|
Perhaps we could compile a list of ideologically correct junk foods? I need a verdict on whether these carne asada fries are authentic enough!
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2013 11:32
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 03:33 |
|
|
Vivian Darkbloom posted:Perhaps we could compile a list of ideologically correct junk foods? I need a verdict on whether these carne asada fries are authentic enough! There's a pretty decent percentage of restaurants and food processing plants that have semi legal immigrant labor and shady labor practices. It's better to just not eat.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2013 11:36
|
|
|
Shbobdb posted:"Nah man, my daddy totally eats good food too!" Quit tripping, you already admitted that you freaked out without reading his posts.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2013 16:24
|
|
|
I'm waiting at a car dealership and they're playing Fox News. Some middle aged guy in a visor profusely thanked the clerk for saying "merry Christmas." I feel like I'm in hell.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2013 16:31
|
|
FuzzySkinner posted:I wish there were more figures within churches across the country that would be willing to stand up against people like Phil Robertson and his supporters. This article is along those lines. http://intheparlor.wordpress.com/2013/12/19/what-you-believe-about-homosexuality-doesnt-matter/
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2013 16:34
|
|
|
Shbobdb posted:"Nah man, my daddy totally eats good food too!" Is this the part where you tell us how your dad is totally cooler than his dad?
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2013 18:00
|
|
|
My dad isn't a member of the petit bourgeoisie, capitalosers 
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2013 18:16
|
|
|
PUGGERNAUT posted:I'm waiting at a car dealership and they're playing Fox News. Some middle aged guy in a visor profusely thanked the clerk for saying "merry Christmas." I feel like I'm in hell. When I used to feel that way I would play any old Hour of Slack episode in the car. (Or Firesign Theatre.) They're free to download, although gratuities are always appreciated. I've been away from the big city for five years now and I guess I've gotten less thin-skinned or something, but I just don't seem to notice the teabagger talk no mo'. And instead of stealing all the "Remember Benghazi!" signs along the highway, I just laugh at what an rear end somebody has made of himself, and paid a sign company to be able to do it too. Odelay, odelay.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2013 18:31
|
|
|
Wolfsheim posted:I'm not siding with Shbobdb or anything because he's being kind of an rear end in a top hat about it, but you can definitely get sick from eating McDonald's? Maybe it's just because I live in godless Portland but due to the availability of so many other, better options I only eat at fast food chains anywhere between weeks and months apart. I noticed if I go too long my body will actively reject that poo poo, and I can actually become somewhat nauseous when eating it. The point is that when traveling and unfamiliar with what local places are awesome and what local places are a week away from being shut down by the Board of Health its usually a safe bet to go with places like Cracker Barrel or McDonalds. And sure, there's food on those menus that could make you regret eating but there's also probably plain, milquetoast items that if you eat in moderation you can satisfy your stomach and get back on the road with minimal issue. And odds are you know what items on the McDonalds menu upset your stomach and which don't if you eat there occasionally. But yes, of course, if you're home find the good food and skip the franchises. But franchises exist largely because of familiarity and that when you're out of towner they are known quantities. And for what its worth I also go months between fast food when at home and often get sick when I do eat it, but I can probably safely chalk that up to over eating because its been months so I kind of over indulge. The one time I ate at a Cracker Barrel it was for exactly this reason. I was with a group of friends traveling and very unfamiliar with what the area and they decided the Cracker Barrel was a safe enough place that had enough things on the menu to cover our group's tastes. My only real memory of the meal was that it was pretty bland and I had to negotiate with the waiter for something green.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2013 18:43
|
|
|
Race Realists posted:http://stuffblackpeopledontlike.blogspot.com/2013/12/americas-reaction-to-phil-robertson-of.html White Protestant males are not the establishment because we can't oppress gays and blacks as easily anymore (but still pretty easily).
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2013 19:10
|
|
|
Pyroxene Stigma posted:Who is Steve Deace, and why did he tag this article "Palin" when she isn't referred to once? A very damaged human being whose major accomplishment in political life was getting the Iowa state senator that had to resign for getting caught with his hand in Michelle Bachmann's cookie jar originally elected.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2013 19:45
|
|
|
 My Facebook feed right now.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2013 21:19
|
|
|
Typical Pubbie posted:
This is just really confusing. Do they really need to make an effort to not feel ashamed because they're straight? Are they suggesting that only one group can have pride at any given time and must coopt other groups symbols in order to absorb their power? I mean as a heterosexual individual I don't understand how I'm supposed to be invested in this movement.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2013 21:26
|
|
|
cafel posted:This is just really confusing. Do they really need to make an effort to not feel ashamed because they're straight? Are they suggesting that only one group can have pride at any given time and must coopt other groups symbols in order to absorb their power? I mean as a heterosexual individual I don't understand how I'm supposed to be invested in this movement. Sexuality hierarchy works by highlander rules.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2013 21:31
|
|
|
cafel posted:This is just really confusing. Do they really need to make an effort to not feel ashamed because they're straight? Are they suggesting that only one group can have pride at any given time and must coopt other groups symbols in order to absorb their power? I mean as a heterosexual individual I don't understand how I'm supposed to be invested in this movement. You aren't its a tone deaf movement done by retards in order to push back against some sort of perceived societal slight that fails to take into consideration that maybe gay pride is being pushed so that many people in their discovery of their orientation aren't ashamed of whatever they end up finding themselves to be. How many teenagers commit suicide due to their overwhelming burden of being heterosexual?
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2013 21:53
|
|
|
Only caught a bit of it when I was out doing some shopping, but Rush's substitute today, Mark Belling (though I kept hearing Bell-end because I'm apparently 13), seemed to be half-seriously advocating for a conservative alternative to Bitcoin, Rush Coins. I hope it happens. 
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2013 22:04
|
|
|
ReidRansom posted:Only caught a bit of it when I was out doing some shopping, but Rush's substitute today, Mark Belling (though I kept hearing Bell-end because I'm apparently 13), seemed to be half-seriously advocating for a conservative alternative to Bitcoin, Rush Coins. I hope it happens. These pundits are so far behind the times. Everybody knows dogecoin is the hot new crypto currency.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2013 22:33
|
|
|
ReidRansom posted:Only caught a bit of it when I was out doing some shopping, but Rush's substitute today, Mark Belling (though I kept hearing Bell-end because I'm apparently 13), seemed to be half-seriously advocating for a conservative alternative to Bitcoin, Rush Coins. I hope it happens.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2013 22:37
|
|
|
I had no idea that bitcoins were too liberal for Dittoheads.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2013 22:38
|
|
|
Rushcoin ads will show up in the show, where they'll send you a voucher good for Rushcoins that you can obtain without using a computer to get. Also, Rushcoins will have to be the exact opposite of bitcoins where instead of 1 btc being worth a $100, it's $1 for 100 r$c. You can be a r$c MILLIONAIRE for only an investment of a few thousand dollars!
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2013 23:01
|
|
|
Scamming people with gold schemes must be getting less and less effective for right-wing radio. It's time to diversify.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2013 23:08
|
|
|
Lycus posted:I had no idea that bitcoins were too liberal for Dittoheads. What isn't? One of the many guilty pleasures of enjoying Limbaugh's inevitable demise will be seeing his audience split 700 ways and tear each other apart over those obvious RINOs trying to fill his shoes. I'm kidding, of course. There's nothing guilty about it.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2013 23:17
|
|
|
cafel posted:This is just really confusing. Do they really need to make an effort to not feel ashamed because they're straight? Are they suggesting that only one group can have pride at any given time and must coopt other groups symbols in order to absorb their power? I mean as a heterosexual individual I don't understand how I'm supposed to be invested in this movement.
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2013 00:24
|
|
|
ReidRansom posted:Only caught a bit of it when I was out doing some shopping, but Rush's substitute today, Mark Belling (though I kept hearing Bell-end because I'm apparently 13), seemed to be half-seriously advocating for a conservative alternative to Bitcoin, Rush Coins. I hope it happens. please, please do this
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2013 00:38
|
|
|
Guilty Spork posted:It's basically mistaking no longer having quite enough privilege to Conservativism.txt
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2013 02:34
|
|
|
Typical Pubbie posted:
I wonder when they'll be taking back shoving stuff up your butt for pleasure. e: also good dance music and tasteful interior design
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2013 04:56
|
|
|
The one thing I don't get is from the right wing talking heads that I heard from today (including Mike Huckabee who is starting yet another campaign about this). Why should I be tolerant of these people? They're clearly creating a rather hostile environment in this country, clearly doing damage to the Christian faith, and are clearly bigoted.
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2013 04:59
|
|
|
FuzzySkinner posted:The one thing I don't get is from the right wing talking heads that I heard from today (including Mike Huckabee who is starting yet another campaign about this). Why should I be tolerant of these people? They straight up believe that gay people are unrepentant sinners that must be saved, and that their sexuality is an affront to God. For the best of them, they think they're doing gay people a favor by pointing out their impending damnation. For the worst, it's an opportunity to judge and hate. But in all cases their observations of gay people are objective fact according to their religion. So when Phil Robertson or whoever makes these claims about gay people, it's statement of religious belief, and criticism of those comments is an attack on religious freedom. Thus the real problem here is the persecution of people based on religion. To understand this you have to come from the position of surety that they're right in these convictions. They simply do not entertain the possibility that what they're saying is wrong or hurtful or bigoted.
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2013 07:27
|
|
|
They're just treating people like how they would want to be treated.
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2013 07:29
|
|
|
In the least surprising development in the history of the universe, Sarah Palin didn't read the GQ interview she defended:quote:When pressed by Fox News host Greta Van Susteren whether the language Robertson used when talking about his opposition to homosexuality was graphic and offensive, Palin admitted she didn’t know what Robertson had said. http://www.politico.com/story/2013/12/sarah-palin-duck-dynasty-interview-101500.html
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2013 17:48
|
|
|
RetroHelix posted:In the least surprising development in the history of the universe, Sarah Palin didn't read the GQ interview she defended: But I though she read all of 'em, Katie. 
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2013 17:51
|
|
|
How the gently caress did she get tripped up by Greta Van Susteren? Van Susteren has been Palin's unofficial media officer since the 2008 campaign.
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2013 17:55
|
|
|
Reading is hard. Really, really hard.
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2013 18:12
|
|
|
If she could feel shame I bet that would be really, really embarrassing.
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2013 18:17
|
|
|
With all that time spent getting fabulous in hair and makeup, how do you expect her to stay informed? Leave Sarah ALONE!
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2013 18:23
|
|
|
Radish posted:If she could feel shame I bet that would be really, really embarrassing. That's the thing - there is no shame in being wrong for these people. What matters is she took a swing for her team and win or lose, she's a good guy. It's pandering to idiots, for idiots. There are no consequences for what the Right does. Credibility does not matter to them and it's maddening. It's like when you hear these GOPshitthatdidnthappen.txt stories and confront it with facts or disprove whatever, the response is always "Well it was just a nice story" or something similar.
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2013 18:24
|
|
|
Phone posted:Reading is hard. Really, really hard. I would honestly believe if someone told me that Sarah Palin cannot read.
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2013 18:57
|
|
|
RetroHelix posted:In the least surprising development in the history of the universe, Sarah Palin didn't read the GQ interview she defended:
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2013 19:10
|
|
|
TASTE THE PAIN!! posted:With all that time spent getting fabulous in hair and makeup, how do you expect her to stay informed? Leave Sarah ALONE! Yo please don't go this route. There are plenty of excuses to crap all over Palin for being a repugnant person without bringing her appearance into it in a gendered attack. Leave that poo poo to them
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2013 19:50
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 03:33 |
|
|
I think it was more of a tongue in cheek nod to the "Leave Britney ALONE!" video.
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2013 20:07
|
|
