Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
dont be mean to me
May 2, 2007

I'm interplanetary, bitch
Let's go to Mars


HalloKitty posted:

Now that's gangsta. If I had something that high DPI, I'd definitely set it to 100% to see what it's like. Maybe I'd leave it that way, but I don't know. Not a fan of screens that require scaling - don't know why it's suddenly become a massive problem to see a pixel. Seems like the market is swinging wildly both ways right now, though. Either you have a lovely 1366x768 screen, or something that requires scaling to be seen easily. The middle ground is lost.

In standalone displays, 1080p is basically standard now. QUALITY 1080p is a different story but not too hard to find.

In portable devices, it still exists in 'worth buying' models, it's just... like, a handful each of inertia-designed laptops and dockable Real Motherfucking Windows tablets (and ten times as many ConsumptionOS devices).

dont be mean to me fucked around with this message at 12:49 on Feb 24, 2014

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Gwaihir
Dec 8, 2009
Hair Elf

Malkar posted:

How much of a pain in the rear end is dual monitoring different resolutions? Trying to decide whether to get a 2560 and use my current (fairly old) 1920 as a secondary. Though, I'm also curious as to how a 2560 looks when gaming in 1920. Am I going to regret the decision until I can upgrade my GPU? I have a 7870 at the moment, and I'm fairly sure it's not good enough to pump out high quality 2560x1440 gameplay

I use a U3014 primary next to a 2412 secondary. The only downside is that the 3014's AG coating is lightyears better than the 2412's so it makes the smaller screen look a little bad in that respect. The size differences aren't a big deal though.

You will absolutely need a lot more graphics horsepower than a 7870 to enjoy a 2560 monitor though.

FrenzyTheKillbot
Jan 31, 2008

Good Hustle
Hey guys, a monitor is the last thing I need for my new build. I found a daily deal for a Dell E2414H for $160. I noticed the Dell Ultrasharps are highly recommended, but I wasn't sure about this one. I like the price, but would prefer if someone could confirm that that's a good deal.

Wowporn
May 31, 2012

HarumphHarumphHarumph

FrenzyTheKillbot posted:

Hey guys, a monitor is the last thing I need for my new build. I found a daily deal for a Dell E2414H for $160. I noticed the Dell Ultrasharps are highly recommended, but I wasn't sure about this one. I like the price, but would prefer if someone could confirm that that's a good deal.

It's a TN panel, so don't get it. The Ultrasharps are way better, an you should get one of those instead if you can. But, if you don't like the price hike, go for the S series instead. I have an s2440l, it's some VA pseudo IPS whatnot, but still looks really nice; I was apprehensive of how glossy it was but the gloss makes the colors looks real nice 'n pop-y. You can get one on Amazon for like $180. Or if you want real deal IPS you can get that 24" ASUS whatever it's called for around $230.

Stanley Pain
Jun 16, 2001

by Fluffdaddy

Good Will Hrunting posted:

Do you 1440p'ers boost the default text size of your operating system? I've only been using it for a few days but I feel like I'm going to go blind with the default Windows font size.

I would if Windows (even 8.1) wasn't so completely terrible with font size changes :(

Stanley Pain fucked around with this message at 19:51 on Feb 24, 2014

FrenzyTheKillbot
Jan 31, 2008

Good Hustle

Ruin Completely posted:

It's a TN panel, so don't get it. The Ultrasharps are way better, an you should get one of those instead if you can. But, if you don't like the price hike, go for the S series instead. I have an s2440l, it's some VA pseudo IPS whatnot, but still looks really nice; I was apprehensive of how glossy it was but the gloss makes the colors looks real nice 'n pop-y. You can get one on Amazon for like $180. Or if you want real deal IPS you can get that 24" ASUS whatever it's called for around $230.

Oh ok thanks. I didn't even realize Dell made TN monitors so I didn't check. I might just pony up and get an Ultrasharps since I know they're good. Do you have any more info on that Asus one, or where it was talked about in the thread?

Edit: actually don't worry about it. Gonna get the U2312HM for $230. It's within my budget and I know it's good.

FrenzyTheKillbot fucked around with this message at 20:14 on Feb 24, 2014

Zorilla
Mar 23, 2005

GOING APE SPIT
The panel in my new X-Star sat a little too low in its housing, but poster tape seems to work as a decent spacer:



I wish I could find something more pliable and with stronger adhesive, but between the weight of the panel and the front bezel keeping it somewhat captive, these aren't going anywhere.

ChaosArgate
Oct 10, 2012

Why does everyone think I'm going to get in trouble?

Question, since everyone seems to discourage getting a TN panel, why are they recommended in the OP for gamers?

jink
May 8, 2002

Drop it like it's Hot.
Taco Defender

ChaosArgate posted:

Question, since everyone seems to discourage getting a TN panel, why are they recommended in the OP for gamers?

Faster refresh rates mostly. Also; gamers aren't concerned with color accuracy that IPS would aid with. :)

Nephilm
Jun 11, 2009

by Lowtax

jink posted:

Faster refresh rates mostly. Also; gamers aren't concerned with color accuracy that IPS would aid with. :)

No, unless you're on a 144Hz TN, all monitors are the same in that regard. The argument would be for pixel response time, but I've been playing around with my new P2414H and with its unnoticeable RTC it has similar response times than my 5yo TN panel, which at the time I acquired it was recommended as an excellent gaming monitor and still is.

Outside from the aforementioned outlier case, there's no reason to get a TN panel besides being too cheap to spend $50 dollars in the single most significant part of the computer.

DrDork
Dec 29, 2003
commanding officer of the Army of Dorkness

Nephilm posted:

Outside from the aforementioned outlier case, there's no reason to get a TN panel besides being too cheap to spend $50 dollars in the single most significant part of the computer.
Pretty much. If you're looking to game at 120-144Hz, there aren't a lot of options other than TN (there are a few overclockable IPS monitors, but those are hit or miss) right now. This will hopefully change in the future, though, and then we can leave TN behind entirely. If you're happy gaming at 60Hz, or are doing basically anything else you want a IPS/PLS/VA panel of some sort.

Zero VGS
Aug 16, 2002
ASK ME ABOUT HOW HUMAN LIVES THAT MADE VIDEO GAME CONTROLLERS ARE WORTH MORE
Lipstick Apathy
If you have a huge boner for G-Sync, TN is still the only game in town. I actually bought that one monitor compatible with the DIY kit in anticipation, but now I'm reselling it after getting a taste of IPS. I'd rather watch the screen tearing than having my whole image washed out.

Nephilm
Jun 11, 2009

by Lowtax

Zero VGS posted:

If you have a huge boner for G-Sync, TN is still the only game in town. I actually bought that one monitor compatible with the DIY kit in anticipation, but now I'm reselling it after getting a taste of IPS. I'd rather watch the screen tearing than having my whole image washed out.

Or just turn on V-Sync and take the 2-5 FPS drop. Or overclock your monitor to 80Hz :getin:

Wistful of Dollars
Aug 25, 2009

Zero VGS posted:

If you have a huge boner for G-Sync, TN is still the only game in town. I actually bought that one monitor compatible with the DIY kit in anticipation, but now I'm reselling it after getting a taste of IPS. I'd rather watch the screen tearing than having my whole image washed out.

I've seen tales that Overlord is waiting to get g-sync upgrade kits for Korean monitors. I haven't gone looking for direct confirmation of that yet, though.

TheRationalRedditor
Jul 17, 2000

WHO ABUSED HIM. WHO ABUSED THE BOY.

Nephilm posted:

Or just turn on V-Sync and take the 2-5 FPS drop. Or overclock your monitor to 80Hz :getin:
V-sync has its own pretty common problems that I personally find much worse than tearing, like increased input lag.

uhhhhahhhhohahhh
Oct 9, 2012

TheRationalRedditor posted:

V-sync has its own pretty common problems that I personally find much worse than tearing, like increased input lag.

Have you tried putting the Maximum pre-rendered frames setting in your GPU control panel to the lowest? Fixed every input lag vsync problem I ever had in any game

DrDork
Dec 29, 2003
commanding officer of the Army of Dorkness
Does Overlord even stock anything, ever? I've idly checked back with them now and then for months, and I don't think they've ever had any of their 27" monitors not listed as Sold Out. Ever.

Smashing Link
Jul 8, 2003

I'll keep chucking bombs at you til you fall off that ledge!
Grimey Drawer
What do you guys think about something like this to replace a 5 year old LCD TV and two 20" Dell monitors, mostly used for spreadsheet type work?

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824005390

Wasabi the J
Jan 23, 2008

MOM WAS RIGHT

Smashing Link posted:

What do you guys think about something like this to replace a 5 year old LCD TV and two 20" Dell monitors, mostly used for spreadsheet type work?

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824005390

Large format 1080p screens never feel or look that great. Stick to a smaller screen.

Disappointing Pie
Feb 7, 2006
Words cannot describe what a disaster the pie was.
My buddy bought this monitor a bit back and hasn't really been using it, he just keeps his pc hooked up to his TV, I'm building a new PC and interested in a new monitor he's offering it to me for $100, it's in basically brand new condition can't tell it's ever been used but for not much more I can get a brand new monitor, my question is, do you guys notice anything about this that seems off, the few reviews I can find seem almost overly glowing about it and obviously it's the official MLG monitor so it's got great low input lag (if that makes sense lol)and from what little I saw him play on it the colors seemed fine if not amazing.

Just looking for some quick thoughts if anyone has any. If it seems like a decent deal and I can help out a buddy I'm all for it. I'd be doing 1080p gaming and webbrowsing and some video watching and thats about it.

Nephilm
Jun 11, 2009

by Lowtax

Wasabi the J posted:

Large format 1080p screens never feel or look that great. Stick to a smaller screen.

I have a 23.8" monitor and sometimes wish it was bigger. What you're comfortable with depends a lot on your setup.

Disappointing Pie posted:

My buddy bought this monitor a bit back and hasn't really been using it, he just keeps his pc hooked up to his TV, I'm building a new PC and interested in a new monitor he's offering it to me for $100, it's in basically brand new condition can't tell it's ever been used but for not much more I can get a brand new monitor, my question is, do you guys notice anything about this that seems off, the few reviews I can find seem almost overly glowing about it and obviously it's the official MLG monitor so it's got great low input lag (if that makes sense lol)and from what little I saw him play on it the colors seemed fine if not amazing.

Just looking for some quick thoughts if anyone has any. If it seems like a decent deal and I can help out a buddy I'm all for it. I'd be doing 1080p gaming and webbrowsing and some video watching and thats about it.

It's a 60Hz TN monitor.

Nephilm posted:

Outside from (G-sync and 120+Hz), there's no reason to get a TN panel besides being too cheap to spend $50 dollars in the single most significant part of the computer.

ShaneB
Oct 22, 2002


I can't find the Auria EQ276W at Microcenter anywhere and haven't seen it in stock in a long while. Are there any clones/competitors I should look at in the $400 27" 1440p range?

1997
Jan 20, 2008

calmer than you are

ShaneB posted:

I can't find the Auria EQ276W at Microcenter anywhere and haven't seen it in stock in a long while. Are there any clones/competitors I should look at in the $400 27" 1440p range?

Why don't you order one from Korea? Do you need the extra inputs? If not then something like this works.

ShaneB
Oct 22, 2002


1997 posted:

Why don't you order one from Korea? Do you need the extra inputs? If not then something like this works.

Nice. Are the perfect pixel ones usually worth it?

Paul MaudDib
May 3, 2006

TEAM NVIDIA:
FORUM POLICE
.

ShaneB
Oct 22, 2002


Paul MaudDib posted:

4K seems to be on the horizon at this point. The ASUS PB287Q is going to do 4K @ 60hz for $800 sometime in Q2. What kind of GPU are you going to need to drive something like that at reasonable (non-Ultra) settings?

A very very powerful one. It's literally 4x the pixels of 1080p so.... Stuff like a 290x doesn't even really make high-end games at 4k very playable: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/radeon-r9-290x-hawaii-review,3650-17.html

Alereon
Feb 6, 2004

Dehumanize yourself and face to Trumpshed
College Slice

ShaneB posted:

Nice. Are the perfect pixel ones usually worth it?
I'd suggest googling for "Korean IPS" and "Korean PLS", you'll find megathreads on various forums with details. To summarize, there's two major types of Korean monitors out there, those based on LG IPS panels and those based on Samsung PLS panels (Samsung's version of IPS). It's kind of personal which type you'd prefer, I think PLS is generally "better" for most users who'd be considering Korean monitors, due to less "IPS glow" and better screen finishes, but that's me.

Most Korean IPS monitors are glossy, though I have heard some have an awful grainy matte finish with a terrible anti-glare coating. The PLS monitors come in glossy and VERY fine matte, fine enough not to cause visible grain. In general glossy monitors provide better image quality and no glare, EXCEPT if you have bright lights at an angle that will reflect them directly, in which case you need matte. Avoid monitors labelled "glass front", these have a sheet of tempered glass in front of the panel for kiosk/cafe usage and this affects image quality seriously. Pixel perfect monitors are not worth paying for, if they test them at all it's not thoroughly, so there is no change in your chance of getting a dead pixel.

Zorilla
Mar 23, 2005

GOING APE SPIT
I've had both LG IPS and Samsung PLS panels, and I think I prefer PLS because they seem to have more vibrant color and better backlight/color uniformity based on my personal experience.

I don't think I've made the same observations about the matte AG coating between the two OEMs. My current X-Star's matte finish is pretty much indistinguishable from LG-paneled monitors I've used in the past, such as the Dell U2713H/HM and HP ZR2740w. Same with the IPS glow; aside from the U2713H, which is a bit of an oddball and not for general purpose use anyway, the amount of glow has been similar between all IPS/PLS monitor's I've viewed in the past.

I can't say I've seen many glossy PLS panels around- that's probably more of an LG thing due to OEM demand. In fact, the only true glossy Korean PLS monitor I've seen was one that only just showed up within the last month: the Monex M27QSM. I haven't heard much talk about it, so I have no idea how it stacks up to the X-Star/QNIX or anything else with the LTM270DL02 PLS panel.

Zorilla fucked around with this message at 01:18 on Feb 27, 2014

quaker69
Jul 3, 2004

Four measures of cheap Vodka combined with a bottle of Bawls
Lipstick Apathy

Zorilla posted:

The panel in my new X-Star sat a little too low in its housing, but poster tape seems to work as a decent spacer:



I wish I could find something more pliable and with stronger adhesive, but between the weight of the panel and the front bezel keeping it somewhat captive, these aren't going anywhere.

Some guy wrote a guide on completely de-bezelling them and remounting the vesa with epoxy.

They look badass, but christ the amount of work and sperging required makes them basically not worth it.

http://www.overclock.net/t/1404407/how-to-create-a-vesa-mount-after-debezelling-your-monitor-qnix-qx2710

This is after he sprayed it with canned powder coating. I wouldn't mind popping the front bezel off and doing the same to it. I don't really like all the buzzword specs being etched into the bezel, or the highly reflective plastic.

quaker69 fucked around with this message at 01:18 on Feb 27, 2014

ShaneB
Oct 22, 2002


Zorilla posted:

I've had both LG IPS and Samsung PLS panels, and I think I prefer PLS because they seem to have more vibrant color and better backlight/color uniformity based on my personal experience.

I don't think I've made the same observations about the matte AG coating between the two OEMs. My current X-Star's matte finish is pretty much indistinguishable from LG-paneled monitors I've used in the past, such as the Dell U2713H/HM and HP ZR2740w. Same with the IPS glow; aside from the U2713H, which is a bit of an oddball and not for general purpose use anyway, the amount of glow has been similar between all IPS/PLS monitor's I've viewed in the past.

I can't say I've seen many glossy PLS panels around- that's probably more of an LG thing due to OEM demand. In fact, the only true glossy Korean PLS monitor I've seen was one that only just showed up within the last month: the Monex M27QSM. I haven't heard much talk about it, so I have no idea how it stacks up to the X-Star/QNIX or anything else with the LTM270DL02 PLS panel.

I have a glossy Dell 23" IPS right now (a cheaper one from Microcenter) and I love the color fidelity for photography work and general niceness, but I have 3 windows 12 feet behind me and the glare during the day gets kind of old. I guess I should go for the matte PLS?

Zorilla
Mar 23, 2005

GOING APE SPIT

BrettRobb posted:

Some guy wrote a guide on completely de-bezelling them and remounting the vesa with epoxy.

They look badass, but christ the amount of work and sperging required makes them basically not worth it.

http://www.overclock.net/t/1404407/how-to-create-a-vesa-mount-after-debezelling-your-monitor-qnix-qx2710

This is after he sprayed it with canned powder coating. I wouldn't mind popping the front bezel off and doing the same to it. I don't really like all the buzzword specs being etched into the bezel, or the highly reflective plastic.

Yeah, that is a bit extreme for me too. Which is to bad, because the problem I've had with panel positioning seems to be part of a larger fit and finish issue specific to my new X-Star. In addition to the monitor sitting too low by default, it has a really bad convex bow in the rear shell of the housing that causes the bottom center of the front bezel to stick way out when reassembled, revealing a big gap. The part is perfectly straight when taken off. All of these Korean monitors that use this style of housing have a tiny bit of warping there, even though the rear shell is usually perfectly straight, but this one way beyond what is typical. Unfortunately, the panel has more "give" than the housing, so I can't really fix it with strategically placed padding. That would just caused the panel to bend to conform to the housing.

Zorilla fucked around with this message at 02:28 on Feb 27, 2014

Zorilla
Mar 23, 2005

GOING APE SPIT

ShaneB posted:

I have a glossy Dell 23" IPS right now (a cheaper one from Microcenter) and I love the color fidelity for photography work and general niceness, but I have 3 windows 12 feet behind me and the glare during the day gets kind of old. I guess I should go for the matte PLS?

I'm not sure, to be honest. I use a FIRST FSM-270YG at work, which is an earlier Korean 27" IPS monitor that uses the same style housing as the QNIX and X-Star, but has the same LG LM270WQ1 glossy panel as the 2010 iMac 27". I use it in a office with lots and lots of big windows, and despite it being a glossy panel, it does such a good job of suppressing glare that I can use it in just about any lighting conditions. It even seems to do well where matte panels would go hazy. The only time I even see a reflection on it is when I'm displaying something dark.

In your situation, since you have three windows directly behind you, facing your screen, then I would probably stick with a matte panel. As big as the windows are in my office, they're to the side and in front of me, so glare isn't as big of an issue there.

If you have a monitor with edge-to-edge glass, that could be part of the problem. Monitors like the Dell S2340M reportedly have quite a bit of glare because of this. The glossy surface of the panel itself seems to do a great job of creating a nice, clear, straight finish with very little glare, but once you add another layer of glass like you see on the S2340M or most Apple products, then the situation gets worse.

Zorilla fucked around with this message at 02:23 on Feb 27, 2014

KingEup
Nov 18, 2004
I am a REAL ADDICT
(to threadshitting)


Please ask me for my google inspired wisdom on shit I know nothing about. Actually, you don't even have to ask.

BrettRobb posted:

Some guy wrote a guide on completely de-bezelling them and remounting the vesa with epoxy.

I would buy one of those instantly if they were actually sold like that.

What kind of a stupid industry thinks it's a good idea to wrap a monitor in cheap-rear end looking plastic?

Alereon
Feb 6, 2004

Dehumanize yourself and face to Trumpshed
College Slice

Zorilla posted:

I don't think I've made the same observations about the matte AG coating between the two OEMs. My current X-Star's matte finish is pretty much indistinguishable from LG-paneled monitors I've used in the past, such as the Dell U2713H/HM and HP ZR2740w. Same with the IPS glow; aside from the U2713H, which is a bit of an oddball and not for general purpose use anyway, the amount of glow has been similar between all IPS/PLS monitor's I've viewed in the past.
It sounds like you have way more personal experience with these monitors than I do so I'll defer to your judgment, I've seen a Korean LG IPS model in person once and I only really had time to appreciate the contrast and color (in terms of pop, nor correctness) and not look deeply. I thought I remembered a site showing closeup comparisons of pixels on the various monitors showing the matte LG IPS panels had worse-than-average grain, but I will admit to being overcautious and having high standards due to having a VERY gritty Dell LCD. Similarly I thought I had seen comparison shots showing much lower "glow" on the PLS panels, but I can't find that via Google again so I could be making that up.

quote:

I can't say I've seen many glossy PLS panels around- that's probably more of an LG thing due to OEM demand. In fact, the only true glossy Korean PLS monitor I've seen was one that only just showed up within the last month: the Monex M27QSM. I haven't heard much talk about it, so I have no idea how it stacks up to the X-Star/QNIX or anything else with the LTM270DL02 PLS panel.
I was poking around the Ebay vendors this week and they seemed to mostly be selling glossy PLS panels, and from the forum reviews I was reading they really were glossy and not just fine matte.

KingEup posted:

What kind of a stupid industry thinks it's a good idea to wrap a monitor in cheap-rear end looking plastic?
The kind that is buying defective (A-) panels at a deep discount, connecting it to electronics at the lowest possible costs, and then selling them at whatever markup they can get overseas? :)

KingEup
Nov 18, 2004
I am a REAL ADDICT
(to threadshitting)


Please ask me for my google inspired wisdom on shit I know nothing about. Actually, you don't even have to ask.

Alereon posted:

The kind that is buying defective (A-) panels at a deep discount, connecting it to electronics at the lowest possible costs, and then selling them at whatever markup they can get overseas? :)

Wouldn't it be cheaper to not bother manufacturing a plastic case and stand?

Alereon
Feb 6, 2004

Dehumanize yourself and face to Trumpshed
College Slice

KingEup posted:

Wouldn't it be cheaper to not bother manufacturing a plastic case and stand?
You kind of have to have something to hold the panel and electronics and buttons together, unless I'm misunderstanding what you're saying. I totally get that it is ridiculous that a monitor would be perfectly usable except the plastic case is slightly too inconsistent, it seems like the answer to that is spending like $1 each more on build quality. The manufacturers probably don't care and will sell all the monitors they make without that because they are so drat cheap, though. Wanting an option that's like 5% less lovely for 5% more money is the story of technology (and most things really).

quaker69
Jul 3, 2004

Four measures of cheap Vodka combined with a bottle of Bawls
Lipstick Apathy

KingEup posted:

I would buy one of those instantly if they were actually sold like that.

What kind of a stupid industry thinks it's a good idea to wrap a monitor in cheap-rear end looking plastic?

On the backside of the monitor everything is completely exposed. I may give up having a second monitor for a bit give it a try. I've already taken them apart twice to remove the stand and glass, so I am pretty comfortable with them at this point.

subx
Jan 12, 2003

If we hit that bullseye, the rest of the dominoes should fall like a house of cards. Checkmate.

Malkar posted:

How much of a pain in the rear end is dual monitoring different resolutions? Trying to decide whether to get a 2560 and use my current (fairly old) 1920 as a secondary. Though, I'm also curious as to how a 2560 looks when gaming in 1920. Am I going to regret the decision until I can upgrade my GPU? I have a 7870 at the moment, and I'm fairly sure it's not good enough to pump out high quality 2560x1440 gameplay

I'll go the other way and say it's not a big deal at all. I have a 32" 1080p TV on my desk next to my 1440p monitors and it doesn't bother me at all when I'm moving windows or whatever.

I like having them all aligned at the top since I don't typically have the mouse at the bottom of the screen when I move across monitors.

Malkar
Aug 19, 2010

Taste the cloud
Quick update, I went ahead and did the opposite of what I was going to do and just bought one of the Korean IPS', a QNIX QX2710. No dead pixels, and only a bit of backlight bleed from the lower left. The only issue I've had with using two monitors is realizing just how CRAP the colors and the display were/are on my old 1080. Looking between the two, it's kind of depressing that I never noticed just how washed out my cheapo 23 inch was.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

KKKLIP ART
Sep 3, 2004

I just looked up the QNIX, and apparently you can get it on Amazon and Newegg. How does that work with any sort of perfect pixel things they might offer?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply