|
What if I have a baggy of Durban Poison and another of some Goat and another with a little Strawberry Jerry?
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2014 15:01
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 02:31 |
|
|
On any given delivery my disabled friend gets no less than 3 different bags for 3 different strains. The variety pack has like 7 1-gram baggies in one big bag. She keeps those baggies separate because she likes to know what she's smoking, because different strains have different effects and she likes to compare them. She also keeps the bags for storing ash to throw away and stems and keef to keep. Multiple bags = Dealer is a terrible terrible TERRIBLE assumption to make.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2014 15:45
|
|
|
And also who the gently caress cares about "DEALERS!!!" It's a plant, get over it.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2014 16:53
|
|
|
JollyGreen posted:http://baltimore.cbslocal.com/2014/04/07/md-lawmakers-enter-last-day-of-session-marijuana-decriminalization-minimum-wage-on-agenda/ Can you smoke weed in the White House/Congress then? TenementFunster posted:it's like nobody paid attention the last half-dozen times I outlined the reasons why legal, recreational stuff has been expensive so far It's more than "like" that.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2014 17:03
|
|
|
Powercrazy posted:And also who the gently caress cares about "DEALERS!!!" It's a plant, get over it. Yeah, for real. I love smoking with my friends and that's cool, but if they ask me to buy some weed so they can smoke when I'm not around I'm suddenly doing some terrible thing?
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2014 17:09
|
|
|
scroogle nmaps posted:Can you smoke weed in the White House/Congress then? Nope, those are still federal land where federal law applies. Once decrim goes into effect in DC, crossing no small number of streets with a joint will be enough to take you from a ticket to a year in prison.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2014 17:11
|
|
|
Federal laws are still in force all over the country, FWIW. It's just a matter if the officer that sees you smokgin wants to make it an arrest, and who pays the officer. Until the either the Supreme Court or Congress does something, the Federal schedules are still the law and appealing to local decriminalizations will not help your case if you face an officer that wants to make the arrest and a DA that wants the conviction.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2014 17:17
|
|
|
Powercrazy posted:And also who the gently caress cares about "DEALERS!!!"
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2014 17:27
|
|
|
So (speaking hypothetically, because this is probably not going to happen), how does this work in practice? DC Capital Police, as I understand it, have jurisdiction for a few blocks around Congress, or anywhere while serving on protective detail or dealing with a violent crime. If that's the case, it sounds like he couldn't do anything to someone smoking across the street from a block that is under their jurisdiction. And on the other hand, let's say someone from DC Metro Police stops you while smoking on city jurisdiction, can they hand you over to federal law enforcement for federal prosecution? How about on federal property - can DCMPD even detain someone there in the first place, and if they can are they required to hand you over to the federal law enforcement with jurisdiction there?
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2014 17:28
|
|
|
TenementFunster posted:is this rhetorical? if not: hundreds of millions of people in america and abroad. hth. It's moral panic, with a little bit of racism mixed in, and it's bullshit and has been as long as the war on drugs has existed.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2014 18:13
|
|
|
AreWeDrunkYet posted:And on the other hand, let's say someone from DC Metro Police stops you while smoking on city jurisdiction, can they hand you over to federal law enforcement for federal prosecution? Public consumption is still a criminal offense under DC law. The bill was going to change that, but the chief of police and mayor's office whined enough that it was removed.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2014 18:14
|
|
|
JollyGreen posted:http://baltimore.cbslocal.com/2014/04/07/md-lawmakers-enter-last-day-of-session-marijuana-decriminalization-minimum-wage-on-agenda/ quote:“You’re going to allow civil process for people who possess it. And the guy who sells it to ‘em, you’re still going to call him a distributor and he’s going to have a five-year felony on his record. Now that’s ridiculous!” said Mike McDermott, (R)-Eastern Shore.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2014 18:32
|
|
|
I still want Colorado to arrest a DEA agent to throw its states rights dick around.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2014 18:39
|
|
|
That sounds like an incredibly bad idea that will serve no good purpose at all.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2014 18:50
|
|
|
VROOM VROOM posted:He's absolutely right. I can hear the gears almost turning. I wouldn't hold out much hope for this guy. http://somd.com/news/headlines/2014/18059.shtml posted:Del. Mike McDermott, an Eastern Shore police officer who had fought the bill as a member of the Judiciary Committee, vocally opposed it in floor debate, and in two instances, his diatribes ended with him screaming.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2014 18:56
|
|
|
ColoradoCleric posted:I still want Colorado to arrest a DEA agent to throw its states rights dick around. What possible reason could you want that for?
