Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Parts Kit
Jun 9, 2006

durr
i have a hole in my head
durr
Much like demons and devils are evil given a living form, it is a plot hole given living form.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Random Stranger
Nov 27, 2009



What if it's a meta thing and we are the snarl?

Answer: it would be a pretty stupid and flimsy metaphor.

ArchRanger
Mar 19, 2007
I'm tired of following my dreams, I'm just gonna ask where they're goin' and meet up with 'em there.

Robviously posted:

Oddly enough, it could be a really weird callback to the fact that Earth exists as an alternate plane of reality to Oerth, where Greyhawk takes place. There's also a few other planes mentioned, if I recall right, but Gygax all but said way back when that Earth is a place as far as D&D is concerned.

Please tell me Earth existing in the Greyhawk canon has been used in some awful stories I can track down and read.

Shugojin
Sep 6, 2007

THE TAIL THAT BURNS TWICE AS BRIGHT...


Parts Kit posted:

Much like demons and devils are evil given a living form, it is a plot hole given living form.

One of my friends ran with a DM who would pull this out if someone pointed out a plot hole.

RickoniX
Dec 4, 2005

A human or elf?

NO NOT A BADGER YOU GOON

ArchRanger posted:

Please tell me Earth existing in the Greyhawk canon has been used in some awful stories I can track down and read.

FR, not Greyhawk, but Elminster used to go to Earth to hang out with Ed Greenwood and drink his beer

Tinyn
Jan 10, 2003

Taciturn Tactician posted:

Blackwing and the order both only looked in, Laurin reached in with her mind. A better question is why it reacted to Laurin amd not all the humans Redcloak threw in to the rift for research purposes


Did Redcloak actually throw people into the Rift? He backed off when he was pressuring O-Chul I though. And the Tower wasn't actually as tall as the Rift was high. Redcloak was just going to throw them near and see if a tentacle reached out for them?

Illuyankas
Oct 22, 2010

Tinyn posted:

Did Redcloak actually throw people into the Rift? He backed off when he was pressuring O-Chul I though. And the Tower wasn't actually as tall as the Rift was high. Redcloak was just going to throw them near and see if a tentacle reached out for them?

Catapults.

We don't see them actually do it, or I believe any dialogue saying they did though.

Dr. Buttass
Aug 12, 2013

AWFUL SOMETHING

Tinyn posted:

Did Redcloak actually throw people into the Rift? He backed off when he was pressuring O-Chul I though. And the Tower wasn't actually as tall as the Rift was high. Redcloak was just going to throw them near and see if a tentacle reached out for them?

He kind of implied that he already had been? But he hadn't learned anything, so he told O-Chul that if he spilled the beans they'd all be saved but if he couldn't, he'd keep pitching them in theoretically because it was better than any other information-gathering strategy they'd yet employed but really because he's Evil and tortures prisoners for funsies.

Tinyn
Jan 10, 2003

Dr. Buttass posted:

He kind of implied that he already had been? But he hadn't learned anything, so he told O-Chul that if he spilled the beans they'd all be saved but if he couldn't, he'd keep pitching them in theoretically because it was better than any other information-gathering strategy they'd yet employed but really because he's Evil and tortures prisoners for funsies.

But then why would he back down when O-Chul didn't have any info to provide? It makes it seem like Redcloak was bluffing and actually wasn't willing and/or able to throw prisoners into the Rift.

Parts Kit
Jun 9, 2006

durr
i have a hole in my head
durr

Tinyn posted:

But then why would he back down when O-Chul didn't have any info to provide? It makes it seem like Redcloak was bluffing and actually wasn't willing and/or able to throw prisoners into the Rift.
Considering he toasted his little brother in Start of Darkness and prior to his little conversion in his attitude to the hobgoblins was killing and/or sending them to their deaths left and right without any concern I'm going to go with 'no' on the not willing part.

jsoh
Mar 24, 2007

O Muhammad, I seek your intercession with my Lord for the return of my eyesight
He's a high level cleric couldn't he summon something to carry them or cast some kind of flying spell and carry them himself or cast some kind of flying spell on them and some kind of compulsion spell or have Xykon do one of those things. High level magic mans are not wanting for ways to move people around.

Roland Jones
Aug 18, 2011

by Nyc_Tattoo

Tinyn posted:

But then why would he back down when O-Chul didn't have any info to provide? It makes it seem like Redcloak was bluffing and actually wasn't willing and/or able to throw prisoners into the Rift.

He thought that leaving them alive with the knowledge that a paladin would have let them die would demoralize them and spread discord among the prisoners. Instead the opposite happened, though, as from their perspective the goblins were torturing a paladin (they didn't even know any paladins had survived) and he didn't break no matter what.

Regalingualius
Jan 7, 2012

We gazed into the eyes of madness... And all we found was horny.




That, or he came to realize before he was going to carry out his threat that O-Chul legitimately knew even less than he himself did as a result of the Sapphire Guard oaths, and decided throwing them in would be a waste.

Lurdiak
Feb 26, 2006

I believe in a universe that doesn't care, and people that do.


Pseudoscorpion posted:

I'm kinda getting the impression that it isn't that someone was close enough to get in; after all, there've been at least two times where that easily could have happened. I'm thinking it may be more what Laurin is: a psion. My guess is that that's actually a real planet in there, and the Snarl is effectively it's god or guardian deity. Why lash out at Laurin in particular, and not Blackwing or Roy and co.? There are really only two major differences between them: alignment (and I'm not gonna go there because :can:) and their abilities. So the Snarl senses something it doesn't recognize outside of its domain, and attacks it. And it doesn't recognize psionics.

...were there any psions in 2e DnD?

(:speculate:)

I would laugh my rear end off if the Snarl turned out to be the ultimate cosmic grognard. "THIS DOESN'T FIT GYGAX'S VISION!" it would screech as it obliterates everything that isn't the tomb of horrors.

Dr. Buttass
Aug 12, 2013

AWFUL SOMETHING

Tinyn posted:

But then why would he back down when O-Chul didn't have any info to provide? It makes it seem like Redcloak was bluffing and actually wasn't willing and/or able to throw prisoners into the Rift.

Roland Jones posted:

He thought that leaving them alive with the knowledge that a paladin would have let them die would demoralize them and spread discord among the prisoners. Instead the opposite happened, though, as from their perspective the goblins were torturing a paladin (they didn't even know any paladins had survived) and he didn't break no matter what.

Evil, remember? Never do something efficiently if you can get away with making someone suffer while you're at it.

Jimbone Tallshanks
Dec 16, 2005

You can't pull rank on murder.

Random Stranger posted:

What if it's a meta thing and we are the snarl?

Answer: it would be a pretty stupid and flimsy metaphor.

Someone gets close enough to examine the Snarl and reveals it's made up of OoTS forum posts. OoTS was the "new world" in order to contain the worst of D&D fans before they could do any more damage.

MikeJF
Dec 20, 2003




VanSandman posted:

gently caress if I know, but it doesn't seem to mind a huge rift existing above Azure Goblin City, so unless we get a scene change to show that rift also freaking the gently caress out, that's my best guess.

Well, Redcloak speculated back then that the remaining gates were suppressing the Snarl's awareness that the rifts were open, didn't he? Maybe this is the Snarl finally realising after the destruction of Girard's gate.

Ursine Asylum posted:

Yeah, you'd think that if an adventuring party can gate them, Xykon and co would just re-gate the rifts and keep going with their plans, unless it's a "these people knew how to do it and there's literally no evil spellcaster anywhere who could also do it" thing.

I think that the original Order of the Crayon had to research how to create the gates, and it took them a long time to figure out how to do it. And they may have had the gods feeding them intelligence on how to seal them. I doubt it's written in Serani's journal, she's not one of the primary spellcasters.

Zogundar
Dec 5, 2007
Plus sealing them and assembling a Gate are two different steps (Kraagor was killed during or by a sealing; the Gates went up later.)

Also I noticed that Mijung (Soon's wife who was killed by the Snarl) was also studying one of the rifts, possibly not unlike Laurin. Maybe it dislikes magic.

Random Stranger
Nov 27, 2009



Lurdiak posted:

I would laugh my rear end off if the Snarl turned out to be the ultimate cosmic grognard. "THIS DOESN'T FIT GYGAX'S VISION!" it would screech as it obliterates everything that isn't the tomb of horrors.

Psionics were in 1st edition and had really terrible rules back then. Maybe the Snarl just knows that he wants none of that in his campaign.

Triple Elation
Feb 24, 2012

1 + 2 + 4 + 8 + ... = -1
I like that V and Roy just got to talk out things like reasonable human beings. I was worried they would put it off forever for some irrational reason and then it would of course eventually come back to bite them in the rear end. Obstacles that result from people just refusing to do the obviously reasonable thing are way too convenient and common in fiction for my taste.

Facebook Aunt
Oct 4, 2008

wiggle wiggle




Random Stranger posted:

Psionics were in 1st edition and had really terrible rules back then. Maybe the Snarl just knows that he wants none of that in his campaign.

Which setting is most known for psionics? Darksun. Darksun is also known for a critical lack of water. The Snarl is probably just tired of psithieves trying to siphon off his ocean.

Dolash
Oct 23, 2008

aNYWAY,
tHAT'S REALLY ALL THERE IS,
tO REPORT ON THE SUBJECT,
oF ME GETTING HURT,


Triple Elation posted:

I like that V and Roy just got to talk out things like reasonable human beings. I was worried they would put it off forever for some irrational reason and then it would of course eventually come back to bite them in the rear end. Obstacles that result from people just refusing to do the obviously reasonable thing are way too convenient and common in fiction for my taste.

I have to agree with this. Further, it's nice to actually see the conversation, since it's good for both of their characters. A lot of authors just won't give their heroes enough breathing room or time to have basic, important discussions, but it's also a bit disappointing when they have them but shuffle them off screen because they're concerned about repeating things the reader's already heard or just want to bring all their characters up to speed so they can hurry to the next plot point.

If V and Roy had just disappeared below decks and then from that point on it was handwaved away that they'd talked it out, it might've been strictly faster and easier but we'd miss the chance to see V's sincere desire to atone and see how Roy's handling all these necessary evils he's dealing with in order to save the world.

Roland Jones
Aug 18, 2011

by Nyc_Tattoo

Regalingualius posted:

That, or he came to realize before he was going to carry out his threat that O-Chul legitimately knew even less than he himself did as a result of the Sapphire Guard oaths, and decided throwing them in would be a waste.

Well, yes and no. He did realize that O-Chul knew nothing, but what I said also actually happened. Also he kept torturing O-Chul even after this, and in fact didn't really care much if O-Chul knew anything at all by that point; the whole thing is less "well I don't need to do this so I guess I won't be evil about it" and more "there is a better way to get what I want, and I'll get a little bonus doing it this way too" (though, again, that ended up backfiring, for what little that meant).

Roland Jones fucked around with this message at 18:38 on Feb 16, 2014

TunaSpleen
Jan 27, 2007

How do I say, "You're the grossest thing ever" without offending you?
Grimey Drawer
Redcloak is most certainly evil, but he's still pragmatic. Those human prisoners are more useful as slaves hauling food around and sparing goblins from doing heavy work than as Snarl Food. The only reason he kept torturing O-Chul after realizing he had no intel to spare was to entertain Xykon long enough to let Gobbotopia stabilize and gain political influence. Which it certainly did after they squandered time looking for the phylactery, heh. As for his act of snuffing his brother in Start of Darkness, it was with great hesitation and sadness because doing so was the only way to ensure his mission from The Dark One would succeed.

Colonel Cool
Dec 24, 2006

I think there was also an element of self-awareness and Redcloak not wanting to literally be a moustache twirling cliché villain.

Shwqa
Feb 13, 2012

Colonel Cool posted:

I think there was also an element of self-awareness and Redcloak not wanting to literally be a moustache twirling cliché villain.

He literally says that nearly word for word.

Taciturn Tactician
Jan 27, 2011

The secret to good health is a balanced diet and unstable healing radiation
Lipstick Apathy
I might be misremembering, but I thought he'd said or implied that he'd already tried throwing people in the rift before the ones he was threatening O-Chul with.

Mniot
May 22, 2003
Not the one you know
I think you're remembering Redcloak and Xykon killing goblins with the first gate (well, second, I guess).

Taciturn Tactician
Jan 27, 2011

The secret to good health is a balanced diet and unstable healing radiation
Lipstick Apathy

Mniot posted:

I think you're remembering Redcloak and Xykon killing goblins with the first gate (well, second, I guess).

That's probably what it is. Still, that makes it so Laurin is the only one to do anything other than look with their eyes into the portal, since she was extending some kind of psychic tendril into it.

Gwyneth Palpate
Jun 7, 2010

Do you want your breadcrumbs highlighted?

~SMcD

Mniot posted:

I think you're remembering Redcloak and Xykon killing goblins with the first gate (well, second, I guess).

The gate wasn't killing the goblins, the rune inscribed on the gate was doing it.

Fire Storm
Aug 8, 2004

what's the point of life
if there are no sexborgs?

TheAceOfLungs posted:

ETA: For what it's worth, Orion has long been my favorite constellation partially because it's the only one I could reliably find in the night sky. The rest all look like random dots with possibly seven or more Dippers and the occasional star that turns out to be an airplane.
I too like to look out for Orion and hope he doesn't end up blowing out his shoulder.

SirDippingSauce
Oct 25, 2012

We're here to interrogate Manly Dan the lumberjack for the murder of wax Stan.

ArchRanger posted:

Please tell me Earth existing in the Greyhawk canon has been used in some awful stories I can track down and read.

There is a n official module where the final part of the adventure has your party travel to an Earth musem to steal back St. Cuthbert's mace.

Phanatic
Mar 13, 2007

Please don't forget that I am an extremely racist idiot who also has terrible opinions about the Culture series.

SirDippingSauce posted:

There is a n official module where the final part of the adventure has your party travel to an Earth musem to steal back St. Cuthbert's mace.

That was in Dragon magazine, wasn't it?

Affi
Dec 18, 2005

Break bread wit the enemy

X GON GIVE IT TO YA

SirDippingSauce posted:

There is a n official module where the final part of the adventure has your party travel to an Earth musem to steal back St. Cuthbert's mace.

"Let's just go and grab these wands the security guards had on them."

"Huh? A Wand of Kinetic Slugs"

Dead Reckoning
Sep 13, 2011

wdarkk posted:

Maybe it reacts to intent to study it? Like with Soon's wife.

Zogundar posted:

Also I noticed that Mijung (Soon's wife who was killed by the Snarl) was also studying one of the rifts, possibly not unlike Laurin. Maybe it dislikes magic.

Yeah, the end did seem like a fairly blatant callback to #275, same pose and all.

Dead Reckoning fucked around with this message at 13:49 on Feb 17, 2014

Cat Mattress
Jul 14, 2012

by Cyrano4747
Active vs. passive detection measures. It's quite hard to detect when you're looked at with passive systems, whereas you can detect if you're painted with active systems.

Being nearby and looking at the rift is passive. That light would go through regardless of whether you're here or not. Using magic or psionic to probe inside, on the other hand, is active and can be detected (there are "detect magic" spell effects after all, but not "detect gaze"). And it's especially true here as she was trying to contact minds ("telepathically scanning") and she apparently ended up pinging the Snarl's mind.

Biggest difference between Minjung's fatal picnic and this: the snarl tendrils don't end in claws.

oobey
Nov 19, 2002

So far, the only time the Snarl has lashed out has been to attack women. I'm thinking the Snarl is super sexist and actually got locked in its prison on account of being a tremendous douche bag.

Who What Now
Sep 10, 2006

by Azathoth

Cat Mattress posted:

Biggest difference between Minjung's fatal picnic and this: the snarl tendrils don't end in claws.

We don't know if Soon was a reliable narrator so we can't know if the claws were literal or an embellishment of the retelling.

My Lovely Horse
Aug 21, 2010

oobey posted:

So far, the only time the Snarl has lashed out has been to attack women. I'm thinking the Snarl is super sexist and actually got locked in its prison on account of being a tremendous douche bag.
Rapidly mounting evidence for the "ultimate grognard" theory.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

MildShow
Jan 4, 2012

Who What Now posted:

We don't know if Soon was a reliable narrator so we can't know if the claws were literal or an embellishment of the retelling.

I'm guessing embellishment. If you look at the bottom of the panel, you can see one of the guards getting speared.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply