|
I can offer a critique. I'm more of a grammar/spacing/formatting bitcher than anything else. Anathema Device posted:
I'm loving that the "harpy" is less a mystical creature and more an insult to a girl that's starving with hunger and not as clean as the others. It makes me want to know more about Christi's background. Since you're willing to expand the words past 1K, my advice is to go more into why she only gets to eat at lunch. Is it poverty (free lunch), or abuse (her dad won't let her eat/neglects her), or what? That part caught me hard, having known many a person who only got food at school due to poverty and hunger issues. I also like how Christi's constantly thinking of revenge, because it's realistic to think horrible things about people hurting you. The cruelty of children, man. The ending could probably do with more inner monologue, to "strengthen" the ending. It seems fine to me, but maybe tie the offering of crackers from the quiet girl into them giving her more strength to ignore the crowd? I don't think there needs to be an after scene/ongoing with the counselor, as long as it's said near the end that Christi's going to tell him/her why she's hungry so often.
|
# ? Mar 4, 2014 19:48 |
|
|
# ? May 28, 2024 19:13 |
|
Anathema Device posted:Apparently my thunderdome this week had a weak ending compared to the rest, so I did some rewriting. For anyone who read the original, am I going in the right direction? This story certainly works and your abilities as a writer are clear but I was sorta disgusted by the whole thing and felt pretty uncomfortable when it was done. It came off as sorta contemptuous of the protagonist, as though the whole appeal of the story was just seeing how disgusting this girl is and how terrible her life is as a result. I'm not saying it was intended that way but I figured I might as well let you know what my reaction as a reader was.
|
# ? Mar 4, 2014 22:00 |
|
Helsing posted:This story certainly works and your abilities as a writer are clear but I was sorta disgusted by the whole thing and felt pretty uncomfortable when it was done. It came off as sorta contemptuous of the protagonist, as though the whole appeal of the story was just seeing how disgusting this girl is and how terrible her life is as a result. I'm not saying it was intended that way but I figured I might as well let you know what my reaction as a reader was. This is a well-made point, and probably explains what I was meaning better than I did. You do a good job of setting her up as gross, then someone talks to her and bam. But there's no actual change; what would change this girl? Maybe nothing, but if so you need to show us that.
|
# ? Mar 4, 2014 23:14 |
|
Thank you all for your comments. I'm setting to work on another draft of this now.
|
# ? Mar 5, 2014 00:35 |
|
So after the line-by edits I was given, I redid huge chunks of the story I did for Thunderdome. There was a lot of "why should I care about these characters" and "you're really drilling in things that we have gleaned already" and such. So this is the rewrite, hopefully a little improved. quote:Fire-Girl
|
# ? Mar 5, 2014 04:56 |
|
I would suggest you redo the tense. Maybe it's just me but present tense stories bug the hell out of me. It feels awkward to read something that supposed to be happening as you read it. Can someone give me a critique on this story? It's just something I wrote for the hell of it: https://docs.google.com/document/d/15vAAJQsxPFUzJ5fjOvYWowEBG8e51udYzswuYQWWrSQ/edit?usp=sharing I'm specifically working on balancing description with action and punctuation.
|
# ? Mar 5, 2014 07:13 |
|
Nethilia posted:So after the line-by edits I was given, I redid huge chunks of the story I did for Thunderdome. There was a lot of "why should I care about these characters" and "you're really drilling in things that we have gleaned already" and such. So this is the rewrite, hopefully a little improved. I wish I had good news for you, but I actually enoyed the original version more. It feels like you tried to answer the question “why should we care?” with “BECAUSE THEY ARE GAY PARENTS! That's not bad, just different!” I don't care more because it's a political issue; I want to care about the people. I liked how subtle that was in the original draft. In this one you could use it as a source of character development, but you never really go deeper. Major notes: POV shifting. You're going to have to shift at some point, because you start out following Ross and finish after his death, but in the middle you skip to Kyle and the town as a whole. The strongest parts of this are in more limited point of view, so I'd recommend following Ross until the funeral and then showing us Phoebe’s world through her own eyes. If you must show us town gossip through omniscient POV, have a clear change into Phoebe’s POV, not a gradual fade. I want to know why Ross and Kyle were Phoebe’s favorite parents, not just hear you tell me they were. I also liked parts of the first version better; it set the era more clearly. So I'm splicing bits of both together in the line-by-line. Italics are from the original quote:Fire-Girl elfdude posted:I would suggest you redo the tense. Maybe it's just me but present tense stories bug the hell out of me. It feels awkward to read something that supposed to be happening as you read it. Are you suggesting I move "Harpy" out of present tense? You don't clarify who you're talking to. I'll crit your story if you leave a nice in-depth crit for someone else; putting down in detail what works and doesn't will help you write better. Anathema Device fucked around with this message at 08:13 on Mar 5, 2014 |
# ? Mar 5, 2014 07:59 |
|
Anathema Device, my bad, I figured it was obvious. Yeah I was suggesting that I don't like harpy in present tense. For example just rewriting the first paragraph as is in past tense reads much better imo. The writing otherwise is quite good although it lacks a story 'componenet' the characterization itself is intriguing. I've only seen a few stories written in present tense that manage to pull it off and fewer still that still don't sound better in past tense.
|
# ? Mar 5, 2014 08:26 |
|
Anonymous Robot:quote:Inside, the diner was nearly vacant. The broad-shouldered cook regarded him with a quiet nod. At the other end of the room, a young man sat in a booth, smoking a cigarette and staring at the table. Roger took a seat at the counter. “I’ll take a cup of coffee, please.” My first impression seems about as empty as the bar, give some characterization to the environment and the bar to make it more interesting, if this happens in the middle of your story then that might not be necessary but setting up an environment this bland tells us not to care about it Overall, the story is utterly boring because I feel like it's happening between shadows, and not actually people. Your lead in paragraph explains more in a couple sentences than this entire piece does. That seems odd to me. You say you struggle with characterization, and that's certainly true here, but your summary to give us background includes pretty solid characterization. Such characterization, even a hint of it, was painfully missing throughout the story. I would google search how to show and not tell. It's definitely a difficult thing, and it's something I'm working on too so don't worry about not getting it, but if you can add it into the story the majority of it would be a lot better. As it is, it's really reliant on dialogue as the central action to move the story forward, and most of the dialogue is boring without any characterization to explain it. elfdude fucked around with this message at 09:10 on Mar 5, 2014 |
# ? Mar 5, 2014 09:06 |
|
Anathema Device posted:I wish I had good news for you, but I actually enoyed the original version more. It feels like you tried to answer the question “why should we care?” with “BECAUSE THEY ARE GAY PARENTS! That's not bad, just different!” I don't care more because it's a political issue; I want to care about the people. I liked how subtle that was in the original draft. In this one you could use it as a source of character development, but you never really go deeper. Mmm. I was going more for the characterization I had been told that I lacked, but I clearly went too far on one spot and not on other aspects of Kyle, Ross, and Phoebe, and was told before that they didn't understand why I didn't just drop Kyle wholly and leave it to Ross to be a single father. (I don't write queer families for politics, I write queer characters cause I am.) The shift is hard, but I can probably use the last paragraphs to switch from Ross to Phoebe and go more into her life before she cycles again. Since I can go over now, I might go for 1500 words as an upper limit. (I'm prone to "dump words, cut them in edits" from Nano style writing. Setting an upper limit is my current exercise, hence me starting in on Thunderdome.) I'd cut that original dialogue because the line-by crits by one of the judges said that it sounded like a police report, so I took it out. But I had liked it. I'll tweak it again, let it sit for a bit, and then put it up for more crits with my regular beta. Thanks a lot for the crit.
|
# ? Mar 5, 2014 16:13 |
|
Anathema: I also agree that 3rd person present tense is really jarring. It's hard for me to get a sports announcer out of my head. "She heads to the trashcan, she's going long.... she reaches, she scores some chips! Oh man!" I don't think your story really requires it either, but it's always a personal decision. Myself, I only do present tense in the first person, and usually only when something happens to that character that would leave them unable to tell a story later, or if the knowledge gained after the story ruins how the story would be told. Your girl would probably tell the story the same even knowing she ended up at the counselor.
|
# ? Mar 5, 2014 22:00 |
|
This is a controversial opinion on this forum but I quite like present tense and rhere have been some really good stories and novels done in present tense as well. A lotta posters in CC seem to view it as a gimmick or distraction but I like the sense of immediacy it provides. Since people are used to past tense you may end up drawing attention to the style of your writing rather than the content (though for my part I usually don't find that to be the case) but I yhink present tense stories can work quite well if you do them properly. In the case of "Harpy" I didn't even really notice that it was present tense when I first read it and now, looking at it again, I think the tense is a strength as it situates the reader more firmly within the protagonists perspective. I liked how the story was written, for me the issue was the lack of any character arc ((hard to do in under a 1000 words) and the general sense that the protagonist could have been handled more sympathetically or at least in a way that humanized her a bit more and didn't make her seem like a total freak (for instance: why is she so uncontrollably hungry? Why does she lack impulse control? Why doesn't she seem to have any sense of dignity?)
|
# ? Mar 5, 2014 22:25 |
|
About third person present tense: I use present tense in flash fiction because I find I can use it more efficiently, word-wise. I didn't really think about what tense to put the story in, so I will make a more conscious decision with the next draft. I'm trying not to respond to the comments about "Harpy" too much because I want the next draft to answer them, rather than me blathering away. I appreciate all of the conversation and input about it. Nethilia posted:Mmm. I was going more for the characterization I had been told that I lacked, but I clearly went too far on one spot and not on other aspects of Kyle, Ross, and Phoebe, and was told before that they didn't understand why I didn't just drop Kyle wholly and leave it to Ross to be a single father. (I don't write queer families for politics, I write queer characters cause I am.) Isn't it confusing when crits contradict each other? Go with what seems to work best for you. I think what's needed to justify both Kyle and Ross's characters is to show what each of them brings to Pheobe's life, or what their relationship with each other does, if that makes sense. Right now they're sort of Kyle-and-Ross, rather than distinct people. I'd love to see how this turns out. elfdude posted:I would suggest you redo the tense. Maybe it's just me but present tense stories bug the hell out of me. It feels awkward to read something that supposed to be happening as you read it. Here's my thoughts: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Q0eUl7espE7DvJTY_VydqX3xjViNtAAGnMj5K7h-R48/edit Edit Oh hell, I don't know if this goes here or in fiction advice and discussion, but "Harpy" is really pushing the edge of my writing ability. I know what I want to get across, but I feel like I don't have the knowledge or the skill to pull it off. It's frustrating. Anathema Device fucked around with this message at 23:43 on Mar 5, 2014 |
# ? Mar 5, 2014 23:40 |
|
Thank you for your critique on that! I agree I probably could've handled the opening better. My goal was to create a world in which things were disappearing yet the main character was the only one who realized this, it's a plot point that I loved to explore but I wasn't sure how to resolve so you've got me there. A lot of the action picked up towards the end and that was me trying to maintain a sense of word count. It's not a thunderdome submission but my typical story is 10+ pages in length which makes writing for the thunderdome habitually problematic. It's nice not to see punctuation comments on every sentence although I think there's still some difficulty. One question I had was exploring the idea of the sentence structure I was using a lot, could you explain that a bit more? I think I have an idea of what you mean but my grasp of sentence structure is basic to say the least so I don't feel I have much of a grasp to fix it. Helsing posted:This is a controversial opinion on this forum but I quite like present tense and rhere have been some really good stories and novels done in present tense as well. A lotta posters in CC seem to view it as a gimmick or distraction but I like the sense of immediacy it provides. Since people are used to past tense you may end up drawing attention to the style of your writing rather than the content (though for my part I usually don't find that to be the case) but I yhink present tense stories can work quite well if you do them properly. It definitely is a preference thing but I would wager most people are on the side of that feels third person present tense is awkward. It's original and for me that gains huge points but it's difficult for me to appreciate originality when I can picture the same story in third person past tense and it feels a lot stronger overall. I have seen a few authors handle present tense for certain scenes and switch between the two well but again doing so is difficult and if done wrongly massively detracts from a story. The hunger games is perhaps the only real story I can think of in present tense but even that I'm not sure wouldn't have been a richer story in past tense. Then again the hunger games was a wonderfully successful book and several sci fi dystopia books handle it pretty well so there's that but I'm hard pressed to claim it as a strength of the writing and not simply a self-imposed handicap by a skilled author. elfdude fucked around with this message at 05:16 on Mar 6, 2014 |
# ? Mar 6, 2014 05:01 |
|
As far as my crit of Fire Girl: I was critting on how it read as is. I think it had some deep structural problems, and my advice to "cut the extra character and cut the 'police report'" was made in the context of "If you cut these out, you have room to flesh out other stuff," but you still have to choose wisely what you will flesh out instead. It feels a bit like you can't decide if you want the story to focus on Phoebe or on the parents, and it suffers for that. I think it would be better to have it completely from Phoebe's perspective, and you could even show her reactions to "I have two fathers, oh my!" since she is from a different, older generation than them. That's a kind of cool premise you have, but all we see from Phoebe's eight lifetimes is that she does well in school. Show us snippets throughout her life, show us cool details. Is she only able to process all her old memories when she hits like three or four years old, or can she--unlike other one-day old infants--see and process and understand everything? If it's the latter, you could show her confusion in these two men who live together and act like a man and woman are taking care of her, then show how it changes her feelings toward these kinds of relationships, and show how it improves her as a person while simultaneously giving us an idea of what great parents these guys are and how much they love her. Sorry if my crits were confusing, but the "cut this," and "cut this" or "this reads boring" type advice is just trying to help you show you a prose-level idea of what is working and what is not; the line-by-lines are not really a suggestion to just cut or change what I mark in a line-by-line, and then your story is good. It should give you an idea of what themes or ideas you did well, then by cutting certain things you gain more room to add other ideas. In this story I think you have a nice idea, but you need to fix the focus and immediacy of it for it to have emotional weight. Do everything you can to show the relationship between these three people rather than all the mundane details of the fire, the factoids about how well she does in school, etc.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2014 05:12 |
|
Nethilia posted:Mmm. I was going more for the characterization I had been told that I lacked, but I clearly went too far on one spot and not on other aspects of Kyle, Ross, and Phoebe, and was told before that they didn't understand why I didn't just drop Kyle wholly and leave it to Ross to be a single father. (I don't write queer families for politics, I write queer characters cause I am.) I think the problem with your story is that there are two stories (or rather, one story in two very different "styles") you are trying to fit in one. These two are: 1. The narrower storyline of Kyle and Ross discovering Phobe 2. The wide net casting over the whole life of Phobe You need to figure out which one you want to focus on. Based on your comment here I'm assuming you would rather focus on the narrower Kyle-Ross story. In my crit to your story I had suggested that you read A Hundred Years of Solitude, which does the 2nd "wide net" type of storytelling very well. However, since you are going for the narrow version I would propose that you cut out most of the whole "phobe's life in a flash" bit - specifically, the paragraph on her lifetime no. 8 with farmers taking care cars driving being in love dying etc. Make the life events more human. Actually show us, rather than tell us, what happened when Ross/Kyle were spoiling her. What she did that made her smart. What they did when she wanted to get educated, when she questioned her choice to marry, when one died and the other followed a year later. This is more specific, but I think your whole beginning should just be cut out completely and immediately begin with them discovering the child, so you get the much more interesting hook of "a child found in the ashes of a burnt house!", rather than what seem like two persons meandering about with the fire department.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2014 06:48 |
|
A new story for y'all to critique. Still working on description and punctuation but mostly characterization. I know I sort of did a tell instead of show part way through but I couldn't think of a better way to do it without a full on flashback. Hope you can look past that. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tmCUqTLeG2zCpCsztZJVnEAbWBO376xYYfcMo79q9UU/edit?usp=sharing I'll be doing more critiques on other's stories soon.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2014 07:35 |
|
systran posted:As far as my crit of Fire Girl: Oh, I'm not bitching about the crit you gave me or what you said should be cut/what came off as boring. It wasn't too confusing, expect the part where the dialogue was cut. I don't mind my stuff getting ripped to shreds. My betas will tell me if my poo poo is poo poo every time, and I once had to drop an entire chapter because it sucked. The idea of more details from her side and their relationship is a good thing to aim for, thanks. The Saddest Rhino posted:I think the problem with your story is that there are two stories (or rather, one story in two very different "styles") you are trying to fit in one. These two are: I was mostly going for the feel of "for Phoebe it's number eight of she doesn't know how many lives yet, but Kyle and Ross raising her had an significant impact on her life." So more focus on her and her interactions with her parents as she grows up might help, and cut the fire and finding down to less than it is. The whole lifetime details of Phoebe lost a lot in editing when I was aiming for the word count limit. That's two (edit: three) people that seem to care/want to hear more more about Phoebe's side than Kyle and Ross's, so I'm really going to focus more that way. Nethilia fucked around with this message at 08:00 on Mar 6, 2014 |
# ? Mar 6, 2014 07:57 |
|
Lead out in cuffs posted:E: Apparently when I posted this I committed the cardinal goonsin of not reading the OP. My quid pro quo review is in the next post, over the page. Overall, I like how you handle a very technical subject but I get the feeling that if I wasn't more familiar with the terms that I wouldn't be able to follow this. Unfortunately, credit counseling doesn't cost creditors money it just lowers their future profits in an effort to prevent bankruptcy and thus prevent a discharge of the debt accrued. I'm not sure what the linkage between suicide prevention and credit counselling is however, you should explore that more, how does credit counselling prevent suicide when the primary problem with suicide is depression? Lastly as far as I know the money from mortality insurance typically far exceeds the amount of money that a single employee or debtor is worth which is why companies will often invest on it (in the US this is legal and can be kept secret) so it might be more interesting for the companies to use such an accurate script (six months is beyond some of the best predictions available with the largest organizations with the largest supercomputers) to bias the outcome towards actually encouraging suicide rather than discouraging it. Anyways, a great story I think. There was some clumsiness at parts but I don't see that as things that can't be fixed and the background concept is compelling to me. Perhaps I'm biased because I have a business degree.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2014 22:36 |
|
elfdude posted:A new story for y'all to critique. Still working on description and punctuation but mostly characterization. I know I sort of did a tell instead of show part way through but I couldn't think of a better way to do it without a full on flashback. Hope you can look past that. I got this up for you, ask if here's any questions. Overall it's ok, it just needs work on the middle. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IUUqweAwRaT1aTNYHF36ZWJh3rZI0X80C7rRcYvTBKU/edit?usp=sharing Anyone mind critting this: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TlokknRLdDhcvvGsEgyeXSlgj0rDVGbZxz8bb0Hbqqo/edit?usp=sharing It's for my dome brawl, prompt "pack mentality".
|
# ? Mar 6, 2014 22:40 |
|
Starter Wiggin posted:I got this up for you, ask if here's any questions. Overall it's ok, it just needs work on the middle. Decent voice, no glaring errors, nothing really happens. 'character wants x, character gets x, yayyyy' isn't a story. Lake Jucas, feel free to pm me for a crit of yours. sebmojo fucked around with this message at 23:48 on Mar 6, 2014 |
# ? Mar 6, 2014 23:10 |
|
I like the story but it does seem a bit bland. Definitely better at punctuation than I am. :P The one thing I think it's missing is a sense of suspense. I mean it seems like a difficult thing to really go into with the way the story is worded. The other thing is that while you characterize the backpack it doesn't seem like its actually doing much to accomplish the end goal. He gets bought because apparently he has a dora the explorer tattoo on him, and he's only ten dollars. Both of which are inherent properties of it not something he accomplished or did. We're missing a sense of suspense, conflict, and accomplishment.
|
# ? Mar 7, 2014 00:24 |
|
elfdude posted:One question I had was exploring the idea of the sentence structure I was using a lot, could you explain that a bit more? I think I have an idea of what you mean but my grasp of sentence structure is basic to say the least so I don't feel I have much of a grasp to fix it. The two sentences I commented on were: “He felt powerless, and stumbled outside. The old lady was talking to several police officers, and pointed at him.” I think my issue is that when you use them repeatedly you end up with a list of events. It's essentially saying: “He felt powerless. He stumbled outside. The old lady was talking to several police officers. She pointed at them.” That sort of listing of events is something you're moving away from, which is good. I might rewrite that as: “Feeling powerless, he stumbled outside. The old lady was talking to several police officers. When she saw him, she pointed him out.” Or: “He felt powerless. When he stumbled outside, the old lady was talking to several police officers. She pointed at him.” Neither of these are objectively better in any way. They just change the rhythm a bit to make it less like a list. If you feel like you have a list of events and want to break it up, consider thinking about the details more. You might write, “Feeling powerless, he stumbled outside. The old lady stood on her front step in her dirty gardening clothes talking to three police officers. She pointed at him with a pink-gloved finger.” This is also not objectively better, but it gives a sense of what things look like. Having called you out on this, I had to fix a few instances of it in my story. Speaking of which, here's “Harpy” again, still in third person present because I like it that way. The parentheses feel gimmicky, which is why I cut them from the original. I'm not sure how else to get that information across. I've tried to make Christi more relateable and explain why she does what she does. Harpy 1075 words Christi dumps her tray into the trashcan slowly, looking to see what's gone in before. There's half a cookie and a packet of chips, and with her broad (fat, her dad's words follow her, ugly) body in the way, she can reach in and grab them without anyone noticing. She's eaten all they've given her, but she's always hungry (because you're a glutton, girl.) She wraps her (stolen) goods in a napkin and stuffs them in her sweatshirt pocket, hating herself for doing it. She's got more hunger than pride, and there's still time before math to find a quiet place to eat. There's something on the chip bag that's sticky and smelly. Her gorge rises when she pulls her hand from her pocket and sees the trashcan slime on it. She wants to stuff all the chips into her mouth (like the fat pig you are) before she's caught. Christi makes herself walk to the bathroom first. She has to pee, but she can't wait that long; there's food in her pockets and she can feel it itching at the back of her mind. (Is food all you ever think about?) She makes herself wash her hands slowly, meticulously. She glances under each door to make sure she's alone. When she pulls the chips from her pocket she breaks. She tells herself to throw it out again, or at least to wash the sticky mess off the bag. Instead her fickle body pinches one corner, reaches in, and stuffs them into her mouth all in one big handful. In the mirror her face is speckled with bits of chip and grease. (Fat slob.) Crumbs fall on her sweatshirt and stick there, staining it. She has the cookie in her mouth when the door opens. She chews fast, trying to swallow it, but the chip bag is still on the counter and her mouth is still full when the two girls come in. “Oooh, look,” the first says. “It's the harpy. Come to stuff your face?” “Look what she's got,” says the second. “Did you pull that out of the trash, Harpy?” “She can't answer, look. Her mouth's full of trash!” The girls make theatrical gagging noises that set off Christi's own gag reflex. She swallows dry cookie and nausea. (Throw it up, girl, before it makes you fatter.) That isn't an option; it's just past noon and she doesn't know when she'll get to eat again. Not until lunch tomorrow if her dad finds out she's been stealing treats. So she swallows and doesn't puke and doesn't cry, because there's no tears left. “Harpy, Harpy,” they call her, while she washes her hands and keeps her eyes down so she doesn't see their pretty, thin faces in the mirror. (You could look like them, if you stopped being a pig.) She wishes her class had never studied the mythical vulture-women with their insatiable appetites and their stink. By afternoon it's all over the school that Christi the Harpy is eating out of the trash again. High, shrieking cries follow her through the hallways, and people cover their noses when she walks by. The history teacher is late, and two boys in front of her open a package of candy and share it. She watches each piece from the bag to their mouths (like a bitch dog begging for scraps) and tries to ignore the way they look at her and laugh. She bites her tongue until it bleeds, but she can't stop the words tumbling out. “Can I have one? Please?” There's a nasty whine on the please, and oh god she wants to die. “Go buy your own,” they say, and turn their backs to her. She imagines herself jumping over her desk, grabbing their hair, and smashing their smug, fit faces into the table. She imagines stealing their candy. Instead she opens her history book and tries to shut out the sounds of the bag rustling, of chewing and swallowing. She thinks she can hear the sugar melting on their tongues. She sees the package of crackers first, slipped onto the open page of her book. Then she notices the small (thin, perfect) girl sitting next to her. “Hey,” the girl says, as Christi tears open the crackers and shoves two in her mouth, “I'm Ali.” Christi tries to answer, but the crackers are sticky with peanut butter, and she doesn't know why someone as pretty as Ali wants to talk to her. By the time she swallows enough to mumble, “Thanks,” the teacher's there. The boys throw the last few candies at her after class. They bounce off her face and hit the floor. She's on her knees scrabbling after them before she even realizes what happened. Above her she hears, “Look at the harpy, crawling on the floor like a dog. Did someone drop some trash, harpy?” Her tears fall on the backs of her hands (crybaby.) She thinks of being hungry all night. The candy is fuzzy and gritty when she puts it in her mouth. The crowd squeals and gags. At this level she can see the legs of the chairs. One's missing a foot, ending in jagged, sharp metal. She imagines shoving it into the boys' faces. Then there's a thin pair of legs between her and the boys. “Leave her alone,” Ali says. “Standing up for the Harpy, Ali? Are you that desperate for friends? Do you like trash, too?” The crowd laughs. Christi doesn't look up; she hiding on the floor (like a wimp) and Ali's taking the abuse for her. The chair's still right there. (Do it, her father would tell her. Stand up for yourself. Don't make your betters do it for you.) She feels the sharp edges of the metal. She's felt the damage a smooth belt buckle can do to skin, washed the blood out of her shirts. She could make those boys ugly, scared, imperfect. (Like you.) “She's a hell of a lot nicer than you,” Ali says. Christi's never been called nice. She's never been called anything good. She's crying harder now, and she doesn't even know why. (She's a liar, Christi. She doesn't even know you, you fat bitch.) Christi pulls her hand back, empty, because nice girls don't beat boys up with chairs. Even Christi knows that, and she hungers for praise now with the empty ache that food has never filled.
|
# ? Mar 8, 2014 01:35 |
|
Thanks, I have a habit of going to the extreme in response to criticism. I tended to write all of my sentences in the ways you've provided but I got yelled at for doing so, it seems there's a sweet spot in the middle :P I totally agree with you though.
|
# ? Mar 8, 2014 03:33 |
|
Anathema Device posted:revision I'll take a crack at this...with the caveat that I'm largely a content editor and you may find all of what I say to be woefully unhelpful. quote:Speaking of which, here's “Harpy” again, still in third person present because I like it that way. The parentheses feel gimmicky, which is why I cut them from the original. I'm not sure how else to get that information across. I've tried to make Christi more relateable and explain why she does what she does. A few things: 1. The ending is frustrating because the story, in the span of a few sentences, becomes much ado about nothing. I wanted her to hit those boys over the head! Or else Ali to do it. I really just wanted something to happen. 2. I'm a little iffy on the dialogue. It seems to mirror, at times nearly identically, the prose, the protag's inner thoughts. Why not have it be a little better voiced and tell us something that's not already been said? Also, I know it's just ghastly to suggest that anything other than "said" can be an appropriate dialogue tag, but me and most of the editors I've known actually disagree with this to some extent. Quite often, while working an MS, I've found that I have to get an author to clarify how a given line is meant to be delivered. Obviously, writing vivid and specific dialogue is the fastest way to achieve this, but an endless barrage of "saids" starts to make it sound like the characters are just flatly reading aloud to each other from a script, even during a very emotional or tense scene. "Of course, anything can be run into the ground," she ejaculated, "But there really isn't a problem with saying things like shouted, whispered, pleaded, cried, scowled--and intermingling these with strong action can obviate the need for any dialogue tag in many situations." 3. I don't know what your word limit was, if any, but I feel like this story often lacked a necessarily visceral and nasty level of detail, a sense of absolute filth that would have pulled me into the protag's state of mind and made me sympathize/relate better with her. As it's written now, it's detached and feels kind of...clinical? 4. I thought the parentheticals were fine--aside from the extraneous parts I cut. Anyway, I hope that's helpful for you. I liked the subject matter, and would certainly be interested in reading this as a longer short story, where the characters have a bit more chance to breathe. Nika fucked around with this message at 07:24 on Mar 8, 2014 |
# ? Mar 8, 2014 07:18 |
|
Nika posted:
I agree with you on principle. Said is mostly invisible, but there are other options that can work in some instances. A good strong verb is infinitely better than said + adverb as well. The whole challenge in most situations is to get the right verb for the job. But if you do decide to go with a verb other than said, be sure to use a word that refers to speech or at least some kind of sound. A scowl refers to a facial expression. You can't scowl (or snarl for that matter) words. You can growl them though. JuniperCake fucked around with this message at 21:40 on Mar 8, 2014 |
# ? Mar 8, 2014 21:37 |
|
JuniperCake posted:I agree with you on principle. Said is mostly invisible, but there are other options that can work in some instances. A good strong verb is infinitely better than said + adverb as well. The whole challenge in most situations is to get the right verb for the job. Absolutely. I completely forgot to mention my massive gripe with said+adverb when a stronger verb would have been so much more effective, and in fewer total words to boot. I can't tell you how many times I've edited some variation of the following line: "Don't leave me," she said, whispering quietly. to "Don't leave me," she whispered. Of course there are lots of other ways to say this or any line without needing a tag at all, but sometimes it works best with one, and sometimes--not often--'said' is not the best choice. JuniperCake posted:But if you do decide to go with a verb other than said, be sure to use a word that refers to speech or at least some kind of sound. A scowl refers to a facial expression. You can't scowl (or snarl for that matter) words. You can growl them though. This is definitely true, though it's strange how often this very rule is broken in a great deal of published fiction. I would never encourage an author to do it, and would never suggest something like that as an edit. But if I'm honest, I actually have to make a conscious effort to catch it, no matter if I'm reading for work or pleasure. That's assuming, of course, that it's not something just completely ridiculous like: "Take that!" he punched. Nika fucked around with this message at 01:17 on Mar 9, 2014 |
# ? Mar 9, 2014 01:14 |
|
Imo every use of a 'said-book' tag or adverb should just trigger a quick 'hang on, do i really need this' internal edit loop. If you need it, then fine, they both have their uses.
|
# ? Mar 9, 2014 02:23 |
|
It's been a long while since I've written anything, but I want to get back into the groove of things. Basically, I want my first few chapters to establish the fantastic as mundane before I start writing the weird poo poo. I'd also like to know about any problems I have writing dialogue, so here's a short snippet from something I've started working on.quote:No Drive (Fantasy/Sci-fi, 670 words) As this is the beginning to what I hope would be Chapter 1, there isn't a lot of conflict or resolution, but I hope I've properly set up the problem of the busted engine to be solved later.
|
# ? Mar 18, 2014 06:08 |
|
CommissarMega posted:The obelisk stood before Shara, eldritch runes glowing red on its obsidian surface, pulsing with the rhythm of a great beast’s breaths. The chamber was silent,I think you need a period or an "and" here. Without one or the other, you're implying that the chamber was silent because there was no other light source. the sole illumination The hook isn't working for me. Shara, whose name my brain keeps auto-correcting to Sarah, needs to buy a new engine. If she doesn't succeed, she can either a) return to her dad who is gonna gloat or b) return to her best friend Torch's hive and her father would gloat. This isn't really a risk though, since she has the money for a new engine, so I expect we're gonna see her go buy a new engine and possibly lose her crew. Not super interesting. Then again, I guess it's fine as long as something interesting happens in the next chapter/we find out what's at stake. The dialogue is boring. The characters sound the exact same, and use "funny" stock phrases, especially toward the end. The dialogue reminds me of Buffy the Vampire Slayer, which worked well enough on screen, but I'm not sure if it works here. I guess you're trying to show the two joking around with each other, having fun etc. But it's not funny when I read it. There's also a lack of description, or just plain out showing what's going on. As far as description goes, I do not mean that you should describe every single thing in the room. I'm talking about adding a detail here, a detail there - details that make the story a little more tangible. Same goes for the action between the dialogue - which is bland. She sighs, groans and runs her hand through her hair. The reason we obviously use these types of descriptions is to show, rather than tell, how a character feels. And there's nothing wrong with these words in themselves, I suppose, but they are so often used as labels for a feeling that they are almost invisible to me. They aren't precise, and so the story isn't vivid. Here's a bad and exaggerated example of what I mean: He unbuttoned his suit jacket and sat down. He cleared his throat. The man on the other side of the table looked at him and smiled. versus He unbuttoned his suit jacket - a cheap two-piece he picked up at H&M - and sat down in the squeaky chair. He cleared his throat. The man on the other side of the table was observing him, his lips stretched into a thin smile. Personally, I get a lot more mood and info from the second version. The first one is ambiguous. I don't know anything about the situation. The second one tells me he's probably embarrassed about his cheap suit, that the room is silent and that the situation is awkward etc. The problem with the first example is that it's not giving me much of anything - I'm not immersed in the story. Now, less is also more, so one should never over-do it, but excluding the bit about the mandibles and stuff, you're not giving me anything much to go on here. I realize that the wall of text might seem harsh. Your writing isn't bad, however; it's clear and to the point. Nor did I need to force myself to read through it. The things I criticised didn't jump at me, I had to think long and hard about why I didn't get into it. And I'm obviously not sure that I'm right about any of it. I still hope I was of some use.
|
# ? Mar 19, 2014 00:32 |
|
I'm not a critmaster like any of the Thunderdome old guard, but let's give this a whirl.quote:The obelisk stood before Shara, eldritch try not to use 'eldritch' unless you are H. P. Lovecraft or writing a roleplaying sourcebook runes glowing red on its obsidian surface, pulsing with the rhythm of a great beast’s breaths. The chamber was silent, the sole illumination being the deep crimson of the stone pillar. I get that this is flowery and purple for a joke, but it doesn't work for me. Most of your work is from Shara's point of view, so it doesn't make sense that she'd wax poetic briefly then go back to modern sarcasm. The juxtaposition of weird technology with mundane attitudes is fine, but the execution doesn't really work. Your prose isn't too bad, and it's certainly better than some stuff I've seen in Thunderdome. Where you could use some work is in imagery, dialogue, and pacing your descriptions. If you're trying to do the weird-but-it's-normal tone, that's done best through the eyes of the person to whom it's normal. This means you have to trust your readers a bit, sure, but it means you can do more interesting things, like having a character blithely notice that another character is on the ceiling, and oh, he's climbing down along the wall and he's got booze in his clawhand. That slow drip of information, gradually filling out with more odd details, is more interesting than knowing all at one that he's a centipede. Doing this would also probably help you to show more of your description, as you'd be showing it as it becomes relevant instead of telling it to the reader all at once. When it comes to the dialogue, I can see how you're weak there. Part of learning to write dialogue is just learning from hearing--ideally, hearing other real people talk. But part of it is also dramatizing how real people talk, and I think the advice I gave you for how to structure multi-line conversations can help. Each sentence should make sense as a response to the previous one. Even if in your mind you're working toward something specific that they're saying, remember that each line needs to make sense in context.
|
# ? Mar 19, 2014 01:07 |
|
shooz posted:The hook isn't working for me. Yeah, I tend to get spergy over setting the scene up- if there wasn't the 1000 word limit, I'd have posted the next section (which, sadly, is even MORE setup, though). shooz posted:The dialogue is boring. The characters sound the exact same, and use "funny" stock phrases, especially toward the end. The dialogue reminds me of Buffy the Vampire Slayer, which worked well enough on screen, but I'm not sure if it works here. I guess you're trying to show the two joking around with each other, having fun etc. But it's not funny when I read it. Yeah, that was exactly what I was going for, and seriously, thank you for pointing out the problems. Would it be too much if I reposted a corrected version later? shooz posted:I realize that the wall of text might seem harsh. Your writing isn't bad, however; it's clear and to the point. Nor did I need to force myself to read through it. The things I criticised didn't jump at me, I had to think long and hard about why I didn't get into it. And I'm obviously not sure that I'm right about any of it. I still hope I was of some use. Hey, no problem- this was some good stuff. Not like I can lock myself in the echo chamber of my head, after all. Djeser posted:If you're trying to do the weird-but-it's-normal tone, that's done best through the eyes of the person to whom it's normal. YES, THANK YOU! This is exactly the overall feel I want to put across with the first chapter. shooz posted:When it comes to the dialogue, I can see how you're weak there. Part of learning to write dialogue is just learning from hearing--ideally, hearing other real people talk. But part of it is also dramatizing how real people talk, and I think the advice I gave you for how to structure multi-line conversations can help. It does, thanks. Time for revisions, it seems.
|
# ? Mar 19, 2014 05:00 |
|
CommissarMega posted:Would it be too much if I reposted a corrected version later? I'm not in charge here, but I'd love to read a revised version. And btw, the last quote in your post is by Djeser, not me.
|
# ? Mar 19, 2014 17:57 |
|
Nobody's in charge here. Post revisions as much as you want.
|
# ? Mar 19, 2014 21:08 |
|
All right; it's a little over the word count though, won't happen again: No Drive (Revision 1, Sci-Fantasy, 1148 words) Shara grunted in frustration as the lightning died down and the room went dark again. In front of her, an obsidian obelisk glowed red, unchanged from how it was when Shara began channeling raw magic into the chamber. Her eyes passed across the web of red runes, weakly pulsing with arcane energies. She then ran her fingers across the surface, sparks of magic dancing on her fingertips. Finally, she stepped back, and kicked it. “Stupid engine!” she hissed before throwing her arms up in frustration. “There goes everyone’s bonuses,” the elf said, running her hand through her short, copper-red hair as she turned the lights back on. Not that she didn’t see this coming, of course, but being on the arse-end of Hegemony space meant that engine replacements were a bitch to find. Especially now, what with the big inner-galaxy megaguilds finally expanding into the frontier and buying up all the trade routes- and all the ship equipment too, greedy bastards. Now, she was left with a cargo hold almost as empty as her savings account. Okay, okay, calm down. This isn’t the end of the world; the engine would be good for one, maybe two more jumps. Plenty of time to- Something clicked above her. When Shara looked up, she saw a man-sized centipede stretching forth from the ceiling, segmented body coiling out from a vent at the top- and a bottle of steel-melting liquor in one of its four hands. "Gods drat it, Torch," she said, grinning widely as she took the bottle. "Why aren't we married yet?" "Because one of us has standards?" Torch quipped, his carapace flaring. “Enjoy the Blackbird,” he said, handing the bottle over. “Been saving it for a special occasion- a funeral, by the looks of it.” “You’re an angel,” Shara said, taking a swig with one hand and bumping Torch’s fist the other as the quel-datha crawled down the wall beside her. “What? It’s true!” she said when his carapace rippled blue. “An ugly angel- no, the ugliest angel- let’s be fair, but still an angel,” she added, before peeling the bottlecap off with her teeth and spitting it out. “So, apart from corrupting the ship’s officers, what else are you doing aboard my ship, you big roach?” “Mooching,” Torch said, crawling towards the engine, his eyes gleaming as they fixed on the engine. “Eating anyone who calls me ‘roach’,” he chirped. “It builds morale,” he chirped. “That kind of thing certainly makes me feel better,” Shara said. She took a swig, and sighed as Troch started tapping the engine. “Not enough to get you a bonus, though.” “Not even with the Blackbird? Things must really be bad then,” Torch said, scuttling around the pillar. “So what’s wrong with the engine, exactly?” “The channeling’s shot, no way around it,” Shara replied, gesturing towards it with the half-empty Blackbird. “And before you ask, yes, I’m sure. The way we’re leaking magic, we could use the engine as a drat sieve. Tried shunting power from the rest of the ship, brute force some power draw, but it just wouldn’t take. It’s just too old to work anymore- that’s not something I can fix.” “First time for eveything,” Torch said, peering closely at the engine. His compound eyes let him see a far wider spectrum of colour than most sentient races’, which was why Shara let him borrow her practical projects whenever he wanted to get high back at the academy. “Thanks.” Shara walked over to him, her eyes fixed on the engine. “So, you think we can sell it? There’s got to be some weird antique collector out there.” “Hm? Oh yes, I think. Maybe. How much would you want for it?” Torch asked, massaging his antennae to clear his head. Shara shrugged. “Een...ough? Honestly, as long as we have the cash to pick up some cargo at Elphes, I’m considering that a win.” Torch looked back at the engine, clicking his mandibles thoughtfully. “You want good news or bad news?” “I’m feeling lucky- hit me with the good news,” Shara said, her hands on her hips. A whistling sound filled the air as Torch took a deep breath, the spiracles at his side expanding. “Good news is, you can keep the rest of the bottle.” Once Shara’s exasperated scream was done, he added. “That bad, hnh?” Shara nodded, her face in her hand. “You have no idea. We’re running on fumes and dreams here,” she said. “Best thing I can think of is borrow some money to keep us afloat for a bit,” she added, when she heard Torch hiss. “Don’t flare those tentacles at me, mister- I told you it’s the best idea I have. Anyway, even that’d only keep us afloat a month or two. Unless we score something big...” she trailed off. “We’ll lose the ship,” she finished quietly. “We won’t,” Torch said, patting her on the shoulder. “Once we reach Elphes, we’ll just secure some contracts, ask for advance payment, buy a new engine, make a few trades- we’ll be rolling in cash before you know it.” “You make it sound so easy,” Shara sighed, leaning her head back. “Gods,” she said, shaking her head. “Can you imagine how insufferable Father would be if I moved back in?” “You can move back in with me and mine,” Torch said, slinking in front of Shara. “My hive would love to have you back. True, the location needs a little work, always has- but I’m sure things’ll work out.” “Like that would stop Father,” Shara said, stepping over him. “He’d set up a covered chair in front of the house every morning and irradiate me in smug satisfaction as soon as I stepped out of your place.” “There you go!” Torch chittered, patting Shara on her arms. “Motivation!” “Hah! You said it!” she said, then took a deep breath. “All right, we’re shelling out for a new engine at Elphes,” she said after a short pause, cracking her knuckles. “Something dwarven, maybe.” Torch let out a short, high-pitched screech. “You’re setting the bar that high? I thought you wanted to save money.” “We’ll need something reliable and long-lasting. I’m not talking about buying some Ranulf Stoneworks Mark Ridiculous top shelf deal,” Shara said. “As long as it lasts longer than this lump, it’s fine by me.” “You’re setting the bar that low? I thought you wanted a good engine.” Torch’s scales twitched for a moment under Shara’s withering stare, before he leaned forward and nudged her forehead with his antennae. “Look, don’t worry about it. poo poo happens, you know? It’s how you clean it up that matters.” “Thanks,” Shara said, placing her arm around Torch’s waist. “You know, that sounded actually intelligent,” she added. “Where did that come from?” “Well, before I set off to see you, I had two bottles of Blackbird,” he said, scales flaring in laughter. EDIT: Changed a little as per JuniperCake's suggestion. CommissarMega fucked around with this message at 10:11 on Mar 20, 2014 |
# ? Mar 20, 2014 08:23 |
|
CommissarMega posted:All right; it's a little over the word count though, won't happen again: I just wanted to comment about one thing real quick because I noticed this issue in your first draft as well. If you want to establish a sense of camaraderie between the two of them and portray Torch's appearance as not a big deal to Shara who is presumably your viewpoint character, don't start with a lengthy description of him with an aim of making him seem alien and menacing to the viewer. Also it's kinda cold to have Shara think of him as "something clicking above her" when she clearly behaves as if he is a someone. It's good to keep your view point character's expectations in mind when it comes to describing stuff. Describing him first as a monster, but then saying, oh but hes a friend is also a bit too coy which can turn some people off. It's false suspense that gets deflated immediately, and it makes one wonder whats the point of it. Trust your reader, just have the dude descend, maybe use like one tiny description to imply hes moving in a way that's not human or something like that, then let the rest of the details follow. People will be able to follow the exchange and figure stuff out from there. Leaving some stuff to the imagination and downplaying the bizarre elements, especially in the eyes of Shara, will do much more to make things seem mundane in respect to the setting. People don't tend to obssess over mundane details that they see every day and usually take forgranted, well unless they have OCD I suppose. Also as far as description goes in general, you'd be surprised with how little you can get away with. If you don't say something specific, people's minds will fill it out for you. A little bit of the right description can evoke a far more vivid and interesting picture than 3-4 detailed sentences. Sometimes that much description is appropriate, however I don't think this situation is one of them. JuniperCake fucked around with this message at 09:53 on Mar 20, 2014 |
# ? Mar 20, 2014 09:46 |
|
JuniperCake posted:I just wanted to comment about one thing real quick because I noticed this issue in your first draft as well. If you want to establish a sense of camaraderie between the two of them and portray Torch's appearance as not a big deal to Shara who is presumably your viewpoint character, don't start with a lengthy description of him with an aim of making him seem alien and menacing to the viewer. Also it's kinda cold to have Shara think of him as "something clicking above her" when she clearly sees him as a someone. Keep your view point character's expectations in mind when it comes to describing stuff. Describing him first as a monster, but then saying, oh but hes a friend is also a bit too coy which can turn some people off. It's false suspense that gets deflated immediately, and it makes one wonder whats the point of it. You know, now that you mention this, it seems to blindingly goddamn obvious Would this work? quote:Something clicked above her. When Shara looked up, she saw a man-sized centipede stretching forth from the ceiling, segmented body coiling out from a vent at the top- and a bottle of steel-melting liquor in one of its four hands. EDIT: Of course I'd have to redo the next few lines, but that should go without saying. CommissarMega fucked around with this message at 10:09 on Mar 20, 2014 |
# ? Mar 20, 2014 09:52 |
|
CommissarMega posted:You know, now that you mention this, it seems to blindingly goddamn obvious Would this work? Yeah it looks straight to the point to me. I do think it works much better.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2014 09:57 |
|
This is probably a small complaint, but stylistically, there's a construction you're using repeatedly to the point where it's distracting. It is: "<dialogue>", <character> <said/bookism>, <verb>-ing <clause>. There's nothing wrong with it, but don't do it for every line.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2014 19:15 |
|
|
# ? May 28, 2024 19:13 |
|
Promethium posted:This is probably a small complaint, but stylistically, there's a construction you're using repeatedly to the point where it's distracting. It is: And THIS might be a little embarrassing, at least for me, because I can't quite seem to get my head around how else I should do it Have any examples I can look at, or suggestions on how to keep it down?
|
# ? Mar 25, 2014 09:00 |