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2014 18:57
|
|
|
Didn't some state almost pass a nullification law authorizing the arrest of federal GUN GRABBERS? Not a great model to follow.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2014 19:33
|
|
|
scroogle nmaps posted:Can you smoke weed in the White House/Congress then? Hypothetically speaking, I'd love to see everyone in Congress piss tested and see how many piss hot.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2014 19:53
|
|
|
ColoradoCleric posted:I still want Colorado to arrest a DEA agent to throw its states rights dick around. How does sovereign immunity work there? Also what would they even arrest them for?
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2014 20:18
|
|
|
veedubfreak posted:Hypothetically speaking, I'd love to see everyone in Congress piss tested and see how many piss hot. I'd actually want the President to say he is going to force all of congress to drug test because it would force the supreme court to get involved and ultimately would result in drugs tests being unconstitutional. It could be amazing if handled in a smart way.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2014 20:21
|
|
|
Powercrazy posted:I'd actually want the President to say he is going to force all of congress to drug test because it would force the supreme court to get involved and ultimately would result in drugs tests being unconstitutional. It could be amazing if handled in a smart way. This would be amazing.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2014 23:25
|
|
|
http://www.laweekly.com/informer/2014/04/07/marijuana-legalization-proponents-throw-in-the-towel-for-2014 California is officially gone for 2014. On the bright side, 2016 will almost certainly see full legalization in California and several other states.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2014 01:42
|
|
|
Nonsense posted:This would be amazing. The District Court for the District of Columbia would have many, many ways to declare that unconstitutional without even touching on drug testing, like for example, the fact that the president can't just order someone in the legislature to do something.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2014 03:44
|
|
|
AreWeDrunkYet posted:So (speaking hypothetically, because this is probably not going to happen), how does this work in practice? DC Capital Police, as I understand it, have jurisdiction for a few blocks around Congress, or anywhere while serving on protective detail or dealing with a violent crime. If that's the case, it sounds like he couldn't do anything to someone smoking across the street from a block that is under their jurisdiction. And on the other hand, let's say someone from DC Metro Police stops you while smoking on city jurisdiction, can they hand you over to federal law enforcement for federal prosecution? How about on federal property - can DCMPD even detain someone there in the first place, and if they can are they required to hand you over to the federal law enforcement with jurisdiction there? Considering how Congress treats the District, DCMPD will probably be happy to ignore the Feds on this, so it's very unlikely they would turn you over, plus they already have actual city police poo poo to deal with. Most of the federal law enforcement is concentrated downtown around the Mall where the federal buildings are so that is still definitely off limits if you want to stay out of jail. Add to that a lot of the green space across the city administered by the National Park Service, which means US Park Police. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_law_enforcement_agencies_in_the_District_of_Columbia Either way I wouldn't gently caress around with smoking across the street or anything like that, I'm sure they would love to make an example out of someone. KernelSlanders posted:The District Court for the District of Columbia would have many, many ways to declare that unconstitutional without even touching on drug testing, like for example, the fact that the president can't just order someone in the legislature to do something. Yeah this is why the Capitol Police exist among other things, there's a pretty massive constitutional firewall between Executive and Legislative. rockopete fucked around with this message at 04:38 on Apr 9, 2014 |
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2014 04:34
|
|
|
AYC posted:http://www.laweekly.com/informer/2014/04/07/marijuana-legalization-proponents-throw-in-the-towel-for-2014 just be sure to stay in california, californians
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2014 04:52
|
|
|
veedubfreak posted:Legal prices here in CO are roughly double the price of Medical, then add to that the tax on top. So he does kind of have a point, except that it's a hell of a lot easier to find someone with a green card than going down to your local cartel buddy and buying lovely brickweed. Cartels do not only supply lovely brickweed.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2014 04:56
|
|
|
TenementFunster posted:good. california doesn't deserve anything nice. It's way too late for you.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2014 04:58
|
|
|
AYC posted:http://www.laweekly.com/informer/2014/04/07/marijuana-legalization-proponents-throw-in-the-towel-for-2014 Well, at least it'll be during a presidential year, which should boost its chances of passing (and they were probably pretty good for 2014 already)
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2014 05:22
|
|
|
TenementFunster posted:good. california doesn't deserve anything nice. Serious question is anti-Californianism aimed only at white Californians or is it some kind of socially-acceptable racism against Hispanics? I don't get it.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2014 05:34
|
|
|
Plexiwatt posted:Serious question is anti-Californianism aimed only at white Californians or is it some kind of socially-acceptable racism against Hispanics? I don't get it. No, because one in ten Americans is a Californian and people from other States just like to poo poo on us for totally reasonable reasons. Well, let's specify: Southern Californians, we're extremely materialistic, fake, and don't talk to anyone outside our clique, and sometimes not even then. Bay Area types and those in the North hate on Southern Californians, but when they go anywhere else they don't get treated as special and unique snowflakes. They're equally disliked. They've got the same attitude but they're generally more of a hairy hipster breed (women included) and brag about 'OMG OUR WEED IS SO MUCH BETTER" and like to say things like hell-a. So douches as well, just different douches. I say this as a Californian (San Diego) born and raised for 28 years now living in Texas (GUESS WHICH CITY!?)  We get a lot of hate here for good reasons, not by race but just because of our attitudes and how our rich parents and richer grandparents who 'totally all live on the coast' are buying property here like crazy and building McMansions in just about every "poor two years ago but now a totally hip and gentrified part" on the city.They all hate us but secretly love us. I swear, I see more people wearing t-shirts with the California flag more in Texas than at any time while living in CA. I'm sure a lot of them are transplants but there's way too many for just that. THE BOMBINATRIX fucked around with this message at 06:26 on Apr 9, 2014 |
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2014 06:18
|
|
|
Plexiwatt posted:is it some kind of socially-acceptable racism against Hispanics? either that or it's los angeles, san diego, fresno, sacramento, bakersfield, anaheim, all of the inland empire, riverside, stockton, irvine, modesto, huntington beach, and every other shithole little burb Alex DeLarge posted:now living in Texas (GUESS WHICH CITY!?)
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2014 06:47
|
|
|
One of the Austin mayoral debate questions raised by the audience several years ago was "How will you stop Californians from moving to Austin?" Really they're just an easy target to blame for the rapid gentrification and overpopulation of the city when they're more of a symptom. Most of the people moving to Austin are moving from the rest of Texas.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2014 06:54
|
|
|
Colorado hates California because y'all keep moving here, but can't seem to stop going on and on and on about California and how its so much better because
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2014 07:20
|
|
|
TenementFunster posted:austin sucks and is for terrible white kids. texas is a terrible state and austin is the worst city in texas. Does not suck thank you very much. Given the weather sucks 9 1/2 months of the year but that doesn't mean it sucks, you just gotta harden up. And I don't place much credence to some sexual tourist who's been porking children on the other side of the world for the better half of a decade.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2014 07:47
|
|
|
Alex DeLarge posted:And I don't place much credence to some sexual tourist who's been porking children on the other side of the world for the better half of a decade.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2014 07:50
|
|
|
The Maroon Hawk posted:Colorado hates California because y'all keep moving here, but can't seem to stop going on and on and on about California and how its so much better because Idaho has the same hate of Californians moving in but at least they're ideologically consistent about hating the state too! (Even though it's mostly the conservative shitbags that are moving in)
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2014 12:46
|
|
|
Well I live in Florida and we seem to be hitting peak state-loathing so save it. I can only hope legalizing medical cannabis this election will help dispel that.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2014 13:05
|
|
|
Plexiwatt posted:Serious question is anti-Californianism aimed only at white Californians or is it some kind of socially-acceptable racism against Hispanics? I don't get it. As long as Diane Feinstien is a senator, Californian's deserve more scorn than the rest of the US combined.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2014 14:23
|
|
|
superjew posted:Well I live in Florida and we seem to be hitting peak state-loathing so save it. I can only hope legalizing medical cannabis this election will help dispel that. I live in Tallahassee and I'm pretty content. It seems to not have most of the shittiness of the rest of the state. I suppose it's because it doesn't have the beaches and other niceties of the rest of the state.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2014 14:51
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 02:31 |
|
|
Powercrazy posted:As long as Diane Feinstien is a senator, Californian's deserve more scorn than the rest of the US combined. I mean she's kind of lame, I guess. Edit: Is this a single issue voter "Mah Gunzz!" argument?
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2014 18:14
|
|