not ultimately where his money goes, but that he doesn't want his kids to be soft. I sympathize with that considering how hosed up the people were in Born Rich, but it was real crazy to see his granddaughter disowned for practicing what he was ultimately preaching.

Hilarious side note, rich people sure get uncomfortable when you start talking about money in any sense other than them getting to keep what they inherited. It's hilarious.

WoodrowSkillson
Feb 24, 2005

*Gestures at 60 years of Lions history*

fade5 posted:

On the white Jesus part, the first thing that popped into my mind was Huey Freeman:

:allears: The Boondocks is the best show.

I have never understood the black jesus thing, he was an arabic looking dude from the middle east.

Thomas13206
Jun 18, 2013
Do you understand the white Jesus thing?

Mantis42
Jul 26, 2010

Maybe Jesus can be another color?

Acquilae
May 15, 2013

pd187 posted:

Do you understand the white Jesus thing?
One of the things that made Christianity take off so fast and prosper is that Jesus can be whatever you want him to be :allears:

Zeroisanumber
Oct 23, 2010

Nap Ghost

ErIog posted:

The thing that surprised me was what a dick Warren Buffett turned out to be. There's been some anti-Buffett posts here and there in D&D recently, and those + the second Jamie Johnson doc definitely made me rethink how I feel about him and the Gates Foundation. Instead of seeming like an ultra-progressive, it seems to me like Buffett is just one of the rare guys who actually believes in some of the bootstraps social theory without exempting himself or his family. It seems like the most important thing for him is not ultimately where his money goes, but that he doesn't want his kids to be soft. I sympathize with that considering how hosed up the people were in Born Rich, but it was real crazy to see his granddaughter disowned for practicing what he was ultimately preaching.

My brother-in-law is very rich, mostly from working connections that he has in the oil states of Africa and the ME as well as the government of India. He and my sister have three kids now and even though they're very young he spends a lot of time worrying that they'll turn out as bad as some of the children of the people that he knows and works with. I pointed to Buffett as an example of what he might want to consider doing, telling his kids that he'll provide for and help them get into any field that they want to, but that they shouldn't expect an inheritance. He hasn't said what he's planning, but his kids are a pair of newborns and a three year old, and he's still in "conquer the world" mode, so he probably hasn't made a lot of concrete plans.

mr. mephistopheles
Dec 2, 2009

Zeroisanumber posted:

My brother-in-law is very rich, mostly from working connections that he has in the oil states of Africa and the ME as well as the government of India. He and my sister have three kids now and even though they're very young he spends a lot of time worrying that they'll turn out as bad as some of the children of the people that he knows and works with. I pointed to Buffett as an example of what he might want to consider doing, telling his kids that he'll provide for and help them get into any field that they want to, but that they shouldn't expect an inheritance. He hasn't said what he's planning, but his kids are a pair of newborns and a three year old, and he's still in "conquer the world" mode, so he probably hasn't made a lot of concrete plans.

Well, a big problem with the kids in that movie seemed to be that their parents kept them completely isolated from the "common folk" and it warped their idea of what normal is and how to properly behave and treat other people. I don't think the kids were necessarily spoiled by being handed all the money they could ever need, but rather the way in which they were raised. Buffett is the kind of man who doesn't believe he is better than anyone because of his wealth, and so his children didn't grow up believing that either. I think his reaction to the Johnson documentary had more to do with what he felt was his privacy being invaded than anything else.

My mom's dirt poor giant Catholic family went to a normal, public high school with Warren Buffett's kids, and from everything I've heard they were all-around good people. My uncle was actually really good friends with his daughter Susie and would go over to their house all the time and she even came to his funeral.

The money thing is a factor, but I think it's more the environment they grow up in and the moral lessons they are taught that shape who they are as people.

E: Another anecdote. I worked at Nebraska Furniture Mart for years, a company that is owned by Buffett's company Berkshire Hathaway, and I once personally loaded a desk chair into the back of his wife's several year old Ford Explorer. I don't know what he drove but I recall hearing it was some relatively modest Cadillac. They are not the kind of people who let their wealth affect their values.

mr. mephistopheles fucked around with this message at 10:27 on Dec 15, 2013

max4me
Jun 15, 2003

by FactsAreUseless

Guilty Spork posted:

Admittedly I only saw the clips as they were presented on the Daily Show and Colbert Report, but Kelly came off as extremely serious and non-jokey when she said that. If she did in fact mean it as a joke, as far as I can tell she managed a wholly un-joke-like delivery, to a degree that would be hard to manage on purpose.

I can see how it happened. You have to get people emotionally engaged. So every year you do the war on christmas, and every year you have to make it bigger you have to be bigger cause you competing with people in your own organization, who might shout louder than you.

This was in response to something a black woman wrote about how she felt left out growing up cause all the major figures are white.

So you have war on christmas + race issues, remember the knock out game was just being pushed.

So you get angry to get your viewers angry and you tell them your drawing the line cause not compromising is a sign of character and STATE JESUS AND SANTA ARE WHITE.

which I think is stupid. I think O riley would have calmly and smoothy bent issue alot better.

The race angle could be played as

"I really feel for this woman and agree that the African American Community does have a problem. They have a lack of good role models for children to look up to. blah blah. I think its wrong to blame Santa for it blah blah"

In fact I am amazed she back peddled I thought the whole point of her being combative is draw the line the sand and defend christmas. Baiting people to call you out on it would be great way to validate the narrative that your under attack

Rexicon1
Oct 9, 2007

A Shameful Path Led You Here

max4me posted:

I can see how it happened. You have to get people emotionally engaged. So every year you do the war on christmas, and every year you have to make it bigger you have to be bigger cause you competing with people in your own organization, who might shout louder than you.

This was in response to something a black woman wrote about how she felt left out growing up cause all the major figures are white.

So you have war on christmas + race issues, remember the knock out game was just being pushed.

So you get angry to get your viewers angry and you tell them your drawing the line cause not compromising is a sign of character and STATE JESUS AND SANTA ARE WHITE.

which I think is stupid. I think O riley would have calmly and smoothy bent issue alot better.

The race angle could be played as

"I really feel for this woman and agree that the African American Community does have a problem. They have a lack of good role models for children to look up to. blah blah. I think its wrong to blame Santa for it blah blah"

In fact I am amazed she back peddled I thought the whole point of her being combative is draw the line the sand and defend christmas. Baiting people to call you out on it would be great way to validate the narrative that your under attack

Give Kelly a chance, she's only recently been wading around the kiddie pool off punditry. She'll find the right balance of ignorance and arrogance that made stars of hannity and oriley

My Q-Face
Jul 8, 2002

A dumb racist who need to kill themselves

pentyne posted:

He ended up giving up on school and worked on an oil rig for 6 months before going back to resuming his wealthy life.

That was the Vanderbilt-Whitney kid, and it was two years in oil fields in Texas. He was still somewhat vacuous, and yeah, he went back to his wealthy life afterwards, but he was the most sympathetic and self-aware of the group.

Rexicon1
Oct 9, 2007

A Shameful Path Led You Here

My Q-Face posted:

That was the Vanderbilt-Whitney kid, and it was two years in oil fields in Texas. He was still somewhat vacuous, and yeah, he went back to his wealthy life afterwards, but he was the most sympathetic and self-aware of the group.

I watched that video, and as someone who married into wealth through my mother, all those kids are shitheads and I recognize each of those kids from the brief time I spent with my mother and her husbands friends' kids. They are mentally and socially deranged and for the most part, solidify into huge dickbags after they go through their "liberal youth" where they question if it's fair that they get infinite resources and pleasure at the expense of others.

e: gahh I just dredged up memories of going out to dinner with some of these cretins and basically being so loving embarrassed at the way they treated "the help". I'm pissing bile out of my eyes thinking about them.

e: also if another multiple mansion owner tells me that some working class guy is "richer than he is" because of his huge debt, I'm going to erupt into flames.

Rexicon1 fucked around with this message at 15:22 on Dec 15, 2013

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

Rexicon1 posted:

Give Kelly a chance, she's only recently been wading around the kiddie pool off punditry. She'll find the right balance of ignorance and arrogance that made stars of hannity and oriley

Hasn't she had a show there forever, but just the evening show is the new one?

She knew what she was saying, there's not a ton of ways you can think you'll be taken when you say 'santa is what he is, white, and Jesus was a white man too'. Like, that's an objective statement of what you believe.

Nonsense
Jan 26, 2007

Tatum Girlparts posted:

Hasn't she had a show there forever, but just the evening show is the new one?

She knew what she was saying, there's not a ton of ways you can think you'll be taken when you say 'santa is what he is, white, and Jesus was a white man too'. Like, that's an objective statement of what you believe.

Reddit's top voted comment, on this story cited a bunch of wikipedia links and biotruths to prove her correct.

Rexicon1
Oct 9, 2007

A Shameful Path Led You Here
:biotruths:

Hieronymous Alloy
Jan 30, 2009


Why! Why!! Why must you refuse to accept that Dr. Hieronymous Alloy's Genetically Enhanced Cream Corn Is Superior to the Leading Brand on the Market!?!




Morbid Hound

max4me posted:

I can see how it happened. You have to get people emotionally engaged. So every year you do the war on christmas, and every year you have to make it bigger you have to be bigger cause you competing with people in your own organization, who might shout louder than you.

This was in response to something a black woman wrote about how she felt left out growing up cause all the major figures are white.

So you have war on christmas + race issues, remember the knock out game was just being pushed.

So you get angry to get your viewers angry and you tell them your drawing the line cause not compromising is a sign of character and STATE JESUS AND SANTA ARE WHITE.

which I think is stupid. I think O riley would have calmly and smoothy bent issue alot better.

The race angle could be played as

"I really feel for this woman and agree that the African American Community does have a problem. They have a lack of good role models for children to look up to. blah blah. I think its wrong to blame Santa for it blah blah"

In fact I am amazed she back peddled I thought the whole point of her being combative is draw the line the sand and defend christmas. Baiting people to call you out on it would be great way to validate the narrative that your under attack

She backpedaled because the whole schtick at Fox is plausibly deniable racism, and saying "Jesus and Santa are white, kids, just deal with it" isn't plausibly deniable, it's just plain old racist.

Dr.Zeppelin
Dec 5, 2003

Hieronymous Alloy posted:

She backpedaled because the whole schtick at Fox is plausibly deniable racism, and saying "Jesus and Santa are white, kids, just deal with it" isn't plausibly deniable, it's just plain old racist.

How is that racist? Sounds like liberals are the real racists for thinking it's better to be one race than another :smug:

My Q-Face
Jul 8, 2002

A dumb racist who need to kill themselves

Rexicon1 posted:

I watched that video, and as someone who married into wealth through my mother, all those kids are shitheads and I recognize each of those kids from the brief time I spent with my mother and her husbands friends' kids. They are mentally and socially deranged and for the most part, solidify into huge dickbags after they go through their "liberal youth" where they question if it's fair that they get infinite resources and pleasure at the expense of others.

I didn't mean to suggest he wasn't a shithead, just that he came off as less of one than the rest of them did.

quote:

e: also if another multiple mansion owner tells me that some working class guy is "richer than he is" because of his huge debt, I'm going to erupt into flames.

Yeah, I just watched "The One Percent", interesting that his father took a stand against Apartheid, however long ago it was, and it seems he's genuinely concerned with the wealth gap and lack of social support for the neediest, but then he has that guy near the end talking about how rich he is on the inside. Seriously, some of the looks he gave when he got the reaction or the line he wanted from his interview subjects were just so :smug:

max4me
Jun 15, 2003

by FactsAreUseless

Dr.Zeppelin posted:

How is that racist? Sounds like liberals are the real racists for thinking it's better to be one race than another :smug:

I think its bad that I see a million ways to say what she said and not sound like poo poo heel.

You lead into by explain what the lady was talking about regarding lack of black Christmas characters. You use this to insult the black community. You explain that the true meaning of christmas is about Christianity and you cant make Jesus black cause he was white. (though I think he is black in the Caribbean)

The beloved tradition of the fictional character of santa clause well you cant just make him black he is white as well, thought its a shame the lack of inclusive black Christmas characters, this is still part of the war on christmas. Oh why cant the black community have the good role models and leaders it needs. But cant they admit this with out being so racist. Why do they need a role model that has a certain skin color blah blah. honestly this poo poo writes itself

Once the backlash start just say your critics are the real racists rise and repeat.

Alkydere
Jun 7, 2010
Capitol: A building or complex of buildings in which any legislature meets.
Capital: A city designated as a legislative seat by the government or some other authority, often the city in which the government is located; otherwise the most important city within a country or a subdivision of it.



Zeroisanumber posted:

My brother-in-law is very rich, mostly from working connections that he has in the oil states of Africa and the ME as well as the government of India. He and my sister have three kids now and even though they're very young he spends a lot of time worrying that they'll turn out as bad as some of the children of the people that he knows and works with. I pointed to Buffett as an example of what he might want to consider doing, telling his kids that he'll provide for and help them get into any field that they want to, but that they shouldn't expect an inheritance. He hasn't said what he's planning, but his kids are a pair of newborns and a three year old, and he's still in "conquer the world" mode, so he probably hasn't made a lot of concrete plans.

Tell the guy to just send them to public school. Ideally one that isn't the public school in the richest part of town.

Honestly, it's not so much that having rich parents leads to shithead kids, its the social environment they grow up in. If they grow up in a toxic environment, such as a private school full of kids who's parents are constantly playing golden dick-waving games at the local country club or looking down on the poor, chances are the kid will grow up to be a toxic shithead. If a kid grows up around other kids his age from a relatively wide variety of social/economic situations, he's gonna end up being more well balanced and less of a toxic shithead.

CommieGIR
Aug 22, 2006

The blue glow is a feature, not a bug


Pillbug

beatlegs posted:

She's FOX's brightest star.

...and may I say, America's sexiest journalist



I see this and all I can think of is Basic Instict

:stare: She is going to kill us!


max4me posted:

I think its bad that I see a million ways to say what she said and not sound like poo poo heel.

You lead into by explain what the lady was talking about regarding lack of black Christmas characters. You use this to insult the black community. You explain that the true meaning of christmas is about Christianity and you cant make Jesus black cause he was white. (though I think he is black in the Caribbean)

The beloved tradition of the fictional character of santa clause well you cant just make him black he is white as well, thought its a shame the lack of inclusive black Christmas characters, this is still part of the war on christmas. Oh why cant the black community have the good role models and leaders it needs. But cant they admit this with out being so racist. Why do they need a role model that has a certain skin color blah blah. honestly this poo poo writes itself

Once the backlash start just say your critics are the real racists rise and repeat.

I had a friend literally say it was just 'leftists misinterpreting what she said'.

:doh:

pentyne
Nov 7, 2012

Alkydere posted:

Tell the guy to just send them to public school. Ideally one that isn't the public school in the richest part of town.

Honestly, it's not so much that having rich parents leads to shithead kids, its the social environment they grow up in. If they grow up in a toxic environment, such as a private school full of kids who's parents are constantly playing golden dick-waving games at the local country club or looking down on the poor, chances are the kid will grow up to be a toxic shithead. If a kid grows up around other kids his age from a relatively wide variety of social/economic situations, he's gonna end up being more well balanced and less of a toxic shithead.

There are plenty of high performing public schools, and public 'magnet' schools, that are generally better then any private schools. Private schools are generally either expensive boarding schools for children of elites to rub noses, or catholic schools that have varying levels of quality.

"Waiting for Superman" was a b.s fake film that argued that private schools were inherently superior to public schools when every study ever conducted has found that at best they are equal but most likely worse given they don't have to follow the same laws as public schools.

FMguru
Sep 10, 2003

peed on;
sexually

Remulak posted:

My understanding is that most of Trump's failed businesses only lose other investor's money.
All signs point to Trump being near-broke, or to have debts in excess of his assets and living on credit. That's why he shills so hard for his reality show and his books and his speaking engagements - actual rich people don't have to work that hard or chase down stray dollar bills like he does. His other source of income is lending out his name and brand to other development projects. If you're building a new golf course or luxury condo block, you can hire Trump to be the public face and brand of it for a suprisingly affordable fee.

And all that explains why he's running a crazy, trolling twitter account, pandering to the lowest common denominator, and fake-running for President - because it gets his name in the news, and creates the illusion that he matters and that he's a mover and shaker and not some has-been eighties leftover, which is absolutely essential to him if he's going to keep paying his bills.

Dr.Zeppelin
Dec 5, 2003

CommieGIR posted:

I had a friend literally say it was just 'leftists misinterpreting what she said'.

:doh:

It should be a rule that when someone claims that someone was taken out of context, they should be forced to explain what the correct context was actually supposed to be.

Beowulfs_Ghost
Nov 6, 2009

pentyne posted:

"Waiting for Superman" was a b.s fake film that argued that private schools were inherently superior to public schools when every study ever conducted has found that at best they are equal but most likely worse given they don't have to follow the same laws as public schools.

And if private schools do rate better, it is because they have the freedom to just expel under-performing students for any reason at all.

And I would be very surprised is all private schools averaged out equal to public schools given that the vast majority of private schools are hooked to churches as an income source and sold to parents based on the things they won't teach (evolution, sex ed, etc).

pentyne
Nov 7, 2012

Beowulfs_Ghost posted:

And if private schools do rate better, it is because they have the freedom to just expel under-performing students for any reason at all.

And I would be very surprised is all private schools averaged out equal to public schools given that the vast majority of private schools are hooked to churches as an income source and sold to parents based on the things they won't teach (evolution, sex ed, etc).

The top performing catholic schools are some of the best in the country, but the rest are just poorly managed institutions and exploit the poo poo out of teachers, pay terrible wages, and expel students come standardized testing time and overall offer much less then any public school can.

The conservative fetish for breaking teacher's unions and demonizing public schools is astounding until you realize that the US public school system is the only thing allowing countless disadvantaged children (especially minorities) the chance to get an education.

socialsecurity
Aug 30, 2003

The best private/charter school stories are the ones where they shut down overnight and all the students are screwed for that schoolyear. A wonderful lesson in the Free Market.

beatlegs
Mar 11, 2001

Maybe the problem conservatives have with dark-skinned Jesus is they would have to admit that either a) God is dark skinned (cause he's J's dad) or b) God chose a dark-skinned woman over a white woman to have his baby.

These are the stupid arguments you get into when taking myths & fables literally.

Beowulfs_Ghost
Nov 6, 2009

pentyne posted:

The top performing catholic schools are some of the best in the country, but the rest are just poorly managed institutions and exploit the poo poo out of teachers, pay terrible wages, and expel students come standardized testing time and overall offer much less then any public school can.

The conservative fetish for breaking teacher's unions and demonizing public schools is astounding until you realize that the US public school system is the only thing allowing countless disadvantaged children (especially minorities) the chance to get an education.

For every Notre Dame of private primary schools, there are dozens Liberty/Bob Jones University analogs :smith:

nm
Jan 28, 2008

"I saw Minos the Space Judge holding a golden sceptre and passing sentence upon the Martians. There he presided, and around him the noble Space Prosecutors sought the firm justice of space law."

Beowulfs_Ghost posted:

And if private schools do rate better, it is because they have the freedom to just expel under-performing students for any reason at all.

And I would be very surprised is all private schools averaged out equal to public schools given that the vast majority of private schools are hooked to churches as an income source and sold to parents based on the things they won't teach (evolution, sex ed, etc).

The other problem with charter/private schools is that they are self-selecting. It takes a certain level of knowledge and effort to get your child enrolled in these schools v. public school. The children from horribly poor, uneducated households are much less likely to enroll in these schools. The charter school kids are the ones whose parents will take an active interest in their education and make sure they do homework and such. They're also more likely to have sent their kids to preschool, read to them, and more likely to foster reading and study habits.

ShortStack
Jan 16, 2006

tinystax
Full Sail Primary School

nm
Jan 28, 2008

"I saw Minos the Space Judge holding a golden sceptre and passing sentence upon the Martians. There he presided, and around him the noble Space Prosecutors sought the firm justice of space law."

ShortStack posted:

Full Sail Primary School

University of Phoenix K-"MBA"
No credit check student loans!
(Please don't check our accreditation).

Ocean Book
Sep 27, 2010

:yum: - hi

Nonsense posted:

Reddit's top voted comment, on this story cited a bunch of wikipedia links and biotruths to prove her correct.

Can you link to this?

Babylon Astronaut
Apr 19, 2012

nm posted:

The other problem with charter/private schools is that they are self-selecting. It takes a certain level of knowledge and effort to get your child enrolled in these schools v. public school. The children from horribly poor, uneducated households are much less likely to enroll in these schools. The charter school kids are the ones whose parents will take an active interest in their education and make sure they do homework and such. They're also more likely to have sent their kids to preschool, read to them, and more likely to foster reading and study habits.
The other other problem is they are not compelled to accept children with disabilities. So they will always be able to "out compete" with public schools that are required to make accommodations for disabled students.

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

quote:

Francis said many places in the world were seeing a "serious rise" in inequality between people living side by side.

He attacked the "widening gap between those who have more and those who must be content with the crumbs", calling on governments to implement "effective policies" to guarantee people's fundamental rights, including access to capital, services, educational resources, healthcare and technology.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/12/12/us-pope-economy-idUSBRE9BB0EH20131212?feedType=RSS&feedName=worldNews

This dude's gonna be the first Pope in history to get ex-communicated if he doesn't shut up.

Armyman25
Sep 6, 2005

Mr Interweb posted:

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/12/12/us-pope-economy-idUSBRE9BB0EH20131212?feedType=RSS&feedName=worldNews

This dude's gonna be the first Pope in history to get ex-communicated if he doesn't shut up.

The Roman and Orthodox Churches excommunicated each other in 1054.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East-West_Schism

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

Armyman25 posted:

The Roman and Orthodox Churches excommunicated each other in 1054.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East-West_Schism

That wasn't supposed to be an actual question! :mad:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply