|
Honestly if I had to rely on MMing to play CS:GO I probably wouldn't still be playing CS:GO. Goonmans are fun, come goonman. Most of us have been playing with each other on the reg for going on two years now and it definitely beats playing against randoms. Hed posted:Is there an he_glass_go yet? 
mcvey fucked around with this message at 04:50 on Feb 17, 2014 |
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 04:44
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 21:42 |
|
|
mcvey posted:Honestly if I had to rely on MMing to play CS:GO I probably wouldn't still be playing CS:GO. Goonmans are fun, come goonman. Most of us have been playing with each other on the reg for going on two years now and it definitely beats playing against randoms. Except when said randoms are absolute garbage: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cl-C1liITAM Never enter a site against an awp 1 by 1 when you have a 4v1 advantage  edit: this happened in the same game, you can't tell from the gif but the guy shot 3 rounds at mcvey and just whiffed on every one 
astr0man fucked around with this message at 05:49 on Feb 17, 2014 |
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 05:23
|
|
|
I'll join goonmans more often when 
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 05:40
|
|
|
Had a good amount of fun playing with you goons in tonights Goonman. I was "L.N.C.S. Flashbang!" Also happy to report that I can get a kill with a P250, just required moral support.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 08:56
|
|
|
I will start to get in on goonmans now that I know that I am silver III and you guys are forewarned as to how much of a burden you are carrying. I will still enjoy MM but I will refuse to drop into classic casual because that place is a loving zoo.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 09:06
|
|
|
I had fun tonight, too, and you guys are really patient. Thanks for being accepting and I'll try to 
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 09:59
|
|
|
If you don't have a DJ on your team drowning out your sound, chances are, it's not a goonman.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 11:17
|
|
|
There's a bit of speculation going around, half disproven, that VAC is keeping tabs on which domains you visit and may or may not be storing it. Gabe knows about all that horrible porn you've been watching.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 11:20
|
|
|
Gaben_1v5_uncensored.avi
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 12:01
|
|
|
Xenaero posted:If you don't have a DJ on your team drowning out your sound, chances are, it's not a goonman. If you haven't muted everyone in the game by the fourth round, chances are, it's not a goonman
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 12:06
|
|
|
a slime posted:If you haven't muted everyone in the game by the fourth round, chances are, it's not a goonman You wouldn't do that to me.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 13:30
|
|
|
Would you guys skin me alive if I were to play a goonman with a ping of 220
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 13:43
|
|
|
Cowabanga posted:Would you guys skin me alive if I were to play a goonman with a ping of 220 They let me play with 150ish so you should be fine.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 13:46
|
|
|
Iriquois posted:I will start to get in on goonmans now that I know that I am silver III and you guys are forewarned as to how much of a burden you are carrying. I just got demoted to Silver 3 so we can goonman together. Eventually we'll have one team of all silvers so nobody can yell at us. Unless allchat is on. And we'll still die in 30 seconds.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 14:53
|
|
This poster loves police brutality, but only when its against minorities!
|
astr0man posted:this happened in the same game, you can't tell from the gif but the guy shot 3 rounds at mcvey and just whiffed on every one The best part was finding out they were all novas+ at the end of the game.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 14:55
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G7UInEqleMI Bushido, even amongst silvers.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 15:52
|
|
|
kcer posted:There's a bit of speculation going around, half disproven, that VAC is keeping tabs on which domains you visit and may or may not be storing it. Gabe knows about all that horrible porn you've been watching. There's no way this is even possible, unless maybe you are using the in game browser to watch your weird furry porn while you are dead in csgo or something?
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 15:53
|
|
|
astr0man posted:There's no way this is even possible, unless maybe you are using the in game browser to watch your weird furry porn while you are dead in csgo or something? They're just hashing the URLs in your DNS cache to use with a local bloom filter. Can you imagine the bandwidth if they really sent your DNS cache to Valve's servers?
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 15:55
|
|
|
What's the source of the VAC spying rumor?Jeoh posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G7UInEqleMI I felt ashamed just watching that.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 16:28
|
|
|
Jeoh posted:They're just hashing the URLs in your DNS cache to use with a local bloom filter. Can you imagine the bandwidth if they really sent your DNS cache to Valve's servers? Huh that's interesting: for those who are curiuos here's the reddit thread talking about it: http://www.reddit.com/r/GlobalOffensive/comments/1y0kc1/vac_now_reads_all_the_domains_you_have_visited/?top I will have to fire up IDA at some point and see for myself what they do with it after that I guess. edit: But honestly even if they did flag you for having organner.pl in your DNS cache it doesn't mean you bought/downloaded any actual hacks. astr0man fucked around with this message at 16:36 on Feb 17, 2014 |
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 16:33
|
|
|
astr0man posted:edit: True, but I think the main concern here is that it might actually be happening. Surely, getting banned for visiting websites is an after thought.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 17:16
|
|
|
It's pretty safe to say that they're not banning anyone if they just visit cheat sites. Most likely it's just another parameter in their machine learning algorithm. Shady stuff in any case.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 18:28
|
|
|
I'm more interested in seeing if maybe they are trying to catch people spoofing valve/vac related domains.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 18:29
|
|
|
Xenaero posted:If you don't have a DJ on your team drowning out your sound, chances are, it's not a goonman. I no-poo poo woke up yesterday morning with "500 miles" blaring in my brain. Then I discovered I had a ton of TF2 crap I could sell, so I listed several pages worth of stuff yesterday and made about $10. Then I used that money to open a case I had and got a blue laminate StatTrak AK! Good things happen to good people.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 19:53
|
|
|
I am curious what everyone's "true" sensitivity is (Mouse DPI multiplied by in game sensitivity setting). I play at 600 DPI X 2 in game = 1200
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 20:48
|
|
|
750~
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 20:49
|
|
|
ScienceAndMusic posted:I am curious what everyone's "true" sensitivity is (Mouse DPI multiplied by in game sensitivity setting). Use a measurement that actually makes sense like inches/360 please. http://www.notalent.org/sensitivity/sensitivity.htm
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 20:52
|
|
|
astr0man posted:Use a measurement that actually makes sense like inches/360 please. So this is exactly the same as I was saying the only difference would be if someone (for whatever reason) changes their windows default sensitivity? Or am I missing something here? What is m_yaw?
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 20:54
|
|
|
When I play I mostly spend my time roasting nerds and hollowing people's guts with my Nova, am I a bad player y/N?
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 20:55
|
|
|
It's the same as what you said, except that an arbitrary number like "1200" isn't very helpful to anyone. And unless for whatever reason you have changed your m_yaw value in game you can leave it alone.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 20:55
|
|
|
astr0man posted:It's the same as what you said, except that an arbitrary number like "1200" isn't very helpful to anyone. And unless for whatever reason you have changed your m_yaw value in game you can leave it alone. How is the arbitrary number of 1200 which is DPI * Ingame Sensitivity, any better than inches per 360 which, by your logic, is equally as arbitrary. "True sensitivity" is a term I have heard countless times, where as I have never heard inches/360. Granted I don't read this thread. Both values are equally consistent. I will grant you that yours takes into account two additional settings. However it seems like in 99% of the case those settings never differ from the defaults.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 20:57
|
|
|
ScienceAndMusic posted:How is the arbitrary number of 1200 which is DPI X Ingame Sensitivity, any better than inches per 360 which, by your logic, is equally as arbitrary. "True sensitivity" is a term I have heard countless times, where as I have never heard inches/360. Granted I don't read this thread. Inches/360 is the accepted metric for overall sensitivity in CS.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 20:58
|
|
|
Except that inches per 360 accounts for how many degrees in game one "dot" in DPI actually moves your crosshair... edit: and yes I realize that multiplying DPI times in game sensitivity gives you the same thing, but unless you are a sperg who has all those numbers memorized saying "12 inches per 360" will be a lot more helpful to anyone in this thread than "1000" or whatever you want to use. astr0man fucked around with this message at 21:02 on Feb 17, 2014 |
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 20:59
|
|
|
ScienceAndMusic posted:How is the arbitrary number of 1200 which is DPI * Ingame Sensitivity, any better than inches per 360 which, by your logic, is equally as arbitrary. "True sensitivity" is a term I have heard countless times, where as I have never heard inches/360. Granted I don't read this thread.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 20:59
|
|
|
920 or 17.8 inches with both of these arbitrary measurements!
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 21:00
|
|
|
astr0man posted:It's the same as what you said, except that an arbitrary number like "1200" isn't very helpful to anyone. And unless for whatever reason you have changed your m_yaw value in game you can leave it alone. Lol, what he said was useful/made sense to me. He even gave us the formula he was using to get his numbers. It's not a general measurement as it only applies to CSG, sure, it works fine.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 21:00
|
|
|
astr0man posted:Use a measurement that actually makes sense like inches/360 please. I went a head and did this. Looks like I have 0.5 inches/360. I play 8200 DPI, I know, I'm bad.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 21:02
|
|
|
Dylan-D posted:Lol, what he said was useful/made sense to me. He even gave us the formula he was using to get his numbers. It's not a general measurement as it only applies to CSG, sure, it works fine. ScienceAndMusic posted:Regardless I'm fine using this metric, I play with 13.6 inches/360. I am just curious to see the sensitivity most players use.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 21:02
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 21:42 |
|
|
^^^ I understand the point, but I still don't think it makes one inherently better than the other. Especially since one requires you to use a tool to get the value whereas the other anyone can just tell you (assuming you know your dpi).astr0man posted:Except that inches per 360 accounts for how many degrees in game one "dot" in DPI actually moves your crosshair... But for comparitive purposes they are still equivalent... Regardless I'm fine using this metric, I play with 13.6 inches/360. I am just curious to see the sensitivity most players use.
|
|
#
?
Feb 17, 2014 21:02
|
|