|
I'm thinking of just de-friending one of my relatives now that I found out he is a tea partier, but I think I'd like to confront him first.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2014 04:44 |
|
|
# ? May 27, 2024 03:29 |
|
Did someone say... Moon God?
|
# ? Jan 30, 2014 04:45 |
|
E: Beaten by Chick. I'm glad you posted the full version.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2014 04:49 |
|
Bizarro Kanyon posted:"Moon God" It comes from crazy racists refusing to believe that Muslims are an Abrahamic religion.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2014 04:49 |
|
God, I love that comic so much. The Muslim is threatening the man's life and gloating about the coming worldwide caliphate, then the guy goes "My friend..." spouts some unsubstantiated bullshit and suddenly the Muslim is all "Oh three daughters of the moon god, you say, well gosh I guess I am going to hell, tell me about your Christ!"
|
# ? Jan 30, 2014 04:52 |
|
VitalSigns posted:God, I love that comic so much. The Muslim is threatening the man's life and gloating about the coming worldwide caliphate, then the guy goes "My friend..." spouts some unsubstantiated bullshit and suddenly the Muslim is all "Oh three daughters of the moon god, you say, well gosh I guess I am going to hell, tell me about your Christ!" The full thing was far, far greater than anything I could have imagined.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2014 04:56 |
|
Also what is that about a figure of Allah sitting on a throne? I thought Islam didn't allow depictions of living things, Allah included?
|
# ? Jan 30, 2014 04:56 |
|
The tract is claiming that Allah was a pre-Islamic pagan deity, and is presenting the idol as proof of that. Paganism = idolatry, at least to devout Jews, Christians, and Muslims. Muslims destroyed all the idols they could find, but that one was spared because it was hidden until archaeologists found it.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2014 05:01 |
|
ArchangeI posted:Also what is that about a figure of Allah sitting on a throne? I thought Islam didn't allow depictions of living things, Allah included? Maybe a book called "Islamic Invasion" isn't the best source? Edit: The best part of that comic is how the Christian guy doesn't exactly offer any "proof." He just quotes scripture and the Muslim guy converts. "Oh, YOUR holy book says that its right and my religion is wrong? I guess that must be so, why would it lie?" muscles like this! fucked around with this message at 05:04 on Jan 30, 2014 |
# ? Jan 30, 2014 05:02 |
|
ArchangeI posted:Also what is that about a figure of Allah sitting on a throne? I thought Islam didn't allow depictions of living things, Allah included? You're giving Chick far too much credit. His knowledge of Islam probably comes solely from a series of tracts put out by some batshit Independent Baptist press.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2014 05:03 |
|
Someone should do an inversion of that explaining how the easter bunny represents pagan fertility rituals therefore no Jesus.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2014 05:10 |
|
Isn't Islam stemming from polytheism/paganism basically correct, as it is derived from faiths that can be traced back to polytheism?
|
# ? Jan 30, 2014 05:14 |
|
EightBit posted:Isn't Islam stemming from polytheism/paganism basically correct, as it is derived from faiths that can be traced back to polytheism?
|
# ? Jan 30, 2014 05:16 |
|
Nevvy Z posted:Someone should do an inversion of that explaining how the easter bunny represents pagan fertility rituals therefore no Jesus. Don't forget that December 25th was not the birthday of Christ, it was based on an original Roman holiday worshipping Sol Invictus ( worship of a Syrian pagan god).
|
# ? Jan 30, 2014 05:22 |
|
muscles like this? posted:Maybe a book called "Islamic Invasion" isn't the best source? "Okay, time to leave the house. Keys, check. Wallet, check. Phone, check. Photograph of moon god statue, check."
|
# ? Jan 30, 2014 05:26 |
|
Ghost of Reagan Past posted:Polytheistic religions like Christianity and Judaism, yes. Uh no, Christianity was the first religion, it says so right here in this collection of contradictory Bronze Age stories. The false gods came later when God got bored for a while and stopped showing up at brunch to tell people which religion was the right one. VitalSigns fucked around with this message at 05:28 on Jan 30, 2014 |
# ? Jan 30, 2014 05:26 |
|
radical meme posted:Here you go. Forwarded by my crazy family. Holy loving balls... What scares me is that whoever made this obviously has a little bit of knowledge about Islam, but not once do they mention that it worships the same god recognized by the Christians and the Jews. They don't mention that giving alms is one of the five pillars of Islam. Just... wow.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2014 05:34 |
|
Job Truniht posted:
|
# ? Jan 30, 2014 05:42 |
|
They also continue to willfully ignore what "Gun Free Zone" means. Its not supposed to stop criminals, its supposed to stop regular people from bringing guns into those areas to prevent accidental shootings.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2014 05:47 |
|
Dyz posted:Holy loving balls... They also ignore that one of the old testament verses say if you meet anyone who doesn't worship your god, kill them. If you find a town that doesn't worship your god, kill them all and burn it to the ground. If your child is rude to you, stone him. If your wife is not virgin on her wedding night, stone her. They proclaim that the Old Testament doesn't matter, at the same time they hold up 'homosexuality is a sin'. Oh, and the Old Testament does still apply. “For truly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass the law until all is accomplished. Whoever then relaxes one of the least of these commandments and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but he who does them and teaches them shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.” (Matthew 5:18-19) Clearly the Old Testament is to be abided by until the end of human existence itself. None other then Jesus said so.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2014 05:58 |
|
Yeah but then God stopped by and told Peter to stop being such a square and eat some drat bacon, so it's a bit more complicated than that.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2014 06:02 |
|
VitalSigns posted:Yeah but then God stopped by and told Peter to stop being such a square and eat some drat bacon, so it's a bit more complicated than that. What irritates the absolute piss out of me, is that it says. Right there. "Whoever then relaxes one of the least of these commandments and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven" By that logic, Peter should be ignored because he's lying about what Jesus said and is going against the WORD OF loving GOD. But instead they canonized Peter and basically worship him just as much as the loving son of christ.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2014 06:06 |
|
VitalSigns posted:Yeah but then God stopped by and told Peter to stop being such a square and eat some drat bacon, so it's a bit more complicated than that. Naw, that story is actually about how you should accept Gentiles. The "unclean" animals God invites Peter to eat are a metaphor for the "unclean" people he should care about.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2014 06:08 |
|
Pththya-lyi posted:Naw, that story is actually about how you should accept Gentiles. The "unclean" animals God invites Peter to eat are a metaphor for the "unclean" people he should care about. Man, I knew Jews ate Christian babies.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2014 06:09 |
|
Pththya-lyi posted:Naw, that story is actually about how you should accept Gentiles. The "unclean" animals God invites Peter to eat are a metaphor for the "unclean" people he should care about. Why can't they be both? Are you saying that Peter defied God and still didn't eat them? Or that after he did, God was like "Ha, psych! That was just a metaphor telling you to convert the Romans...I can't believe you actually ate that accursed flesh! Enjoy Hell!"
|
# ? Jan 30, 2014 06:28 |
|
Job Truniht posted:
We defend all those things with trained specialists using guns in a very limited and restrictive way so good to see he's down with that.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2014 08:16 |
|
VitalSigns posted:Why can't they be both? Acts 10:28 posted:“You are well aware that it is against our law for a Jew to associate with or visit a Gentile. But God has shown me that I should not call anyone impure or unclean."
|
# ? Jan 30, 2014 08:37 |
|
We defend all those things with armed guards. I am glad to see he doesn't mind paying extra taxes to pay for security officers at loving elementary schools.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2014 09:09 |
|
MisterBadIdea posted:We defend all those things with armed guards. I am glad to see he doesn't mind paying extra taxes to pay for security officers at loving elementary schools. But god damned if he'll see a dime go for art teachers.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2014 09:48 |
|
radical meme posted:Here you go. Forwarded by my crazy family. quote:After 80%, expect daily intimidation and violent jihad, some State-run ethnic cleansing, and even some genocide, as these nations drive Out the infidels, and move toward 100% Muslim, [...] Palestine -- Muslim 99% This was my favorite part, and by favorite I mean ugghh.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2014 11:03 |
|
E-Tank posted:If you have absolutely no choice but to beat the hell out of your child, you have failed as a parent and need to seek help from professionals. Holy poo poo, I'm against spanking but equating occasional spankings with acting 'to beat the hell out of your child' makes you a disingenuous rear end.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2014 11:10 |
|
muscles like this? posted:They also continue to willfully ignore what "Gun Free Zone" means. Its not supposed to stop criminals, its supposed to stop regular people from bringing guns into those areas to prevent accidental shootings. But then only criminals will have guns in the gun free zone! Alternatively: So you're saying it's better that we only have deliberate shootings? Huh????
|
# ? Jan 30, 2014 11:23 |
|
Bizarro Kanyon posted:"Moon God" Re: The moon being everywhere in Islam: quote:The date of Easter is determined as the first Sunday after the paschal full moon, the 14th day of a lunar month, determined from tables.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2014 12:23 |
|
muscles like this? posted:They also continue to willfully ignore what "Gun Free Zone" means. Its not supposed to stop criminals, its supposed to stop regular people from bringing guns into those areas to prevent accidental shootings. That's pretty much the exact reason why most filthy gunhavers don't like them. Putting up a pretty sign without enforcement or security doesn't actually make anyone safer, and if you don't enforce your "Gun Free Zone" anyone can carry a concealed weapon onto the premises anyway. This is why actual gun free zones like government buildings have armed guards (With GUNS ) and metal detectors and controlled access points and probably swarms of FEMA drones or something. Mostly the macro is (poorly) trying to make the point that the government relies on guns and a monopoly of force to maintain its own security and that it is therefore hypocritical for the government to restrict its citizens from carrying sidearms to protect themselves.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2014 13:30 |
|
"This is true because 100% of what McDonalds charges is to pay their lowest-level workers. Literally zero money is spent on packaging, rent, utilities, management pay, the raw materials for the food (beef, buns, potatoes, etc), or advertising."
|
# ? Jan 30, 2014 13:49 |
|
EDIT: Nvm
|
# ? Jan 30, 2014 13:54 |
|
Azipod posted:That's pretty much the exact reason why most filthy gunhavers don't like them. Putting up a pretty sign without enforcement or security doesn't actually make anyone safer, and if you don't enforce your "Gun Free Zone" anyone can carry a concealed weapon onto the premises anyway. This is why actual gun free zones like government buildings have armed guards (With GUNS ) and metal detectors and controlled access points and probably swarms of FEMA drones or something. The government having a monopoly on firearm use is no more hypocritical than having a monopoly on the power of eminent domain, to choose an arbitrary one of the enormous number of powers society delegates to the government without reserving for private individuals.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2014 14:25 |
|
Mornacale posted:The government having a monopoly on firearm use is no more hypocritical than having a monopoly on the power of eminent domain, to choose an arbitrary one of the enormous number of powers society delegates to the government without reserving for private individuals. Uh, you're forgetting about the 2nd Amendment, which does in fact reserve the right to keep and bear arms to individuals for self defense and has been upheld in recent Supreme Court cases. Maybe instead of "government" I should have said "government officials"... you see those sort of macros often, criticizing say, Senator Feinstein for opposing concealed carry shall issue in California while she herself has a concealed weapons permit and teams of armed guards. Or a police chief saying that AR-15s are "Weapons of war that have no place on our streets" while buying piles of them for his department. Its seen as elitism by a lot of gun owners, an institutional insistence that only "The right people" should have guns and all you filthy commoner peasants can get hosed when you need to defend yourself. I'm just trying to fill in some background knowledge here, because a lot of these lovely ARE GUNS memes reference insider knowledge and esoteric gun culture stuff that isn't obvious to people that aren't involved in it. Which is a pretty big part of why GUN CONTROL debates are so lovely.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2014 14:53 |
|
Azipod posted:I'm just trying to fill in some background knowledge here, because a lot of these lovely ARE GUNS memes reference insider knowledge and esoteric gun culture stuff that isn't obvious to people that aren't involved in it. Which is a pretty big part of why GUN CONTROL debates are so lovely. Maybe we shouldn't have one here in this thread then. And I don't think recent 2nd Amendment Supreme Court jurisprudence is particularly obscure- or uncontroversial.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2014 15:05 |
|
|
# ? May 27, 2024 03:29 |
|
My brother posted this article on Facebook, I'm sure this has been posted before but I don't specifically recall. I've bolded the parts that I think are particularly dumb. http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/sthompson/130621 quote:The inherent racism of liberalism 1. I can't think of a god drat ideology that anyone is calling for in America, where one designated group of people does not hold power over another. Democracy, where people are elected to represent others, still hold power over them. 2. It's hosed up to say that the other ideology says blacks need to be cared for, while trying to make the point that blacks are a perfect target for manipulation. Oh, please! Care for those poor blacks by pulling the wool from their eyes so that they know they're being manipulated by others! 3. So liberalism is racist because it is agnostic? Give me a loving break.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2014 15:50 |